Comments by "Aarthi Rajaraman" (@aarthirajaraman7453) on "Is India So Poor Because of the United Kingdom?" video.

India's poverty rate is just 12% while the government has spent around 134 million dollars on education and over a billion dollars on healthcare. GDP Per capita is a useless stat, Equatorial Guinea's GDP per capita is 7,586 dollars, is it as developed as the likes of China?
2
The 18th and 19th century, even if we use the latter time period, that would be anywhere from 191 to 91 years before India liberalized.
1
No choice when you took so much money from us we couldn't even afford toilets back then.
1
@Mightyflynn77 are u dense? U genuinely think the British developed India. Do you also believe Aliens exist and Santa's real?
1
India isn't so poor, India's per capita income by PPP is 10,430 USD. our GDP is 4.1 trillion USD by nominal standards and 14.6 trillion USD by PPP, our industrial output is 776 billion USD which is the 4th highest on earth, our exports are 626 billion USD, our average household income is 8 lakh INR, poverty rate is 12% by 3.65 USD a day, extreme poverty is just 2.6% by 1.90 USD a day, household ownership is 84% and 97% of Indians have a house though if u were to exclude squatter settlements it would be around 88%. India is lower middle class, poor is a country like Gambia.
1
@soumenbiswas5836 12% of 1.4 billion is 168 million, that is not crazy, it's facts
1
China suffered way less, it's obvious, this comparison is like comparing a kid who got beaten when he'd get in trouble or not get good grades to a kid who was beaten on a regular basis for no reason. China was far far far less exploited than India yet both countries are growing.
1
@rmotfamily9846 41% of Indians are middle class including both lower and upper middle class.
1
@i6power30 no, but comparatively China was far less exploited, not saying they deserved what happened
1
This video was as well handled as the Pakistani economy.
1