Comments by "Akira Nakamoto (中本明)" (@AkiraNakamoto) on "Geoff Buys Cars" channel.

@djtaylorutube What he said is appilicable to ALL EVs. Even TESLA performs poorly in Canada's winter. There is no exception.
3
@djtaylorutube Stayed in Big Bear lake during a Christmas several years ago, my car battery died completely after parking outside for 1 night. Here you go about the basic chemistry of your battery.
2
@Iceeeen You really argued for nothing. Norweigians want to drive weakened EVs. That's their free will and personal freedom. It has nothing to do with science, though. BTW, if you really have a look at Norway's geography. It's a narrow land with large population along the coastline and small population in mountainous inland. Due to North Atlantic Current, Norway's coastline is warm, actually warmer than Germany and Ukraine in winter. So, no long trip is needed to travel to mountainous inland, and no battery degradation for coastline trips. In addition, Norweigians are extremely rich due to crude oil supply in the North Sea. Unfortunately, 99% of the world doesn't meet these idiosyncratic conditions.
2
@jimjones-bk2is Batteries are millions of times more poisonous than gasoline. Imbeci1e! And E100 ICE is the TRUE answer to zero pollution. M0r0n!
1
@andytunnicliffe7223 Right. Sooner or later the mother earth will be suffocated by the pseudo-clean highly-poisonous batteries left by you and you alikes.
1
@mikebreen2890 If you really are an environmentalist, you should vouch for E100 ethanol ICE rather than batteries, unless you are a hypocrite or an imbeci1e. Ethanol production = water + carbon dioxide + (renewable) energy. In other words, at least in theory, producing ethanol can reduce the atmospheric carbon dioxide. The volume energy density of ethanol = 80% of gasoline. Both are about 10 to 15 times better than Lithium battery. In other words, stop ur pseudo-science sh1ts. The best energy storage form is always E100, not your battery. The former is ten times better than the latter.
1
@djtaylorutube You need to be more openminded to understand analogy. By the example of "Canada's winter", I really meant low temperature, which also occurs in any high-altitude mountain regions, for example, even in Southern California when people want to go to Big Bear Lake for skiing during Christmas.
1
@Acemeistre Pseudo-science. Your battery causes millions of times more toxic pollution than gasoline. And there is a REAL zero pullution solution you have completely ignored, that is, the E100 ethanol ICE.
1
@Acemeistre No, you are selling pseudo-science. E100 ethanol ICE is the REAL zero pollution energy. Your battery is NOT.
1
Simon Evans is merely a puppet propagandist paid by his EV masters to sell more EV vehicles. He and his masters do NOT care about your environment.
1
Tell you what, the EV industry doesn't care about environment or whatever sh1t, they only care about selling more EV vehicles and make more money. That's all.
1
@Pimpernicholas Imbeci1e. CO2 level and atmosphere temperature of modern days are very low compared to the average values in the earth history. The average temperature of the Jurassic Period was 3 celsius/6 fahrenheit degrees higher than today's temperature. Also in Late Jurassic Peroid the temperature was even higher. Yet, life boomed during the Jurassic Period. Almost all the largest animals ever existed on earth came from the Jurassic Period. Ask the so-called climate-change experts to explain this.
1
@Pimpernicholas Nooooooooo. E100 ICE is the future. Zero emission. Zero pollution. Zero poison. Can be manufactured from atmospheric CO2. What do you expect from a REAL clean energy? The woke liars cannot hide the truth forever.
1
@jimjones-bk2is E100 ICE, where the real environmentalists can use water, atmospheric carbox dioxide and renewable energy to produce ethanol. It causes zero pollution, involves zero poison and reduces atmospheric carbon dioxide.
1