Comments by "Akira Nakamoto (中本 明)" (@AkiraNakamoto) on "Sky News Australia"
channel.
-
1400
-
699
-
557
-
507
-
369
-
272
-
200
-
196
-
172
-
107
-
81
-
79
-
76
-
73
-
71
-
53
-
52
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
37
-
32
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
19
-
18
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Please check Fauci's self-incrimination at 4:26 4:57 5:38 of this video.
Let me quote what Fauci said from his own mouth:
4:26
"And I can't guarantee everything that is going on in the Wuhan lab. We can't do that, but it is our obligation as scientists and public health individuals to study the animal-human interface."
4:57
"So it was incumbent upon us to study the animal-human interface and to understand what potential these viruses have of infecting humans, which then might damage the United States."
5:38
"So you don't want to go to Hoboken New Jersey or to Fairfax Virginia to be studying the bat-human interface that might lead to an outbreak, so you go to China."
The last section from Fauci's own mouth, i.e., the 5:38 section, is in particular self-incriminating. In this very sentence, Fauci basically admits that the bat-human interface and his sending research fund to China have something to do with the bat coronavirus outbreak (i.e., the pandemic). Note that he doesn't use the term "animal-human interface" here. Instead, he used a very specific species "bat" here to refer to "bat-human interface". And it is well-known that Shi Zhengli, THE BAT WOMAN, had the largest bat virus sample database in the entire world and had fed live bats in her lab according to China's official propaganda (also thanks to Sharri Markson for digging the fact out in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-_Y1zmLCME )
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@tonyatgoogle6076 . LOL. I published over 60 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences, then graduated from UC with doctoral degree in computer science many years ago. You are just a self-assured hack working for Sundar and Sergey.
I never said US federal government is not responsible. On the contrary, I have accused NIAID/NIH be partially responsbile because NIAID/NIH director Anthony Fauci is the (not "a" but "the") key character to delegate gain-of-function research to Wuhan. In a recent TV interview, he publicly said this kind of research is too dangerous to be done "here" (referring to US soil), thus it is the reason to do the gain-of-function research "there" (referring to Wuhan, China).
But, it is your CCP government's state-run Wuhan Institute of Virology, not Fauci, who released the coronavirus to the world, isn't it? No matter how you argue for your master Xi Jinping, you can only convince yourself and your 5mao gang. Even the anti-America Iranians refuse to take your side in regard to this pandemic.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@prakash_pov FYI, fascism is a totalitarian subtype of socialism. Check any English dictionary, for example, Merriam-Webster Online. Socialism = any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or GOVERNMENTAL ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.
Also check the 1st sentence of your Constitution of India: "WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, ...... constitute India into a ... SOCIALIST ... DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC".
Socialism in the non-English-speaking continental Europe means Marxist-Leninst Socialism, aka. Soviet-style socialism.
Socialism in the English-speaking world means GOVERNMENTAL SOCIALISM.
Socialism in the non-English-speaking world is only a subtype of Socialism in the English-speaking world. The latter is more generic. The term "socialist" (socialism) in India's constitution clearly refers to the English definition of socialism, i.e., governmental socialism because you have never had a Marxist-Leninist party in India.
Fascism is not only a governmental socialism, but also an extreme version of governmental socialism, aka. totalitarianism.
Your India is a governmental socialism dystopian h0le. Admit it when you look up an English dictionary.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Peter Daszak, the so-called principal scientist of WHO and collaborator of Wuhan Institute of Virology's Shi Zhengli, is the president of EcoHealth Alliance.
Fauci gave Daszak's EcoHealth $3,000,000 NIH grant, then Daszak took $600,000 from the NIH grant and gave the money to Shi Zhengli, who has published multiple "gain-of-function" papers based on Yun'nan horseshoe bat corona virus. Note that SARS-COV-2 (aka. Wuhan virus, aka. COVID-19, aka. COmmie-VIrus-Disease-19) is a Yun'nan horseshoe bat corona virus, just like its kin RaTG13.
Fauci, Daszak and Shi are criminals conspiring to commit anti-humanity bio-crimes. This is the only reasonable conclusion given the abovementioned verifiable facts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As a Lockean, I think Biden is illegitimate. I don't regard him as the POTUS.
John Locke "Two Treatises of Government", Chap. XIX. Of the Dissolution of Government.
216. Thirdly, When, by the arbitrary power of the prince, the electors, or ways of election , are altered , without the consent , and contrary to the common interest of the people, there also the legislative is altered: for, if others than those whom the society hath authorized thereunto, do chuse, or in another way than what the society hath prescribed, those chosen are not the legislative appointed by the people.
222. Thus to regulate candidates and electors, and new-model the ways of election , what is it but to cut up the government by the roots, and poison the very fountain of public security?
Since the 2020 election, the ways of election are altered without our consent by introducing unverifiable mass mail-in ballots. It's illegitimate according to John Locke. The current Biden-Harris regime should be dissolved.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@williamhenderson4182 I think we are essentially in the same anti-socialism camp. This is the reason why I voted for Trump.
Just my 2 cents that may be interesting to you folks.
1. Thomas Sowell has some magical ability to explain things in common-sense English. His notion of "unconstrained vision" versus "constrained vision" is a must-know for anybody who is against socialism. Unconstrained vision promises a utopia with an elected group of LIVING PERSON agents. According to Sowell, these living people are called "(self-)anointed". Examples include Jacobian Montagnards of French Revolution, communists of all kinds - Marxists, Leninists, Stalinists, Maoists, national socialists of all kinds - Italian fascists, German Nazis. Woke lefts are a most recent example. All of them are unconstrained tyrants whenever they control the power.
These "anointed" people are very dangerous. They cannot be reasoned with. It's nearly impossible to reach a meaningful agreement or compromise with them. The ONLY choice we have is to physically contain and eventually eliminate them, for example, like what Reagan did to Soviet. Absolutely no collaboration because collaboration with these anointed lunatics only means commiting suicide.
2. John Locke actually would think Biden admin is illegitimate. Here is what I figure out by reading Locke's "Two Treatises of Government".
John Locke "Two Treatises of Government", Chap. XIX. Of the Dissolution of Government.
216. Thirdly, When, by the arbitrary power of the prince, the electors, or ways of election , are altered , without the consent , and contrary to the common interest of the people, there also the legislative is altered: for, if others than those whom the society hath authorized thereunto, do chuse, or in another way than what the society hath prescribed, those chosen are not the legislative appointed by the people.
222. Thus to regulate candidates and electors, and new-model the ways of election , what is it but to cut up the government by the roots, and poison the very fountain of public security?
Since the 2020 election, the ways of election have been altered without our consent by introducing unverifiable mass mail-in ballots. It's illegitimate according to John Locke. The current Biden-Harris regime should be dissolved, and any future regime elected by unverifiable mass mail-in ballots is also illegitimate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Nathanation88 . "So I can shoot anyone who verbally threatens me, who’s unarmed, but within 3 feet of me? Tell me you’re not that ignorant. Or someone who’s armed with a firearm, but not drawn, because they say ‘I’m going to kill you’? Or someone with a knife, in a verbal argument, as long as they’re within 10 yards.. "
No, you cannot. See my orginal choice of words, "attacker". Obviously you have trouble in English reading comprehension. None of your counterexamples can be classified as "attacker".
On the contrary, all of the three, Rosenbaum, Huber, Gertz, were classified as attackers. They were physically attacking Rittenhouse when they were shot. Your sophistry simply cannot argue away their attackership.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Nathanation88 . Who first made physical threats ? Who showed callous disregard for human life? Majority of Americans would agree that the answer is your buddy BLM.
As a gunsmith myself, I'm glad you want to show off your petty knowledge about ARs. If you understand the word "lower" and "upper" in everyday English, it doesn't mean you understand the word "lower" and "upper" in firearm industry & its regulations. Those are component part names, just like barrel, stock, trigger, gas block, and so on.
The difference between M16 and AR15 is the BCG (Bolt Carrier Group), trigger and selector switch. Upper, lower, barrel, stock, gas block, gas tube, grip etc. are all shared between the two platforms.
Now we can laugh at your stupidity. AR15's lower/upper is M16's lower/upper. It is classified as part of machine gun. The United States National Firearms Act handbook DOES NOT list an AR15 AS A MACHINE GUN!!! It only lists AR15's lower/upper as part of machine gun.
I can see you really live on Mars for too long. You cannot tell the difference between a lower/upper from the whole gun. Dumba$$ martian.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
My 2 cents:
1. Renewable energy is a good idea because fossil energy sources will be exhausted sooner or later. Nevertheless, this won't happen in this century, and perhaps not in this millennium. Left's hysteria about an emergent renewable energy agenda is 99.99% a political move rather than anything to do with science.
2. The left selects a completely wrong and evil medium, POISONOUS BATTERY, to store the renewable energy generated. Battery causes more pollution to the environment because of its toxicity. The right answer is E100, i.e., pure ethanol. There are many publications in chemistry proving that we can use WATER and CO2 to generate pure ethanol upon some energy consumption. Therefore, here is what a clean and renewable energy industry should look like:
2.1 Let experts build efficient renewable energy plants, e.g., solar farms in high desert, wind farms in windy mountain passes, tidal power plants along coastline.
2.2 Use these renewable energy plants to generate ethanol from water and CO2. If in mass production, this practice also significantly reduces atmospheric CO2, because generating billions of tons of ethanol means eliminating billions of tons of CO2 from the earth atmosphere.
2.2.1 Unlike the battery industry, this plan ACTUALLY reduces CO2, not increases CO2 emission.
2.2.2 The unreliable power cycle of renewable energy sources is NOT a problem here. When there is no renewable energy available, temporal suspension won't destroy the production process.
2.3 All vehicles should use E100 ICE to replace gasoline/diesel ICE. This requires minimal and low-technical updates in ICE hardware. Any certified mechanic can do the job.
2.3.1 A good news is that volumetric energy density of E100 is 80% of gasoline. This means, for example, a vehicle that can drive 300 miles upon a full tank of gasoline can drive 240 miles upon the same tank of E100. This is acceptable to me.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Democrats are always in the wrong direction.
In 19th century, Democrats advocated slavery.
In 1930s and 1940s, Democrats fed Soviet Union with 120% efforts. The Soviet grew from a rural shithole (at the time Lenin died) to a superpowered monster.
In 1945, Democrats begged Stalin to invade Manchuria. Then Stalin used WW2 Japanese arsenals and personnels to transform Mao's PLA from a guerrilla of bandits without bullets in their guns to the best army in Asia supported by best arsenal (military industry) in Asia. The Chinese nationalist government was defeated twice by WW2 Japanese. The result is the creation of Red China and North Korea.
In 1970s, the Democrat mainstream media CBS and ABC were the major reason why US lost in Vietnam war. US army won every and each battle in Vietnam, but they lost to the leftist media in a civil war. Right now the Democrat mainstream media is repeating what they did in Vietnam war again, because we have never been able to hold them accountable for their propaganda shit. They will do the same propaganda shit again and again in the future.
If Ronald Reagan had never been born, then the Soviet Union would have never been defeated. Under the rule of Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Hussein Obama and Joe Biden, the Soviet would persist and act as the only superpower today. Today's USA would be Soviet's bitch.
Democrats are ONLY good at fighting Americans in civil struggles within US border. They are ferocious beasts in any domestic conflict inside US. Once outside the US border, Democrats suddenly become meek pets of foreign adversaries (e.g., Taliban, CCP).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1