Comments by "Akira Nakamoto (中本明)" (@AkiraNakamoto) on "Fauci 'should be in jail': Majorie Taylor Greene calls for Anthony Fauci to be prosecuted" video.

Agree. The godfather of the gain-of-function mafia belongs to jail.
507
@steviegbcool . You CCP troll have proven nothing. Peter Daszak and his EcoHealth Alliance and his Lancet journals are major suspects whose words prove nothing. In a real due process, Tony Fauci and Peter Daszak should recuse themselves from the very beginning.
6
@ralphverboten8816 . Blah your CCP a$$. LOL
3
@thebeanymac . The history is more like this: Fauci advocated gain-of-function in 2012. Then in next a few years, he sent money to his buddy (Consigliere) Peter Daszak who in turn sent money to Shi Zhengli, the "BAT WOMAN" in Wuhan Institute of Virology. Shi and Daszak (and UNC's Ralph Baric another Consigliere of Fauci's gain-of-function mafia) published several peer reviewed papers in some international journals including Peter Daszak's Lancet journal. Their gain-of-function research raised serious concerns amongst many non-Fauci-controlled scientists, for example, former CDC director Robert Redfield. Then the US government shut down the gain-of-function research.
3
@steviegbcool . We also have about a 100 papers published by Shi Zhengli the "BAT WOMAN" of the Wuhan lab, co-authored with Fauci's Consiglieres Peter Daszak and Ralph Baric. The CCP, the godfather Fauci, the Consiglieres Daszak and Baric really want to retract everything, and they did retract many records, but they cannot retract all records. Check what Lincoln said: You can fool all the people some time, and some people all the time, but you just cannot do it to all the people all the time.
3
@thebeanymac . As early as 2012, Fauci is the 1ST public health headmaster who vouched for gain-of-function research despite the risk of a pandemic. None of his counterparts in all other countries have ever said that. This fact singles Fauci out to be the godfather of gain-of-function.
2
@steviegbcool . I don't give a rat ass to you demonrats or to Trump. I am not associated with any party. I used to cast my vote of executive branch positions to Republicans and vote of legislation branch positions to Democrats. This time will be different. Since Democrats have been dominated by demonrats like you, I will cast all my votes to Republicans for the next decade. Demonrats like you must be punished.
2
@tonyatgoogle6076 . No. Fauci is guilty of advocating and covering-up. It's communist party member Shi Zhengli who made and leaked the CCP virus.
2
@tonyatgoogle6076 . No, Your hitman theory doesn't work at all. The man who recruits a hitman is intentionally trying to kill someone. Fauci was NOT intentionally trying to kill anyone. He is a politician pretending to be a scientist trying to claim some freaky credits in virology. His behavior from 2012 to 2019 is controversial, but hardly anything that can be incriminated. It's his cover-up behavior in 2020 and 2021 that can be incriminated, including lying to the congress and obstruction of justice. As to your defendent Shi Zhengli, her behavior before 2019 is also hardly anything incriminating. The crime part is the unintentional leak and intentional cover-up. The first one is man-slaughter and the second one is obstruction of justice.
2
@tonyatgoogle6076 . You are a radical with little common sense and no logic. Your hitman theory is a fiasco. If you were a Japanese, by your (il)logic you would blame Albert Einstein and Robert Oppenheimer for the 2 A-bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by USAAF. Learn some basic logic and gain some common sense please. If you are ignorant of the history, I can tell you that Einstein wrote a petition letter to FDR to vouch for the Manhattan A-bomb project, then Oppenheimer was selected by FDR administration to accomplish the project. Their behavior is controversial, but not criminal at all. Your hitman theory is basically insane and against common sense. And I guess you are a mainland Chinese engineer working for Google. You maybe good at coding, but your knowledge of common law legal system is ridiculous. Covering-up is a CRIME in Anglo-American common law system. It belongs to the crime class of obstruction-of-justice, which is unheard of in China's continental law system. Do your homework before you make ridiculous comments here.
2
@steviegbcool . Basically you demonrats are unregistered foreign agents working on US soil. You represent foreign interests rather than we Americans. It's not a surprise at all that US foreign adversaries agree with you demonrats. We have seen hundreds of such incidents over the past years.
2
@tonyatgoogle6076 . LOL. I published over 60 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences, then graduated from UC with doctoral degree in computer science many years ago. You are just a self-assured hack working for Sundar and Sergey. I never said US federal government is not responsible. On the contrary, I have accused NIAID/NIH be partially responsbile because NIAID/NIH director Anthony Fauci is the (not "a" but "the") key character to delegate gain-of-function research to Wuhan. In a recent TV interview, he publicly said this kind of research is too dangerous to be done "here" (referring to US soil), thus it is the reason to do the gain-of-function research "there" (referring to Wuhan, China). But, it is your CCP government's state-run Wuhan Institute of Virology, not Fauci, who released the coronavirus to the world, isn't it? No matter how you argue for your master Xi Jinping, you can only convince yourself and your 5mao gang. Even the anti-America Iranians refuse to take your side in regard to this pandemic.
2
@tonyatgoogle6076 . What's the matter with you? Gain-of-function is a controversial research. Gain-of-function itself is not the criminal. The criminal here is the one who made and leaked the CCP19 virus. Gain-of-function is the facilitator, an accessary of the actual criminal.
1
@steviegbcool . Read the papers. Search "Peter Daszak" and "Shi Zhengli" and WIV1 virus. Youtube censors the website hyperlink. You demonrats must do your own homework to pass the humanity test. Let me give you a hint. WIV refers to Shi Zhengli's Wuhan Institute of Virology. As Jon Stewart said in a joke, the virus has the same name of the lab. LOL @ u
1
@tonyatgoogle6076 . No, the USAAF authority, not the pilots, is responsible for the A-bombing. From your words we can see that your common sense is a joke.
1
@tonyatgoogle6076 . lol, you're a foreigner, more specifically a typical 5mao fascist graduated from Tsinghua.
1
@tonyatgoogle6076 . No. The Anglo-American procedural common law legal system doesn't work as you imagined. All crime must go through proper procedures defined by the laws passed by elected legislature. Responsibility and crime are different things. What you have said just now is a typical twisted smearing from your communist propaganda brainwashing program. Even if responsibility is the only concern, your words are nevertheless absurd. John Locke's representative democracy doesn't attribute the behavior of the representatives to their voters. Even if you disregard this fact, election in a democratic society is never 100%. Yes, I would agree that the people who voted for FDR/Truman adminstration is also PARTIALLY responsible, but not all people of America. Now return to the crime part. Fauci is the crime suspect of lying to the congress, as Senator Rand Paul is preparing to sue him now; and possibly violating the gain-of-function ban issued by Obama adminstration. The first one is quite provable in court. The second one is not very clear now, need to see how new evidence and witness emerge.
1
@tonyatgoogle6076 . Tsinghua is not a good place to do original research. UC is much better. Indeed no university under communist's control is a good place for real research because you serfs are not supposed to think. You are supposed to be a copycat to repeat what the authority has said. In addition, my advisor had a huge research team because he was one of the leading roles in his field. I am the primary author in about one-third of my publications, and a co-author in other publications. Obviously all of these academia themes are beyond your imagination.
1
@tonyatgoogle6076 typical left tantrum, or in chic words, typical critical theorist's tantrum. lol
1