Comments by "Akira Nakamoto (中本明)" (@AkiraNakamoto) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

This is the most absurd lie made by commies. The Japanese Kwan-tung Army in 1945 was at most a paramilitary force. Please check the history of all Elite Divisions of IJA (日本帝國甲種常備師團）. In 1945, the real IJA military, i.e., all Elite Divisions of IJA, were in the Pacific theater fighting Americans. There was only one Elite Division, 3rd "幸兵團" Division, deployed on the Eurasia continent (on the continent, not on islands). That's in Jiang Xi (江西) below the 32nd parallel north. After 1942, there was no IJA Elite Division on the Eurasia continent above the 32nd parallel north, certainly not in Manchuria which is above the 38th parallel north. In 1945 the Kwan-tung Army in Manchuria was at most a paramilitary force like the National Guard in a state in America. Even facing such a third-tier paramilitary force, Soviet's Red Army was unable to win convincingly. Japanese Kwan-tung Army's casualty is about 40,000. Soviet's casualty is about 36,000. And the funniest thing is: On the 2nd day of this so-called "Soviet-Japanese war in 1945", Japanese already announced surrender. What they did after August 10, 1945 was simply self-defense as the Red Army didn't give them a peaceful option. Even at the end of the war, Soviet was uable to take Dong-ning Fortress (東寧要塞) . On August 28, 1945, the Japanese soldiers in Dong-ning Fortress received surrender order from Kwan-tung Army headquarter, then they surrendered. Otherwise, the Red Army was still incapable of breaking into the fortress by their own force.
7
@alexbort3082 . How old are you? Kiddo, go back to your mom and cry for help. I can easily crush you and her by the weight of my books. Lol
5
The food was the most important lend-lease supply. Soviet lost its primary food court Ukraine in Operation Barbarossa (i.e., 2nd half of 1941), then lost its secondary food court around Don River and Volga River in 1942 as wehrmarcht marched toward Stalingrad. In 1943 Soviet soldiers had nothing to eat if there's no lend-lease. Khrushchev had a famous comment about SPAM: Without SPAM, I didn''t know how I could feed my Red Army soldiers in Stalingrad.
3
Your morale means nothing when there is no bullet in your guns. In 1945, Soviet's air force was a joke compared with Anglo-American's because Soviet's propeller engine technology was copied from UK and US. This was changed in 1950s when both Soviet and US copied jet engine technology from captured Nazi engineers, thus side-by-side in the same generation at the same scratch line. Back to 1945, Soviet's supply line was superlong (as major portion of the soviet military industry was still in Urals) and had little chance to survive the Anglo-American air superiority. In addition, American had A-bombs. Soviet stole the A-bomb secrets by their comrades inside American government (mostly America-born radical left Soviet sympathizers, not real soviet-born spies), but it takes time to implement the stolen technology. Soviet had its 1st A-bomb in 1949. In 1945 Soviet didn't even understand what's A-bomb. On the American side, although 1 A-bomb was used for testing purpose and 2 A-bombs were used in Japan, it only took less than 6 month to manufacture a new A-bomb. Imagine Moscow's hit by an A-bomb and Stalin's dead. Game over. Finally, Anglo-American will not lose the war even if they can't win it. Soviet's navy in 1945 was not even a joke. It simply didn't exist at that time. There's no way for Soviet to occupy London, let alone Washington D.C. The worst outcome for US and UK was a draw.
2
Внук Ельцина . You Russians didn't have aircraft fuels in 1945. 90+% soviet aircraft fuels during WW2 were lend-leased. Even if you had aircraft fuels in 1945, your air force would not have a better end than the Luftwaffe and Imperial Japanese air force.
2
@llothar68 Debunked by who? Soviet liars.
2
@danoarmstrong2597 . Exactly. Actually I know Zhukov admitted in 1950s that Soviet didn't have colored metal to transform iron into steel during the WW2. The problem was solved after WW2 when Soviet discovered a few mines of colored metals.
2
@МихаилМощенко-м2я . I agree to your comment "without each other they couldn't defeat nazis". Although Anglo-American had air superiority and navy super-overwhelming superiority compared to Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine, the ground army was much weaker than the Heer. Only the Red Army could eat the Heer alive by a meatgrinder style fight. Stalin, Zhukov and Khrushchev knew this fact and said something many times that is consistent with the fact. But the propaganda of the soviet union and its minions in the socialist bloc have changed the narrative since Brezhnev's era. The narrative becomes the conclusion that Soviet didn't need lend-lease, and Nazi would be eliminated by Red Army alone. You can see lots of fools spitting out such nonsense in this comment area.
2
PLA is merely a larger-sized Saddam's Republican Guard. It's a near modern armed force, but not fully modernized, similar to US Army in 1960s, two generations away from nowadays US armed forces.
1
@alexbort3082 . No book when talking about history? Lol. Thug.
1
Внук Ельцина . I never said Soviet didn't have fuel. What I have said is Soviet didn't have aircraft fuel (needed by propeller engines). Your chemical industry could not produce enough amount of qualified aircraft fuels so the lend-leased aircraft fuels became your major source. Sure, you can argue that without lend-leased aircraft fuels you can switch back to low-quality fuels, but I can mock you that the number of your pilots killed by plane crash due to suddenly-stopped sleazy Russian engines will be far more than the ones shot down by enemy. As to the Soviet's Manchuria operation in 1945, I am really tired of debunk the communist's lies about the historical facts. Let me copy-and-paste one of my comments under another topic here. The Japanese Kwan-tung Army in 1945 was at most a paramilitary force. Please check the history of all Elite Divisions of IJA (日本帝國甲种常備師團）. In 1945, the real IJA military, i.e., all Elite Divisions of IJA, were in the Pacific theater fighting Americans. There was only one Elite Division, 3rd "幸兵團" Division, deployed on the Eurasia continent (on the continent, not on islands). That's in Jiang Xi (江西) below the 32nd parallel north. After 1942, there was no IJA Elite Division on the Eurasia continent above the 32nd parallel north, certainly not in Manchuria which is above the 38th parallel north. In 1945 the Kwan-tung Army in Manchuria was at most a paramilitary force like the National Guard in a state in America. Even facing such a third-tier paramilitary force, Soviet's Red Army was unable to win convincingly. Japanese Kwan-tung Army's casualty is about 40,000. Soviet's casualty is about 36,000. And the funniest thing is: On the 2nd day of this so-called "Soviet-Japanese war in 1945", Japanese already announced surrender. What they did after August 10, 1945 was simply self-defense as the Red Army didn't give them a peaceful option. Even at the end of the war, Soviet was uable to take Dong-ning Fortress (東寧要塞) . On August 28, 1945, the Japanese soldiers in Dong-ning Fortress received surrender order from Kwan-tung Army headquarter, then they surrendered. Otherwise, the Red Army was still incapable of breaking into the fortress by their own force.
1
@Alex Funk . If Russians really attacked Anglo-American armed forces like what Hitler did in Dunkirk, then definitely Britain would support Churchill again. Your logistic argument is meaningless. On the other hand, Soviet's man power was exhausted at the time of summer 1945. Now we all know that near 100% Soviet males born in 1923 died in Russo-German war. Soviet males born in neighboring years of 1923 were not much better than those born in 1923. Many young Soviet females had to be enlisted to replace males. Stalin knew his limits. If he could defeat Anglo-American Allies in 1945, he would surely start a sequel war in order to conquer the world. But he dared not to.
1
@milmoose622 . Long ago debunked fake left news. After summer 1942, Soviet's 90+% food, trucks, locomotives, aircraft fuels, colored metal needed by factory to transform iron into steel, and so on, were provided by lend-lease. Without lend-lease, there's no way to transport heavy equipments (e.g., artilleries) from Ural to the front; there was no soviet aircraft flying in the midair to destroy panzers; there was no steel-made T-34, only iron-made T-34. German could shoot through your T-34 from 400 meters away by machine guns, rather than from 4 meters away using Panzerfausts.
1
@3rdeye671 . No, you cannot grow food in Urals, not even today, let alone in 1945. You need food everyday to avoid starving to death, then can you fight a war.
1
@lc9245 No. The Soviet's food courts did NOT survive German's 1941 and 1942 campaigns. Soviet lost its primary food court Ukraine in Operation Barbarossa (i.e., 2nd half of 1941), then lost its secondary food court around Don River and Volga River in 1942 as wehrmarcht marched toward Stalingrad. In 1943 Soviet soldiers had nothing to eat if there's no lend-lease. Nikita Khrushchev is the witness.
1
@lc9245 . Your fake data directly contradicts Nikita Khrushchev's words per his own real-world experience. He fought in Stalingrad. Your data source, a bunch of Soviet Russians born in 1950s and became propagandists in Brezhnev's government, didn't.
1
@Lion_Of_Damascus . I am sorry to hear that your grandma was sent to one of the Gulags. Based on Solzhenitsyn's work, I am pretty sure people there can hardly produce food for themselves. How can they produce food for others? You know, the Red Army soldiers during WW2 were full-time warriors. They were the extra mouths need to feed.
1