Comments by "Akira Nakamoto (中本 明)" (@AkiraNakamoto) on "PragerU" channel.

  1. Remember these names: Fauci, Baric, Daszak and Shi Zhengli.
    28
  2. Every socialist is a disguised dictator. -- Ludwig von Mises
    25
  3.  @criticalthinker8007  Read "The Communist Manifesto" please. Communism is a political system that advocates that property and resources are owned by 'the STATE', not your community.
    22
  4.  @EdoardoB-xz1jp  Just my 2 cents: 1. Fascists are also socialists, but with flavor of nationalism inside and outside. Stalinists are socialists, with internationalism outside and nationalism inside. Here we go. 2. Even a stopped clock will tell the true time twice a day. So a rational person will process any information without ad hominem concerns.
    18
  5.  @EdoardoB-xz1jp  Please read Lassal and Bismarck's "state socialism" (German: Staatssozialismus). What your narrative labels as "state-run capitalism" has nothing to do with Adam Smith's free market capitalism. It IS state socialism all the way. German fascism is the combo of Staatssozialismus/State Socialism + Nationalism, as I said in the previous comment.
    18
  6.  @EdoardoB-xz1jp  In Staatssozialismus/State Socialism, the State owns a significant portion of the so-called "private" sector. For example, in Nazi Germany, the partisan State makes decisions in What,When,Where,Who of social productions, and the private sector only makes decisions in How, because How is the only part for technical details. (I assume that u know what 5W means in manufacturing processes) In Marx-Lenin-Stalin-Mao socialism, the State also manages the How part, i.e., all 5W. In free market capitalism, everybody just follows laws to make all 5W decisions, and the Invisible Hand of the probabilistic market determines the result.
    12
  7. Then why are you here?
    12
  8.  @EdoardoB-xz1jp  For an example, you should have a look at MG machine gun's production. The Nazi State decided What,When,Where and Who of the production, of course, via a Nazi State enforced procedure. The Nazi State only left the How part to the "private" sector, i.e., Werner Gruner, Großfuß, Mauser etc. This is also the mode of operation for nowadays US military industry. Yes, I am saying that US military industry is not free-market capitalism, but a vivid example of state socialism. I think this is just common sense regardless of ur opinion.
    9
  9. For those Soviet lovers who deny the significance of Lend-Lease, without Lend-Lease, Soviet would be defeated after repeating Rezhev-Vyazima meatgrinder campaign for a few times. FYI, in January 1942's Rezhev-Vyazima battles, Lend-lease aids hadn't arrived yet to Soviet, there was no American trucks. Thus Zhukov's soldiers had to carry light weapons by manual labor only, then were mowed down by German MG machine guns batch by batch. Zhukov lost to General Model in January 1942, and would keep on losing unless lend-lease arrived in time.
    8
  10. I think Thomas Sowell's Conflict of Visions did a better job than the video. In my opinion, Sowell's "Unconstrained Vision" roughly refers to the left, and "Constrained Vision" the right. People with Unconstrained Vision: Ultimately they believe that man is morally perfectible. Because of this, they believe that there exists some people who are further along the path of moral development, have overcome self-interest and are immune to the influence of power and therefore can act as surrogate decision-makers for the rest of society. The keyword is "surrogate", which is the center piece of all schemes crafted by the left. Nowadays the "surrogate" is normally the socialist government. Based on Sowell's notion, Rudyard Lynch (@Whatifalthist) has a list to compare Left with Right: The Left: 1. Humans are perfectible. 2. Good people in power can save the world. 3. The future is all progress. 4. The only real things are materially what you see. 5. Inequality (mainly) comes from oppression. 6. Everyone is a blank slate which are socialized. 7. Cultural differences are arbitrary and can easily be transcended. 8. Tradition holds us back. 9. It's wrong to judge someone by their results. 10. You have loyalty to all humanity, not your people. The Right: 1. Humans are inherently flawed. 2. Power corrupts. 3. It's possible to degrade back into barbarism. 4. There is a God. 5. Inequality is normal. 6. Races, classes and the sexes are genetically different. 7. Cultural differences are important. 8. Tradition is valuable even if we don't understand why. 9. You can assess things by competency. 10. You have loyalty to your group over others. You can match a Leftist with something in the list of "The Left". For example, let the government take over the education, this matches #2 in the list of "The Left".
    8
  11.  @EdoardoB-xz1jp  test. As censorship under this video is abnormally severe, just a few words to u: move, to, Venezuela, because, they, share, the, property, as, u, wish.
    6
  12. Without Lend-Lease, Soviet would be defeated after repeating Rezhev-Vyazima meatgrinder campaign for a few times. FYI, in January 1942's Rezhev-Vyazima battles, Lend-lease aids hadn't arrived yet to Soviet, there was no American trucks. Thus Zhukov's soldiers had to carry light weapons by manual labor only, then were mowed down by German MG machine guns batch by batch. Zhukov lost to General Model in January 1942, and would keep on losing unless lend-lease arrived in time.
    6
  13.  @EdoardoB-xz1jp  no, US faced British sanctions in its first century, and it didn't change anything....
    5
  14.  @EdoardoB-xz1jp  btw, if u don't like venezuela, then build a time machine and go to soviet union.
    5
  15. Every socialist is a disguised dictator. --- Ludwig von Mises In Soviet. In Germany. In China, In Brazil. In USA.
    5
  16. Finally, justice is unserved.
    4
  17. Yes. All these so-called "climatologists" conveniently ignore the Holocene Optimum/Maximum that happened from about 5000BC to 2200BC.
    4
  18. That's commie's ultimate trick --- playing gods.
    4
  19.  @Stevarooni  I think Ayn Rand suffered from Asperger Syndrome. Everything matches between her behavior and the syndrome.
    3
  20. I think justice is unserved for Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman.
    3
  21. .................3W out of the 5W (i.e., majority), then it is socialism..................
    3
  22. f youtube for Stalin style censorship.
    3
  23. @Di_Qin Only in your alternative reality, Mao Zuo.
    3
  24. There is a close tie between Catholicism and Communism. Extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Extra communist party nulla salus. If you know what the former phrase means, then you should know what the latter phrase means. Also refer to Thomas Sowell's "Unconstrained Vision" to see the connection between these two ideologies. American population has had a significant change since 1990 (the end of the cold war). This has a major impact on American ideological reality and American politics.
    3
  25.  @tefky7964  test. Read "The Communist Manifesto", page 41 and 42. The quote is censored every time I include it in my reply.
    3
  26. You should ask Fox to create a program "Friday Night Live" and write scripts for it.
    2
  27. You are describing exactly the same people that Thomas Sowell whacked 30 years ago in his book "The Vision of the Anointed". Sowell calls them "the Anointed".
    2
  28.  @Objective-Observer  If they censor, then they're a publisher, NOT a public square.
    2
  29.  @ryllo2886  Nah, you are.
    2
  30.  @criticalthinker8007  Read Robert Michels's "Iron Law of Oligarchy" and Adolf Gasser's refutation. Any top-down approach in politics will eventually result in Michels's Iron Law. The only possible exit is Gasser's bottom-up approach. So, the most fundamental classification of politics is top-downer vs. bottom-upper. All top-downers are doomed to reach oligarchy, and most of them eventually reach dictatorship. It's possible that bottom-uppers would avoid oligarchy and dictatorship. But there is no guarantee. You are free to make your own choice. I am a bottom-upper by all means.
    2
  31. In regard to DOMESTIC policy, Hitler/Nazi is far left. In regard to FOREIGN policy, Hitler/Nazi is far right. Therefore, whether Hitler/Nazi is far left or far right? It depends on the context, DOMESTIC or FOREIGN.
    2
  32. Exactly.
    2
  33. I vouch for electrofuel generated from CO2, water, catalyst and all types of renewable energy sources. Electrofuel is fully recyclable, forever renewable, carbon neutral, zero toxic and having comparable volumetric energy density with fossil fuel.
    1
  34. Bill Maher could be Bill Bob Thornton II. Thornton used to adore the lefts, then he figured out they are self-righteous @$$holes who are ONLY good at fighting a civil war against Americans like him.
    1
  35.  @spencercabana6082  Your didn't get high score in logic class, did you? Trump is NOT a socialist like Stalin or Hitler. Obama is. AOC is. Trump is a modern version of Henry Ford. He acts like an emperor in his own corporation, but he is against big government that socialists are vouching for.
    1
  36. David, you are the snake catcher.
    1
  37. We do need a government, but not a bureaucratic government led by a centralized legal person (political party) or a person (strong man). What we must need is a social consensus procedure/protocol to furnish any necessary social contracts. The so-called "government" is the toolkit to accomplish the social contracts by enforcing the social consensus procedure/protocol. In a nutshell, government is a tool, not the goal. The fundamental stupidity of the leftism is always regarding government as their goal, so that the leftists can enforce their utopian concepts upon us and deny our own free wills. The center piece of leftism is always the external salvation (Extra some-left-shit Nulla Salus) disguised as altruism. A leftist is essentially a denier of self-salvation no matter what he/she says orally. IMHO, modern leftism is the direct successor/heir of medieval Catholicism, and we are still in a struggle of a modern variant of the Thirty Years' War. The key piece of the struggle is not really about a religion or political power as interpreted by mainstream historians, but about the fundamental choice between Extra-SomePerson-Nulla-Salus and Self-Salvation. Choosing the former, you are a leftist; Choosing the latter, you are not. Government so far is always an EXTERNAL and MANNED (bureaucratic) entity on top of we the citizens (social contractors). Nevertheless, I think this is merely a historical fact; I don't think this is an objective truth. Why? Because RIGHT NOW WE KNOW that an UNMANNED regulation can accomplish any social contracts by enforcing BLOCKCHAIN-BASED social consensus procedure/protocol. It is called DeFi (Decentralized Finance), a realistic Blockchain-based design now. I don't see any technical barrier of DePo (Decentralized Politics), aka. Blockchain-based Government, because political activities and financial activities are essentially the same thing, that is, (socially-)consensused transactions. Let me call this Blockchain-based UNMANNED government as Nakamoto Government. My point is that, we only need this UNMANNED Nakamoto Government, NOT the legacy MANNED governments. As to Trump and Musk's DOGE efforts, I respect their endeavor and fighting spirit against the legacy manned governments. But I personally don't think they will succeed. Even if we suppose they can reduce the federal government by half (which is very unlikely) at the end of Trump administration (year 2028), I can predict that the federal government will grow back to its current size (2024 size) within a decade or two. The MANNED DOGE effort will eventually fail in any long run. And the only solution to the DOGE problem is an UNMANNED government, such as a Nakamoto Government I abovementioned.
    1
  38.  @kathleenking47  Since Reagan became president and John Wayne died. When they were active Hollywood actors, Reagan and Wayne crushed the socialists like Trumbo. After Reagan left Hollywood and Wayne died around year 1980, the Pandora's box in Hollywood was released.
    1
  39. Youtube keeps censoring my reply to @tefky7964, so I have to post a separated comment here. @tefky7964 33 minutes ago @AkiraNakamoto No? Communism is by definition stateless, moneyless, classless society, the USSR wasn´t that. They are called communists, because they want to achieve that goal, but they never claimed that they actually achieved it. @AkiraNakamoto 15 minutes ago Again, read "The Communist Manifesto", in particular the part of its REALISTIC proposals, and stop accumulating meaningless adjectives for the unicorn utopias. Literal quote from "The Communist Manifesto": 1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 2. 3. 4. 5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. 6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
    1
  40. I cannot even write a complete sentence which is as normal as plain water.
    1
  41. The ultimate fallacy of communists is trying to be omnipotent. Every socialist is a disguised dictator. --- Ludwig von Mises Every communist is a god-less self-appointed God, aka. a false God, a synonym of Satan. See Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Xi for examples. EdoardoB u r of no exception because we all know that u r NOT God.
    1
  42. Indeed Harry Truman and many Americans around him should be held accountable for creating the Red China.
    1
  43.  @Kaleb_Hicks  Read Karl Marx's and Herbert Marcuse's writings please. "Class struggle" (or "critical class theory" if adopting Marcuse's nomenclature) is the center piece of Marxism.
    1
  44.  @Kaleb_Hicks  Social class is not biological. Herbert Marcuse replaced Karl Marx's "social class" with "social culture". Then some of his woke followers replaced "culture" with "race".
    1
  45.  @Kaleb_Hicks  Social class is not biological. Herbert Marcuse replaced Karl Marx's "social class" with "social culture", for example, he was strongly against America's consumer culture and would become Bezos's worst enemy if he is alive today. Then some of his w0k3 followers replaced "culture" with "race".
    1
  46. Social class is not biological. Herbert Marcuse replaced Karl Marx's "social class" with "social culture", for example, he was strongly against America's consumer culture and would become Bezos's worst enemy if he is alive today. Then some of his w0k3 followers replaced "culture" with "race".
    1
  47.  @Kaleb_Hicks  Social class is not biological. Herbert Marcuse replaced Karl Marx's "social class" with "social culture", for example, he was strongly against America's consumer culture and would become Bezos's worst enemy if he is alive today. Then some of his w0k3 followers replaced "culture" with "race".
    1
  48. test
    1
  49. Social class is not biological. Herbert Marcuse replaced Karl Marx's "social class" with "social culture/social structure", for example, he was strongly against America's consumer culture and would become Bezos's worst enemy if he is alive today. Then some of his w0k3 followers replaced "culture" with "race".
    1
  50. Social class is not biological. Herbert Marcuse replaced Karl Marx's "social class" with "social culture/social structure", for example, he was strongly against America's consumer culture and would become Bezos's worst enemy if he is alive today. Then some of his w0k3 followers replaced "culture" with "ra..........ce".
    1
  51. Social class is not biological. Herbert Marcuse replaced Karl Marx's "social class" with "social culture/social structure", for example, he was strongly against America's consumer culture and would become Bezos's worst enemy if he is alive today. Then some of his w0k3 followers replaced "cul..............ture" with "ra...........ce".
    1
  52. blame youtube for deleting my comment. shame.
    1
  53.  @Kaleb_Hicks  Social class is not biological. ....................................
    1
  54. ...........................Herbert Marcuse replaced Karl Marx's "social class" with "social culture/social structure", for example, he was strongly against America's consumer culture and would become Bezos's worst enemy if he is alive today....................................
    1
  55.  @Kaleb_Hicks  ...........Herbert Marcuse replaced Karl Marx's "social class" with "social culture/social structure", ...................
    1
  56.  @Kaleb_Hicks  ............ for example, he was strongly against America's consumer culture and would become Bezos's worst enemy if he is alive today.......................
    1
  57.  @Kaleb_Hicks  ................. Then some of his w0k3 followers replaced "culture" with "race".
    1
  58.  @Kaleb_Hicks  Then some of his vv0k3 followers replaced "culture" with "race".
    1
  59.  @Kaleb_Hicks  ...................... Then some of Marcuse's vv0ke followers replaced "cul..ture" with "ra..ce".
    1
  60.  @Kaleb_Hicks  ................. Then some of his followers replaced "culture" with "race".
    1
  61. Censorship is the prelude of a tyrannical government, as proven by Prussians--> Nazi German, Bolsheviks --> Russian & Chinese communists. No exception.
    1
  62. Every socialist is a disguised dictator. --- Ludwig von Mises Barack Hussein Obama is not an exception. Neither is Michael Obama, or Peloci, or Biden, or Gavin Newssolini, .................................
    1
  63. I wonder whether the boundary between Artificial Intelligence and Artificial Stupidity does exist or not. ChatGPT4.0 may look "intelligent", but I find out that it is still a stupid liar whenever you want to get real information from it. I am a computational scientist. ChatGPT hardly gives right answers to my scientific questions and it lies a lot to cover up its ignorance. The cover-up act is also stupid because it is easy to see through the lies.
    1
  64. California = the Argentina state of USA. We need a Milei to replace Gavin Newssolini.
    1
  65.  @Di_Qin91  Stay where u r. Don't f around.
    1
  66.  @tefky7964  Again, read "The Communist Manifesto", in particular the part of its REALISTIC proposals, and stop accumulating meaningless adjectives for the unicorn utopias. Literal quote from "The Communist Manifesto": 1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 2. 3. 4. 5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. 6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
    1
  67.  @tefky7964  Again, read "The Communist Manifesto", in particular the part of its REALISTIC proposals, not the adjectives for the unicorn utopias. Literal quote from "The Communist Manifesto": 1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 2. 3. 4. 5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. 6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
    1
  68. \\at tefky the commie// Again, read "The Communist Manifesto", in particular the part of its REALISTIC proposals, and stop accumulating meaningless adjectives for the unicorn utopias. Literal quote from "The Communist Manifesto": 1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 2. 3. 4. 5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. 6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
    1
  69. \\at tefky the commie// Literal quote from "The Communist Manifesto": 1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 2. 3. 4. 5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. 6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
    1
  70. Again, tefky c0mmie please read "The Communist Manifesto", in particular the part of its REALISTIC proposals, and stop accumulating meaningless adjectives for the unicorn utopias. Literal quote from "The Communist Manifesto": 1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 2. 3. 4. 5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. 6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
    1
  71. I have something to add to your argument. The liberals are mainly trained products of those schools of liberal arts. I believe this is the etymology of the name "liberal". In a modern school of liberal art, they are trained in a similar way as those (Catholic) schoolmen centuries ago in the Medieval Era. They don't know nothing about science and math, in particular anything related to probability. Karl Marx, Noam Chomsky and all the liberals following them share the same God Complex, such that they believe 1. everything has a deterministic and perfect answer, and 2. they can get the perfect answer just like the God. So they become arrogant, stubborn, self-assured and self-congratulatory. (Here the term "God" is not necessarily a Bibilical God. It can be Einstein's God (or Spinoza's God according to Einstein himself), aka. a mathematical God. This God is deterministic and omniscient for all true beings.) Unfortunately, they are wrong. The 2022 Nobel laureates in physics already proved that Einstein's deterministic view of the physical world is wrong, and quantum physics' probabilistic view is right. Even though I tend to believe the intemporal, metaphysical/mathematical world (of Einstein's God) is still deterministic, every scientific evidence says that the temporal, physical world we are living in is a probabilistic one. A temporal being (such as human being) can never be as smart as the intemporal God (either a Bibilical God or a mathematical God). Liberal's God Complex is a sheer lunacy. Most economists, in particular those from Chicago School, and most STEM scientists know about the probabilistic nature of the physical world. Therefore we do know human being's limitations. On the other hand, mainstream Hollywood people (with performing art degrees granted by schools of liberal arts) and many Silicon Valley engineers (engineers are very different from scientists, for example, alchemists and their modern counterparts are anti-science) have the God Complex because they normally act like the God in their limited fantasy land. I am NOT saying that everybody graduated from schools of liberal arts is an arrogant, anti-science, self-congratulatory prick. The demarcation line is usually about the faith. In other words, those atheists graduated from the schools of liberal arts become liberals, and those believing in some sorts of God mostly stay as conservatives. It's quite intuitive to understand the situation. The atheists graduated from the schools of liberal arts don't believe in the Biblical God, and meanwhile they know little about science to believe in a mathematical God. Therefore, they become their own God. In other words, they become the disgusting left-leaning libtards.
    1
  72. Let me summarize the basic conclusion in a few sentences. The so-called LIBERALS / LIBTARDS are mostly atheists graduated from the schools of liberal arts. They consider themselves as their own God. A Hollywood career / performing art, a social media career / public communication, and so on, all belong to modern school of liberal arts where neither Biblical ideology nor science is taught to the liberal art students. This generates tons of atheistic liberals, aka. left-leaning libtards.
    1
  73. I vouch for electrofuel generated from CO2, water, catalyst and all types of renewable energy sources. Electrofuel is fully recyclable, carbon neutral, zero toxic and having comparable volumetric energy density with fossil fuel.
    1
  74. My view on the comparison between Huxley's Brave New World and Orwell's 1984 can be described as comparison of deductive rationalism vs. inductive empiricism. Huxley's approach is more about a set of axoimatic ideal rules lead to dystopian results. Orwell's approach is more about describing some detailed phenomena in a utopia/dystopia. At least for me, I am impressed with Huxley's logical chaining in Brave New World and Orwell's description of details in 1984. Just my 2 cents.
    1
  75. I cherish the hope that you guys can sue the commietube to its bankruptcy.
    1
  76. 12:39 What Hamas did in 2005 was exactly what Hitler did in 1933. Unlike what the left propaganda claims that democracy is the answer, it is NOT. The answer is John Locke's rule-of-representatively-democratic-law (it's the combo of rule-of-law and Lockean representative democracy in the law making and abiding practice). The answer is never simple democracy.
    1
  77.  @kirklaird8345  If we consider "nationalism" as right and "internationalism" as left.
    1
  78.  @kirklaird8345  That's not arbitrary, but a common sense after the so-called "1st International" led by Karl Marx. U need to read some history of late 19th and early 20th centuries.
    1
  79.  @kirklaird8345  U cannot blame me for ur ignorance, my dear. Internationalism means denial of national borders. That's what communism advocates and what the current Democrats' border policy. I don't paint anything. That's simple fact.
    1