Comments by "Dr Gamma D" (@DrDeuteron) on "He almost faked his way to a Nobel-Prize" video.

  1. 1) Jan is totally guilty 2) Batlogg is not clean. He's got a postdoc with Nobel level results, and he doesn't go in the lab? That means he's a former scientist, and now just a tenured educrat in our administration heavy university system. (my advisor was in the late late night all the time, pre tenure, ...but mostly to keep me from breaking stuff) 3) Peer Review: the referee comments and revisions need to be made public for forensic analysis 4) My aforementioned advisor, when queried about a publishing in Nature/Science, just snickered, "no I want to publish in a science journal, not a porno mag".
    126
  2.  @richardokeefe7410  well, regarding the quantum entanglement measurements, which have since won a Nobel, he said: quantum mechanics works, we’ve known that for 100 years. He was into far more difficult things.
    3
  3. Editorial note: " less fewer papers" we need to save "fewer" (and "number of") from the Zoomer language grinder.
    2
  4. Great Comment!
    2
  5. Note to self: CHANGE THE RANDOM NUMBER SEED!
    2
  6. you research spelling?
    1
  7. Ppl have faked their way to Nobel Peace prizes for decades....why not Physics?
    1
  8. well, the electrons could fit through the barriers (x), provided the uncertainty in the momentum goes up per p^2 ~ hbar^2 x^2...which is quantum physics, and when p^2 goes up, p^2/2m_e goes up, kinetic energy is KE = p^2/2m_e, and (3/2)k_B T = KE...so temperature goes up. Everyone's right. No need for retractions.
    1
  9. yeah, but were they better than The Tubes? W.P.O.D 4eva!!!
    1