Comments by "Dr Gamma D" (@DrDeuteron) on "The SAT Question Everyone Got Wrong" video.

  1. this fact (10:20) about the total distance the center travels, and the fact the kinetic energy is quadratic in (rate of change) of distance is why you can add translational kinetic energy and rotational kinetic energy linearly when calculated the total energy of a tumbling object. If it's ok to do a lil physics on a math video.
    1
  2. Ernst Mach would say "4", while Einstein would say 3, 4, or anything you want. Daniel Webster would say 1. So I retract my early post that this question is too hard for the SAT, rather: it's classic garbage the educrats put on.
    1
  3. Maybe do a video on the Lense Thirring effect, that when you transport a gyroscope around the earth, there is in fact NOT 360 degrees to go around.
    1
  4. 11:34 that is so funny. When I saw the problem I thought: as long as none of these educrats work it NIST or the Naval Observatory.
    1
  5. facts. that's why they're getting rid of it.
    1
  6. sorry. no way is this an SAT question. SAT math question are as follows: Easy question with pure math, or woke BiPoC characters doing dumb stuff 1) two answers that make absolutely no sense 2) another answer that can be ruled out with a little thought 3) the correct answer that you don't need to calculate because you just ruled out the other ones. This is why I scored 800/800 in 15% of the allotted time. and took a nap drooling on my desk. And I'm sticking with "4" for the not-SAT-problem in the wijeo,
    1
  7. that fact that you even brought 2 pi into the calculation shows you don't know how to crush SAT tests. Dilation symmetry is implicit.
    1