Comments by "And Rei" (@AndRei-yc3ti) on "TOP SECRET Ukraine Info Leaked - All Part Of The Plan?" video.

@adamhall5298 Russia started the war with 190k vs Ukraines 240k. Then Ukraine mobilized to 750k and Russia stayed at 190k. Then Russian soldier 6 month contracts expired, and there was no one left to man Kharkov region lol. Hence the need for partial mobilization
4
Lol I've been following the war from the beginning and I read in Russian fluently and I had no idea who Tatarsky was. You are overstating his significance.
3
@war1980 conscripts were indeed there at the beginning. Not since. Everyone is a contract soldier - conscripts don't have a contract but an obligation. There's a difference. Also, LPR/DPR conscription is not Russian conscription lmao, it's hilarious when people try to equate the two. It just proves they have no idea what they're talking about
3
@Outsider Labs so are all US citizens that support wars deserve assassinations?
2
 @12zaf1 Russia started war with 190k. And is currently at around 200k as mobile are finishing training after which it'll go up to 500k
2
 @saumyacow4435 ukraines count is a meme propaganda count. See mediazonas umber that places Russian KIA at 20k and total loses at no more than 60k.
2
@temchak better than Oryx for sure
2
@12zaf1 where are you getting "150k conscript draft". The partial mobilization ended at 300k. Wagner are around 30k. Dpr and lpr troops are not Russian army and are in fact quite different
2
@war1980 you do realize that conscripts are not allowed to be used in the Special Military Operation? Like thats why people say Putin needs to escalate the SMO to a formal declaration of war, as it instantly makes all the conscripts able to be used on the front and makes a wholescale draft of everyone possible. So no the biannual conscripts are not used in the SMO. The one time that it did caused a very negative reaction from Putin and caused the sacking of a Russian high military commander.
2
 @RandleBeckford and yet Reuters wrote that 9000 civilians have been killed in Ukraine since war began
1
@Titanium Rain it's significantly more now, if Ukrainian admissions are to be believed😊
1
@Zacharoni4085 so? I lift more than you most likely and don't have a beer belly.
1
 @Zman44444 well Polish Krabs have their guns falling off after a few shots and theirs columns of burning western equipment I'm the South and in Bakhmut
1
@adamhall5298 catastrophically? No. A little, yes
1
@adamhall5298 lol confirmed by who exactly? Oryx? The same oryx that counts one repaired tank three times or gives ukranian tank losses as Russian ones?
1
@saumyacow4435 lol "limitations"? Are you kidding? The "undercount" they claim won't make a significant difference to the numbers. Besides do you think "NGOs" like this have trouble with funding and staff to analyze the data? Bruh, you're delusional if you think mediazona is inaccurate
1
@war1980 which even with these recent additions puts Russias casualties at 19688 which is what I said🤷‍♂️ when I said Russias losses were around 20k. My Wagner numbers were outdated, they're at 1.1k which is nothing for a force of 20k
1
@war1980 lol you do realize that plays into my point even more? If Russian casualties are 20k then the actual number of deaths are smaller, as casualties are historically 2-3x above Kia. And exactly, it's the deaths that have been confirmed. Any other number is simply conjecture. Thanks for proving my point lmao. How anyone can claim "orders of magnitude undercount" is beyond me, it's hard to simply hide or be unable to confirm that many dead lmao Estimate of Ukrainian killed based on the same methodology that "confirms" Russian dead? From a pro-Ukrainian source? 🤦‍♂️😂 bruh, I have a bridge to sell you
1
@Kevlar_soul your understanding is incorrect. All the mobilized troops have been training and have just been finishing up training at the end of March (takes 4 months or so to train them)
1
@Kevlar_soul assuming that's true, it is highly doubtful that it is significantly more since large numbers are difficult to ignore
1
@Koko Jambo what does that even mean? Most Ukrainians east of the Dniper are "Russian" as there isn't really a big difference between Russians and Ukrainians
1
@Andrii Goncharenko they are the same. They come from the Venedi tribes, their language is also derived from the same roots and Kievan Rus was founded by Oleg of Novgorod. There is a big difference between Galicians and rest of what is now Ukraine though. Galicians are ethnic Poles
1
@Sean Niemeyer lol as a Ukrainian I can tell you there is no difference between Russians and Ukrainians, census data doesn't tell the full picture and plus Western and Russian/Ukrainian understanding of "ethnicity" differs
1
@docthunder8678 lol you heard wrong. That's why Russia currently has about 200 nationalities speaking their own language (eg Tatars, Bashkirs, Yakuts, etc) and teaching their local language in schools. In fact, in Soviet era, Soviet government helped different nationalities develop a written language, like Ukrainians, Kazakhstan, Yakuts, Mongolians, etc.
1
@AndriiGoncharenkoAG no there isn't. Culturally and historically there is no difference. Outside "language" that Russian developed for Ukraine, name 3 significant differences lmao
1
@Andrii Goncharenko lol. You just told me you know nothing of Russian culture beyond memes you see on 1+1. Lets fix your errors. Religion: Russia's official religion is Eastern Christian Orthodox and most people in Russia are Eastern Christian Orthodox. There are some people of different religions which is normal for a large, multi ethnic country but they are in minority. The main difference with Ukraine is Russia does not attempt to destroy the Church as its currently doing. That is a difference. I'll give you that lol. Not sure it's something to be proud of though. Cuisine: lol this is straight from Ukrainian TV trying to compare Russia to "Mongol horde". There is nothing in Russian cuisine that isn't in Ukrainian cuisine. Russian cuisine is more influenced by Eastern European and French cuisines like Caviar and Salad Olivier and various bulochki that they like to eat. Just like Ukraine. Traditional Dress: the vyushvyuvanka is a form of Kosovortka as depending on the region of Russia/Ukraine there would be different amounts of embroidery. If we look at the clothing of Eussian aristocracy and rich merchant class from the Middle Ages it has some quite elaborate embroidery, which is not different from Ukranian forms. Architecture: lmao what? Russian churches have many different forms depending on time period and locations. They were predominantly wooden with various beautiful moldings and not all had onion domes. If we look at Russian izbas (изба) they look no different from Ukranian ones (which also heavily differed depending on region) Literature: all the authors you listed spoke and wrote in Russian primarily, Ukrainian was always heavily secondary to them and they did it mostly for fun. Music: Russian folk music utilizes both the bandura and balalaika. The reason that Ukraine doesn't have its own composers is because they listened to Russian composers and saw them mostly as their own too. National symbols: of course Ukraine is going to make up different "national symbols" lmao. Even random regions like Urdmurtiya or Yakutsk have their own symbols and even flags. Dagestan also has its own anthem and these are territories within the Russian Federation. Don't see how that proves Ukraine is "vastly different" from Russia Sports: Russian school of gymnastics is world renknown, so much so that Russia is one of the countries with the most medals in gymnastics. Ukraine doesn't even come close. Besides, like with basically every sport, Ukraine uses Russian school for training its gymnasts and Russian classifications (like МС and КМС). Again you just show me similarities of Ukraine with Russia. Climate: Russia is so large as to have both mild continental climates and polar climates and even subtropical climates. I don't see how this proves anything lmao Political history: Ukraine played a huge role in the founding of the USSR, and was one of USSRs founding countries. Also, both Ukraine and Russia were the first to seperate from the USSR. Economic history: Ukraine has alot of state backed companies as well - look at what happened to Motor Sich when the Chinese wanted to buy a stake in it. Ukraine sold it, took the money then took it back. This is what state backed economies do. Military History: Ukraine has a long history of conflict with itself over the fact that half the country has never seen itself as "Ukrainian" and this co flict has continued to this day. As for Crimea, Ukraine also has a history of territorial expansion by invading and annexing independent Crimea in May 1995. Thanks for only demonstrating my point that there is little difference between Russia and Ukraine and further enforcing the notion that Ukraine is at best a renegade Russian province.
1