Comments by "" (@Josh93B93) on "WSJ News" channel.

  1. These new IRBM's are nuclear capable and Dnipro falls on the same flight trajectory as Kiev, this was a warning shot.
    101
  2. Yeah Panama has already said its not for sale and the US has no legal precedent to seize it, kick rocks.
    29
  3. Zelensky declined to attend, thats on him.
    21
  4. Zelenski chose not to attend
    12
  5. I would take this as the answer to Ukraine's truce suggestion.
    9
  6. No, this is hilarious, now you all get to see what capitalism has always been behind the veil of neoliberal democracy.😂😂😂😂
    6
  7. ​ @brett3140 or 25% more expensive things because mexico and china arent paying for the tariffs, the consumer is.
    5
  8. Not the same thing, while there were concentration camps set up in 1938, they were still in what was recognized internationally as German territory, where Guantanamo Bay is sovreign Cuban territory that has been illegally occupied for 6 and a half decades.
    4
  9. Lord above bless Comeade Krasnovfor doing the good work
    4
  10. No, you and the taxpayers did, AMLO didnt give one centavo to that fence
    3
  11. Hasnt the US and the OAS been doing that to Cuba for the last 60 years?
    3
  12. ​ @sl4983 i dont remember Trump holding Ukraine to minsk 1 or 2, nor did he pull US support for when Ukraine violated said agreements, it would have still happened when Trump was president because it did happen when Trump was president.
    3
  13. ​ @sl4983 of Ukraine had adhered to the Minsk agreement Russia wouldnt have intervened, but they didnt, and yet when they violated the agreement repeatedly.Trump continued selling arms to Ukraine. So we're going to have to agree to disagree I think.
    3
  14. ​ @GeneracionGoshen777 a failed nation.
    3
  15. You would see this on AP but IDF soldiers shot their journalist twice.
    3
  16. The US has every right to open dialog with Russia regarding Ukraine as a benefactor, Ukraine can refuse to abide by any agreement reached while the US can negotiate the ending of US support to Ukraine
    2
  17. Maybe in 2014, that ship sailed
    2
  18. More likely coming from the egyptian term Paleset, used to describe a neighboring people or land. It was a peaceful region inhabited by amorite farmers and nomadic tribes before Joshua invaded and started the israelite conquest.
    2
  19. ​ @alviverdeus except in this case both powers are capitalists states who were always going to exploit the conflict and the outcome thereof, Ukraine was never going to win, it was always going to be the US, Russia, or the IMF
    2
  20. скажите Зеленскому просить мира.
    2
  21. ​ @teehasheestower not to mention all of that hardship in "just leaving depends on if your shot by a sniper while trying to pass through an IDF checkpoint.
    2
  22. ​ @NJIT22 yeah that just makes israel no better than anyone else. Just a different flavor of theocratic oppression.
    2
  23. ​ @obiwankenobi661 or the nazionist could pack up and go back to poland and the baltics so the region could return to the peaceful coexistence it had prior to 1948
    2
  24. Good, about time the US pulled support for a fascist regime.
    2
  25. No where even close, i mean bless him for trying but hes got alot softer hand than Stalin and it shows, if he was another Stalin then two thirds of Ukraine would be in the gulag by now, leaving the other third to manage the collective farms.
    1
  26. No its the satélite feed that Ukraine uses to guide its missiles and air defence.
    1
  27. Fascism is just capitalism in decay
    1
  28. ​ @winstonwho it's not incoherent, it's just french, I didnt have any trouble understanding the comment?
    1
  29. I thought it was a million? Hard to follow Ukrainian state propaganda.
    1
  30. Its called capitalism.
    1
  31. Because the cost of the conflict is greater than the gains the US stands to make in a Ukrainian victory or defeat and the US is a capitalist nations, why support a war that cant be won? This is not a new precedent, ask South Vietnam for an explanation.
    1
  32. Absolutely right, why is there no representaron from the DPRK?
    1
  33. ​ @SeanThomasCross  What do you mean by "after agreeing to a 50/50 split? Are you implying that they ever had a choice in the matter, seeing how things worked out Faisal should have sided with the fuggin Ottomans.
    1
  34. Ukraine doesnt want peace.
    1
  35. Wouldnt make a difference if they are there, Ukraine is losing the war on the ground, they lost another city just this morning, South Vietnam got a seat at the Paris summit, didnt change the outcome.
    1
  36. The United States is a constitutional federal republic, Ukraine is a failed state that has banned democratic institutions such as opposition political parties freedom of speech, assembly, and religion while the current head of state is a dictator whose legal term has long since ended, so yeah your analogy is very flawed
    1
  37. I believe his answer was "that's an interesting question" 😂😂😂
    1
  38. Busy asking the EU for more money so they dont have to seek peace.
    1
  39. The worst of the worst in Guantanamo bay are the illegal occupiers squatting on sovreign Cuban territory.
    1
  40. They're busy retreating from Yampolivka, I wonder what city they're going to lose next week? Smart money is on Belgomorsk
    1
  41. He chose not to go to the talks
    1
  42. ​ @ubub932 Sure just as soon as Zelensky is overthrown and Yanukovych is reinstated as the legitimate president and all the vestiges of the coup regime are wiped away. Any more non-starters or should we wait for Ukraine's unconditional surrender after Zelenski has run out of cannon fodder?
    1
  43. You mean the illegal coup in 2014 and Poroshenko's invasion of the Donbas?
    1
  44. ​ @james-jg8iu Poroshenko invaded the donbas
    1
  45. Russia leaving Ukraine can be achieved by Kiev renouncing all claim to the Donbas Republics
    1
  46. All hands to our glorius leader Comrade President Krasnov, the long con paid off!!👏👏👏👏👏👏
    1
  47. Little bit, but by the context it feels more like the treaty of Versailles when Russia wasnt invited and had most of its territories in the baltics taken away, or every arbitrary action that the US and the OAS has levied against Cuba without allowing Cuban participation while the US simultaneously continues to occupy sovreign Cuban territory.
    1
  48. While actively choosing to not be involved...says more about Zelensky than Trump or Putin, at least they want to see the bloodshed stop.
    1
  49. Worked out pretty well actually, the war ended, they were freed from the yoke of western imperialism once and for all while the south would show exponential economic growth, and aside from the minorities that collaborated with the imperialist the liberation of the South was welcomed by the majority of the nation.
    1
  50. Zelenski chose not to attend, he has no interest in peace with Russia, never did
    1