Comments by "" (@Josh93B93) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

@trollmastermike52845 again, computers and mobile phones were the creations of communist, not capitalist, some proof you've gotten there, lol
1
@trollmastermike52845 argueing? I already stated open sourced facts to finish said arguement that you had no counter to, im just laughing my arse off at this point, but please dont let me stop you 😂😂😂😂
1
Blitzstrk aww, did i piss on your sunshine bitch? Stay salty, see if i give a shite
1
Only nostalgic wt south africana believe they won at Cuito, even the US State department regarded it as a Cuban/MPLA victory in all official reports at the time.
1
@mazambane286 Country A is the home of BB people forcefully colonized by AA people who stole the natural wealth of BB people and then exploited said wealth to maintain dominion over BB people for more than a century.
1
@Zetawavez worked out so well for Lybia and Iraq right?
1
Verdad, tengo mis críticas sobre Canel y que tienes razón, Cuba era mejor con Fidel y el partido mandando, pero si me tuvo eligir Cuba hoy o Sudáfrica en los 80's bajo apartheid, me elige Cuba 100%
1
America was a worlds ahead of China in 1950 and still couldnt achieve any decisive victory.. Since that time, China has modernized quite a bit. Besides that, I think China could handle the US after the Americans just gave up in failure after 20 years of war against illiterate peasants with the technological capacity of a RadioShack.
1
@looinrims actually that was President McKinley when he refused the notion of Cuban statehood because the old protastant order in america at the time was weary of millions more catholic constituents. Cuba was an Independent nation wracked by debt and poverty before Che was even born. The difference was that the west didnt care for the Cubans suffering prior to the revolution because they profited from it, and the hardships that exist in cuba today in every sector can be linked to the ecconomic blockade and sanctions against the island that serve as a collective punishment of the Cuban people for refusing to submit to American hegemony.
1
@looinrims Yeah collective punishment is also a violation of the Geneve Convention of 1948 bub, of which the US is a signatory, so the hypocrisy continues.
1
@tomk3732 Dont tell him that even Stalin tried to resign 3 times but was denied permission by the central committee and politburo...the Soviet Union's Central committee was a stronger democratic body than the Russian Duma today that only pays lip service to Putin
1
While I dont agree, Death to UNITA imo, but if not Savimbi than your probably the next person I would expect to hear such sentiment from.
1
Ohh propaganda miamense del CANF, que sorpresa 🙄
1
@geoffwalters3662 Better than said evil USA trying for 60 years to starve the cuban population into submission.
1
@chaosXP3RT They initially had US support, which after the US congress shut that down support still continued using Israel as a deniable proxythus is why the idea to replace the R1 with the M16 was dropped in place of the R4 Galil clone when they could no longer get rifles from Colt, the US support fo SA at the time was similar to its support of the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan and Contras in Nicaragua, hands off in the light but tip to butt out of sight.
1
Paints a really biased narrative
1
@ZANDF LMAO how did that pan out for Savimbi?
1
@looinrims So vietnam 2.0 but the trees speak Spanish.
1
@kurousagi8155 Not while trying to fight a guerilla war with about 70% of the population, the US simply doesnt have enough men, while said munitions and equipment for an insurgency large enough to challenge US invasion have been stockpiled and maintained since the last time America tried to invade. They can sit at the ports while the Cubans shell them from the mountains. Commonality does not automatically imply causality, these occupations failed for far more complex geopolitical and social reasons than who they were neighbors with, they failed because they never had any chance of success from the moment boots were put onto ground they never had any case being, and I believe that the FAR and local CDR's are prepared to repeat that lesson to the Americans if neccessary.
1
@kurousagi8155 Tell yourself that and good luck trying that theory of yours out, could the us win eventually, yes but it would be pyrrhic at the international level because it would require leveling the entire island and genociding most of the population through extended bombing campaigns that will likely only enrage the entire region making it more difficult to maintain your blockade, 5he cuban people would resist foreign agression with everything they have down to machetes, they have before, ask the Spanish, and enduring such losses in the face of open imperialist aggression and genocide would spark international int er invention from cubas allies, as well as the UN, they're already against the blockade, I dont advise pushing that envelope, At the end of the day, the US gets literally nothing good out of invading Cuba, nor do the Cuban people, you can disagree with the socialist government in Cuba if this is where the whole invade Cuba thing is coming from, but at least the government in power is stable and run by a democratic body with alot of oversight, we've seen what US invasions and interventions have accomplished in Iraq, in Syria, in Lybia, in Sudan, so please, no one wants to see the Cuban version of ISIS, America justsneeds to take a break from invading places,it hasnt been good at it for 70 years and it's only getting worse every time, at some point you have to stop blaming every other country for Americas failures.
1
@kurousagi8155 Well, given that your main arguement is that correlation is causation, which is to say, non measurable and non-existent factors, and that I lived in Cuba and am fairly familiar with Cuba's defensive plan in the event of US invasion, and based upon what I saw with my own eyes, from what I was told and from what I have read while an invasion could be attempted, it's success is about as likely as the last time. And on the human cost of such an invasion it wouldnt be worth it. That being said, to prioritize financial cost over the human cost is very telling, and it tells me this is not a conversation that I wish to continue
1
@hoplitecenturion9441 I cant help but get the feeling you two arent going to agree lol
1
Watch out for hoplite, hes trying to cop in new members for CANF in the hopes of a USAID check in return.
1
@pepperedash4424 there never was a true communist nation, and the US is already losing its position as the prime economic superpower in the world to China. Communism will win because its ultimately necessary for the survival of the human race. As the infinite exploitation of finite resources for profit in a world who's population only increases will only lead to the breakdown of civilization and mankind's extinction as we know it, removing all political bias from the equation, the math just doesnt add up to a prosperous future for the worlds masses.
1
@pepperedash4424 "If dozens of nations have all tried and failed to emulate something, than that means its unobtainable" was the excuse of the royal families of the Brithish, Spanish, Portuguese, and Austro-Hungarian empires amongst others against democratic rule for centuries, they used that excuse while spending vast sums of money and millions of lives to control the spread of these liberal progressive ideals just as the western "democracies" have spent trillions of dollars and millions of lives to strangle socialism in its crib since its inception in 1917, If socialism is so unobtainable, why was it never once left to fail of it's own accord? Why has it always required direct western intervention in the form of military occupations, the financing of terrorist groups inside socialist nations, illegal blockades and hostile sanctions, forming Coup d'état's and installing right wing authoritarian regimes that were 10x bloodier and more brutal than the communist they replaced (ask Pinochet, or the Taliban), if communism was unobtainable, and China is set to fail, then none of this would have been necessary for the survival of western capitalism and so its responsible for the most colossal waste of lives and resources es in human history, or, just maybe, your mistaken, and communism has not been achieved because every time it was attempted the west immediately tried to strangle it in the crib before it became a threat to western imperialists hegemony and that true communism can only come to fruition after the complete dismantling of the capitalist system as theorized by Marx and Engels as capitalist will always be able to sow divide amongst the populace so long as they can agitate and exploit the existing class antagonisms. History has provided us both with different lessons based upon different perspectives, and it will be up to history to prove which one of us is correct. Until then, and with respect, we'll have to agree to disagree.
1
Chairman Mao did nothing wrong, the birds are capitalist LIES
1
@VisibilityFoggy I would happily if the immigration laws weren't so stringent and difficult to navigate
1
@SparkBerry Its never been left to thrive, within months of is first inception the rich capitalis powers sought to isolate it and destroy it in the cradle, from the polar bear expedition in support of the white russians to the continued sanctions and illegal blockade against Cuba that was put in place to cause economic hardship, hunger, poverty and discontent with the goal of eventually overthrowing the government. It's all in Lestory mMallory's report to the state department when he designed the plan to topple socialism before it could affect the americans economic and political hegemony in the developing world as it needs poor neighbors to exploit.
1
@Kill Billy Cuba didnt "have to" fight, Agustino Neto asked Fidel for support and Fidel offered to depot tropos in 1975 without ever talking to the Soviets about the decisión even though the equipment was given to Cuba only for the defence of the nation against US invasion, the Soviets were not happy with Cuban involvement.
1
@user-bh9wg3wq7s Survival of the Cuban regime depended on pragmatism, not soviet aid, while soviet aid helped, Cuba would have stayed a functiong state even without it via mutual aid from the nonaligned movement, as they have for the past 31 years.
1
@ZANDF No, if it was competing against an actual Centurion you would have a point to the T-55 being more modern, but the Olifant Mk1 started development in 1976, and officially introduced in 1978 with production beginning the next year, it was trialed against the T-55 and several upgrades were added such as replacing the Centurions 84mm gun with the 105mm GT3B, the fire control system was improved with night vision and a laser range finder. While the hull from the Centurion was retained, literally everything else about the Olifant Mk1 and Mk1A were more modern and superior to the T55 and T34/85 tanks it fought against, enough so to spur the development of the T-72M
1
How did that journey end? Ohh...yeah
1
China isnt going to invade itself.
1
@reserva120 this is provably incorrect, mistakes and abuses by left wing governments led to MAYBE 60-65 million deaths throughout its entire history, Capitalism as an institution has existed since the end of the renaissance, the Colonization of the new world was a capitalist enterprise, the spanish caused 65 million deaths between 1492-1699 alone, Americas drive to the sea in the aspirations of manifest destiny led to over 40 million more deaths in the further quest for profit, the british killed 30 million indegenous peoples during thier occupation of India, the poor planned capitalist infrastructure that they left killed another 100 million Indians between 1947-1978, then add in the wars for profit over the last 5 centuries and you start to get the picture
1
@treerat7631 Aye yeah I think he's done m8
1
@myms7375 The USSR was founded in February of 1917, during WW1, the Russian people that founded the USSR had fought through the war for 2 and a half years by that point, and it was the USSR that signed the treaty of Brest-Litovsk ending the war with the German and Austro-Hungarian empires, not the Tsar or Imperial family, From Feb. 1917- Mar. 1918 the USSR was at war against the German Empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and the Ottoman Empire, just because Russia changed its name and became more progressive and democratic doesnt mean that it wasnt still a belligerent in the conflict, nor does it change the fact that Russia had still just lost millions of lives, suffered multiple crop failures, and had its industry and economy wrecked before the civil war even broke out, which lasted years longer and further devastated an already crippled nation. Your arguement there is like saying that the Weimar Republic was in no way involved or affected by the loss of german lives in WW1 or the sanctions on germany by the Treaty of Versailles.
1
@myms7375 Ok, so your previous comment about the USSR not fighting in WW1 was incorrect, you know you could have just said that and saved the semantics. The USSR was in the war and would feel the full consequences of the Tsar's blissful ignorance, I feel like your "germany was fighting a losing battle" is trying to mitigate german capabilities in 1917, while the soviets had no choice but to sign the treaty because there was nothing stopping the german army from marching over from finland and up from silesia to take Petrograd which along with the civil war, the western intervention and wars with Finland, Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine, soviet production and rebuilding was handicapped in manpower, funding, and strategic reserves for the first 15 years of its existence, yet in that 15 years they managed such economic and industrial progress that took the west two centuries to achieve, that's hard to belittle, and doing so is kind of a dick move, just admit you were wrong and have some respect for yourself, it's not the end of the world.
1
@myms7375 Operation Faustschlag February of 1918, Germany and Austria Hungary invade the USSR with 53 divisions, the battle of passchendaele was by no means the final nail in the coffin for germany at the time and no one on any side would have agreed with that theory, your thinking of the ludendorff offensive of 1918 and the kaiserschlact that broke the back of the german army, and even then they still could have fallen back, reorganized and continued the defence for another year, the final nails in the coffin for the German empire were socialist revolutions in Berlin and Bavaria that scared the politician into making peace unexpectedly. In 1918 the peace came as a shock as Rollins, Currie, Petan, and Pershing were planning for the 1919 spring offensive, but now we have gotten far off topic, your argument there, "the USSR was only involved in WW2" is an outright falsification of historical fact. The USSR was absolutely involved in WW1, as well as 5 other conflicts before WW2 even kicked off, so why lie when said lies can be so easily disproven? Why is this so personal to you?
1
@schmuelsonsradang4301 True, they were more advanced in alot of areas as you have mentioned, when it comes to wireless communication they were far ahead of the west by leaps and bounds. First Man made satellite in space: USSR First Living Organism in space: USSR First Man in Space: USSR First extra vehicular space walk: USSR First woman in Space: USSR First Black man in space: Cuba via USSR First Space Station: USSR Second Space Station: USSR If the west had any advantage over the USSR was its ability to move the goalpost so they could try to catch up before anyone was the wiser. After the N1 explosion the soviets stopped playing the west's game because because thier game of constant competition and moving the goalpost was needlessly costing lives.
1
@tranquoccuong890-its-orge Qouldnt exactly be a first for Vietnam, China had to learn the same lesson as the American imperialists, and the japanese imperialists, and the french imperialists, and Chinese imperialist before them, the lesson is; Vietnam is a proud and strong nation that ought not be fucked with, I dont think China would invade Vietnam by land or sea because they already tried, and failed.
1
@himanshugurjar9002 imagine if the french never had Sankara murdered, and he developed the Pan-African movement with Gadaffi. Just imagine what could have been...
1
@matthew1882 About that, under the Defence act of the 1976 Constitution soldiers in the FAR could only be deployed outside of Cuba's national territory under a voluntary basis, compulsory service was mandatory, but if you refused to volunteer for overseas service you were put into a labor Batallion to cut trees in the Oriente, Sierra Maestra and Pinar del Río. So what your claiming is impossible. If your going to start your comment with such a easily debunked fallacy I wont be bothered to read the rest of it.
1