Comments by "" (@Josh93B93) on "The Armchair Historian" channel.

  1.  Scott Ouellette  yep, which accounted for 18% of soviet logistics, big help, they would have still steamrolled the nazis without lend lease
    22
  2.  @ruthlesstruth8639  So Hitler has less troops, ay least in the east to actually fight the soviets, as his superior numbers were streched all across europe and north africa, meaning the third riech never had the ability to ever effectively use any advantage against the soviets as holding onto the west was a constant struggle of bite and hold, for Stalin it was much more simple, factories go east, soldiers go west, all the way to the reichstag.
    6
  3.  @Grusken19 so your part of something that ceased to exist in 1923, alright🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣, sure ye are. As to having no backing, due to waste and speculation in the capitalist world, 8 million people die every year to a lack of clean water, 7,655,000 people die every year from hunger, 3 million people die every year to vaccine preventable diseases, and 500,000 die every year from malaria, that's 20 million preventable deaths that occur every year because preventing them isn't profitable for said capitalist. Sources: Poverty.com UNwater.org CHop.edu 100 million deaths every 5 years, but please, continue to bitch about how the communist killed 100 million in a century, ohh the horror...
    6
  4.  @ruthlesstruth8639  speaking from personal experience in Lebanon, war is never fuckin easy m8, to fight one and much less to stop one.
    4
  5.  @goatwarrior3570  Frighteningly there are even more people that defend fuggin nazis, so yes, critical support to the red army.
    4
  6.  @Grusken19  ohh sorry, let me correct myself, died in exile, and yes, russia is a capitalist state run by corrupt oligarchs who enricheched themselves by whoring the nation to the west in blatant betrayal of the russian people, but hey, at least ye got McDonald's and wrangler jeans now
    4
  7.  @alessandroguermandi8828  No, lend lease only accounted for 20% of soviet logistics, while it would have taken longer, they still would have steamrolled the Reich without the yanks help.
    4
  8.  @arystanbeck914  It started before stalingrad but at that point it only contributed 4% to soviet logistics
    3
  9.  @Grusken19  Capitalism is a cancer that kills 100 million people every 5 years and has made Russia such a shithole it's only comparable to Detroit. Capitalism wasnt the poison, liberalism was, from Khrushchev to Yelstin. A well managed Soviet state was perfectly capable of steamrolling capitalist leeches, ask Kerensky or Deniken or Kolchak for proof. The white army was defeated the 16th of June, 1923, what remained of the white movement fled into exile and died in ann arbor
    3
  10.  Justus Immelmann  Finnland declares war against the soviets twice, allied with the nazis, and lost twice lol
    3
  11.  Justus Immelmann  that's how you justify allying yourself with fuggin nazis, alright, weird flex, and also according to the article you posted, the finn's lost the winter war, and the continuation war,read the moscow treaty of 1940, then the armistice of 1944, ye know, when your nation had to cede karelia, pay 300 million in war reparations to the soviets, and admit to being a fascist ally, so with that said, I reiterate, Finland fought the soviets twice, and lost twice, lol 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    3
  12.  @brianfuller5868  for logistics maybe, for combat tactics the calvary was ineffective by the russo-japanese war, because....maxim guns, unless your talking about imperialist using cavalry against tribals in the third world, the yes i suppose you have a point
    2
  13. An anticomintern pro-western bias where facts are ignored for the sake of the narrative.
    2
  14. Lot a nazis in these comments....
    2
  15. But are you going to release a video specifically on life in American-occupied Okinawa where you can more properly address the thousands of rapes committed by the "guardians of freedoms"
    1
  16.  E Smidt  maybe not blame them for your refusal to coordinate with them when your both fighting a common enemy
    1
  17. Because they became tacit imperialist like the frenchmen they replaced?
    1
  18. Not to mention induvidual shots from smoothbore musket were largely ineffective due to the limited range and mediocre accuracy, whereas a long volley of shingle shots has a much greater margin of davastation one can inflict upon an opposing column of infantry, it was already becoming apparent by the crimean and american civil war's that the line formation was already showing its vunerability to accurate long range fire made capable by the standardization of rifled muskets, by the time repeating arms had come about the tatic was more and more left to history.
    1
  19.  Marc Inglese  wes, ended poorly, watch "war horse" for further details
    1
  20. When the Berlin bomb shelters say learn Russian
    1
  21.  @compatriot852  and then said snow it surrendered to the soviets with the rest of karelia lol
    1
  22. 1:01, I'm goin to stop right here. US Casualties from the Civil War 365,000 US casualties from WW2 407,300
    1
  23. @Spicyleaves how did that brainpower work for Paulus m8? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    1
  24.  @tomanderson9774  your capitalist paradise kills 100 million every 5 years, you dont have a fuggin leg to stand on.
    1
  25.  Justus Immelmann  except you did in 1941, both mannerhiem and ryti wanted to annex east karelia shite ryti wanted to triple the size of finnish territory at the cost of its neighbors with the aid of nazi germany, and then got your arse handed to you by said soviets, again.
    1
  26.  Justus Immelmann  I'm one of said comrades in said streets, and an sks suites me better than a blade.
    1
  27.  Justus Immelmann  the last time anyone shot at me was in Guatemala, a capitalist nation, I've been nothing if not safe and content since moving here
    1