Comments by "Norma Mimosa" (@normamimosa5991) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. 656
  2. 434
  3. 361
  4. 288
  5. 189
  6. 84
  7. 48
  8. 41
  9. 41
  10. 40
  11. 36
  12. 36
  13. 32
  14. 31
  15. 29
  16. 29
  17. 28
  18. 28
  19. 27
  20. 25
  21. 24
  22. 23
  23. 22
  24. 21
  25.  n52nimbus  - Your comments are astounding, so ill-informed. You say, "We have a president who does not understand our system of government."?! Do you understand how absurd that comment is? Give just one example of his picking and choosing from the constitution; one example of his not respecting the U.S. system of government. The American system of government is founded on democracy. He won the presidency. Underlying that system of government is the expectation of respect for the office of president. For the first time in U.S. history, there has been an attempted coup against the U.S. government (by no other than career liberal bureaucrats who figured their choice should stand no matter who the American people elected). Not only shocking that, in a long-term and respected democracy, such a coup could have been attempted, but also the most serious crisis in U.S. history. And don't forget for one second that the evidence against these traitors is overwhelming! Didn't know that? Then I suggest you start doing what it takes to find out what is actually going on in the world, because it is very important to know, for the sake of your future. If you glean your information from the mainstream media, such as CNN and MSNBC, you will never know or understand what is actually going on. Not to know the details about the attempted coup, to discount them, support them, or sit back and pretend it didn't happen is seriously dangerous for you and your family. "To refuse the obligations of international leadership..." What on earth does that mean? International leadership: The people of France are crying out in the streets, "We want Trump." President Trump had the courage to vehemently oppose the outrageous policies and statements of Macron, who will most likely have to resign for his disrespect for his country and its people. Maybe you are speaking about pulling out from the Paris Agreement on Global Warming. Have you ever read that accord? At least a summary of that accord? My guess is that your answer is, "No." If you don't know what is involved in the accord, how can you possibly be for it? Here are some main reasons why he pulled out. The accord has language that would result in unelected foreign committees having authority in the U.S. The accord amounted to a handout of billions of U.S. tax dollars being paid to under-developed countries whose record for appalling environmental activity is monumental and whose record of aid money being siphoned into pockets of their corrupt leaders is also monumental. The obligations of the U.S. under such an accord was a gift that would keep on giving, while they keep on polluting. Major polluters, such as India and China, were not under the same restrictions under the accord. As the world is a small finite planet, that means, any action on one side of the world deeply affects the other side of the world, so if one side is allowed to carry on global-warming activities, then any restrictions on the other side are useless. And here's the piece de resistance about that deeply flawed accord: The global temperature has not been rising for many years. Environmentalists refer to this as the "PAUSE." Of course, you won't hear about this in the media. It would put a dent in their agendas. You have to seek out the Nobel Prize winners in physics who are discounting the notion. Global Warming has become a deeply entrenched pseudo-scientific issue, perpetuated by those in that spurious industry and politicians who enjoy exploiting and bamboozling the ignorant for votes. Could it be that you are talking about President Trump's goal to create fair trade agreements and his tough stance against President Xi Jinping of China? The U.S. has had a massive trade deficit for decades. Do you have any idea about the economic consequences of that? Job loss, low wages, lost manufacturing, lower GDP, and trillions of U.S. dollars floating around the world unable to be repatriated to the U.S. because of high taxes, until President Trump came around to greatly reduce taxes. By the way, President Xi and President Trump may have disagreements about trade (albeit it Xi has now made commitments towards fair trade as a result of President Trump's actions), but they greatly respect each other personally. He was very impressed that Ivanka's children speak Mandarin. Do you speak any foreign language in your commitment to globalism? Liberals screamed and whined about President Trump's vow to end NAFTA. That agreement was initiated by Bill Clinton, and is the single most important cause of the decimation of manufacturing, job loss and low wages. President Trump has now signed a much, much better and more up-to-date agreement with Canada and Mexico, after much whimpering and crying from the Canadian "leader," Trudeau, the drama-teacher, without an iota of education in economics, finance, business or investments. Will continue on another response, as this one is getting long.
    20
  26. 19
  27.  n52nimbus  Lesson for you. In work and careers, it is results that count; not hard work. I was once an Obama supporter. Huge mistake. He certainly has some good qualities. He's eloquent, an excellent writer, a family man but has had difficulties in his marriage. That's about it. Dabbled in drugs. Went to a third-rate college before Columbia and Harvard. Was a failed community organizer. Pretended to be a centrist, but is actually a globalist and leftist. His legacy is Obamacare, a serious failure. His foreign policy and pick of Hillary Clinton were disasters. The piece de resistance when it comes to Obama, his mentors who supported him through to the presidency, something that has been deliberately hidden. As you research the attempted coup, check his mentors out. If you pride yourself as an American, that story will send chills down your spine. Didn't understand economics or finance. Trump: not eloquent but straight to the point. Understands economics, finance, business and investments, essential for a successful president. Graduated from a top military academy. Graduated from one of the top business schools in the world. Expanded a multi-million-dollar local development business into a multi-billion-dollar international conglomerate. As an outlier, beat sixteen candidates to become president. Has delivered the best economy, particularly for women, Hispanics, African Americans and youth, ever -- a direct result of his pro-business and tax reducing platform. Highly successful foreign policy. On the verge of creating peace on the Korean Peninsular. Got Xi to agree to initiate changes for fair trade. Ended the disastrous Clinton NAFTA that has been directly responsible for massive American job loss and downward pressure on wages. Adamantly against exploitive outsourcing and insourcing for cheap labor (reason CEOs are against him). I could go on and on. There was a time when I would say Obama was a lousy president but a nice man. His shadow government and campaigning against President Trump (against the expectation for American former presidents to leave and behave with decency and diplomacy has thrown any notion of his being a decent person out the window. Unfortunately the democrats have turned far left, with socialism, open borders, sanctuary cities, globalism, flawed global warming, massive government spending, higher taxes, irrational and hugely irresponsible hatred for Trump, support of, or silence about, an attempted coup, calls to violence against Conservatives, silencing conservative opinions, massive inward migration, dumbed-down liberal schools, colleges and universities, etc. on their agenda. If they win, that will be the end of America.
    19
  28. 18
  29. 18
  30. 18
  31. 17
  32. 15
  33. 15
  34. 15
  35. 15
  36. 14
  37. 14
  38. 14
  39. 14
  40. 14
  41. 13
  42. 13
  43. 13
  44. 12
  45. 12
  46. 12
  47. 12
  48. 11
  49. 11
  50. 11
  51. 11
  52. 11
  53. 11
  54. 11
  55. 11
  56. 10
  57. 9
  58. 9
  59. 9
  60. 9
  61. 9
  62. 9
  63. 9
  64. 8
  65. 8
  66.  @doctormorbius6430  What an incredibly ignorant comment. Before I start, an aside. The loss of professional journalism is one of the most serious crises we face today. Without professional, factual journalism, there can be no functional democracy. Why do you think many CEO's would not support Trump, despite Trump's pro-business platform, elimination of unnecessary bureaucratic regulations, and tax cuts? Because Trump is adamantly against the exploitative outsourcing/insourcing of cheap labor that keeps wages down, destroys jobs for Americans, decimates manufacturing and destroys cities. The CEO's want the status quo of low wages and cheap labor to maximize profits to fill their bulging bank accounts on the backs of low-paid workers. As the mainstream media that has thrown professional journalism out the window to ply their political agendas never reported on this, the mostly uninformed people who watch these corrupt media outlets thought Biden was the man for working people. They still have no idea how wrong they are. And that brings us to the eerily similar tactics used to elevate the Nazis to power in Germany, the Communists to power in Eastern Europe and the Democrats to power in the U.S. The tactics all come under the heading of "totalitarianism." They include the following, every single one of the examples of which has been used or suggested by 2020/21 Democrats: censorship; silencing opponents; corrupt media working with a corrupt political party (in this case the Democrats); vile goebbelsian propaganda in the place of news (CNN, MSNBC et al); approved news outlets, while those with opposing news are silenced or struck out of business; banishing free speech on campuses; indoctrination of students in schools and universities; removal of books from libraries, schools and universities; rioting; burning books; smashing into private stores and looting; occupying; attempted coups (putsches in your words) - Russia/Trump false accusations fabricated by Hillary Clinton who also funded the false dossier to back her lies, then spread for almost four years as fact by corrupt media; falsely arresting and/or charging opponents (General Flynn); spying on innocent individuals (Carter Page / George Papadopoulos); enemies lists; re-education camps for opponents; cooperation of big business with the totalitarian seditionists; staging insurrection as an excuse to oust opponents and set up draconian measures to "protect" the totalitarian interlopers; fraudulent elections; unelected frontmen. I could go on; however, if you are intelligent, you should get the picture. Every single tactic has been used by the Democrats and can be proven. After WW2 an aghast world asked how the Germans allowed such corrupt individuals to rise to power. Don't let yourself be one of the people to whom that question will be asked, as this new totalitarian, fascist Biden Regime plunders and destroys America.
    8
  67. 8
  68. 8
  69. 8
  70. 8
  71. 8
  72. I don't have a clue who Gavin McInnes is, but shame on him for thinking Hillary Clinton is a wonderful person. That sort of thinking is leading society down a crooked and dark path. Let me remind him that Hillary Clinton has been up to her ears in scandal for years, starting with her being fired by a democrat when she was working on the Watergate Investigative Committee. He fired her for, in his own words, being "a dishonest, unethical lawyer and a liar." As she was practicing law at the time, that firing should have been the end of any public career for her. What had she done? During discovery when it came time to exchange information with the opposite side, she stole relevant information and hid it in her home, so the other side would not see it. For years, Hillary Clinton has been an enabler of a serial sexual abuser, even setting up war rooms, apparently with the aid of her smear merchant, Sidney Blumenthal, to strategize how to demean, and in some cases have investigated, her husband's victims, calling them "Bimbo Eruptions," along the way. Accordingly, anyone who supports her, including this guy Gavin McInnes who apparently thinks she's wonderful, has forever lost any credibility in protesting against sexual abuse. Topping Hillary Clinton's scandals, she set up a private server, over which classified information was transmitted (felony); she lied to congress about her server, emails and Benghazi (felonies); she tampered with and destroyed subpoenaed evidence (felony); she used a supposed charitable foundation as a personal slush fund and pay-for-play facility (felonies); she bought and paid for a phoney "Russian" dossier filled with lies about Donald Trump (felony), which dossier was illegally used to obtain warrants to spy on Donald Trump to find dirt to bring him down, while she started spreading the false narrative that Donald Trump was colluding with Russians to influence the election. And this man says he has nothing against her that she is a lovely woman. That in a nutshell is why society is going to hell in a handbasket.
    8
  73. 7
  74. 7
  75. 7
  76. 7
  77. 7
  78. 7
  79.  Hercules Grytpype  I suspect that you may not read my response. Your statement hints that you may not have the wherewithal to read it, learn from it, and do some research to confirm the facts. It is uncanny how many Democrat comments are so ignorant, so uninformed, so uneducated, and not least so childishly dangerous; however, others will read my response, for it is vital in a functioning democracy that electorates be informed. One of the worst crises in the U.S. is massively failed education. Your comment is a great example of that failed education. Firstly, a well educated person would debate the topic with reason and intelligence, not throw out childish, but extremely dangerous epithets with no relevance or logic whatsoever to the situation. Secondly, to suggest that Trump is in the pay of Putin is absurd. Provide your evidence, or apologize. You will find no evidence, because your statement that Trump is in the pay of President Putin is flatly false. That statement indicates that you are one of the uninformed whom a corrupt media has shamefully exploited to spread its twisted political agenda, including lies about Trump/Russia collusion. Obama's FBI, DOJ, DOS, CIA and executive, including Obama and Biden, attempted a coup against President Trump, using as a foundation, a completely false story about Trump/Russia collusion. This false accusation has been thoroughly exposed as false, with mountains of actual evidence, yet you continue to spread it, either totally unaware that it has been exposed as false, or viciously attempting to spread it, knowing it is false. Either way, not pretty. We know that Biden and Obama were involved in the plot against President Trump, because they attended a meeting on Jan. 5, 2017, in the White House, during which they and other Democrat attendees plotted how to frame an innocent man, knowing he was innocent -- a side plot to the attempted coup. How do we know about that meeting? From their own notes that were subsequently released. Biden was extraordinarily proactive in the meeting. We don't know how active Obama was other than being in the meeting. At a minimum, as the president at the time, Obama should have put an end to the plot right then and there. Worse yet, Hillary Clinton fabricated the story about Trump/Russia collusion and spread it in an attempt to detract from her email scandal. How do we know? John Brennan, head of the CIA at the time, briefed Obama about her lies. That briefing has since been made public. Hillary Clinton also paid for a false dossier -- the Steele Dossier -- to back up her lies. The media ran with that false dossier, accusing Trump for almost four years, knowing it was false. How do we know Hillary Clinton paid for the false dossier? Her laundered funds were traced from the DNC, through her law firm, Perkins Coie, to her smear agents, Fusion GPs, who coordinated the dossier with Peter Steele. How do we know the dossier was false? The main source for the dossier, a suspected Russian spy who worked with many Democrats at the Brookings Institute, admitted it was totally false under questioning from the FBI and through court testimony in a European court.
    7
  80. 7
  81. 7
  82. 7
  83. 7
  84. 7
  85. 7
  86. 6
  87. 6
  88. 6
  89. 6
  90. 6
  91. @JRG2733 Outrageous comment. Do you even know the meaning of the word, "profane." Did you not watch his speech at the Prayer Breakfast? Or were your feelings hurt because President Trump rightly called two of the individuals who have viciously and baselessly attacked him over and over again -- Pelosi and Romney. For society to thrive and be decent, sedition must be called. President Trump has not once blamed the American people for "his criminal life" or the impeachment. Provide the evidence or apologize. Firstly, Trump has not led a criminal life; however, those who attempted a coup and impeachment, with no crime, are steeped in criminality. Many will be indicted. Your statement is nothing but a string of epithets, slander and defamation. If you don't like President Trump, then be specific and provide the evidence. One of the most troubling aspects of society today, led by a corrupt press and politicians, is the propensity to name call and lie about those whose policies the corruptors don't like. In such a society there can be no democracy and no justice, just anarchy and chaos Einstein once said that there is a lot of evil in the world, but more evil are those who do nothing about it. Not calling and exposing the attempted coup and baseless, illegal impeachment against the president is evil. In that regard those who mitigate, support, ignore, twist or deny what the Democrat politicians and seditious civil servants have done are also accountable; however, President Trump has never said that. He is known for always including the American people in his goals of making America great again. If you are not aware of that, then you have been blinded by the deeply destructive hatred perpetuated by Democrats and the press today, and you obviously have never listened to a word he says.
    6
  92. 6
  93. 6
  94. 6
  95. 6
  96. 5
  97. 5
  98. 5
  99. 5
  100. 5
  101. 5
  102. 5
  103. 5
  104. 5
  105. 5
  106. 5
  107. 5
  108. 4
  109. 4
  110. 4
  111. 4
  112. 4
  113. 4
  114. 4
  115. 4
  116. 4
  117. 4
  118. 4
  119. 4
  120. 4
  121. 4
  122. 4
  123. 4
  124. 4
  125. 4
  126. 4
  127. 4
  128. 4
  129. 4
  130. 4
  131. 4
  132. 4
  133. 4
  134. 4
  135. 4
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139.  @OtayBuckwheat  Sounds as if you are attempting to defame President Trump, which, judging by your headshot is extraordinary. One of the most serious crises today is dumbed-down education leading to ignorant electorates who have no idea about economic issues and no idea about the political platforms, activities or accomplishments (good or bad) of the various politicians. President Trump delivered the best economy in the US EVER for ALL groups (including African Americans and Black Youth), with the lowest unemployment for all the groups (for women the best in 75 years). The Biden Regime has quickly stripped that away, and we are headed into a very scary and inflationary economy. Do you enjoy paying double for your groceries? Intrigued by the irrational hatred towards President Trump, I would question "liberals." I discovered, without exception, that they knew nothing about him, his actual policies, his initiatives or his accomplishments. That was not all. They also knew nothing about the liberal and Biden agenda. They simply threw my way anti-Trump epithets and slander they had heard on CNN, including the Russia/Trump collusion conspiracy theory. We now know, of course, that it was no less than Hillary Clinton who had started that lie. That is concretely documented, not hearsay or rumor. Do you have any idea why certain CEOs would not support Trump? Because he is adamantly against the exploitative outsourcing/insourcing of cheap labor that keeps wages down, destroys jobs, decimates domestic manufacturing and makes h. holes out of cities. CEOs want the status quo to increase profits and fill their already overflowing bank accounts on the backs of cheap labor. Astonishing that, given just those two facts, you, judging by your photograph, would make such an ignorant claim.
    3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147. 3
  148. 3
  149.  @slangtang6671  (2) America was hardly a beautiful place under Obama. The economy after 2008 simply did not rebound sufficiently. Obama actually said it could not be done. Pre-Covid, Trump delivered the best economy EVER for all groups (for women, the best in 75 years), manufacturing & businesses returned to America, tax cuts and elimination of extraneous government regulations stimulated business & helped people. Post CoVid, under Trump, unemployment is already as low as 6.5% and GDP increased 33.1%, the highest increase ever recorded (more on that later). Exploitive outsourcing/insourcing of cheap labor that keeps wages down accelerated, in line with Obama's globalism, and was bolstered by the continuation of NAFTA and a proposed new Pacific trade deal that was worse. His deal with Iran was frightening. Did you read the summary? Chilling, pretty well ensuring the threat of future nuclear war in the Middle East, if not actual nuclear war. He did nothing to stop China from manipulating its currency to increase America's trade deficit with China. Continuous trade deficits are extremely bad for a country (subject for another thread). China accelerated its theft of US technology. Indoctrination of students toward socialism and some of the most ridiculous but dangerous trends sprouted out of universities (racist Critical Race Theory; Equal Outcome Theory versus Equal Opportunity; Safe places for students, preventing them from learning how to survive in a difficult world; loss of free speech and attacks on opponents on campuses; gender stretching in the face of science, etc. Continued....
    3
  150.  @slangtang6671  (5) Obama's intelligence agencies illegally targeted innocent Americans using his intelligence services. The Obama Administration and Obama left-over civil servants mounted a treasonous attempted coup against Trump. Hillary Clinton created a false story about Trump/Russia collusion while Obama was in office. How do we know? Brennan briefed Obama, and the briefing has been released to the public. At a minimum Obama should have put an end to it. She then funded a false dossier to back up her lies, which was also used to further smear Trump, defraud the FISA court to illegally obtain warrants to spy on innocent Americans in an effort to bring down Trump, and to alienate the American public against him. We now know Obama was in on the corruption. Page wrote to Strzok that POTUS wants to know about everything we are doing. On January 5, 2017, a meeting was held in the White House to plot how to frame an innocent man, General Flynn, knowing he was innocent, in order to avoid his policies and as another effort to bring Trump down. Obama, Biden, Brennan, Susan Rice, Sally Yates and likely Strzok attended the meeting. How do we know? From their own notes. Biden was proactive in the meeting, suggesting using the Logan Act against General Flynn. The framing of General Flynn is one of the most egregious, corrupt incidents in US politics. Now this man Biden, who for years was involved in foreign influence peddling, racketeering and bribery to enrich himself at the expense of America is pretending to have won the presidency. Democrats are actually supporting massive censorship that was involved in hiding evidence of Biden's influence peddling. You couldn't find a person more disappointed in Obama than me. It all lies in his complex relationship with his father. I have come to the point that perhaps eliminating political parties would be a good thing. Vote for candidates on the basis of their own merits. Why? Because, ignoring ignorant electorates as a result of the loss of professional journalism, the only way I can fathom people voting for corrupt politicians, such as Biden, is that they are voting for a party and whoever happens to represent their party in their districts, or as potential president, even if they are as corrupt as h. THE END
    3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. 3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. 3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179.  @bcxaz  All public figures concern themselves with the themselves. It's actually a necessity to gain the exposure in today's mean and nasty world. Trump's character includes a self-congratulatory trait. The millions who support him don't mind, and I am amazed at his courage of self-deprecation that is so evident at this rallies. People love him for that. Obama was the most eloquent president of our time -- perhaps all time; however, his administration turned out to be the most corrupt in US history. So do you go for the eloquence and corruption? Or the self-congratulation and common sense? Trump is a straight-forward, transparent guy. What you see and hear is what you get. In the past, liberals have screamed for transparency, then when it comes their way, they can't handle it. He doesn't have a dishonest bone in his body, although Democrats would love you to believe he's a package of dishonesty and lies. He has the courage of steel. I doubt any other politician could have stood up to the bullying, slander, libel, epithets, plots, lies, sabotage and cancellation that he withstood - and he didn't even take a presidential salary. By the way, HE DID WIN THE ELECTION. Leaving aside the rigging for a moment, if the mainstream, liberal media had been professional and honest, he would have won with the largest landslide ever. I agree with you about his self congratulation, but it is the issues that count. I am conservative, but I am also an atheist. We cannot possible line up all our own wants, needs and wishes with those of our favorite politicians. The world is too complex for that. We have to pick the relevant and significant issues. Personally, I would like to see Republicans de-emphasize god and the right to life. I am not saying they should abandon those key issues of their platform, just de-emphasize them - put them in perspective if you will. I believe many liberals who are aghast at the trend to socialism and totalitarianism would vote Republican if god was not front and centre of the party. In today's world of technology, emphasis on the myths of religion over science, are counter productive.
    2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. Good one. Bill Clinton, signed NAFTA, the beginning of America's gift to China. Its jobs, money and technology. He also proactively and aggressively promoted housing for all through sub-prime mortgages, the trigger for the crash of 2008. He married and promoted a me-me woman, who turned out to be the most corrupt politician in US history. She did it by riding on his back. She enabled his serial sexual misconduct, calling his victims "Bimbo Eruptions." Don't worry, I supported Barack Obama, and I knew about politics, but not enough. He turned out to be the most corrupt president in US history. My saga, supporting him - in fact, I was a pest singing his praises - is all about not doing enough research and throwing integrity - loyalty to my own, innate conservative views - out the window. Not to gaslight myself completely, I first supported Barack Obama when Hillary Clinton ran against him in the Democratic Primary, bringing dirty politics and filth to new heights. I am tired of politics, but the rumor is that Hillary Clinton is dusting off her ashes to run again, after being true to herself and throwing filth Trump's way, the likes of which we would never have believed could have happened in America. A cloud of her sedition still hovers over us, but she sees an opportunity to exchange Biden's nasty totalitarian game for her corruption. There is no rest for the weary. Albert Einstein once remarked on all the evil in the world but warned that those who do nothing about it are more evil. The evil of Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton must be stamped out.
    2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219.  @jidf32  The media can do all the calling it wants -- and with a corrupt anti-Trump media, we could have predicted how that would go, but the MEDIA DOES NOT call the presidency. The electoral college does that. There were not the obvious fraudulent irregularities during the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton was so sure she was going to win in 2016, there was no need to rig the election. The massive 2020 voting fraud had started to be exposed before the election -- not hearsay, assumptions or suspicions, but real live evidence. Ilhan Omar won this election by about 65% of the vote. What was done by the massive voting fraud in which her campaign was implicit -- paying voting harvesters to harvest and pay for ballots of old people to fill those ballots out for Omar! Just one example of massive pre-election voting fraud. Why do I focus in on Hillary Clinton? In 2016 she was the first to start spreading the false accusations about Trump colluding w/ Russia. At the time, we put it down to her relationship with smear politics, but the false accusations spread and engulfed the country for 3-1/2 years (some still stick to the lies), with the corrupt media leading the way. Lo and behold, when the evidence started trickling out, we discover it was Hillary Clinton who dreamt up and initiated the conspiracy and funded the false dossier used as a backup for their attempted coup. Hillary Clinton's hubris demanded she be the first to hint about a plot she, herself, concocted. A little while ago, when the danger of mail-in ballots was being discussed, Hillary Clinton was the first to demand that Joe Biden not concede on election night - not until "all the votes were counted," versus (not until "all the legal votes were counted.") Then and there, remembering her being first to hint to the world about her Russia plot, I thought something is up here. How did she have such prescience about the chaos that has happened over legal versus illegal votes. Nancy Pelosi's and her relationship to the company owning the tech application that spewed Trump votes in Biden's count raises my suspicions even more. I believe, whether squatter Biden or President Trump ends up in the WH, there should be a thorough investigation into that company, Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
    2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. @Mimi Mc -- Too much Russia for you? There is not one ounce of evidence of any Russian collusion on the part of Donald Trump. Russians interfering with the election? Hillary Clinton bought and paid for a phoney Russian dossier, filled with false information about President Trump. She paid over $12 million dollars for it. It was used to illegally obtain a warrant to spy on Donald Trump and his team. This is not hearsay or speculation. It is backed up by actual evidence. "Flynn a foreign agent"? What on earth are you talking about? Flynn was paid for several speeches to Russian organizations in 2015, long before he was even involved on President Trump's team. Fees were around $11,000 and one for approximately $30,000, I believe. He was retired and free to make those speeches. We were not at war with Russia. The USSR collapsed ages ago. The Russians paid Bill Clinton $500,000 for a speech. Can you imagine? What speech is worth $500,000. The difference is that his speech was a pay-for-play. They paid him such an outrageous amount, because the Russians had a goal to purchase precious U.S. uranium supplies, and his wife, as Secretary of State, was in a position to enable that. But that wasn't the half of it. The Russians and associated individuals through various corrupt back doors paid the Clinton Foundation $145 million, and voila, Hillary Clinton approved the sale of 20% of America's precious uranium supplies to Russia. Jared Kushner was wrongly accused of setting up a back channel with Russia. He never did any such thing. I suggest you start going further than the mainstream media for your information. It is so dangerous when people get twisted or half news and don't have the wherewithal to find out the facts. Your comment is an example of just that.
    2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. @Adam T - Mueller cannot subpoena the president. Now, I suggest you tell us exactly what President Trump has done to warrant a special counsel to investigate him. Don't answer something like, "he colluded with the Russians." That is no answer; that is mainstream-media parrot speak. Tell us specifically with details and evidence, what he has done. Then we will debate you. The special counsel is illegal. To create a special counsel there must be evidence of a crime. No crime has been committed. It was created, by a team of civil-servant democrats planning a coup, on the basis of a phoney dossier, filled with ridiculous lies about Trump, bought and paid for by no other than Hillary Clinton for over $12 million, through the DNC that she owned and controlled, and laundered through a highly unethical law firm. It was concocted by a discredited, former foreign spy, apparently from unnamed, unverified Russian sources, with a strong suggestion that her own smear agents had input into the false narratives. This false dossier was then used illegally to subversively obtain warrants to spy on Donald Trump and his team. Talk about interference with an election and ill-legality! You want to talk about law and order? Let's do that. A democrat fired Hillary Clinton from one of her first stints as a lawyer on the Watergate Commission. He fired her for, in his words, being "an unethical, dishonest lawyer and a liar." As she was practicing law at the time, that should have been the end of any public career for her, yet people who don't care about decency and ethics thought she was suitable to be president. What had she done? During discovery, when it came time for opposing lawyers to exchange information, she stole relevant information and hid it in her house, so the other side would not see it. She went on to be true to that democrat's description of her. Her political career is full of documented scandals and wrong-doings, culminating in a private server over which highly classified material was sent (felony), lying to congress about her server, emails and Benghazi (felonies), and tampering with and destroying subpoenaed evidence (felony). She then went on to accuse Donald Trump of Russian collusion, when it was she, who was at the centre of an attempted coup, involving participation from hazy, unsourced Russians (felony and in my view treason). How about immigration and sanctuary cities? Do you, so intent on law and order, agree with releasing illegals and criminal illegals into the community with impunity? Do you have children? Have you seen and read about the state of California today, particularly San Francisco? Is that what you want for yourself and your children? For altruists, open borders sounds fine and lovely; however, for open borders to work, the flows must be both ways; otherwise the destination countries will be economically choked off, and the former countries will die in mediocrity and chaos. If countries involved in open immigration are not on a par economically and socially (which is the case today), then the flows will always be towards the better-off countries, ultimately imploding them financially, economically and socially. Is that what you want? Do you respect the kind of "law and order" that allows that to happen? As for front-end law and order, I suggest you start watching police videos of traffic stops and arrests. Not bystanders' videos that may be cut, but the police videos that are not edited. The internet is full of them. They quickly reveal the antics of the left to demean and even falsely accuse police. The antics are, frankly, shocking and disgraceful. If you have any decency in you and care about ethics, then have the courage to face what is happening on the left, condemn it, and insist that things change; otherwise, if this extreme left movement wins, we will see Venezuela looming in the U.S.A., and we will have all those who chose to ignore the reality to thank for that.
    2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. @Stefan Tagwerker - Professional Journalism: Objective: Reports the news objectively, including news that may be contra to the journalist's own goals and opinions. The mainstream media simply does not report Trump's accomplishments, or puts a negative spin on them. During his campaign, they ignored his momentum and touted Hillary Clinton; hence, their shocking surprise when he won. Example: They did not cover the Hispanic rally where Hillary Clinton was chased away. They did not report on the obvious ill-health of Hillary Clinton. The mainstream media has not been reporting objectively, and mostly not at all, about the attempted coup against President Trump. That is frightening in its implications. Checks all sources and facts before reporting the news: The retractions for inaccurate news or outright false news in the mainstream media are growing exponentially. An example is the doctored Time Magazine cover with the young child and Trump, as a statement against separating children from their illegal-immigrant families or minders (an aspect of children at the border also not reported on). During the presidential campaign, the mainstream media pounded out the accusations of various women against President Trump. Within days these accusations were debunked by reputable investigative journalists in the alternative press and actual witnesses, yet the mainstream media kept barking out these false accusations. They did not report that the lawyer of some of them is a known, significant Clinton supporter and donor who should have been disbarred for gross conflict of interest. They did not report that another lawyer had actually paid accusers. Never colludes with a political party to report in favor of it. The mainstream media was caught red-handed colluding with the DNC/Hillary Clinton to report favorably about her and even to have their stories checked by them first! They were caught through their own emails leaked to Wikileaks, the leaker now known to be no on other than one of their own -- also not reported by the mainstream news. Putting opinions dressed up as news -- every day occurrence on the fake mainstream news. I have just rattled some examples off the cuff. It goes on and on, and it is nothing short of shameful.
    2
  277. Ouch, Stef, have you ever been blind sided. I have been watching CNN in the last few days responding to the Strzok hearing, the FIFA application release, Trump's meeting with Putin, and the need to take security clearances from those who are no long working in their government jobs. CNN's reporting on all these issues has been blood-curdling, highly twisted, blatantly misleading and false, and deeply shameful. Hannity has done a great and accurate job in reporting the attempted coup. I know it has been accurate, because I have been following that coup since way before all the focus on it. Frankly, if you want to know what is going on in the world today, you have to find out from the alternative news on the internet. Some great and reputable reporters and commentators. Also, Lou Dobbs, although obviously and admittedly conservative, is a great source if you want to find out what is really going on. He is quick to criticize conservatives and President Trump when necessary. One of the most troubling situations right now is not just the attempted coup, but the Democrats' and fake mainstream media's attempts to mitigate or deny the subversion and in some cases support it. That should shock the living daylight out of anyone who considers him/herself ethical and decent. Decent democrats should have the courage to face what has happened (the attempted coup and completely irrational hatred against President Trump), condemn it outright, demand that the operatives and party be cleaned out, then move forward with a fresh, ethical face. By the way, I don't watch TV. Only the internet. I see what goes on in the fake news, because their appalling narratives and fake coverage are posted on the internet for everyone to see. I watched Anderson Cooper's venomous response to Trump's meeting with Putin (an essential meeting for two nuclear powers) in a restaurant. Anderson Cooper was so transparently venomous against Trump, I asked the restaurant to turn off the appalling outlet. It did.
    2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283.  @jimbrew4529  Sad thing is that if I were to ask you for details about why Putin is a thug in your eyes, you would not be able to answer with credibility and evidence. I have come across this kind of blind thuggery, libel, misinformation and vicious innuendos that you are employing every time I have asked Democrats to be specific about their hatred. They just shout the slander they have heard on CNN and MSNBC, two Democrat goebbelsian propaganda arms. Do you know how ridiculous you make yourself look, calling President Trump "Putin's Poodle" when he did absolutely nothing positive for Russian/American relations. No doubt you still have Hillary Clinton's fabrication on your mind -- missed it's being totally discredited. During her presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton, apparently on the advice of her smear agent, Sidney Blumenthal, made up a lie about Russian/Trump collusion to detract from her email scandal. How do we know? John Brennan, head of the CIA at the time, briefed Obama about it. That briefing has been released to the public. She then funded a false dossier to back up her lies, that was used to defraud the FISA court to illegally obtain warrants to spy on innocent Americans in the hope of bringing down Trump through them. How do we know? Her laundered funds were traced from the DNC, through her law firm, Perkins Coie, on to smear agents, Fusion GPS, who were colluding with a former British spy who hated Trump to produce the false dossier. How do we know the dossier was false? The seditious former British spy, Christopher Steele's main source for the dossier, Igor Danchenko, a suspected Russian spy, who worked with the liberal-left think tank, the Brookings Institute, told us so in sworn testimony under FBI questioning and through documents presented in a European Court Case. Documents in Alpha Bank's lawsuit have now also been presented, indicating that not one of the supposed sub-sources for the false dossier had anything to do with it.
    2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401.  GW Hayduke  I am astonished that you are unaware of the SPYING that went on against President Trump and Trump campaign associates, in addition to the attempted coup based on a fabricated false dossier. Some of the spying was triggered by false information fed to the FISA court to obtain spying warrants; some of it independent of the FISA warrants. The spying is an essential aspect of the whole sordid sedition. Meanwhile, the investigation was also phoney and never should have happened. There was no doubt about the attempted coup. Many involved in the investigation were involved in the attempted coup. They were investigating an attempted coup carried out by the investigators themselves. One of the best books on the Trump Russia hoax is Gregg Jarrett's book, "Witch Hunt." He's a lawyer and documented the information impeccably. And even that book doesn't tell the whole story, because so much more evidence has now been released. I urge you to read that book to be clear on the spying and other seditious activities. There was NEVER any significant security risk. The whole thing was fabricated. We always suspected, but now we have the evidence to prove, that Hillary Clinton initiated the vile and seditious plot in order to detract from her email scandal. We have known from the beginning that she paid for the false dossier, laundering the funds through dodgy lawyers, Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS, but we didn't have the proof that she actually initiated the plot. Now we know. We have the proof. We also have the proof that, at a minimum Obama and Biden knew about the plot but said nothing, at a maximum were involved themselves. You know, it doesn't matter your political affiliation, what has been done to President Trump is beyond appalling, the most vile and serious crime in U.S. politics. If any one of the Democrat presidential hopefuls had had the guts to admit the truth, condemn the sedition, demand that the culprits be brought to justice, and that the party be cleaned up before moving on, that person would have had an enormous chance of being president in 2020, but not one of them had the guts or ethics. They all fell in line with the lemmings, supporting or denying the sedition. It is appalling that many in the country are now supporting the return of such corruption to power. The plot against the president should be enough, in a decent country with the rule of law, to ensure they would not be returned to power, let alone the slide to socialism, critical race theory, globalism, open borders and regime-change policies that party advocates.
    1
  402.  @jackiewilson6249  Why don't you tell us, Jackie Wilson, please, the names of the companies, the charges against the president, the political affiliations of those companies, the reasons for the lawsuits, and the status of the lawsuits? If you cannot do that with concrete, actual evidence, then apologize for your comment. Vote Trump into prison? For what? State the charges. Don't bother with Russian collusion, because there was no Russian collusion on the part of Trump. That has been proven with evidence from the very people who were accusing him of it. There was however Russian interference on the part of Clinton. Now proven with concrete evidence. Hillary Clinton initiated the Trump/Russia false accusations. She paid for the phoney dossier, laundering the funds through her colluding law firm, Perkins Coie and Fusian GPS, a political smear company, that in turn hired a disreputable former British spy, Christopher Steele, who concocted a total false dossier used to fraudulently obtain FISA spying warrants and wrongly accuse President Trump. The source of the false crap in the dossier, a Ukrainian in the US who worked for the left-wing think tank, the Brookings Institute, the same man that was on the CIA watchlist for being a Russian spy. About the Brookings Institute: Adam Schiff's witnesses in his phoney fabricated impeachment were individuals associated with the Brookings Institute, all witnesses of whom, under cross examination admitted they knew of no indictable Trump offenses and that their testimony was all based on assumptions and hearsay. Their objections had nothing to do with illegalities; everything to do with their not liking President Trump's policies. People, such as you, Jackie Wilson, are ruining the legitimacy of Social Media, posting and spreading nasty, false, libelous innuendos intended to demean, without a shred of evidence.
    1
  403. 1
  404.  @Kreegrrr  Guess what? I don't watch TV. I haven't watched TV in approximately 20 years. I recommend that everyone get rid of their TVs. Life is much better without them. I got rid of cable/TV for the following reasons: The outrageous ISP costs and lousy service; sick and tired of watching opinions dressed up as news; refused to any longer pay for bundled channels in order to prop up non-viable and lousy channels that would go bankrupt without the bundling; appallingly bad programming. Recently utterly fake and false news would be added to my list. So, far from watching one source, I watch loads of sources, but I am discerning. I do not watch sources that are obviously spouting fake news. The loss of professional journalism is one of the most serious crises we face today, so dire the consequences. Without professional journalism, there can be no functioning democracy. Outlets such as CNN, MSNBC, the Washington Post, the New York Times, are nothing less than activists and mouthpieces for the Democrat Party. How do I know, if I don't watch TV.? Their pronouncements and programming are constantly featured on the internet to point out their corruption and fake news. I use tons of sources, and make a point of going to original sources to find out the real facts. Unfortunately for you, Nossgrr, in saying there was no coup has shown us that you have no idea what has happened. Either you watch the fake news and believe it, or you don't keep up to date at all. There was definitely an attempted coup. That is not supposition or hearsay. The evidence is now massive. Carter Page was illegally spied on with a view to getting to Trump. The FISA warrants were fraudulently obtained, using a false dossier. The FISA court was defrauded, and the first culprit to be indicted, Kevin Clineman, a lawyer, has pleaded guilty to altering information in order to falsely obtain a FISA warrant. Paul Manafort was found guilty of financial fraud that had absolutely nothing to do with Trump, albeit, they went after Manafort in an effort to get Trump. The concrete written evidence (from released documents) of the plot to frame General Flynn is now so overwhelming that both the prosecutors and defence asked that the case be dropped. Unfortunately, a politically biased and apparently corrupt judge has decided that he is prosecutor and judge (something that is a no-no and unacceptable in Western justice systems) has decided to stall on dropping the case. What has been done to General Flynn is so egregious and vile, it sends chills down one's spine. And if you support it, beware; if they can do it to General Flynn, they can come for you. Shame on you for not finding out the details about the case, because the corruption around it is pivotal in this election to make sure it never happens again. Shame on you for admonishing me (who does tons of research from tons of sources) on an assumption that I drink my news from one source, when it turns out you apparently have no idea what has happened and no idea that evidence of the framing of General Flynn and the attempted coup against President Trump is out there and has been for a long time now. If you are a voter, it is extremely serious that you are either unaware of these details, or that you are aware but deliberately choose not to believe them, because it is imperative for a successful and decent country that such seditions is prosecuted and totally unacceptable, whatever your political leaning.
    1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. Wow! I just worry that their plot may be two pronged. Get Biden and oust him for classified documents as a prelude for blocking Trump for classified documents, ignoring the facts that completely exonerate Trump (Democrat voters too dumb or two devious to grasp the differences in the two cases). Meanwhile on Jan. 5, 2017, Obama held a meeting at the WH. The collection of corrupt democrats at the meeting, including Biden, plotted how to frame an innocent man, knowing he was innocent, General Flynn, exactly, as you said, Tucker, because he know the intel community and planned to streamline it. He knew about the Ukraine corruption. Biden was particularly proactive at that meeting, suggesting the Logan Act to get Flynn, a stupid suggestion typical of Biden's low intellect. They didn't use the Logan Act, of course, but they got General Flynn anyway, Comey went after him with vile pride, after Obama ended the meeting telling his assembled seditious plotters to "do it by the book." How do we know all this? From their own meeting notes and Susan Rice's CYA note she tapped out on her computer, both later revealed to the public. Biden's open borders have, in my view, already destroyed America. He is also culpable for hundreds of thousands of deaths in Ukraine, but in America's mind those deaths will eventually fade into oblivion. Putin will beat the US in Ukraine. The millions of migrants who have flowed across Biden's open borders, by sheer numbers alone, aside from the criminal and drug elements, will result in the social and economic implosion of America, either by unrest and chaos, or through the voting booths. One just has to be aware of what is happening in the UK, Sweden, Germany and France to know what is on track to happen in America.
    1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. @Jay McKenzie -- Ah! Your lack of logic! Universities don't teach students to think logically any more. In my comment, I said absolutely nothing about the turning-out controversies or what I thought about them, so to accuse me of pathetic and flimsy false equivalency is totally assumptive and baseless. I simply stated that there were turning-out controversies. Initially Starbucks very unfairly asked two individuals to leave, and I believe the police were called. Highly inappropriate. After that incident, there were a few more incidents. The subsequent incidents were deliberate and staged to cause a controversies. The first inappropriate incident has absolutely no connection to the vagrant I saw in a Starbuck's corner, other than his likely not being asked to leave, because Starbucks turned yellow after the controversies. Also, I reiterate, when a business caves to demands from the public (other than for excellent service for paying customers), many of whom have never run a business, never had to be cognizant of the bottom line, and don't know a damn thing about brand, then that business is in peril. Businesses are private enterprises, whether publicly listed, or private. Their priority is their shareholders. Period. In my view, Starbucks, in the normal course of business, has always had an issue with people (mainly students) hogging tables with their computers for hours -- some not even purchasing anything (says something about ignorant, entitled individuals today). I can't tell you how many times friends and I have gone to Starbucks for a coffee, snack and chat and not been able to stay, because all the tables are occupied by the hoggers. Starbucks should have a right to have a policy about that. It should most definitely be able to turn out non-paying vagrants from their premises. Perhaps it should charging for WiFi. Brand is everything for a business. Break it and your business will be broken shortly afterwards. Businesses should have every right to determine and follow through with their brands, without interference. Those who don't like a particular brand can try another brand. If a brand is detrimental to customers or society as a whole, customers will flee. The brand will be reactively broken. If Starbucks follows through with allowing non-paying customers to fill its seats, including unwashed vagrants, then Starbucks will proactively break its brand, customers will flee, it will lose money, employees will lose their jobs, and it will have to close.
    1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. @Thomas Jackson -- Very, very important to know and acknowledge the facts. The indictment against Manafort is about events that happened long before he worked with Trump and with which Trump had no involvement. Also, events over which Mueller has no jurisdiction. The charges have nothing to do with conspiring with Russians. There is not one shred of evidence of Trump conspiring with the Russians. There is LOADS OF EVIDENCE about Clinton, the Clinton-owned DNC, the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA conspiring with Russians. Where are Mueller's indictments against these Democrats, including Hillary Clinton? The Mueller special counsel was initiated against the law, as part of an attempted coup against Trump. For a special counsel to be initiated, according to law, there must be a crime. There was no crime, just an attempt to bring Trump down. I could give you the benefit of the doubt and suggest that you are not well informed and have been exploited, demeaned and hoodwinked by the fake mainstream media that no longer practices professional journalism, no longer reports the facts, and is in fact a political arm of the Democratic Party. The fake media's exploiting the not-so-well informed is outrageous. More outrageous are those who actually know the facts and that the mainstream media is not reporting them but choose to protest against, or ignore those facts, for political gain. Both Democrats and Republicans should be outraged that there was an attempted coup in the United States. It goes against everything the U.S., democracy, ethics, decency and honor are about. If you are a man of courage and integrity, then have the courage to stand up as a man and protest loudly against this vile attempted coup, evidence for which is now overwhelming. If you cherish integrity, then wrap yourself in it for the sake of your family and/or children. Demand that the Democratic Party be cleaned up and start again with new leaders who value integrity, fight against the antics of organizations such as Antifa, demand that free speech be sacrosanct, and put forward potential laws to ensure that in a democracy, we never again have a fallen and politicized media.
    1
  554. @Thomas Jackson - I'm not defending any of Manafort's activities. I am protesting against Mueller's involvement in indicting him. It was beyond his jurisdiction, as the judge has indicated. The indictments do not involve Trump. Do your research. Albeit, spuriously and illegally, Mueller's mandate was to uncover Trump/Russian collusion to affect the election. I suggest you actually read up on the case; not what the mainstream media has told you. Perhaps you should take some time to read about Clinton's record of documented scandals. Recently, she set up an independent server over which classified material was sent (felony). She did this despite knowing it was an infraction. The Department of State directives she received banning independent servers have been published, let alone that, with her history and in her position, she aught to have known. She lied to congress about her server, emails and Benghazi (felonies). She tampered with and destroyed subpoenaed evidence (felony). All these felonies have been sufficiently documented for her to be charged. Now, let's talk about her start: A democrat fired her from one of her first stints as a lawyer on the Watergate Investigative Committee. He fired for, in his words, being "an unethical, dishonest lawyer and a liar." As she was practicing law, that should have been the end of any public career for her. What had she done? During discovery, when it came time to exchange information with the other side, she stole pertinent information and hid it in her house, so the other side would not see it. That was just start of her corruption: White Water, Cattle Futures, White House Travel Office, Campaign Financing, assisting ISIS, covert weapons operations through Qatar (revealed through a court case), Clinton pay-for-play, Clinton Foundation, enabler of a serial sexual abuser. Now, if you admire this kind of person and continue to support her, as well as her big-government principles, then, frankly, you have absolutely no credibility. In my opinion, when such corruption is involved, the platform no matter how good or bad is not on the table. Strzok, a traitorous coup monger, was at the centre of the illegalities, including the indictment of Flynn. In an objective court that would warrant the case being thrown out of court. I am not going to reply to anymore of your comments. We reveal so much of ourselves by what we write. The names you have listed and your points are lifted right out of the fake mainstream news. You obviously have no wherewithal to research further, instead choosing to be a parrot. And anyone, in my view who supports such blatant corruption is not worthy of debating. Start presenting the actual facts, stand up and condemn the attempted coup, then we can debate political issues. Meanwhile, your hatred for Trump is transparent and deeply irrational, without a shred of evidence to back it up.
    1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. @Brian McDonald -- Where have you been over the past year? Our whole judicial system is based on the rule of law and nobody is above the law? Are you kidding us? Hillary Clinton is running free. She set up an independent server over which classified and confidential informations was transferred (felony). She lied to congress about her server, emails and Benghazi (felonies). She tampered with and destroyed subpoenaed evidence (felony). The special counsel was set up without cause. Special counsels require a crime to have been committed. Donald Trump has not been found guilty of any crime. It turns out it was Hillary Clinton colluding with the Russians. She bought and payed for (costing her over $12 million) a phoney Russian dossier, originated by a foreign national (ex British spy) and padded by her own smear merchants (Blumenthal and Shearer) loaded with false information about Donald Trump, which dossier was used illegally to obtain a warrant to spy on a political opponent and his team to influence the election and bring him down if he won. That, my friend, is an attempted coup. That, my friend, amounts to treason, and not one of the cabal has actually been charged yet, although criminal referrals have been issued against McCabe. None of that is hearsay. It has been proven through emails, the courts, congressional hearings and investigations and internal FBI investigations. Shame on anyone who attempts to mitigate or ignore this massive political scandal or project it on to Donald Trump in an attempt to bring him down, because, indeed, nobody is supposed to be above the law, but that is far from the case right now. A band of democrats should have been charged. Hopefully, they will be charged. They deserve to be in prison for a very long time, and that includes Hillary Clinton, at the centre of this shameful scandal.
    1
  578. @HenryFWagons -- How old are you, Henry? Just read your comment again. See if you can analyze it from an adult perspective. You watch the mainstream fake news outlets, don't you? How do I know? Because you are under the impression that Donald Trump lies. My guess is that I have been around a whole lot longer than you. How do I guess that? People of my generation were educated under a far better education system. We were taught how to debate; what is an argument; what is not; what makes sense; what does not. Many who have been educated in dumbed-down education systems have not been taught how to debate with reason and intelligence, based on the facts. "How the hell do you think Trump is going to stop himself from lying," is a puerile statement, not an argument, without background, biased conjecture, and as bigoted as it gets. Not an argument. As I mentioned, my guess is that I have been around a whole lot longer than you. There has never before in the history of the U.S. been such an open transparent president as Donald Trump -- certainly not in my time; and I have witnessed a whole pile of presidents. He's straight forward, direct, gets immediately to the point. That's how things get done. That's one reason he is so popular, albeit, the fake mainstream media is doing everything it can to make people he's unpopular and lies. On that note, you might want to recall Bill Clinton. More than once he flat out lied directly to the nation. His actions resulted in his being both disbarred and impeached. You might also want to recall the outcome of one of Hillary Clinton's first stints as a lawyer. A democrat fired her for, in his words, being "an unethical, dishonest lawyer and a liar." As she was practising law at the time, in decent society, that should have been the end of any public career for her. She also recently lied to congress about her server, emails and Benghazi (felonies). Yet, unbelievably, liberals throw all ethics to the wind, and accept her corruption without protest. How do they explain such appalling reactions to their children? Unfortunately, the liberal mainstream media long ago lost any semblance of professional journalism. Watching the clips of their puerility, unbelievable bias, opinions dressed up as news, and spewing irrational hatred of President Trump is chilling -- hair curling. The loss of professional journalism is one of the worst crises we face today. It is so dangerous when people are fed such unadulterated, bigoted, hatred -- told he lies, with insular, uninformed watchers believing it. Liberals cannot even make an argument that the conservative view of the liberal mainstream fake media is just an opinion. The media was caught, red handed, through its own exposed emails, colluding with Hillary Clinton, the DNC and the Democrats. It is shameful, not least to the immigrants they hypocritically profess to support, because many of those immigrants fled to the United States because of the very same tyranny -- closed down free speech and government propaganda dressed up as news. If you believe yourself sufficiently informed, with precognition, to accuse Donald Trump of future lies, be a man, show yourself as educated. Step up to the plate. Tell us, with sources and substantiation, when he lied. We will then be in a position to debate you. I can assure you, you will lose, because one thing President Trump does not do is lie. (And as you are doing your research for the debate, remember that candidates run on the basis of political platforms. They are not promises; they are goals. No intelligent person, for one minute, is under the illusion that they are promises. Presidents have to work with congress, budgets and complex issues. Intelligent people are happy with someone who follows through and goes the extra mile to fulfil his goals. President Trump is doing that in spades.
    1
  579. 1
  580. @Zero Zero -- Firstly, I don't believe Trump has commented on whether he had an affair with Stormy Daniels; however, he might have had an affair with Stormy Daniels (her name speaks for itself doesn't it). It also appears as if she agreed to sign a non-disclosure agreement. If he did, it happened long before he was president and was consensual. People are asked to sign non-disclosure agreements all the time for all kinds of reasons. Affairs go on all the time as well. If those who do sign them disclose the details, then they are in contravention of the agreement and have broken the law, with legal consequences. That appears to be what this porn star has done. To put things into perspective, I suggest you review Bill Clinton's sexual activities. He was impeached and disbarred as a result of his sexual misconduct and lies. He had to pay over $800,000 to Paula Jones, with whom he did not have an affair but outright molested. Years before, he cut short his Rhodes Scholar stint at Oxford, because he was accused of rape. He did have a consensual, extra-marital, twelve-year with Gennifer Flowers. He lied about that too and told the nation he did not know her. Can you imagine being involved with a man for twelve years, then have him tell everyone he did not know you? You seem to be bothered by consensual affairs; then surely you must also be very concerned by such dismissive behavior towards the mistress. Bill Clinton, after many other documented inappropriate liaisons with women -- consensual and forced -- went on to molest an intern in his office. Yes, the word is "molest," because in the workplace, there is no such thing as consensual sex between the CEO, in a position of authority, and a very young intern. Any corporate CEO caught in the same situation would have been escorted out the door immediately, no questions asked. Frankly, @Zero Zero, intelligent people don't give a damn whether President Trump had an affair with Stormy Daniels. We care that he is on the road to denuclearizing the Korean Peninsular; that he is extremely well received by foreign leaders; that he's the first president able to make headway in restoring balanced trade between China and the U.S.; that he's on track to squash the Iran agreement (Ever read the summary of that agreement? I suggest you do, because President Trump is right. it is an unbelievably bad agreement fraught with nuclear danger for the Middle East and the world.); that the economy and employment for minorities is the best it has ever been; that he actually cares about keeping America safe and preventing immigrant-implosion of the country. Meanwhile, with all the issues on which President Trump is focused, you are up in arms about Stormy Daniels?! That is beyond incredulous! Hypothetical: A man offers to come into your house to arrest and stop a robber intent on murder; and you decline the offer, because the man many once have had a quick fling with a porn star by the name of Stormy Daniels. One couldn't make up such illogical, foggy thinking and sheer irrational, bigoted hatred of a legitimately elected president, because the mainstream press made a deal (documented) with the devil, Hillary Clinton, the DNC and the Democrats and now preys on people who either don't have the time or the wherewithal to find out the facts. You should be outraged by that.
    1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. Mitt Romney: Cruel to animals. He strapped poor Seamus to the roof of his car for a 22-hour frigid drive to Canada, stopping once to hose down the chilled and terrified dog after he had relieved himself in fear. He grew wings of a vulture, a corporate vulture, and swooped into vulnerable target companies on wings of massive debt to strip, slice, dice, fire, outsource and fly out, up front, cash and stock carrion dripping from his beak, leaving the carcass company to struggle for years to pay the debt from where the cash portion of his prize came. He muddied and mired the once admirable private-equity game that had sincere investors turning around struggling companies, leaving after an approximate three-year management and turn-around commitment, with a reasonable rate of return. Romney touted his business experience, but voters knew better. He's never in his life run a company with actual products to sell. Then he morphed from a vulture into a chameleon with a scaly skin of many colors, changing his story on the hustings to meet different expectations of each new audience. His campaign loaded with daily contradictions left him on election night, with his family, all dressed up in red, fireworks at the ready, for his victory party. Too bad for Mitt, Obama and his family crashed the party. So, Mitt, your ineptness landed America with the most corrupt administration in history, the farcical, baseless impeachment, just one of the legacies resulting from Republicans having chosen a most unsuitable candidate for the presidential race. They forget to check with Seamus first.
    1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1