Comments by "Norma Mimosa" (@normamimosa5991) on "Gorka: Nobody wants to ask Brennan's advice" video.
-
@Thomas Jackson -- Very, very important to know and acknowledge the facts. The indictment against Manafort is about events that happened long before he worked with Trump and with which Trump had no involvement. Also, events over which Mueller has no jurisdiction. The charges have nothing to do with conspiring with Russians. There is not one shred of evidence of Trump conspiring with the Russians. There is LOADS OF EVIDENCE about Clinton, the Clinton-owned DNC, the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA conspiring with Russians. Where are Mueller's indictments against these Democrats, including Hillary Clinton? The Mueller special counsel was initiated against the law, as part of an attempted coup against Trump. For a special counsel to be initiated, according to law, there must be a crime. There was no crime, just an attempt to bring Trump down. I could give you the benefit of the doubt and suggest that you are not well informed and have been exploited, demeaned and hoodwinked by the fake mainstream media that no longer practices professional journalism, no longer reports the facts, and is in fact a political arm of the Democratic Party. The fake media's exploiting the not-so-well informed is outrageous. More outrageous are those who actually know the facts and that the mainstream media is not reporting them but choose to protest against, or ignore those facts, for political gain.
Both Democrats and Republicans should be outraged that there was an attempted coup in the United States. It goes against everything the U.S., democracy, ethics, decency and honor are about. If you are a man of courage and integrity, then have the courage to stand up as a man and protest loudly against this vile attempted coup, evidence for which is now overwhelming. If you cherish integrity, then wrap yourself in it for the sake of your family and/or children. Demand that the Democratic Party be cleaned up and start again with new leaders who value integrity, fight against the antics of organizations such as Antifa, demand that free speech be sacrosanct, and put forward potential laws to ensure that in a democracy, we never again have a fallen and politicized media.
1
-
@Thomas Jackson - I'm not defending any of Manafort's activities. I am protesting against Mueller's involvement in indicting him. It was beyond his jurisdiction, as the judge has indicated. The indictments do not involve Trump. Do your research. Albeit, spuriously and illegally, Mueller's mandate was to uncover Trump/Russian collusion to affect the election. I suggest you actually read up on the case; not what the mainstream media has told you.
Perhaps you should take some time to read about Clinton's record of documented scandals. Recently, she set up an independent server over which classified material was sent (felony). She did this despite knowing it was an infraction. The Department of State directives she received banning independent servers have been published, let alone that, with her history and in her position, she aught to have known. She lied to congress about her server, emails and Benghazi (felonies). She tampered with and destroyed subpoenaed evidence (felony). All these felonies have been sufficiently documented for her to be charged. Now, let's talk about her start:
A democrat fired her from one of her first stints as a lawyer on the Watergate Investigative Committee. He fired for, in his words, being "an unethical, dishonest lawyer and a liar." As she was practicing law, that should have been the end of any public career for her. What had she done? During discovery, when it came time to exchange information with the other side, she stole pertinent information and hid it in her house, so the other side would not see it. That was just start of her corruption: White Water, Cattle Futures, White House Travel Office, Campaign Financing, assisting ISIS, covert weapons operations through Qatar (revealed through a court case), Clinton pay-for-play, Clinton Foundation, enabler of a serial sexual abuser. Now, if you admire this kind of person and continue to support her, as well as her big-government principles, then, frankly, you have absolutely no credibility. In my opinion, when such corruption is involved, the platform no matter how good or bad is not on the table.
Strzok, a traitorous coup monger, was at the centre of the illegalities, including the indictment of Flynn. In an objective court that would warrant the case being thrown out of court.
I am not going to reply to anymore of your comments. We reveal so much of ourselves by what we write. The names you have listed and your points are lifted right out of the fake mainstream news. You obviously have no wherewithal to research further, instead choosing to be a parrot. And anyone, in my view who supports such blatant corruption is not worthy of debating. Start presenting the actual facts, stand up and condemn the attempted coup, then we can debate political issues. Meanwhile, your hatred for Trump is transparent and deeply irrational, without a shred of evidence to back it up.
1
-
1