Comments by "Norma Mimosa" (@normamimosa5991) on "The New Culture Forum" channel.

  1. 135
  2. 116
  3. 102
  4. 72
  5. 49
  6. 31
  7. 31
  8. 28
  9. 28
  10. 25
  11. 23
  12. 12
  13. 12
  14. 11
  15. 10
  16. 9
  17. 8
  18. 8
  19. 7
  20. 7
  21. 6
  22. 5
  23. 5
  24. 4
  25. 4
  26. 3
  27. Andrew? What on earth has happened to the British justice system, the pillar of a free, democratic country that relies on the rule of law? Innocent until proven guilty, turfed out the window. There is a photo of Andrew with his accuser, who looks decidedly over the age of majority and pretty happy too. She had a middle-class upbringing, so had the background to make sound decisions at her apparent age then - seventeen. Interesting how juvenile criminals can be tried as adults, but when it comes to female accusers months short of the age of majority, they are considered to be children. Frankly, I doubt this woman's accusations. She has a reputation as a deep-pockets chaser. She has already bagged $500,000 (I believe) in connection with related accusations, and has pocketed considerably more in hawking her story. I have watched too many women falsely accuse men. It prevents me from falling hook line and sinker for her twenty-year old victim story. In my view, her word against his is not sufficient evidence. Was Andrew foolish to have befriended E. Yes. He has already admitted that. Many more public figures visited E, including Britain's famous Stephen Hawking. Meanwhile, the man featured in a photograph, in one of E's residences, posing in a blue dress with red high-heeled shoes, walks free and recently surfaced to put in a word for his corrupt wife. Meanwhile, walking free, without fear of prosecution, are the lowest of the low, vile pimps who prowl the streets, checking their street workers, plucked from dysfunctional homes, who do not have the wherewithal to make sound decisions, down and out, sick and often addicted to drugs. Also walking free, the treacherous human-trafficking gangs who buy pre-teen children and sell them into the sex trade. The crowd's perspective is seriously flawed as they scream against Andrew. It's all about the money, political power, and the lemming crowd that does not take time to analyse a story.
    3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. UK politicians can, out of unbelievable ignorance, or deliberate ineptness, continue to ignore the bull elephant in the room, evil warmongering, or they can muster the moral courage to take the first four vital steps to end Britain's economic and social implosion: (1) End all sanctions against Russia and Russians. (2) End all clandestine and official support for Ukraine, including funding, weapons, training, support of Ukrainian genocide against Donbass Russians, Ukrainian targeting of Russian-Ukrainian civilians, nazism in Ukraine, propping up a totally bankrupt, corrupt, Ukrainian government that allows no opposition. (3) Immediately deport all migrants landing in Britain (no hearings; they are illegals) and dramatically reduce far-too high legal immigration. (4) Start immediate action to create new MIC models to end the requirement for war to generate profits. Curb destructive alliances among the MIC, politicians and the City. How about Britain coming to terms with its much diminished geopolitical realty to become a neutral country, just with an ace home guard to prevent migrant, NATO and other invasions and focus on rebuilding British innovation and industrial success, while deterring US interference and hegemony. Russia, under Putin, never did anything untoward towards to the US, UK, EU, WEST. Where are British journalists? Not one seems to have aggressively questioned the reason for war against Russia, using Ukrainian men as proxy fodder to die for US/UK evil intentions. The politicians will respond that Putin is evil, because he invaded Ukraine. The press will not ask why he invaded Ukraine. Putin and Lavrov consistently and relentlessly called for diplomacy to end Ukrainian genocide against Donbass Russian civilians and US/NATO aggression. The US, UK, EU, WEST refused, hence the SMO to end the genocide. Liz Truss declared war on Russia BEFORE the SMO. She screeched that Britain would target anyone in the Kremlin who had anything to do with the continuation of Russia, an ignorant, reckless declaration of war and intent to wipe Russia off the map. The SMO was formed after her abominable behavior towards Lavrov in Moscow. Their doesn't appear to be any pushback against this immoral, unethical, evil war against Russia that is imploding Britain the EU, and not least the US, the instigator of this war for undeclared, depraved, unacceptable reasons, details of which belong in another thread. The first two tasks are easy. Simply leaders with courage and leadership skills. The second two tasks are more in depth and long term, but just the public intentions for change will start the process of saving Britain.
    1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. Changing voting habits. Yes. That will help. People continue to support their favorite political parties out of tradition, after the parties have become corrupt. They continue to align with the parties, because they are often uninformed - unaware of changed platforms. The Democrat Party in the US is a great example. Many support it, unaware that it is no longer a classical liberal party. Perhaps it's time to end political parties. Simply vote for individuals based on their principles, common sense, ethics, smarts, experience and results. Unfortunately, there is another element at play. Changed voting will be like pushing a rope. The millions of migrants and immigrants - those with cultures that clash with British culture - will vote against you. Ed Husain in his amazingly frank book, "The Islamist," mentioned the dilemma of Muslim immigrants who do not support British traditions or culture: terrorism and violence for change? Or, change through the electoral system at the voting booths. This book should be required reading for all British politicians - in fact all politicians today. People are afraid to view migration and immigration with detachment. Afraid to be bullied if they call out the obvious. They justify mass migration and immigration with their hearts, not understanding that filling a country to overflowing breaking point - especially with clashing cultures - will destroy the country socially and economically. The new country will become the countries from which the newcomers fled.
    1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1