Comments by "Norma Mimosa" (@normamimosa5991) on "The New Culture Forum"
channel.
-
135
-
116
-
102
-
72
-
49
-
31
-
Patrick Sanders' call for a British citizen army is abhorrent on three fronts:
(1) Conscripting British men (and women) to fight a war against Russia! Why? For what? Russia, a new country that emerged from the collapse of the USSR, just 32 years old (quite different from its time as a socialist state of the USSR) - has never - not once - threatened or invaded Britain. In fact, prior to February 24, 2022, Russia and Britain engaged in mutually beneficial trade, ended after cowardly sanctions against Russia, that have boomeranged to substantially increase Western energy prices and send the British economy into a tailspin.
(2) Forcing young British men and women to die on the frontlines of a manufactured British war against Russia, forgetting for a moment the arrogance of believing little Britain could defeat Russia, but not to worry, psychopathic warmongers, such as Patrick Sanders, don't care about fatalities. Their continued calls for more and more death and destruction in Ukraine for a US war against Russia, with 500,000+ unwilling Ukrainian conscripts now KIA for this needless, evil war, is all the proof we need of the British government's total disregard for fatalities of war, as long as the elites keep pulling in their MIC profits.
(3) Total disrespect of the British people, using a euphemistic "citizen army" in an attempt to pull the wool over their eyes about the realty: forced conscription with the risk of death for pointless, manufactured wars for MIC profits.
31
-
28
-
28
-
25
-
23
-
@evolassunglasses4673 Likely layered answers: Some examples:
The West foolishly opened its borders to the disaffected of the world, without thought about the impact. They brought their baggage with them. They are now voting to positions of power, fellow disaffected immigrants, who hate Western values, and bleeding-heart liberals with Marxist notions. (Ilhan Omar - American hater - and Bill de Blasio - former Sandinista, thankfully now gone - just two cases in point.)
Misguided, altruistic liberals/marxists support migrant flows that have goals to replace Western history, accomplishments, traditions, mores, and culture with who knows what. Meritocracy to be replaced by "equity," meaning "equal outcome," without any regard for the damage they will face without Western meritocracy.
CEOs are intent on insourcing cheap labor to the West to fill their already bulging corporate bank accounts on the backs of cheap labor. (Something Trump was adamantly against, as foolish lemming populations egged on corrupt media that slandered and libeled him daily.) They cover up their real intent with false notions that no citizens or landed immigrants will do the jobs.
Bleeding heart NGOs actually travel to various developing or poor countries and solicit individuals to become migrants. Seems no one has ever wondered how it happens that so many thousands from different, unconnected countries, all at the same time, decide to pull up stakes and head for the West. Hello NGOs.
12
-
12
-
Leave climate change out of it. Human-caused climate change anyway. The notion that humans can influence cosmic weather patterns is preposterous. Is climate naturally changing? No convincing evidence of that. Pollution, though, is a huge and valid issue that is well on its way to destroying the earth, and pollution is most evident in China, Africa, India, SE Asia and Latin America - all the overpopulated areas. You are so right that those explosive populations are high hurdles to creating better standards of living, especially in countries headed by deeply corrupt leaders.
Of course, all the victim criers, yelling for higher and higher immigration to the West, don't have the intelligence to look ahead and picture the importation of the hell in those overpopulated countries, as open migrations to the West, by sheer numbers alone, lead to massive overpopulation, societal discord, and economic bankruptcy.
11
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
Andrew? What on earth has happened to the British justice system, the pillar of a free, democratic country that relies on the rule of law? Innocent until proven guilty, turfed out the window. There is a photo of Andrew with his accuser, who looks decidedly over the age of majority and pretty happy too. She had a middle-class upbringing, so had the background to make sound decisions at her apparent age then - seventeen. Interesting how juvenile criminals can be tried as adults, but when it comes to female accusers months short of the age of majority, they are considered to be children. Frankly, I doubt this woman's accusations. She has a reputation as a deep-pockets chaser. She has already bagged $500,000 (I believe) in connection with related accusations, and has pocketed considerably more in hawking her story. I have watched too many women falsely accuse men. It prevents me from falling hook line and sinker for her twenty-year old victim story. In my view, her word against his is not sufficient evidence.
Was Andrew foolish to have befriended E. Yes. He has already admitted that. Many more public figures visited E, including Britain's famous Stephen Hawking. Meanwhile, the man featured in a photograph, in one of E's residences, posing in a blue dress with red high-heeled shoes, walks free and recently surfaced to put in a word for his corrupt wife.
Meanwhile, walking free, without fear of prosecution, are the lowest of the low, vile pimps who prowl the streets, checking their street workers, plucked from dysfunctional homes, who do not have the wherewithal to make sound decisions, down and out, sick and often addicted to drugs. Also walking free, the treacherous human-trafficking gangs who buy pre-teen children and sell them into the sex trade.
The crowd's perspective is seriously flawed as they scream against Andrew. It's all about the money, political power, and the lemming crowd that does not take time to analyse a story.
3
-
President Trump, who is on your side, the leader of the free world at the time, was also cancelled (or so the cancellers wish). The parallels of tactics used in 1930s Germany to bring Hitler to power and the tactics being used in the 2020s West are alarming: censorship, silencing and cancelling opponents and those with different opinions, approved propaganda masquerading as news, burning and banishing books, closing down free speech in universities, imprisoning opponents, enemies lists, re-education camps, rioting, smashing stores and looting, taking away jobs, the cooperation of big business with the totalitarians, fraudulent elections, and highly alarming Critical Race Theory).
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
No way this couple can ever return to representing the British Head of State, not after their woke, highly uninformed, political activism. Frankly, I was shocked that the British Government and the Royal Family had overlooked her highly inappropriate political activism before she became a member of the RF. She had publicly, without, knowledge, reason or intelligence, trashed the Head of State of Britain's long-time closest ally. How can anyone engaged in such activity ever represent, with credibility, the British Head of State who is required to be apolitical?
3
-
Interesting that this low-class couple (class involves more than money), Harry and Meghan, supplicate over Beyoncé, a teen pop idol and are appreciated by children who have muddied their father's name by handing out spurious woke awards in his name. The Harkles don't have the reach for say, Thomas Sowell, Doyin Sonibare, Candace Owens, Tulsi Gabbard, Jody Williams, or Lord Rumi Verjee -- just to pick a few names off the cuff. Doubt they have even heard of a few of those names.
The best this nescient couple can come up with are Democrat activists, who are now under a cloud of deep corruption.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Even British colonization is not something to be scorned. Mistakes, yes! But on balance, the countries that were colonized profited from the legal processes, standards, education, infrastructure, technology that the British imported to those countries. The British colony that I am familiar with has many extremely grave problems since its nearly sixty independence. The African workers on the white farms in that colony received, in addition to wages, free housing, water, meat, flour/maze, milk, land for vegetables, healthcare, hospitalization when necessary, and primary schooling. Many of their descendents now live in squalid slums that did not exist during colonization. Yet, for a few decades now, in the few remaining books stores in the West, one sees books on the evils of British colonials, written by academics who never stepped foot in a British colony.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
Legislating that arguments, with or without strong language, against general policies and trends as thought crimes or any other crimes with very real adverse consequences against the "offenders" is so odious and frightening, it's hard to imagine this is actually happening in Britain. Meanwhile, hundreds of young, vulnerable British girls were groomed and raped by gangs of individuals who hate the British way of life, standards and mores, while the police knew about the rape gangs but refused to do anything about them for fear of being politically incorrect or called racist. My god, what has happened to Britain? Quite frankly, I am going to ask something that people won't like. I am a woman and believe in meritocracy -- the best person for a job -- man or woman; however, when jobs with authority were not accessible to women, this nonsense did not happen. Do women in positions of high authority have anything to do with these dangerous trends?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I come from a colonial family: The people who worked for my family had free housing, free water, free plots of land on which to grow vegetables, corn, etc., free milk, free flour (for the standard staple of the country), free meat, free healthcare, free hospitalization when needed, free primary schooling at neighboring schools. Now the descendents are likely in the throws of misery subsisting in the slums that have grown up around towns and cities (that were not there during colonial days), living under corrupt governments, enjoying no free necessities of life, and many dodging the evils of protracted civil war and disease. My point is that any encroachment on culture to protest against colonialism is highly misguided.
1
-
1
-
Take apart someone who is being posh and went to public school? Are you kidding? WHY, WHY ON EARTH WHY? Is your answer to the vileness of identity politics and push for equal outcomes, rather than equal opportunities (the foundation of the nonsense of only accepting scripts with 50% of the parts for women or those who "identify as women"), to demean those who are fortunate to have gone to much better schools and behave in a decent, common-sense way, with manners, knowledge, common sense and self-sufficiency. Surely, the answer for those who are jealous of public school graduates is to insist that the state schools drastically improve their teaching, subjects given, discipline and requirement for assessment by meritocracy.
1
-
UK politicians can, out of unbelievable ignorance, or deliberate ineptness, continue to ignore the bull elephant in the room, evil warmongering, or they can muster the moral courage to take the first four vital steps to end Britain's economic and social implosion:
(1) End all sanctions against Russia and Russians.
(2) End all clandestine and official support for Ukraine, including funding, weapons, training, support of Ukrainian genocide against Donbass Russians, Ukrainian targeting of Russian-Ukrainian civilians, nazism in Ukraine, propping up a totally bankrupt, corrupt, Ukrainian government that allows no opposition.
(3) Immediately deport all migrants landing in Britain (no hearings; they are illegals) and dramatically reduce far-too high legal immigration.
(4) Start immediate action to create new MIC models to end the requirement for war to generate profits. Curb destructive alliances among the MIC, politicians and the City.
How about Britain coming to terms with its much diminished geopolitical realty to become a neutral country, just with an ace home guard to prevent migrant, NATO and other invasions and focus on rebuilding British innovation and industrial success, while deterring US interference and hegemony.
Russia, under Putin, never did anything untoward towards to the US, UK, EU, WEST. Where are British journalists? Not one seems to have aggressively questioned the reason for war against Russia, using Ukrainian men as proxy fodder to die for US/UK evil intentions. The politicians will respond that Putin is evil, because he invaded Ukraine. The press will not ask why he invaded Ukraine.
Putin and Lavrov consistently and relentlessly called for diplomacy to end Ukrainian genocide against Donbass Russian civilians and US/NATO aggression. The US, UK, EU, WEST refused, hence the SMO to end the genocide.
Liz Truss declared war on Russia BEFORE the SMO. She screeched that Britain would target anyone in the Kremlin who had anything to do with the continuation of Russia, an ignorant, reckless declaration of war and intent to wipe Russia off the map. The SMO was formed after her abominable behavior towards Lavrov in Moscow.
Their doesn't appear to be any pushback against this immoral, unethical, evil war against Russia that is imploding Britain the EU, and not least the US, the instigator of this war for undeclared, depraved, unacceptable reasons, details of which belong in another thread.
The first two tasks are easy. Simply leaders with courage and leadership skills. The second two tasks are more in depth and long term, but just the public intentions for change will start the process of saving Britain.
1
-
@neilreynolds3858 Absolutely, the war in Ukraine is nothing less than a US manufactured, hegemonic war against Russia, using Ukraine and Ukrainian conscripts as proxies to fight the evil US war (supported by all its cowardly bootlicking UK/EU/West leaders), with PR bs that we are supporting Ukraine's "freedom and democracy, both of which do not exist in Ukraine, and that Putin started the war, when the timeline of events leads directly to the US starting the war.
Side goals of this vile war: MIC profits, FIRE (Financial, Insurance, Real Estate) profits, for funding the war efforts, then the clean up after they swarm in to repair their damage, and OGAM (Oil, Gas and Mining) profits, for resources to manufacture weapons, plunder oil, gas and other resources), not to forget kickbacks and money laundering, with handouts to Ukraine partially circling into Western bank accounts.
There were wars against Russia before it became part of the USSR, then the Cold War against the USSR. No one from the former Russia is alive today, and I don't think Britain was involved in the wars against Russia (albeit it dallied around instead of promptly moving in to save the Tsar and his family).
You are so right that, had Putin not become president, the West, particularly the US, would already have almost entirely looted Russia.
1
-
1
-
Changing voting habits. Yes. That will help. People continue to support their favorite political parties out of tradition, after the parties have become corrupt. They continue to align with the parties, because they are often uninformed - unaware of changed platforms. The Democrat Party in the US is a great example. Many support it, unaware that it is no longer a classical liberal party. Perhaps it's time to end political parties. Simply vote for individuals based on their principles, common sense, ethics, smarts, experience and results. Unfortunately, there is another element at play. Changed voting will be like pushing a rope. The millions of migrants and immigrants - those with cultures that clash with British culture - will vote against you.
Ed Husain in his amazingly frank book, "The Islamist," mentioned the dilemma of Muslim immigrants who do not support British traditions or culture: terrorism and violence for change? Or, change through the electoral system at the voting booths. This book should be required reading for all British politicians - in fact all politicians today.
People are afraid to view migration and immigration with detachment. Afraid to be bullied if they call out the obvious. They justify mass migration and immigration with their hearts, not understanding that filling a country to overflowing breaking point - especially with clashing cultures - will destroy the country socially and economically. The new country will become the countries from which the newcomers fled.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
BLM is a self-declared Marxist organization with the goal of wiping out Western history, culture, traditions and accomplishments (keeping the accomplishments, of course, for themselves). One of the leaders, right now under scrutiny for purchasing million-dollar homes (Where did she acquire the funds?). This organization has shamefully exploited black people wanting to improve their lives, using them as soldiers in its evil cause. Currently, this organization, along with ANTIFA is terrorizing America, rioting through its cities, as uninformed Democrat-run states turn a blind eye or let them off scott free, all in the name of a great reset that includes toppling whites under Critical Race Theory and massive non-white immigration/migration.
1
-
1