Comments by "Norma Mimosa" (@normamimosa5991) on "Met Police Aren’t ‘Guns for Hire’. Prince Harry’s Selfish, Tin-Eared Arrogance is Jaw-Dropping" video.

  1. In my view, the most egregious action of Harry and his wife has been to remove their children from their rightful heritage and surroundings.
    5
  2. Andrew? What on earth has happened to the British justice system, the pillar of a free, democratic country that relies on the rule of law? Innocent until proven guilty, turfed out the window. There is a photo of Andrew with his accuser, who looks decidedly over the age of majority and pretty happy too. She had a middle-class upbringing, so had the background to make sound decisions at her apparent age then - seventeen. Interesting how juvenile criminals can be tried as adults, but when it comes to female accusers months short of the age of majority, they are considered to be children. Frankly, I doubt this woman's accusations. She has a reputation as a deep-pockets chaser. She has already bagged $500,000 (I believe) in connection with related accusations, and has pocketed considerably more in hawking her story. I have watched too many women falsely accuse men. It prevents me from falling hook line and sinker for her twenty-year old victim story. In my view, her word against his is not sufficient evidence. Was Andrew foolish to have befriended E. Yes. He has already admitted that. Many more public figures visited E, including Britain's famous Stephen Hawking. Meanwhile, the man featured in a photograph, in one of E's residences, posing in a blue dress with red high-heeled shoes, walks free and recently surfaced to put in a word for his corrupt wife. Meanwhile, walking free, without fear of prosecution, are the lowest of the low, vile pimps who prowl the streets, checking their street workers, plucked from dysfunctional homes, who do not have the wherewithal to make sound decisions, down and out, sick and often addicted to drugs. Also walking free, the treacherous human-trafficking gangs who buy pre-teen children and sell them into the sex trade. The crowd's perspective is seriously flawed as they scream against Andrew. It's all about the money, political power, and the lemming crowd that does not take time to analyse a story.
    3
  3. No way this couple can ever return to representing the British Head of State, not after their woke, highly uninformed, political activism. Frankly, I was shocked that the British Government and the Royal Family had overlooked her highly inappropriate political activism before she became a member of the RF. She had publicly, without, knowledge, reason or intelligence, trashed the Head of State of Britain's long-time closest ally. How can anyone engaged in such activity ever represent, with credibility, the British Head of State who is required to be apolitical?
    3
  4. Guess Harry and his wife understand that they are highly disliked in Britain after the destruction they have caused, so they anticipate a need for protection.
    1