General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
David Glickman
CNN
comments
Comments by "David Glickman" (@live_free_or_perish) on "CNN" channel.
Previous
5
Next
...
All
We know about the surveillance transmitters bill gates put in the vaccines. Don't deny it 🥺
2
Not many good response options. I don't see an apocalyptic outcome but whatever happens the world will be substantially changed by this precarious situation.
2
She totally misinterpreted what he said, and then cherry-picked phrases from his speech.
2
Who cares if it's a proxy war? It's just whatever it takes to help Ukraine keep their freedom from tyranny. The free world must remain united against actors that violate the sovereignty of other nations and ignore the rules of international norms.
2
It's a 'denial of service" attack. If YouTube can't deal with it the comment sections will become useless
2
Ukraine didn't do it. The free world doesn't approve of political assassination. It's not in Ukraine's interest to do it.
2
@RyzenShanks the flooding blocks Ukrainian forces and requires them to put resources towards rescue operations. It was pure destruction probably because they know Ukraine would have taken control of both sides of the river.
2
Birds aren't real! They've been replaced by government surveillance drones! Don't let the aliens distract you from the truth!
2
@nenaaa1444 good point. Whoever wants to fire a machine gun should just join the army. In fact, I know guys who joined the army mainly because they like weapons. I'm open to whatever rules and regulations make sense. I was just saying honestly I didn't really have a reason to own an AR-15, I just wanted one and then I got bored with it and sold it back.
2
Anyone but Trump is ok with me
2
Looks like Putin mobilized a lot more trolls. Cowards that don't fight but are complicit in Putin's brutality.
2
Yep. And I don't know why we hesitate. It could be over in a couple of months if we let Ukraine do what any country at war would do in their situation - go after the launch sites and airbases used to attack them.
2
Clarification: within the last 60 years and not including NATO.
2
@johnrivers8617 I meant to say within the last 60 years and not including NATO.
2
@radicalantitheist of course. Putin's fake separatists infiltrated to make people believe his invasion had support but we know it's a lie. The locals are learning what it's like to live under tyranny and are now actively supporting the Ukrainian army.
2
@massengineer7582 I think the mutual economic benefits in trade with Vietnam overcame whatever resentment there was. And we have a common rival in the region. I meant to qualify my comment to say within the last 60 years
2
This is not the counter-offensive, Ukraine has something planned that no one will expect. I'm just guessing. No one really knows.
2
I remember her from when she did finance news. She knew the subject matter really well. Now she knows the new subject. I bet she's crazy smart but downplays it to avoid being stereotyped.
2
EL CID I've been thinking the same. Both are barely functioning democracies and both have failed to condemn Putin. I'm suspicious about where they stand in this situation.
2
@kaiezesi6630 not at all, there is all different kinds of crowdfunding for Ukraine happening right now.
2
@kaiezesi6630 don't think there is for Starlink. It's mostly small stuff like a channel I follow we raised funds to buy a few drones. But every little bit helps.
2
They condemned him for his actions and recovered. They still had principles and integrity back then. I voted Republican a few times myself. But Trump has destroyed the Republican party, and they can't seem to break away from him.
2
Kissinger's appeasement strategy is responsible for allowing China to become so powerful and threatening. He ignored the oppression by the CCP of ethnic minorities in the Chinese empire. We can't let appeasement encourage Putin to conquer more territory and impose his tyranny on more people.
2
Chinese and Russian infiltration is huge. Unfortunately, we cried wolf back in the McCarthy era, and now no one takes it seriously.
2
What kind of leader lets so many soldiers die for a piece of real estate. Putin is a heartless and cruel tyrant. The Ukrainians are fighting for their homeland - they don't have a choice, but Putin could pull his army out and stop the slaughter.
2
The only way Ukraine loses is if the West stops providing support. What would it say about the West if we stopped supporting Ukraine?
2
Your statement is exactly why gun control won't happen. It's an insult to responsible gun owners. Many people who own guns would favor some form of gun control but when they hear statements like that they naturally push back.
2
It is a tough choice. Republicans put democracy at risk, Democrats push woke ideology and indoctrination in schools and corporations. I'm going to have to make democracy a priority and choke back vomit while I vote Democrat.
2
It's a D.O.S. attack. Jamming the signal. YouTube isn't designed to recognize it so it will keep happening until the comment section is useless.
2
Those Russians in Bakmut are going to get slaughtered when Ukraine launches their counter offensive. I bet Wagner pulls out and leaves the regular Russian army to get killed.
2
Putin's army fights with no moral constraints. No distinction between soldiers and civilians. They maximize death and destruction with cruelty and malice. They are an evil in this world that must be stopped.
2
@King James I agree. The pressure is on for Ukraine to push out Putin's army while they still have support. When support fades, Ukraine will have to cut deal with Putin. I wouldn't want to be a decision maker in Ukraine right now. The pressure must be intense.
2
The next guy to fall out of a window.
2
Putin hasn't learned from history. The US bombed the heck out of Vietnam and lost 50K dead and 300K wounded and made no progress at all. A determined nation with a world power supplying weapons (Vietnam was armed by Russia and China) is almost impossible to defeat.
2
Some people buy the AR-15 because it's like the weapon they learned to use in the army. It's light and easy to use. I used to own one. Not saying they shouldn't limit access.
2
Ukraine would suffer a lot more if they didn't get tanks.
2
I wondered the same thing. They could have stopped it faster than anywhere in the world with their complete control of the population. Seriously, they could have ended it within months. 🙄
2
Interesting perspective. Fairly accurate assessment.
2
The guy is a paid Putin troll. Don't waste your time.
2
@Fieldsherbert you are complicit in war crimes by repeating Putin's propaganda. You should be ashamed of yourself
2
Watch Outlander much?
2
Republicans know Trump will lose, and yet they still fear him. Pathetic.
2
His assessment is correct but I doubt there is anything the US can do that will really change the situation. Fighting and killing is part of the culture in that region.
2
EL CID it was a free and democratic nation before China took over. Now it's under CCP tyranny. Resistance is futile, they will be assimilated.
2
Long range weapons to destroy supply lines even if they are across the border. Destroy Putin's navy so Ukraine can export wheat. Ukraine has the human resources and will to fight, they just need more effective weapons and air power. Not so complicated.
2
China knows the US will stand with Taiwan. They won't attack until they think they can fight against the US too.
2
Putin's bot have come up with absurd theories about why it has to be someone else. Give it up bots, the evidence is already out there
2
He may have been mislead at first but he probably has a pretty clear picture now. My guess is he keeps throwing more equipment and soldiers into Ukraine until he gets what he wants or Ukraine gets weapon from the free world and destroys everything Putin throws at them.
2
Too bad he isn't running for president. I'd vote for him.
2
Pretty much. Light, easy to use. Old school style. Not very practical but good for target practice.
2
Previous
5
Next
...
All