Comments by "Kisarez" (@Kisarez) on "Sam Debates Actual Justice Warrior Sean Fitzgerald" video.

  1. Stating as a crime 'scholar' that you are NOT interested in root causes, is a massive red flag. You are basically only interested in punishment. But ALSO opening your desired debate with stating BLM to be the main cause of crime is immensely bad faith.
    4
  2. If intellect is science or policy debate, AJW isn't one. He talks about his values and therefore constantly conflates correlation with causation.
    1
  3. BS. Sam wants to deconstruct your arguments, so asks a lot. You can see how Sean doesn't. He thinks he is right, in fact SO right, he constantly mistakes correlation for causation, AND dismisses root causes. Sean also contradicted himself multiple times, not just in claims, but also in maintaining a different standard for himself than others in a debate. Any sociologist or criminology expert in a journal paper would call it for what it is: Faith or world view discussion. Not actual science or policy.
    1
  4. Oh get real: AJW got all the hospitality to make his point. He also spoke wat more.
    1