Comments by "Maro Cat" (@marocat4749) on "Preston Stewart " channel.

It was rammed, twice! Even i that was the plan, ther is hardly any reasonable denial it was the target, intentionally. Why would you ram it twice? Can we agree it was obviously intentional.
1
To be air, it invaded us airspace an it wasnt claimed by the chinese military, so, free for all. An it was taken down by an sword airjet or sword monition.
1
Good they released it then, and it was apearently rammed twice even. I get why the wanted a good tiiming releasing it as rebuttal.
1
Twice, on the ootage they bumped into it twice, so deinitly intentional. You dont bump into something unintentional, twice!
1
I moan thats why the us , did that on us teritory, beause yah , even with denying badly that it just happened to be thre , on us territory, they can shoot it down, with a sword munition. Really Again, on us teritory, without anyone defending it Also yeah it was mimed or inormation, henge th sword monition. thats international waters and a drone th us did not deny nor posed it any military harm. So yeah would look bad shooting that down, no intentionally speciic shoot it down oin a way you can mine it on inormation, from international territory.
1
Also mine the drone for information, yah thats why on us teritory an unclaimed chinese spy baloon was shot down, with a sword projectile, on us teritory, with no one claiming it. which is fair game. i mean it makes sense to try to mine its inormation.
1
@gameragodzilla China denied that baloon, they were asked i imagine and sisnt say that was , that drone, was not denied, it was a clear drone, in international teritory, the chineses was, on us teritory. Where yeah thats actually fine.
1
@BrownieGrunt A spy baloon, on us air territory, whih aparently happens regulary, it just rarely make it into news.
1
by crashing into it, twice, i ther i any quetion i that was intentional. Or that pilot hated drones that much, but then it would still be intentional, twice.
1
Baloons can do stuff drones cant, and are higher, dont be mean to spy baloons, they are surprisingly better at drones in enough areas. Additional that a weather baloon incident looks less suspicious.
1
@lq7777 You mean ukrainian territory, its still ukrainian teritory concerned any country but russia. It was never officially agnowledged so, it would still have to be by ukrainians to claim that. irst, that wasnt used or that purpose likely, and second, i think uktrainians have the right, to watch ukrainian teritory, it still is, technically, by no agnowledgement o anyone but russia.
1
intrnational space. and if any country there, well that would be ukrainian space, still official. So No not their space, especially not international airspace.
1
@enriqueouro9 Bumping th drone twice, yeah makes it pretty clear it war targeted. I i would bump in a car , twice, i neither would believe it wasnt intentional. Even less so with a drone, in airspace. And thats on footage Also rom all military actions, yeah it was probably pretty reckless but intentional.
1