Comments by "Maro Cat" (@marocat4749) on "Judge Rules Prosecutors Not Allowed To Describe Men Shot By Kyle Rittenhouse As 'Victims'" video.

  1. You mean to try preventing a tragedy? Because that is actually bravery. If a guy that quack and duck like an edhgy school schooter, look the other video where he scared a crowd lik exactly that, , with an assault weapon, every person trying that away from him and demoilize him, is a hero. You happy th victims were actually brave and try stopping a tragedy an schooting.. If i too were scared for my life wold not count out well hitting his had hard to knock him out. If its life hreatening, thats self preservation, and defence. An a skateboard in not a tool or murder an asault rifle is.
    7
  2. Actually if they did given the video how he scared bystanders intentional threatening in that other video, with his assault rifle, that would be fully justified self defence. Find a video of jaconb blak before that looking like a shooter, oh you wont, because he wa just scared for his life from that person with an assault rile and violent intent all about him.
    5
  3. Yes victims thats what they were victims.
    5
  4. Well prior to that ther exists a video where he scared bystanders with an assaul rifle. You tell me a dude waging his assaulrt rifle in an unarmd crowd,. Further it shows he is show intent to use his asault rifle on unarmed people Yousee that do you 1) think nothing of it, just let people get killed 2) try taking his weapon away and demonilize him, and as safety, shoot him first i youhave to. i would say 2 u the correct response, as did the people doing that extended self defence against kyle. He new cos personally and kne they would that him well and maybe let him off? Which they did as much as possible.
    2
  5.  @mikemullins4206  I mean have you tried to copare the version wher he indeed is a shooter that people try to stop and tried seeing differnt perspectives with th diferent videos. People running to a shooter to stop him isnt implausible. The he tried to defend his home ,that was definitly not his home geographical, that makes no sense o the other hand. An i am crazy, not peoople sayig he defended his home, that is proven not to be his home and people willing to support that. To get a person free that killed 3 people and doe not regret it, into society. No remorse, that screams psychopath, I am not the crazy one.
    2
  6. Youmean by a judge doing everything getting a murderer that o camera did murder away, yes tht mis carrial of justice in court is increddibly sad an any reason to cry. As is people defending a shooter planning and killing people.
    2
  7. The victim did that. Kyle entered with a mudererous intent, the victims neiouhood, and made effort to go whre he did not live. That individuals, if you want to talk about just defending la and order and self defence, The victims did that. Keep an unhinged violent duide with an asault rifle from their neighbourhood, self defence if you want. Did kyle live there, did kyle any reason to go in their neighbourhood, to defend whatever, no. Becaus he didnt defend his home, because his home wasnt there, If youstill believe that i have to believe you are not looking up if that was his home actually, just want a hite violent muderous suprematist run free.
    1
  8.  @mikemullins4206  Am i, or are you and accidently getting it right.
    1
  9.  @drowningpooralice5505  Who covered for him and tried to let him get away with murdering people, because dad who wa a cop nd conections. Good call on his part. But makes him not innocent
    1
  10. Definitly, redo the case.
    1
  11.  @Piant_Genis  Defending an obvious dangerous unstabile murderer and let him into public to own the libs?
    1
  12. Truee
    1
  13. Because they were scared for their life, sorry if a scary looking guys with an assault rifle that scared earlier other bystander too in a video. Sorry what would you do, ask him polite? Would you? You would rather try taking his gun away and demobilize him, and at worst get him before he gets you, Like the mentioned people, who were assauled in their neighbourhood. Youwould rist the life of your frinds asking the dude that liooks violent polite?
    1
  14.  @jamesdigriz5449  But the judge does everything in his power , and a judge should be impartial but he coached the defence. The judge doesnt want to let the jury deside on facts if he does that, does refuse victims call victims but with loaded slurs like rioters and, very loaded words. To influence the jury with all his power and, violating anything his job actually is
    1
  15.  @wolfplayer7815  thats provocing, thats him initiating a conflict .
    1
  16. Prooff, any proof, we have proof, he scared clearly bystander in one before that, proof that they were "arsonists, rioters and looters" that threatened his life, or were in any way violent efore that,unkile kyle who we know scard people, with his rifle. You defend an unhinged ruthless murderer there.
    1
  17. It as bogus to callthem, a suggestion by the judge by the way, an i as bogus to not call the victims victims. But parrot anything youwant to hear, now say "please i want to feel valid" Better thing to parrot
    1
  18. Were they looting thou. And is protesting a crime not tht warrats death?
    1