Comments by "Aden Wellsmith" (@adenwellsmith6908) on "ProfSteveKeen"
channel.
-
6
-
5
-
2
-
Another example for you, and part will be easy, part will be hard I think for you software.
You can get from the DWP, a sample, scaled to actual size of the sex, age, number of years of entitlement, pension being received, for the DWP's pension debts. ie. The inputs.
Can you calculate the liabilities? Sum (future pay out * risk free discount factor * probability of making the payment)
The life curve is easily found from the ONS.
The triple lock is harder to value in, so start with inflation only
Next can you handle joint lives?
That's the frightning number that economists ignore because they are playing fantasy economics. Garbage in, Garbage out
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GeoVestAdvisors The big problem is the Garbage in, Garbage out.
Another example is mortgages. They were sold orginally as 3 times salary. Why 3 times salary? It's not the actual rule. It just a rule of thumb used by the advertisers to say what multiple of earnings you could borrow.
The actual measure was not more than 50% of after tax income, and even there that was only for the better off, because of other costs like heating and eating.
Turns out in most interest rate regimes, that equates to 3 times earnings.
That's the affordability measure. If interest rates are zero, then you can go to higher multiples.
The real question relates to risks, if interst rates rise, Multiples of earnings is irrelevant at zero percent
So notice yesterday how the level of interest rates was completely ignored, and the percentage of income being use to service the mortgage, that's ingored too because it blows the narative out of the water.
Similarly, in the UK, the elephant in the room. Mass migration causes a massive increase in demand beyond the ability to build houses. So prices rocket. Ignored.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1