Comments by "Aden Wellsmith" (@adenwellsmith6908) on "Professor Tim Wilson" channel.

  1.  @Jon-xw9om  Ah bless. A civil servant pops their head above the trench.
    2
  2. The guarantee would mean the same losses.
    2
  3. Dyson? He's not in the UK. What' relevance does he have?
    2
  4.  @michaelhearn3052  I have a slight issue with the idea you need a license to be a minister.
    2
  5. Starmer's record at the CPS. He says he prosecuted a handful of Subpostmasters. ie around 5. The figure was close to 100. That's 100 miscarriages, and very expensive ones. That ignores that he had a duty to take over cases were appropriate. No such assessments were made. The result is he is up to his neck in the PO mess. THen he boasts about 4 million prosecutions What percentage of those were wrong? What does it say about a society where 4 million prosecutions are made, and the prosecution / crimes commited is so low. What's the level of criminality?
    2
  6.  @georgesdelatour  So lets deal with some of his offences. Section 2, 2006 fraud act. Signing a document that's false to gain employment. Rules 1,5,6,7 of the Representation of the People's Act 1983. S.65A and 168 of the said amended act. Making a false declaration on the property rental. ie. 20K not 75K value. Bribery Act 2010. ie. Clothes where the full value is not reported. S327 of the Proceeds of Crime Act, covering up the sources of money [Money Laundering] ...
    2
  7. He's being accused of having an injuction if I read between the lines.
    2
  8. My question is will the judges be ordered to turn up and answer questions
    2
  9. People are demading reparations to Australian aboriginals. When will the colonists in the UK pay reparations to UK aboriginals?
    1
  10. Interesting that Syria and Assad going being a consequence of Putin's miscalculation.
    1
  11. Just wait until the accounting fraud over state pensions comes out
    1
  12. Other channels like the BBC and ITV have to be impartial ========= You're having a giraffe Brenda(n)
    1
  13. Charlie Boy can earn his civil list. 700 letters or is it 4,000? A pardon, an exoneration, and an apology as to what his government and legal system has done to them. I wouldn't send them by post. That deals with the immediate issue. The moral issue. 700 letters? A mornings work. 4000 takes a bit longer Compensation needs to be taken out of the courts bar setting the framework for what gets paid. Now for the biggy. Look at the error rate of the courts. It's huge. Starmer admits to 4 million prosecutions on his watch. 4 million!*^%£$!. 1. At the error rate exposed by the PO scandal, we have a major one. 2. What laws are they creating that so many end up breaking them. There cannot be mens rea. 3. Administrative justice. ie. No courts, No human involvement. You are guilty because they want your money. It's just a way of extorting money. Just like the Post Office. On the Post Office. 1. Put people back financially where they would have been. Loss of income. Money handed over Loss of tax benefits - pensions Loss of property Investment returns on the money. 2. Then pay compensation on top. Loss of life in some cases Incarceration Loss of property [ie. Buy it back] Loss of reputation - defamation. Stress. [Look at some work place payouts for what's needed] If some guilty people get it, so what. That's the punishment for the mess in the first place.
    1
  14. The alternative, Davey and Starmer are both up to the necks in the Post Office Scandal.
    1
  15. And the state's pension accounts are "audited", but they are a work of fiction. The Bernie Maddof school of accounting is used.
    1
  16. Of course he has. He's taken a flight out to have another go.
    1
  17. You need 82 rebel MPs to get a leadership challenge in Labour. All Starmer does is pull the whip from 20.
    1
  18. Westminster and the civil service have contempt. The NHS has contempt. Look at the forgery of signatures on Do Not Resuscitate documents, en masse. Look at Blair, we will rub the voters nose in it when it comes to migration,
    1
  19.  @LarryKippings  Went up to 455 2 days ago. PS Here's my favourite. --- Type: MP Party: Conservative Status: gross indecency with a Coldstream guardsman --- In November 1958, Harvey and a 19-year-old guardsman, Anthony Walter Plant of the Coldstream Guards, were found in the bushes in St James's Park and arrested; Harvey tried to escape, and attempted to give a false name on arrest. Both were charged with gross indecency and breach of the park regulations; when tried on 10 December, the indecency charge was dropped and both were fined £5. Harvey paid Plant's fine as well as his own. The last sentence says it all
    1
  20. Channels that were pushing this before you, such as DPS Computing, have been defundede by Google. The question is who forced Google to do this? I suspect its the Civil Service. The Judge needs to call in the head of Google, put then on oath, and find out. The horror at Google and in the civil service would be huge. But you are correct, institutions have failed.
    1
  21. I've a suspiscion that its programmers not understanding accounting, and accountants not understanding programming. Based on personally writing 3 accounting systems  @fjkelley4774 
    1
  22.  @graemehancocks4171  1. The CPS took over no prosecutions 2. Statutory duty? However, there will be instances where it is appropriate for the CPS to exercise the Director's powers under section 6(2) Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, either to continue the prosecution or to discontinue or stop it. So what did Starmer do? He's has already admitted that Saville was let off because the CPS under his watch didn't prosecute.
    1
  23. So the question is now in your court. What did Starmer and the CPS do?  @graemehancocks4171 
    1
  24. 1. He didn't prosecute. That's a CPS decision and he was in charge. 2. For the Post Office. Ditto. Please go and read up on the CPS's role in private prosecutions and their obligations. They failed, again, and it was on Starmer's watch. So he should be stripped of his knighthood for starters for failure.  @Geffo555 
    1
  25. Starmer's infected with Taqiyya.
    1
  26. Less dangerous than a pedestian on the pavement.
    1
  27.  @Mounhas  Who is at most risk? A pedestrian obeying the law, or a cyclist breaking the law?
    1
  28. So austerity. 30% of taxes goes on the debts. There is 16 trillon pounds of unfunded pension debts. How do you pay the pensions with capital other than austerity? Tax receipts are massively up. Why are there any cuts?
    1
  29. Yes. The idea that you do accounting real time is bonkers. What was needed was a persistent message queue. Transactions from the branches pushed on the queue. Then they are processed by taking them off the queue, doing the accounting/inventory, with a two phase commit.
    1
  30. Tax avoidance and certain Labour MP dodging capital gains tax.
    1
  31. It was the car that dunnit. BBC have to told me. They have a problem it was a hybrid, not a full electric. So must be an evil climate denying car.
    1
  32. Repeat across government. Look at the left. There's so little welfare fraud, we should pay more. Then it comes out that 5 stole 50 million.
    1
  33. There's already a case in Scotland where the local authority had no space, so had to pay for the private education of a child from a private school who said, where's my state school.
    1
  34. Nah he will always be the Sp of the Dv.
    1
  35. You're losing. Democracy is President Trump.
    1
  36. A nationalised industry.
    1
  37. I'm torn on this fascist set up by the state. First its wrong, second its a tool that when the right get control, they don't need to pass new laws to deal with the left. On Tousi, he needs to go with cameras, audio, both covert and overt, and film the entire encounter with the police. I suspect the police would say no to that. They will say we are videoing it, you can get a copy. [Then they refuse, as I know and have active complaints on that]. So I suspect its going to be a very short interview.
    1
  38. The opposite. Major Algae blooms. Lots of fish food.
    1
  39.  @johnrussell3961  Of course they will breed. The food supply will rocket for the plankton eaters. The experiment of fertizer in the ocean has its own wikipedia page. A major carbon reduction removal approach. "vA number of techniques, including fertilization by the micronutrient iron (called iron fertilization) or with nitrogen and phosphorus (both macronutrients), have been proposed" Macronutrient nourishment can give 0.38 W/m2 of globally averaged negative forcing, which is sufficient to reverse the warming effect of current levels of around a quarter of anthropogenic CO2 emissions.
    1
  40.  @maremma14  Plants produce oxygen from CO2.
    1
  41.  @maremma14  The research reference on Wikipedia states the opposite. They even state its the solution to carbon capture.
    1
  42. Gambling commission are useless. Organised crime on Westminster bridge? No response. No dinners or entertainment offered so ignore them
    1
  43. Age shouldn't be relevant. But on the tagging, that is wrong. It's the state's problem to sort it out.
    1
  44.  @mikebikekite1  Given the level and rate of cyclist criminality, the burden of proof changes. It's called Baynes. For example, if I was on a jury with a driver up for killing a cyclist, it would be very very difficult for me to say guilty. A consequence of that behaviour.
    1
  45.  @mikebikekite1  It does. The reason is simple probability. Take the NHS. If there's one avoidable death a year, and all other maternitiy wards don't suffer lots of deaths, then the probability of murder in the Letby case is such that someone killed the kids. However, given that 20,000 avoidable deaths in just NHS accute hospitals in England is the rate, you need to adjust. Take account of East Kent, South Wales, Mid Yorks, Shrewsbury and Telford, and the death toll in those maternaty wards, and the odds are different. It's called Baynesian Analysis. So with cyclists, given that close to 100% of them are cycling and breaking the law regularly, with intent, you have to take that into account when on a jury. What's the odds you got the one cyclist who wasn't breaking the law?
    1
  46.  @mikebikekite1  No the reason is the the percentage of black people who are criminals is small in comparison with the population. But in the UK where I live the number of criminal cyclists is basically all of them. Now you might think I'm biased, but I'm pissed off with constantly being the vicitim of common assault by these criminals. So based on the evidence, if I was on a jury, the driver gets let off.
    1
  47.  @mikebikekite1  In the UK, common assault is defined as an intentional or reckless act that causes someone to fear immediate physical harm. It does not require actual physical contact or injury. The key elements of common assault include: Intention or recklessness: The defendant must have intended to cause fear of harm or been reckless as to whether it would occur. Fear of immediate harm: The victim must believe they are about to suffer immediate physical harm. No physical injury required: Unlike battery (where actual physical contact or injury occurs), common assault does not require any physical injury. Which bit of someone cycling at you on the pavement isn't common assault?
    1
  48.  @mikebikekite1  On the pavement. On pedestrian only crossings. Jumping reds when walking on a pedestrian crossing. .... Mass offending.
    1
  49.  @mikebikekite1  I have. They say we haven't got the staff. For example, I was told Lambeth had one officer on at night. Quite what the other 1999 were up to, beyond me. The fixes are easy. 1. Schools. Picks up the motorbikes used for school runs. Seize and destroy, report to Social services. Easy 2. McDonalds. Gets deliveroo. 3. Red light jumpers. Just for the rushhour in the morning, as a cash cow. There you go, some nice and simple solutions. The first, for the whole borrough comes out at 1 man month, plus you are flying the flag for the police. McDonalds, you include mopeds being used for delivery of food. Lots of secondary offences. Red light jumpers. You don't need to get many before the word spreads around the coffee machines at work. Difficult to get the mobile phone snatchers, but I did manage to get one nicked. On report it, I do have script. Video the junction. Then watch it, note the time and offences in a spreadsheet. Then the script reports each offence to the Met. No typing. No errors. Given they have 20-25K CADs logged a day, do you think I would get a visit for reporting 10% of them?
    1
  50.  @mikebikekite1  If you're london based and want to do a site visit, .... you can see for yourself.
    1