Youtube comments of Aden Wellsmith (@adenwellsmith6908).
-
1200
-
769
-
568
-
567
-
544
-
447
-
445
-
413
-
411
-
404
-
395
-
393
-
360
-
339
-
336
-
332
-
323
-
319
-
307
-
281
-
280
-
271
-
270
-
267
-
262
-
262
-
261
-
233
-
231
-
227
-
221
-
221
-
212
-
211
-
211
-
208
-
200
-
195
-
187
-
186
-
185
-
185
-
184
-
183
-
179
-
178
-
178
-
174
-
171
-
169
-
168
-
167
-
163
-
161
-
161
-
155
-
154
-
154
-
153
-
152
-
152
-
150
-
149
-
148
-
147
-
147
-
146
-
146
-
140
-
138
-
135
-
131
-
129
-
128
-
127
-
126
-
125
-
125
-
125
-
125
-
125
-
124
-
124
-
123
-
123
-
122
-
122
-
121
-
121
-
119
-
118
-
117
-
117
-
115
-
115
-
114
-
114
-
112
-
111
-
111
-
111
-
110
-
109
-
108
-
107
-
105
-
104
-
103
-
103
-
103
-
103
-
102
-
99
-
98
-
97
-
96
-
96
-
96
-
95
-
The man who spent £160,000 on chauffeur cars ,took an 85 min flight to Belfast costing £443.spent £20,000 on 4 flights to Washington ,spent £724 for taxis, and took home over £1 million in 5 years in charge of the CPS, and takes a £336,000 State pension and spent £250,000 in travel over 5 years as a public prosecutor.
The man with his own special tax bill, passed by parliament, just so he can dodge taxes.
The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013
Plus £115,000 a year for life as an ex PM, tax free.
93
-
93
-
93
-
92
-
92
-
92
-
91
-
90
-
90
-
88
-
88
-
87
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
84
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
81
-
80
-
80
-
80
-
79
-
79
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
Gurinder Singh Josan, Labour MP for Smethwick in the West Midlands, gets rental income from five homes in Birmingham and Sandwell that he co-owns with family members.
The new MP, who won his seat in 2024, began claiming £2,650 a month in rent on expenses in November. Josan did not respond to requests for comment.
Bayo Alaba, who became the Labour MP for Southend East and Rochford in Essex in 2024, also has a small property empire.
Alaba gets rental income from seven properties in London which he co-owns with a family member. He began claiming his £1,050 monthly rent costs on expenses in September.
Richard Baker, Labour MP for Glenrothes and Mid-Fife, said he rented out a flat in Edinburgh and a flat in Aberdeen. He said his recent £2,400 rent claim, which included the deposit, was “for my accommodation in London for my parliamentary duties”.
A spokesperson for Rachel Taylor – the Labour MP for North Warwickshire and Bedworth who rents out two properties in the area – said she rents a £1,750-a-month home in London “to discharge her duties as an MP”.
77
-
76
-
76
-
76
-
76
-
75
-
75
-
74
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
69
-
69
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
I done a lot of statistics at an advanced level [post degree]. The statistics are very wrong too. It can be best illustrated by taking a deck of cards. You shuffle the deck. Now you start dealing. A club, then another club, then another .... What do you conclude? You could conclude, its a very remote possibilty. [so she musat be guilty], or you look at the deck to discover its almost all clubs.
So in this case its the NHS. Are clubs rare or common? Mid Yorks Teaching NHS Trust, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital Trust, East Kent, Cumbria, Southwales and that''s just maternity wards tell you clubs are very common. BMJ puts the annual death toll just in English acute hospitals at 20,000. Scottish NHS is under investigation for 10,000 cases of corporate homicide just for Covid. How many staff were involved there?
You cannot calcuate the odds without using the actual rates.
That's what was done for the trial, and its wrong.
61
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
In December 2006 Ugirashebuja was arrested in Walton-on-the-Naze, Frinton, Essex, by UK police, acting on a request by the Rwandan government. who requested his extradition for trial on suspicion of murder and for planning or incitement to commit genocide of Tutsis between 1 January 1994 and 12 December 1994. Three other Rwandans were arrested at the same time (Charles Munyaneza, Vincent Bajinya (Brown) and Emmanuel Nteziryayo). The accused were held in Belmarsh prison, South London, while the extradition case was heard at Westminster Magistrates Court (September 2007 – May 2008) before District Judge Evans. Ugirashebuja had a number of very senior barristers acting for his defence including now Labour leader Sir Kier Starmer, Edward H. Fitzgerald, Rachel Kapila, Patrick C. Hill and Rebecca J. Wright. Legal aid fees were at least £183,000.
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
On that front. I've a spreadsheet I kept for the last 6 months. 1358 names
34 were victims and the breakdown is 20 not from the UK, 7 from the UK, 7 I can't tell because the name and age comes back with multiple matches.
On the offending side.
1 Fled [clearly not UK]
267 - multiple hits
606 not from the UK
4 stripped of UK nationality.
357 born in the UK
There are others, who are underage, so you can't tell to bring the numbers up.
So if you pro rata the multiple hits, 780 are deportable based purely on being born overseas so in almost all cases, have a second passport.
Of those born in the UK, if there were two people with that name in the same year, one born here and the criminal born overseas, I can't detect that in most cases.
Even with those with UK nationality, the 4 that have been stripped, show that they can be dealt with.
So a round number? 70% for starters.
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
I've just had an interaction with the police. Walking my daughter to her after school class. Someone on a moped is stuck in traffic. Their solution, mount the pavement, drive at us to avoid the blockage.
It escalates. The police arrive. 10 of them. Whilst the 'discussion' is going on, 5 cyclist just cycle at the police and us, on the pavement. When the police are challenged, ah yes, they can't deal with it.
4 of them were officers on training, there to 'watch'. Why didn't the instructor show them how its done?
As a consequence the superintendent in charge has had a little reminder. 2 months ago I went to the MP, he wrote to the super. The super said the police would be in touch. After 6 weeks nothing. So I left a message on 101 saying given the delay I want a face to face on site. A PC rang. Problem is the PC has no remit to do anything, and I'm not going to listen to a load of copsplaining. I've heard it all and more.
So one option, he's asked them to get in contact and they haven't Or he didn't bother. I think its 60% the first 40% the second.
But he's got a reminder and hint, I don't mess around and rudeness is the easy slam dunk of a complaint. Schedule 3 its on his employment record. Plus the proportionate outcome? That meeting in person to show them what a horlicks they are making.
[1200 offences an hour at one junction]
It's not safe and its not high trust. You are right in demanding it. But with the state of Westminster, nothing will be done.
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
They laughed. It's endemic at the cabinet office too.
There are some very simple solutions. Lets start off with a list of safe countries. ie. Ones where a single white woman can go on holiday [like Afghanistan]. For those countries, its catch and return.
To prevent the SC getting involved, I would suggest a new court that's sole remit is appeals for asylum. It's remit includes the human rights of others, such as article 1. ie. Paying for it.
No involvement of the SC itself. 1 judge, 2 assessors, and its majority voting.
Second asylum is temporary. When its safe to return people get a grace period, then they go home. We've done our bit and looked after them
Then economic migrants. Here we just set the tax code at 38K a year minimum. Solves most problems. Not just for new ones.
Exceptions? Spouses and those that have claimed asylum. First is a right to a family life. Second we need them to defray the costs for the successful asylum claimants.
Criminals - deported. That's solves the channel bit.
Next, no papers or won't say. Internment camp. South Uist is a good location. Certainly no catch and release.
Now for the left. They will complain. Simple choice, we set up a crowd funding scheme were they can pay any short falls.
Next welfare. On 38K a year, no welfare bar contributory elements. That's JSA and Maternity pay.
The biggy is that tax code change, and its easy to implement.
@hypergolic8468
25
-
25
-
I suspect I'm not the only one who sent this to BBB.
I complained to the CPS. They said it wasn't them and clearly pointed the finger at the BBC licensing.
Section 77 of PACE, confessions by mentally handicapped persons, kicks in. It clearly applies, and its clearly been thrown out of the window. There is also no confession of a crime, because the person "confessing" wasn't the one committing any offence.
That Greenwich council, responsible for paying the TVL, didn't, and then stitched up the person not responsible is again cause for, in my view, a prosecution.
Greenwich council made "representations". So the question here is what did the court do? They ignored it. Either because they weren't given it or because there weren't doing their job. Either is possible. If TVL withheld the representation, then they need to be barred from bringing any private prosecutions. That has lots of advantages because it ends their business model. If it was the magistrate/judge, then need to be put into special measures.
The breaches of PACE, that needs prosecutions.
Then there is the question of how wide these practices are. I suspect they are standard practices. That needs to end.
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
What would be interesting is for WT to visit a few places where it is working, and try and find out why it works there.
For example, near me new shops are opening up. Near where my mother lived, in the outer reaches of London, there's a parade of shops. Always had a good bakers, and that's still going strong. A butcher took over the existing butcher's shop. His thing is award winning sausages, and they have queues on a Saturday as a result. They took over the green grocers as a result. What it needs now is a full deli, and a fishmongers. There's already a 24-7 style shop. If they could get a post office, its pretty much complete. You could throw in a cafe/coffee place.
The reason it works is people go for one, buy at others. They have some parking, but if that went it would be screwed. So rates and parking are the way to destroy a high street, combined with out of town supermarkets.
What councils should do, is provide parking, not the supermarkets. Make sure they are low cost parking. That way people will come in and buy.
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
Court documents reveal how a family court judge was hoodwinked by Sharif and Batool into blaming Sara's mother, Olga Domin, for the abuse. The judge praised Batool for taking on Sara and her siblings, saying 'it is a big ask, it's amazing to be frank'.
The judge recommended Ms Domin get help for 'anger management', adding: 'It would be good if you could at least be courteous to her [Batool], be polite to her, be slightly grateful even to her.'
The judge ordered that Sara should live with Sharif as long as Batool supervised the girl's fortnightly visits to Ms Domin.
The judge told the two women to shake hands, suggesting: 'Maybe you could see if you could shake hands, say hello and see if things could go forward a bit differently.'
Social workers claimed Sara had 'a really good relationship' with Batool, which was 'a point of safety' for her.
Yesterday, Sharif's ex-partner Angelika, who was also abused, said of the reporting ban: 'This is shocking. Why don't we know these people who failed Sara? I think this is starting to get sticky.
=============
If his name comes out, that is the end for his career.
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
Lets look at today's met news
Oguzcan Dereli, 26 (08.04.1998) of Islington was arrested on Sunday, 20 October and was charged with murder the following day. He will appear at Highbury Corner Magistrates' Court at 10:00hrs on Tuesday, 22 October.
Ismail Tajzai, 26, (29.01.98) of Moberly Road, SW4 appeared at Wood Green Crown Court on Friday, 18 October after he pleaded guilty to robbery, attempted robbery and two counts of having an imitation firearm with intent to commit an indictable offence, namely robbery.
Between 2005 and 2023, the Met received 21 separate allegations in total against the late Mohamed Al Fayed.
Seven men who “retaliated to violence with more violence” have been jailed for a total over 102 years following multiple shootings in Peckham in May 2023.
Tyreke Smikle, 26, Kai Davis Francis, 25, Duan Correa, 21, Shaquille Marsh, 26, Tyreece Quartey, 25, Malachi David Francis, 21 and Timothy Newton, 18 appeared at the Central Criminal Court on Friday, 18 October.
[Timothy Newton is the exception]
Mohamed Noor Iidow, 35 (17.02.89) of St Paul’s Close, Hounslow was found guilty of rape and manslaughter on Friday, 18 October following a three-week trial at the Old Bailey.
Kyiza Sandiford, 24, (19.9.00), of Merton, was found guilty of the murder of 22-year-old Keelen Wong following a trial at the Old Bailey on Thursday, 17 October.
....
The idea that crime is proportionately represented in London is false. What next? Quotas for police shootings?
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
If you have a minimum tax of £38,500 a year, per migrant things change. First why 38,500? Well that's average wage. In practice you need to earn a bit more to be a net contributor. That is generate more tax than you cost. The reason for that is there's a deficit, but work with it.
Now if you earn that sort of money, you have to be integrated into society. Hard to earn it if you aren't. Similarly if you are denied all no contributory benefits. which is pretty much all of them. You have to be integrated into society.
Then what's other people's views? Well there will no doubt still be some racists, but almost all people will say, look if he or she is paying more tax than they cost, then I get cheaper services, they can stay so long as they carry on doing so.
But that isn't what we have. We have lots of low paid people because the elite have said who will clean our toilets, which is just the modern day equivalent of who will pick our cotton.
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
I disagree. There are what are called common goods. Police, fire, legal system, democracy, defence are the common goods.
For example lets take fire. We had a situation in the past where only insured buildings were protected. Problem is that if you are next to a burning building, you are screwed unless they protect next door. So a common system, were all pay in, I don't think is unreasonable. Same for defence police etc.
Now lets move onto a problem. If you pay in, and don't get the service, and I'm thinking about the police here in particularly, why should you be forced to pay? You are paying and not receiving.
What about pensions for example? Why shouldn't you be allowed to opt out of the state's pension ponzi? You would be better off. You don't pay in, so you don't receive. A quid pro quo, and not a common good.
It turns out that well over 80% of the state's 'serivces' are not common goods.
So in a consensual society, you can pick and choose which of the non common goods you want.
The common good issue, is also about consent. If you don't pay in, but get to force others to fund your common goods, you have violated that other person's right of consent. ie. You have to look at the rights of all involved. e.g. Funding migrants, the people funding have no rights.
Lastly for common goods, I would say there has to be direct democracy controlling those elements.
So for a non common good, direct democracy is also good. For example, road users pay for the roads, and nothing else. No 300% profit margin. Just road users get to vote on maintenance, etc.
@Paul-li9hq
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@danielduesentriebjunior I know. The need more. If you are going to take out an oil refinery, oil storage system, you don't need much explosive. You need 100kg plus incenduary element to make sure it burns.
I did some costings, fibre glass, prop, motorcycle engine, computer brains [$30], servos and some explosive. Under $15,000 for 1000 mi range. Even with some labour on top, its cheap.
Now GPS can be jammed, so ideally you want a mobile phone that calls home and you guide it in visually.
Send a swarm, and the defence system can't handle it.
Send them different routes, if shot down, change the route next time.
Plus those targets, they affect tax revenues big time. Where will Russia get its fuel, and can it afford to pay in hard currency? Look at the Ruble.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@kiwishitloard2568 The bit that gets me, the reluctance to prosecute. From that, it leads me to think that its very bad for the police, over and above what we've seen.
From what we've seen, the officer just says, I thought he had a gun, gets a trial out of area, gets acquited.
However, if he threw the first punch, was out and out racist on video, the defence just says self defence and will win.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
What the sentencing guidelines ignore.
Serial rapists. Where's the aggraviting factor of being a serial rapist? Not on the list for sentencing guidelines.
Next lets look at other cases to compare and contrast.
Lee James Mullen, 38, admitted sexual assault by penetration and inflicting grievous bodily harm at Glan Clwyd Hospital, Bodelwyddan, Denbighshire, on 10 December 2024.
Mullen, of Church Street, Flint, Flintshire, had been previously jailed for 11 years after gagging and raping a woman in 2015.
So a serial rapist. 11 years for a first offence. Look at the serial rapists here, getting fractions of that.
But Lee James Mullen is white. Now it's clear, he was let off lightly for his first offence. He won't be so lucky for his second.
In the case the BBB points out, they have gotten away with it.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
All three have been incarcerated since September of 2017 when the charges were filed. Richard Djassera, 26, of Murray; Dodjim Leclair, 29, of Murray; and Nasouh Albasis-Albasis, 24, of West Valley City, were each charged initially with two counts of aggravated sexual assault, a first-degree felony. Djassera was also charged with an additional four counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, a second-degree felony.
Under plea deals, Djassera pleaded guilty to sexual exploitation of a minor, a second-degree felony, after attorneys noted there was no evidence that he engaged in sex with the victim. Leclair and Albasis both pleaded guilty to a reduced count of rape, a second-degree felony.
According to police, the 14-year-old victim sneaked out of a sleepover to meet with the three men, who took her to multiple parties where she got drunk. Later, two of the men raped her while she was in and out of consciousness in the car, and the third recorded the encounter on video.
Salt Lake County deputy district attorney Samuel Sutton said prosecutors worked closely with the victim and she supports the plea bargains that were offered. She did not attend the sentencing hearing and did not wish to make any statement to the judge.
Sutton agreed that there was no evidence in this case of any force or coercion, but indicated that the girl was too intoxicated to give consent.
Hogan noted the substantial amount of time that has passed since the charges were filed when handing down the sentences, saying much of that delay was due to the COVID-19 pandemic. He said that the lawyers involved in the case had "done an extraordinary job" at litigating the case and balancing the concerns of each side.
While all three were ordered to be released from jail, Djassera and Leclair will be under the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to address their immigration statuses. A hearing was also set for the three men in June to address restitution and probation.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
An East London councillor has been charged with perverting the course of justice after allegedly attempting to influence a 16-year-old girl into dropping her rape allegation.
Councillor Abdul Malik Facing Charges
Abdul Malik, 50, who represents Blackwall and Cubitt Town ward on Tower Hamlets Council, was due to appear at Thames Magistrates’ Court on Friday to face the charge for the first time.
Malik is accused of interfering in the criminal case involving the teenage girl, in an attempt to persuade her to withdraw her allegation.
Two Others Also Accused
Alongside Malik, two other individuals have also been charged in connection with the case:
Abdul Roqib, 45, is accused of contacting the 16-year-old on January 10 to ask her to drop the charges against his son, an action which allegedly sought to pervert the course of justice.
Rahela Begum, 41, is also accused of contacting the girl on the same day in an effort to convince her to withdraw from the criminal proceedings.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
In December 2006 Ugirashebuja was arrested in Walton-on-the-Naze, Frinton, Essex, by UK police, acting on a request by the Rwandan government. who requested his extradition for trial on suspicion of murder and for planning or incitement to commit genocide of Tutsis between 1 January 1994 and 12 December 1994. Three other Rwandans were arrested at the same time (Charles Munyaneza, Vincent Bajinya (Brown) and Emmanuel Nteziryayo). The accused were held in Belmarsh prison, South London, while the extradition case was heard at Westminster Magistrates Court (September 2007 – May 2008) before District Judge Evans. Ugirashebuja had a number of very senior barristers acting for his defence including now Labour leader Sir Kier Starmer, Edward H. Fitzgerald, Rachel Kapila, Patrick C. Hill and Rebecca J. Wright. Legal aid fees were at least £183,000.
Fact Check Details
Rating: True
Severity: High
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
James Henry Hammond, a U.S. senator from South Carolina, in his famous 1858 "Cotton is King" speech, which illustrates the Southern justification for slavery in agriculture:
"In all social systems there must be a class to do the menial duties, to perform the drudgery of life... Such a class you must have, or you would not have that other class which leads progress, civilization, and refinement. It constitutes the very mud-sill of society and of political government... Fortunately for the South, she found a race adapted to that purpose to her hand—a race inferior to herself, but eminently qualified in temper, in vigor, in docility, in capacity to stand the climate, to answer all her purposes."
Channel 4 having a melt down about who will clean their toilets, clean their cars, make their lattes ....
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
One of the three big failures.
1. Government pensions and the hiding of the debts off the books. That offence, with the asset stripping, wealth inequality, pensioner poverty, lack of investment, low take home pay, cost of living that follows. Even migration ties up with it. A demographic crisis they say, get in new workers. Problem is that new workers want their own pensions which means more debt, and most can't even cover the cost of their current services.
2. Migration. In particular uneconomic economic migration. Permenant asylum is another Health tourisim. Crime. Housing crisis. Austerity are some of the consequences
3. The NHS. 20,000 avoidable dispatches each year, just in NHS acute hospitals. Add on Scotland, NI, Wales. Add on GPs mistakes, Pharamacist mistakes. And that's with massive increases in spending.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
You won't find Nemo. He's transitioned. Amphiprioninae are the name of clown fish.
In a group of anemonefish, a strict dominance hierarchy exists. The largest and most aggressive female is found at the top. Only two anemonefish, a male and a female, in a group reproduce – through external fertilization. Anemonefish are protandrous sequential hermaphrodites, meaning they develop into males first, and when they mature, they become females. If the female anemonefish is removed from the group, such as by death, one of the largest and most dominant males becomes a female. The remaining males move up a rank in the hierarchy. Clownfish live in a hierarchy, like hyenas, except smaller and based on size not sex, and order of joining/birth.
Sounds just like the SNP! :-)
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Agreed. It's an easy thing. He clearly has overseas nationality because he wasn't born here. That I've checked. He may have acquired UK nationality. However, that can and must be stripped. Then he gets put on the plane out of the UK.
Now that can be done, and has been done in other cases.
The question is why not in his case?
The answer goes back to the legal system, to the civil service, and to MPs.
MPs need to pass a law, convicted, not born here, UK nationality is removed as of the date of the offence. That prevents the game where people revoke their other nationality so they cannot be made stateless.
I would also add, no papers, ie, stateless, its a camp on South Uist until you provide them. He could then live out his life there...
Next, on conviction, foreign nationals are automatically deported. A quick check. Is the country on the safe list. Yes - from the court to the plane, or from the jail to the plane at the end of sentence. For example, drink driving conviction? You are on the plane home.
So that's MPs. They haven't made the process automatic.
The current set up, the home office are incompetent or its deliberately done. I lean towards both.
MPs. Civil service top of the list
The courts, why don't they put deportation as part of the sentence?
@moniquebode1655
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
"In all social systems there must be a class to do the menial duties, to perform the drudgery of life... Such a class you must have, or you would not have that other class which leads progress, civilization, and refinement. It constitutes the very mud-sill of society and of political government... Fortunately for the South, she found a race adapted to that purpose to her hand—a race inferior to herself, but eminently qualified in temper, in vigor, in docility, in capacity to stand the climate, to answer all her purposes."
James Henry Hammond, a U.S. senator from South Carolina
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I've pushed things to my MP. He's incompetent, a racist and a drunk.
So you have to do it yourself.
I'll give you an example. The police regularly break the law near me. Parking on double reds to fine people parking on double reds. That certainly brings the police into disrepute, but its illegal.
The question is, do they have an exemption? College of policing say for BASIC police drivers they MUST obey the highway code at all times. I FOId the Met,, do you have any exemptions to the regulations for basic police drivers. No was the answer.
So I put the complaint in. In detail, with copies of the regulations, code of ethics, the breaches of law and ethics etc. Comprehensive.
So its being investigated. Then out of the blue, a second response to the FOI arrives, completely contradicting the first.
What has happened is the penny has dropped. Lots of officers have been rampantly breaking the law, and they have been caught.
Now all I asked for as a proportionate response was for a memo to go out, and these two officers to be fined for their offence, not others. The reason for these two is that they made threats and were rude. So given they knew it was an offence, admitted it on video, I think that's reasonable.
Now I suspect internally, they have concluded if two get done, we have to do them all, and that's thousands of offences.
So they have decided which is worse? Lying on a FOI response, or having to obey traffic laws?
Some has lent on the FOI woman, to get her to change the story.
So we are into the cover up being worse than the crime.
So there's going to be a long discussion with the IOPC tomorrow, to try and get them to take over the investigation because when you have Professional Standards perverting the course of Justice its out of control.
@El.Cid17
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@oyvey304 I agree, they won't accept orders, they won't do their work.
So the question then is what's needed to make them change?
Complaints is one approach. I have had 2 where they were ordered to make corrective action. I have a suspicion they have done neither. But generally the higher up the police the more likely they are to not try and fob you off.
The reason is the no update in a month rule. If you haven't been given an update on a complaint, make a second. So lets give you an example. Complain about a PC, it goes to their Sgt. If they don't give you a monthly update, just make a complaint about him/her/it. That's now at inspector level. Repeat. Now you are at chief inspector. .... The highest I got was a personal visit from an assistant commissioner. Too late to deal with the problem but we are getting a bit of a message across.
I've been setting them up for using crime stats. I know a local junction is 1200 offences an hour. Cyclists jumping reds etc, cars on mobiles [and reds] Illegal motorbikes.
I've written an app that takes a video, a spread sheet of timestamp and offence and will submit via their website.
I already have had MOPAC order changes in crime reporting. I'm making a list of lots of officers with dates who say, report it. You can see where this is going.
We're. 1200 offences, would take 3 hours to upload. Given the local stats are 800 offences in a month, that's going to generate a bit of an outlier.
I suspect I would get a visit saying please don't do it. But what about all this advice from police officers and MOPAC warning the met on hiding crime stats? {Its fraud by the way, officers have been jailed for it)
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
ULEZ cameras film a junction. It's trivial AI to pick up on offences
Red light jumping, cycling on pedestrian only crossings, pavement cycling.
That gets the video, and the close up images of the cyclist. That gets stored
Then a few months later, an operation, stop those committing an offence.
£100 fine, name and address AND a photograph. All that put into the system
Then click search. The photograph is matched against photographs of previous
offences, and 500 letters sent out, with £100 fines. £50,000 dished out
What's funny, its a magistrate's fine, so you can't get out of it with
bankruptcy
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
How to fix climate change?
First a green register for greens. They get a special badge to show off their green credentials
Then their name is added to the no fly list. Personally, this should happen just after they jet off long haul
Electoral Roll is cross checked against the register and gas supply. Then the gas is cut off.
Smart meters, when the wind doesn't blow etc, click the power is cut off.
Green only tariffs, no subsidies. After all they say subsidies are bad.
Electric only driving licenses.
If caught in a fossil powered vehicle, that they own, its crushed.
If caught in a fossil powered vehicle, that someone else's owns, its crushed, and they compensate the owner.
There you go, an easy fix, using existing systems bar the register, so its cheap
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@wanderingturnip DA14 6QL if you want to visit.
Another one is Peckham high street. It's interesting, or the Old Kent Road for what can be done at the low end, but still bustling.
Personally, I want to live somewhere with a butcher a baker, a candlestick maker. One with good transport links. That's not London, somewhere like a market town.
For the more unusual items, the web is the way forward. For example, if you are selling accordions, you have to be online. You might have a store, where people can come and try, but most sales will be net.
If you ever go to Istanbul, there's the main bazaar. A very old shopping mall. What's interesting is that its the opposite of the high street. Each street is just for one property. ie. Music, books, you have that in your video. You have Jermyn Street, Savile Row as some areas just left. In Istanbul there is now a street of stolen mobile phones.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I had an interesting call from my brother in the week. He teaches maths. Now they have moved all the homework to be online. That's a great thing. You can see how long each kid is taking over their homework. What their scores are. If you notice lots of kids get question 4 wrong, then you need to revisit it. Information that's not been available in the past.
One thing has come up. Homework was taking a hour a week has dropped to 20 mins. The question is why? The answer is they are using a phone app. Point it at the question, click, it gives you the answer, you write it in. So a disaster for learning. The counter is that you have to have tests in class, where apps can't be used. No homework for your scores.
Same thing is happening in other areas. For example, chat gpt for essays. So all essays have to be hand written. You get given general a research top, and you can do all your research, make notes etc. Then the essay gets written in class. Now that does reduce teaching time, but it does increase some skills you need these days, such as research. They are going to move away from plagiarism checkers too.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@vanessagray8604 So this raises questions, what are the solutions?
On the student front, no working whilst a student unless its teaching [graduates for example]. No "language students" never going to lessons but working. No au pairs.
Next for economic migrants. A minimum tax code set at average wage (39,000) for all adults, and no welfare. None. No HB, income support, child benefit, tax credits, ... Taxed at source, easy to collect.
Commit a crime? Automatic deportation. A consequence of the conviction.
Tax evasion is a crime. At the end of the year, tax paid is checked, and a letter sent out for any short fall. If you don't pay, automatic conviction, and we are in the deportation mode.
That fixes most of the problems very very quickly.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Quite right. Remember the changes in the highway code. Cyclists have to give other users 1.5 meters space.
What was very strange was they couldn't show if there was a cycle path.
Now I have FOI'd my local council. The biggest FOI bundle came back. Maps down to effectively the centimetre of all cycle paths in the borough. Photographs. Legal notices from the London Gazette, the works.
So that they couldn't produce it means it doesn't exist.
For the judge, a cyclist, then to say, doesn't matter, I'm going to rule it does is bizarre.
I've no doubt there was an assault, by the cyclist. Remember, the defence has to prove it was a cycle path. It couldn't, so that means the cyclist was committing an offence. S72, 1835 Highway Act.
If someone cycles at you, that is common assault. You are in fear of being hit, you can defend yourself.
On the could have step aside. Why? Pedestrians have priority over other road users. The cyclist was clearly intent on getting pedestrian out of the way so they could carry on committing an offence.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Worth reading to the end about Natalie Ephicke's actions
On 22 July 2019, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced they had charged Elphicke with three counts of sexual assault relating to two women: one charge relating to an incident in 2007 and the other two in 2016. He appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on 6 September 2019 and denied all three charges. In their statement, the CPS emphasised that Elphicke "has a right to a fair trial" and that "there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings". The Conservative Party again withdrew Elphicke's whip later that day. In October 2019 Elphicke appeared at Southwark Crown Court and was granted bail to return for trial on 29 June 2020.
During his trial the court heard how Elphicke groped one of his accusers, chased her around his house, and sang "I'm a naughty Tory, I'm a naughty Tory." On 30 July 2020, Elphicke was found guilty on three counts of sexual assault. On 15 September, he was sentenced to two years in prison. He sought leave to appeal against the sentence, but this was denied in March 2021.
He was released from HMP Leyhill in Gloucestershire on 14 September 2021 after serving half of his sentence. He was summoned back to magistrates court for non-payment of the £35,000 costs order awarded at his original trial; he claimed to be unable to pay, stating that “I have no job, I have no career, I am long-term unemployed,” and that he was living in a rented one bedroom flat and claiming Universal Credit. He was nonetheless ordered to pay £35,000 within a year towards the costs of the prosecution. In April 2022, Sky News reported that Elphicke was struggling to find new employment.
His ex wife Natalie Elphicke and four other MPs (Sir Roger Gale, Theresa Villiers, Adam Holloway and Bob Stewart) were found to have breached their code of conduct by the Commons Select Committee on Standards for improperly trying to influence a judge, when they had signed a letter on parliamentary notepaper to the Lord Chief Justice pressing Mrs Justice Whipple not to disclose character statements in his trial at Southwark in 2021.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Having built two accounting systems, its important to state what an accounting system should do.
1. It must maintain the accounting equation that liabilities = assets + owners equity at all times. Double entry is a consequence of that, not the other way round.
2. Entries are in "ink". They cannot be altered. If a wrong set of entries are made, you make a reversal of the entry, linked to the old, and post new entries, and that's linked too. The text on the posting makes it clear why its a correction
3. Audit trail. Timestamps, the account used, the IP address making the change, is recorded on every record. That includes automated 'agents' that make postings. For example, a year end process, or mark to market [more relevant for banks etc]. Here you record the agent and the details of who is the proxy for the agent. For example, a timed process or someone clicking on an option, where you record the details of that account
4. You write and produce a full set of unit tests to test the system and that includes breaking it.
5. You add constraints at multiple levels. At the database level, at the code level.
That is, accounts are read and write, never delete. Never ever delete.
6. You do not use SQL etc to get around the constraints to make corrections. Common in my experience
7. You have a full set of controls as to who has the rights to do what. That includes the right to see, the execute jobs etc.
8. The code is kept in a source code control system
9. There are release procedures for the code.
10. There's a proper issue tracking system for bugs and changes.
Looks like the system failed.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
"There is no danger at the school," police spokesman Don Aaron said.
In a statement Thursday, police said the shooter was significantly influenced by what they described as "web-based material, especially that found on non-traditional sites that most would find harmful and objectionable." The police said the FBI was working closely with them on what they described as the "ideological influences portion of this investigation."
During a news briefing Thursday, a school district official said the weapon-detection system uses artificial intelligence technology.
"In this instance, based on the shooter's location in proximity to the cameras, it wasn't close enough to get an accurate read and to activate that alarm," Sean Braisted, chief of communications and technology for the district, told reporters. "The system was activated by police when they brandished their weapons ... There's no foolproof solutions for any of this, but this is one extra step."
The shooting was partially livestreamed on the streaming platform KICK, according to a statement from the company.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@verzeda Elaine Douglas and Tommy Brooks claimed they had lived on the tower's 19th floor but had been staying with friends elsewhere on the night of the fire.
The Jamaican nationals were illegally in the UK.
Douglas, 51, was jailed for three years and Brooks, 52, was jailed for three years and three months after it was realised that their flat had not even existed.
Douglas was housed in the Radisson Blu in Kensington for 276 nights at a cost of just over £55,000 to the council and, after complaining about the food in the hotel, she was given a pre-paid credit card, running up charges of more than £11,000.
She was also handed a pre-paid Oyster card so she could travel free of charge.
Brooks also started at the Radisson Blu before being moved to another hotel - 243 nights that cost the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea more than £49,000. He racked up charges of £9,000 on a pre-paid credit card and was also given an Oyster card.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I know of some. For example, one of my father's students, had to escape Ghadafi. He's become British. He ran a physics department at one of the better universities. Got a gong from the queen. Semi retired, he's now involved building a company to make cheap electron microscopes. So in my books, meets all the criteria for a successful asylum seeker.
I've just had a coffee at a shop. Algerian refugee. I've seen the scars from the bullet wounds. Again, I wouldn't say no. Same for Kindertransport.
The point I am making is genuine refugees behave very differently from low paid migrants brought in because of the "who will pick our cotton" demands of the elite.
So how to fix it.
1. List of safe countries.
2. No asylum from safe countries.
3. If a country moves from dangerous to safe, then a grace period and you move to the economic migrant category.
4. For economic migrants, no welfare and a minimum £38,500 a year tax code.
So which are the safe countries? Afghanistan is now safe. The list I think is Yemen, Palestine, and Ukraine.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The evidence is that they did. Earliest known homo sapiens skeletons, existed in South Africa. Then if you example the earliest dates by location you can track the spread north. That's for our species. You can also look at genetic mutations. More diffences in Africa, less as you get farther away. You can even pick up on breeding with other hominids, such as denosivans and neanderthals. Clear evidence there.
But if you want to widen it to other hominids, you have widespread homo erectus, including in England, such as Boxgrove. Eating large animals - e.g Put another Rhino on the barbeque Bruce.
So where did home erectus originate. more difficult, but for erectus's own ancestors, hom rudolfensis, homo habilish, you are talking only finding them in Africa.
The next step back, the australopithicines, are all African.
What's interesting is that there is a very high correlation between the nationality of the researcher, and the conclusion that their country was the source of humanity.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Correct. My view, send drones in swarms to attack high value targets in Russia. They take different routes. Periodically, they phone home with locations. If they don't, next time you take a different route.
So what targets? Oil refineries are a good example. Doesn't take much explosive to set them off, because the very hot oil petrol etc, goes off with a bang.
Down stream production has to stop, consumption too. Takes a long time to get one rebuilt.
Now a drone with a 1000 mile range can be built for $25,000.
Engine? 600 cc motorbike.
Prop? Cheap
Servos x 4 cheap.
Brains? $30 from ebay. I kid you not. That gets you everything. GPS, controller, ...
Explosives? Cheap for the military along with the fuse.
Airframe? Knocked out in garden sheds with fibre glass.
The difficult bit, getting airborne. Off the roof of a car is a good choice.
Range 1000 miles.
2
-
2
-
@Jsach2020 So lets start. Common goods. That includes your services. That's 20% of state spend. $2,800 a year. All get policing , law, democracy, defence, ...
Next we have the insurance part. £3,000 a year per person for the NHS. The good risks have to pay for the bad. That's another set.
Turns out that the average state spend per person is 14K a year.
So its reasonable that the UK should only allow migrants who generate more tax than they cost.
So what tax do you generate? None it turns out. Even the tax you pay comes from other tax payers.
Note, I've excluded your future costs, pensions from the picture. That makes it even worse.
I've excluded that you've taken away a position from a Brit from the calculation.
I've excluded your other benefits from the cost analysis.
So what is OF2? I presume its officer of some sort.
So here's what should happen.
1. No discrimination. No pro White EU racism for example.
2. Net contributors only.
3. You get a minimum tax code of 38,500 (average wage) a year, increasing in line with average wages.
4. No welfare for economic migrants. No housing benefit, income support....
5. Remember, they came here for economic reasons. If its not economic for them they will leave.
6. No public sector jobs. No Public Sector worker generates any tax revenue.
7. There's a correlation between poverty and crime. Doesn't mean poor people are criminals. Just that the poorer you are, the more likely you are to take short cuts.
So stop importing poverty.
The evidence is that the rate of incarceration amongst people from migrant communities is higher that for those who aren't.
ie. End the pro EU, anti Indian discrimination. I don't care what colour you are.
So what effects will this have?
1. Massive cuts in state spending.
2. The beneficial migrants not affected
3. Wages rise for the poor brits
4. Tax receipts from brits go up
5. Welfare for brits goes down
6. Housing problem cured.
7. Great for entrepreneurs. Unlike a points system
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I made a complaint to the standards committee and to the police.
Starting off with Nolan, she must be open about what has gone on.
So where was she living. Address A or Address B and when.
Then she produces, birth certificates, council tax, income tax, bank statements, insurance documents, driving license, passport, expenses claims etc. The details are then cross checked against those two addresses. All part of Nolan. Must be seen to be open.
Her problem is that all the documents contradict what she was claiming on.
For example, did she tell her insurer about renting the property out? If not - fraud.
Where was she living? Did she tell the DLVA about change of address? Did she claim she lived else where to get lower insurance.
Single person discount?
What address on the birth certificates? That's perjury.
Which property for MP's expenses?
It's different for her because of those Nolan principles about being open.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Let me give you an example from yesterday. Borough High Street in London. Rampant crime. Offences every 10-15 seconds, and that's not peak time. 3 police officers. I spoke to the first. He didn't know its illegal to cycle on pavements. People effectively assaulting people forcing them to jump out of the road. ie. Useless. Instead, he's been tasked with parking on red routes.
Next two. I flagged them down. More interesting, as they were cycle officers. I spent 5 mins talking to them. During that time 20 offences behind them including illegal motorbikes, red light jump and those assaults were pedestrians crossing at crossings had to jump out of the way. Now what did they say? We aren't allowed to stop them. Health and safety of the criminal prevents it. We've been tasked with fining people for parking on red routes.
The same later, 3 officers, standing around in a gaggle, Old Kent Road. Offences going off left right and centre on the road. What have they been tasked with? Ah yes, literally their job was to stand there as the local school closed at 3:30.
So why have more tax when you get no services, no protection from the state?
The police need to think. What happens when the middle class say defund the police?
Civil servants need to think. If you don't deliver then the public won't deliver your pension, and you will be sacked.
All Richard demands is inflation. Pay more get less.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Just another migration to UK murdering people . The odd thing about this case, is that the victims weren't the usual victims. Other migrants.
Dellan Charles sent down
Ibrahima Bah sent down
Ferdous Ahmad, Ajaz Karim, Girdaware Basra, Onkar Basra - PDFs.
Bebi Ibram, sexual assault.
Khalid Baqa, terrorist and grifter
Ishmaiel Kallon, murder
Mohamed Iidow - you'll have to research him. A repeat offender
Loic Nengese, murder
Nicholi Clyne, Ahmed Khaleel, Hamza Ul-Haq, Luca Griffiths, Abdirisak Ali, Kamil Kazmierski Murders
Tyreece Riggon,,Julian Russell,Tyreece Wolfries-Parkin,Alex Pasley,Christopher Wilson same offence
.....
And that's not even a full week's worth.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@shadowsofasiren The risk to me is foreign nationals. I frequent a cafe. Owner is great guy, Algerian. Anyway, the reason I was in there the other day was someone had dumped a wheel chair. It would just end up in landfill, so I dropped it off. I had done the same with my mother's chair after she departed. They will be shipped off to Algeria where there will be used.
Anyway, he pulled me aside. He's worried, Algerians, knives and drug dealing. That's locally. Imported. Or the 3 killed 12 injured in that stretch of road (800m) in the last 18 months. One illegal killed, 2 escaped. The others, one's a neighbour, hit from behind on the pavement. Hit and run, illegal deliveroo motorbike. In a wheelchair. Why should the victims have to put up with it?
Then add on the finacial disaster of migration. But migrant on migrant violence is epidemic.
But I doubt you've factored in Rotherham etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
More than 200 million medication errors occur in NHS per year, say researchers A
study has revealed an estimated 237 million medication errors occur in the NHS
in England every year, and avoidable adverse drug reactions (ADRs) cause
hundreds of deaths.
Researchers from the Universities of York, Manchester and Sheffield report that
an estimated 712 deaths result from avoidable ADRs. They say, however, that ADRs
could be a contributory factor to between 1,700 and 22,303 deaths a year.
Of the total estimated 237 million medication errors that occur, the researchers
found that almost three in four are unlikely to result in harm to patients, but
there is very little information on the harm that actually happens due to
medication errors.
This led researchers to review studies related to the harm caused to patients
from ADRs. As well as the number of deaths reported, they also showed that
avoidable ADRs had significant cost implications, at £98.5 million per year, but
this could be significantly higher.
BMJ Quality & Safety.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
In my view it has. Having made complaints about police officers, its clear that lying is endemic. You can see this on lots of videos. I was watching one the other day where the police officer's opening statement was a lie. He accused someone of trying to open lots of police vehicles. Since it was all on video, its clear he was lying. Eventually he started back tracking because he worked out he had been caught.
So I would be taking a default position that the officer is not honest.
Second we had Stamer the other day triumphant that the CPS on his watch had prosecuted 4 million cases. Lots of things spring to mind.
1. Administrative justice. No courts, just someone or a computer saying pay up. Good examples are parking were you appeal and its clear they haven't looked at what you have written. I've not paid a parking fine in 20 years. I've had them, I appeal. It's denied. I take it to the tribunal and win. Every time. The system is broken.
2. They've created laws that are just there to extract money
3. There are out of step.
4. They are malicious.
5. They look the other way.
A good example here. I had a hand in one peer going down for a year. So I started asking FOI questions. One, if they had released it would have exposed industrial levels of fraud in the Lords. So the person handing our money out to his mates, made it a state secret. You can't go to court to get that reversed. I've now got 6 made out to me personally. The only good thing, you can rightly state that most of the lords are frauds. They can't defend against that without a far more serious crime of breaking state secrecy laws.
So my presumption, they are going to be acquitted unless I make a judgement that they need to be segregated from society. Unless its a politician, a policeman etc, in which case send them down.
@parrotshootist3004
2
-
2
-
2
-
Disagree. List the dangerous countries? Palestine, Ukraine, Yemen. Hard to see others.
So why do we have lots of Asylum seekers from Nigeria, from Algeria, from Afghanistan [the war is over]. ...
So we need to give people who have claimed from countries that are now safe, a period of time to get their affairs in order and return home.
From the commons
In 2021, 42% of applicants were nationals of Middle Eastern countries, and 23% were nationals of African countries. This pattern shifted in 2022 with the largest nationality groups being Asian countries (32% of applicants) and European countries (25% of applicants).
Why are 25% of applications from EU countries? It's fraud
Then we have economic migration. An even bigger disaster. Easy to fix with a minimum tax code for economic migrants at break even.
The issue, and you are losing on this. People know that its a massive fraud. Both asylum and economic migration. So they are quite prepared to say no asylum, period. That's dangerous in my books, but that's what your policy has produced.
So start with the basics. Asylum from the European . 25% Where's the war? UKR isn't included in that number.
@stinkoshatter-shield2096
2
-
1. you don't quite get that the purpose of asylum isn't just "when u do a run away from da war".
Yes it is. It's certainly nothing to do with poverty.
2. So we need to give people who have claimed from countries that are now safe, a period of time to get their affairs in order and return home". OK but why?
We've done the moral thing. Why does that extend to housing feeding educating etc, when the danger isn't there? Of course there's a compromise. You could set up a crowd funding site, to pay any short falls Lots of people like yourself can do that. That's the consensual set up. You do believe in consent?
3. If someone is working in the UK, living in the UK and has become a naturalised citizen - Then they aren't an asylum candidate.
On the getting the citizen ship, there needs to be an extended period of time. They must have made a net contribution and that is likely to continue.
4. They're not directly contributing to the housing crisis, or the mortgage crisis, or the cost of living crisis
They have increased the demand for housing, so they contribute. Mortgage crisis? What crisis? Cost of living? Yes they have if they pay less tax than the cost.
The backlog is I agree, a government error.
I've proposed a simple way to deal with the backlog. Reduce the housing crisis. Help with the cost of living crisis.
What you haven't said, which migrants we should accept.
So lets put some examples.
1. Deliveroo rider on min wage with a dependent.
2. Someone earning 28K a year with a dependent
3. Someone earning 38.5K a year with a dependent
4. Someone earning 100K a year with a dependent.
There's 4 wage points. The dependent bit is based on the actual average for the UK
Which one's help the UK financially, which ones don't?
@stinkoshatter-shield2096
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
## ELECTORAL REGISTER
The central question is where she was living after marrying Mark Rayner in 2010. She was registered to vote at the ex-council house she bought under right to buy in Vicarage Road, Stockport, between 2009 and 2015. And she has said: ‘I owned my own home, lived there, paid the bills there and was registered to vote there, prior to selling the house in 2015.’
But neighbours say she and her children were really based at her husband’s property in nearby Lowndes Lane, and The Mail on Sunday last week uncovered social media posts she made about their life there. Giving ‘false registration information’ on the electoral register is an offence under the Representation of the People Act 1983.
## BIRTH CERTIFICATES
A related issue is whether or not Ms Rayner recorded the correct address for her children.
In 2010, while on the electoral register at her own house in Vicarage Road, she re-registered the births of her two younger children – and wrote on the certificates that she lived in Lowndes Lane. It is an offence under the Perjury Act 1911 to make ‘any false statement with intent to have the same inserted in any register of births or deaths’.
## COUNCIL HOUSE
Ms Rayner bought her home in 2007 at a 25 per cent discount and sold it for a £48,500 profit in 2015.
But many councils state that in order to benefit from the discount, homeowners cannot vacate the property for several years after purchasing it – including by renting it out. If Ms Rayner was found to have lived at her husband’s property she could possibly face charges under the Fraud Act 2006 regarding ‘false representations’. Section 2 in particular.
## COUNCIL TAX
It may also have been an offence if she claimed a 25 per cent single occupancy discount on council tax bills. Ms Rayner is facing separate allegations that she may have avoided paying capital gains tax.
## TV LICENSE
Which property did she declare for TV License? Did she even buy one or was she dodging that as well?
Easy for the standards commissioner to check. TV licensing have all the records. Give then the two addresses, they give up the names and the dates.
## RENTAL INCOME
Did she pay tax?
£220 a week is the going rate. That's £11,440 a year. That's over the £10,000 a year threshold for declaring it on the register of interests. There's no such declaration.
## DELIBERATE
20 year statute of limitations.
## HER EX
Looks like her claiming capital gains exemption, means her ex is screwed if he wants to sell. He's then forced to pay the capital gains if she has legally dodged it.
## THATCHER
The left love to point out that the sale of council houses is very very bad. But here we have Rayner making a major profit out of a council tax sale.
## TIME LINES
You can't buy a council tax property and flip it. Has she waited long enough before cashing in?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
No. They will just state, rightly, that they were correcting errors in the system.
= They should have used a different userid and produced a comprehensive audit trail.
Absolutely correct. The software, for example on the accounting side needs to be that every transaction conforms to the accounting equation [the more general case of double entry]
Each transaction needs to generate an ACID set of entries. ie. All or nothing.
The transaction needs to be idempotent. If you book it twice it doesn't double up
The update time, the record time, and the booking time all need to be on the records. [Update time is a pure timestamp]. The record time, is when the transaction took place. The booking date is the date it was entered. You need three. That means you can book a transaction after a period has been closed because the booking date is after period end, but record date in the period. It doesn't affect the periods account, but appears in the next as adjustments to the prior period. You can select which view you want.
No accounting records are deleted. A new transaction goes in. The first part reverses the old transaction, the second part books the new. The old, the reversal and the new are all linked.
Each record has the user account used to make the entry. That includes system processes such as end of day.
Another bit you've missed, you need a full role based access control system. Who can see what and do what.
Then you need a completely separate and locked down audit log. Write only by the system, read only with special permissions. If you really push it, with cryptographic controls over sequences [to prevent deletions and insertions], crypto on the log itself [can't even be read without the private key, and strong check sums to prevent modifications.
Direct SQL modifications - a completely no no.
Lastly, you need integrity controls on the DB, and reports that check integrity.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@adamredwine774 In reality, most will never pay it back. They are liabilities.
On the children, the same applies. Even asigning all the profits from private schooling to the state, the average product of the state education system is negative. There's a deficit.
How does one of the 1.6 million migrants not working contribute to the UK? They consume just as much if not more than others. There's redistribution.
So a simple change to their tax code. 40K a year minimum tax code. If they aren't working they have to top up their tax at the end of the year, or they get a prosecution for tax evasion.
It's very simple. The migrants who are good for the UK aren't affected directly, one iota. Their tax code isn't changed.
For the ones that take from others, they can't.
Easy to implement, just a letter goes out, tax code changes, taxed at source the money flows in.
Next welfare, that's cancelled. None.
So two changes, solves lots of problems. Easy to implement. No new systems needed.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Jon-xw9om A private prosecution is a prosecution started by a private individual, or entity who/which is not acting on behalf of the police or other prosecuting authority. A 'prosecuting authority' includes, but is not limited to, an entity which has a statutory power to prosecute.
There are a number of organisations that regularly prosecute cases before the courts of England and Wales but they do so as private individuals, using the right of any individual to bring a private prosecution. One example is the RSPCA.
The right to bring private prosecutions is preserved by section 6(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act (POA) 1985. There are, however, some limitations:
the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) has power under section 6(2) POA 1985 to take over private prosecutions;
in some cases, the private prosecutor must seek the consent of the Attorney General or of the DPP before the commencement of proceedings.
In principle, there is nothing wrong in allowing a private prosecution to run its course through to verdict and, in appropriate cases, sentence. The fact that a private prosecution succeeds is not an indication that the case should have been prosecuted by the CPS. Parliament has specifically allowed for this possibility by the way section 6 is constructed: there is no requirement for the CPS to take over a private prosecution.
However, there will be instances where it is appropriate for the CPS to exercise the Director's powers under section 6(2) POA 1985, either to continue the prosecution or to discontinue or stop it.
The key point is that when asked to do so, the CPS must make a decision on whether or not to take over a private prosecution. The decision whether or not to take over a private prosecution should be made by the reviewing lawyer and endorsed/ratified by a Chief Crown Prosecutor (CCP) (or Deputy CCP (DCCP)) or relevant Head of Casework Divisions (HoD) (or their Deputy) and recorded in writing.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@PaulSmith-bd1bk They are incompentent. I had 8 complaints upheld last year, and if I pushed the failures to handle the complaints, with more complaints, that would go over 25. That's upheld, not rejected.
I've already got one this year upheld.
If as a police officer you are rude, commit a crime, commission a crime, I'll ask them what to do. They invariably say, if you don't like it, complain! 🙂
Problem is, when you know how the system works and what the game is, it backfires.
So if you ever need to make a complaint. Send a message
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
James Henry Hammond, a U.S. senator from South Carolina, in his famous 1858 "Cotton is King" speech, which illustrates the Southern justification for slavery in agriculture:
"In all social systems there must be a class to do the menial duties, to perform the drudgery of life... Such a class you must have, or you would not have that other class which leads progress, civilization, and refinement. It constitutes the very mud-sill of society and of political government... Fortunately for the South, she found a race adapted to that purpose to her hand—a race inferior to herself, but eminently qualified in temper, in vigor, in docility, in capacity to stand the climate, to answer all her purposes."
Straight of of Labour's manifesto. We need migrants to do shit jobs.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Inferno- That is even worse with the left. Here's my top three causes.
The state pension ponzi - wealth inequality, pensioner poverty, statea austerity, low take home pay, cost of living crisis
Uneconomical Migration - poverty, crime, housing crisis, NHS waiting lists, tensions in society, court backlog. Cuts in spending
Beveridge NHS (Not a Bismarck system) 20,000 avoidable deaths a year just in NHS acute hospitals in England.
Ever tried getting the left to discuss that?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RebeccaTurner-ny1xx They aren't advocating MMT.
MMT is just about what happens when you print money etc. What's happened is they have latched onto it to use it as excuse to justify the disaster of socialism.
So lets look at your inequality bit. The workers have paid the socialist welfare state trillions for their old age. No capitalism involved, there's no capital. All the money redistribtued which is a core socialist tenet.
So the wealth inequality, austerity, high taxes, low take home pay cost of living crisis, lack of investment, all caused by those socialist debts.
So now the need an excuse to screw people even more and they have latched onto MMT.
For example, governments can print to spend without taxation. That's not the whole story. Governments with fiat can print, but ultimately its about taxation. That's needed to give currency value, and the reason for spending is resources. That's why having a second currency, the voucher where you pay them all in vouchers shows the mess.
ie. spend/tax, which comes first is irrevant. You must do both.
They regularly switch between money and resources when it suits them, to con people that printing money is the same as creating resources.
But the hell is socialist. How are you going to pay your £600,000 share of those debts?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@andyinsuffolk For that junction, I've also done the analysis on fines. It's £1.2 million an hour if you fine at the max. Even at 10%, that is 120,000 an hour.
It's a major profit centre. Money going to waste.
Here's an idea that's cheap
ULEZ cameras film a junction. It's trivial AI to pick up on offences Red light jumping, cycling on pedestrian only crossings, pavement cycling. That gets the video, and the close up images of the cyclist. That gets stored Then a few months later, an operation, stop those committing an offence. £100 fine, name and address AND a photograph. All that put into the system Then click search. The photograph is matched against photographs of previous offences, and 500 letters sent out, with £100 fines. £50,000 dished out. What's funny, its a magistrate's fine, so you can't get out of it with bankruptcy
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Royboy50 No discrimination. Doesn't matter what race, gender, sexual preference, ...
Purely, if you come to the UK, you cannot force other people to fund you.
Now lots of people will object I'm sure. Who will pick my crops, clean my toilet, serve me my latte. The same argument used by plantation owners of course. That philosophy.
However they should be allowed to sponsor migrants. They make up any short fall in costs, pay for prosecutions, imprisonment, deportation, out of their taxed income. That debt isn't included in bankruptcy. It's a debt for life, and for your children, ...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So how are the numbers fiddled to make things look safe?
You can do two things. Don't include debts, inflate income available for the debts
Debt over GPD. A bad measure. The reason is the state cannot tax 100% of the economy. People can't afford it and want to eat.
It's just like saying including your neighbour's income in your mortgage application.
Why not Debt / Taxes? ie debt / income. Problem here is that people want services for their taxes, so even that is a bad measure.
Debt / (taxes less core spending). This is a more realistic measure.
Or you ask the question, what's a reason gross profit margin for the state on its services? That's taxes / cost of services - 1.0.
Currently the state makes a 30% gross profit margin. That's a measure of the austerity needed to pay the debts.
That's fiddling the income side.
Fiddling the debt numbers? Just don't report debts. State pension, PS worker's pensions, the EU, unpaid wages, unpaid invoices, damages [NHS, Post Office], the EU, nuclear clean up, all left off. Just the money owed to bankers included.
Other measures. Total debt per tax payer. £800,000.
Rate of increase in the debt. If its consistently above growth in GDP, its screwed. Long term growth rate is 10% per annum.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How to fiddle debt numbers to make them look affordable.
What you do is have a ratio, like for mortgages that you can borrow three times earnings. That affordability ratio is then debt / annual earnings. If its less than tree its deemed safe.
So to make debts look affordable you can fiddle the numerator down, or inflation the denominator.
Here's some ways to do it.
1. Fiddle the income,
On the income side, assume that you can spend all of GDP on the debt, not just tax.
On the tax front, will the public accept zero services and all their money going on the debts? Clearly not, so even using tax as the income amount is a fiddle.
2. Fiddle the debt number
Banks aren't stupid and insist the money owed to them is reported. So the borrowing gets reported.
But what about the other debts?
Public sector pensions? Off the books so off the debt number. Same for
State pensions
Nuclear clean up
Unpaid wages
Unpaid invoices
EU pensions
Damages for people killed and injured by the NHS, the Post Office
Expected losses on insurance contracts such as guarantees.
Notice almost all debts are omitted, just the money owed to bankers and speculators like Gary.
Makes the debt look "affordable" when you only include one of the debts, and double your income and state its 100% taxation with no services
What other measures can you use to measure affordability?
Debts / (taxes less core spending). Core spending is spending you can't cut without people dying.
You could also look at what level of austerity the public will tolerate. There are two measures of austerity. First is gross profit made by the state. That's taxes less cost of services. The other is take home pay.
So another measure, spending on the debt, is a measure of austerity.
Then you what I think is a measure that's very predictive. It's to compare the growth in size of the debts - all of them - against the increase in GDP. When the growth in the debt is consistently above the growth in GDP, its going to go wrong.
But for the left there's another measure relating to this that they really want to bury. What could you have had if your wealth hadn't been taken, but you invested and owned it? How big would your fund have been if you had been permitted to do what the rich have done.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@StudentDad-mc3pu
The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 Section 34
34.—(1) If an amount which has fallen due under regulation 23(3) or (4) is wholly or partly unpaid, or (in a case where a final notice is required under regulation 33) the amount stated in the final notice is wholly or partly unpaid at the expiry of the period of 7 days beginning with the day on which the notice was issued, the billing authority may, in accordance with paragraph (2), apply to a magistrates' court for an order against the person by whom it is payable.
(2) The application is to be instituted by making complaint to a justice of the peace, and requesting the issue of a summons directed to that person to appear before the court to show why he has not paid the sum which is outstanding.
So they have to apply to the magistrate to get the summons, and the JP issues the summons.
Councils ARE NOT ALLOWED TO ISSUE SUMMONSES.
So when they do, when they send them out, not the courts, when they jump the gun and send them out before the magistrate has issued them, they are in the wrong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Another example for you, and part will be easy, part will be hard I think for you software.
You can get from the DWP, a sample, scaled to actual size of the sex, age, number of years of entitlement, pension being received, for the DWP's pension debts. ie. The inputs.
Can you calculate the liabilities? Sum (future pay out * risk free discount factor * probability of making the payment)
The life curve is easily found from the ONS.
The triple lock is harder to value in, so start with inflation only
Next can you handle joint lives?
That's the frightning number that economists ignore because they are playing fantasy economics. Garbage in, Garbage out
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@daveydarko5026 On what can ameolorate it.
For new arrivals who pay less in than they take out, that ends, you have to go home. Same for any with criminal records. That is one cut to spending that is huge.
Second some of those will be working. That frees up jobs for brits, and wages start to rise.
The state needs to be cut back. Lets take one example, car tax. Abolish it. All the DVLA is manage licenses and car ownership. The VED money then goes on fuel. Collected already, it saves huge amounts, can't easily be dodged. So jobs go, government more efficient. Lots of examples like that.
Then we need to move away, quickly from the pension ponzi the state current runs. Mr Average, 15 years and he's better off, Mr Min wage, 20-21 years.
But to do that we are talking massive cuts to state spending. Not a few billion, but hundreds of billions. Can that be done? yes.
Will it be done? Yes. The issue is it a catestrophic collapse, or managed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jsach2020 I missed on bit.
By your theory anyone who earns under the average salary (Brit/Immigrant) is a burden to society?
Absolutely correct. They are. Someone else is forced to pay for them. They are forced to pay huge sums of money.
There's a website called entitled too. Very left wing. I suggest putting a min wage earner, somewhere in London, with two kids in and a wife. Lots meet that criteria.
See how much they really get in direct support.
Then on top, 2,800 each person for common goods. 3,000 each person for NHS. 8,000 for each kid for education.
Total it up. It's a huge amount of money, all tax free, coming out of someone else pocket.
So the issue is, why allow in more people who need that level of support when there's a simple option of saying no?
By the way, your cost numbers on uni are very interesting. It backs up my view that undergraduates are a good deal for the UK, if they leave at the end. Post grads too. But language students are a bad deal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jsach2020 I haven't made that up, it is an existing UKBA regulation.
=========
It's clearly not. Go into any Starbucks, and Pret and you will see huge numbers of migrants working low paid jobs. They do not make that threshold. That's evidence even you can go and check.
=====
End of the day, I know my story I know how much I have contributed to this country and still being made to feel like an imposter by some
=====
This is because people have worked out that there are huge numbers of people on low wages who are migrants and they have been forced to hand over their money to them by the state. No consent.
That's why that full implementation of no recourse to any subsidises is needed. Not only is it fair people will know, that if you are here, as a mercenary [ ;-)) ], you are paying your way
====
I still stand by my view that legal immigration does no harm, in fact it helps build the country.
===
It does IF, and that's the bit that is important, each migrant pays in more than they cost and everyone else knows that is the case because its enforced.
There is on the left, the plantation owned mentality. Who will do X? Pick cotton, clean toilets, ... It shows their real thoughts
=====
I want all the citizens to be treated fairly (regardless of race),
=====
Almost. No disclination, but if you are a migrant there is that additional net contributors only rule.
For migrants who commit offences again the rules are different. You should and must be deported.
Unfortunately, transportation is no longer an option.
But I am strongly against rejoiners who want special rules for the 97% white EU nationals, different rules for Indians. As you know that's what happens.
===
I have seen fellow Indians come here and excell in their individual fields, I have seen them give back to the communities
===
Absolutely correct. But the test is
no criminals, net contributors only, and no discrimination. That's a simple set of rules, and its clearly failed.
We have anti white discrimination being openly practiced. We have millions of low paid net consumers, and we have tens of thousands of criminals who even post conviction haven't been deported.
I'll stay this out front. At a minimum 50% of those from Rotherham can be deported to Pakistan. They haven't been.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So what's the solution. A register of greens. Tory MPs added, Labour MPs added, SNP, the works. Same for members of the Green party. They get a small badge to show they are in the club. Then its full zero carbon. Not net zero, zero carbon.
Electricity supply? Renewable with no subsidies, and smart meters that cut the power.
Electric only driving licenses, and massive fines if in a fossil vehicle of any sort.
Added to the no fly list, ideally just after they jet off to Bora Bora. Tickets cancelled, not allowed to buy new ones.
Gas supply cross checked against electoral roll, and that's cut off.
It's what they want, lets make sure they get what they want.
How to get off the list? Well that's difficult and would need a lot of work to implement. 10-20 years minimum
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@zotriczaoh7098 Wolfram is rules based. For example, LLM. How does it do, say, integration by parts and get it right? It's no a social science where near enough applies?
So how is it going to work. Look at the recent models that do train of thought. In effect ask it, how would you go about solving it, instead of asking, solve it.
Then given you have that plan, the plan is executed in Wolfram.
Stephen's done TED talks on this and written on it too. It's what's going to happen. You already have AI that codes, then executes the code. So that's what it would be. Plan, produce the code for a step, Execute. Take the answer, evaluate, code, execute the next step.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@WhatyourAncestorsknew That's not THE problem. The problem is westminster.
For the ECHR, its very simple. We have a list of safe countries. Asylum ends for people from those countries. We have prepared a letter. If you take a case relating to it, we will save a lot of money. We withdraw. It's that simple. The ECHR can take the case if they want, but the funding ends the next day.
Start with criminals. I hear talk of 100,000.
1% of UK flights is 60 a day. 100 on each flight. We are talking just over 2 weeks. Lets say a month.
It's not hard is it. In practice, since lots are already in jail, that gets drawn out over time. For those with new convictions, its from the court door to the holding area, on a plane out within a couple of days. If they want to appeal, they can from their home country, at their expense.
That removes those ones who do the most harm, are most likely to riot. Sends a message to the others we aren't messing around.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@6581punk Let me look at my long list of MPs
Yep, here are the numbers for the MPs that lost their credit cards in 2015
Ben Gummer – £1,290.07
Brian Binley – £575.02
David Willetts – £1,172.05
Debbie Abrahams – £2,586.90
Eric Joyce – £12,919.61
Iain Duncan Smith – £1,057.28
Ian Liddell-Grainger – £1,023.94
Ian Paisley Jr – £6,195.94
Jack Dromey – £1,328.46
John Woodcock – £1,756.13
Mark Lancaster – £600.00
Mike Crockart – £720.64
Pamela Nash – £6,929.29
Paul Farrelly – £213.00
Rachel Reeves – £4,033.63
Simon Danczuk – £3,645.67
Simon Hughes – £826.56
Stephen Gilbert – £2,925.76
Toby Perkins – £693.30
She's on it. Number 4 on the list by size.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@indricotherium4802 It still means that the majority will screw the minority.
So here's a better solution.
Open primaries. That removes the power of central office and selection committees.
Next an addition to the HRA. Everyone has the right of explicit informed consent. That protects the minority. You can't tap people as a government to fund wars, migration, sex changes, when people say, I don't consent. As a government you have to find people willing to hand over their cash.
Next. Lets get rid of the lord. 150 million a year saved. What we do is take 20 million of that and add it to the voter registration system. You get to nominate an MP, any MP, as your proxy. You can change your proxy at any time
Proxy votes are the only thing that counts to get bills passed.
So what does that fix?
Tory vote in a Labour seat? Nominate a Tory MP
Direct democracy? One MP would set up a proxy website, where they will pass on your proxy vote.
Manifestos. Things not in the manifesto? You can stop it.
In the manifesto, and not implemented? Well that isn't covered.
If you don't like a policy? Well you have the right of consent. They can't force it on you.
If MPs lie then that's not informed consent. As the victim, you can't be punished for saying no.
Far better than PR, where the control is with whoever controls the party list. You won't get what you want with PR.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@azillliasmith2734 So here's a plan.
1. List of safe countries. Solves the Home Office farce, the court farce.
2. No asylum from safe countries. Asylum ends.
3. Automatic deportation on conviction. From the court or from the prison gate if custodial. You can appeal the sentence, not the deportation
4. For those from dangerous countries a camp on the Falklands until its safe. Prevents the Argentines from invading and acquiring the problem.
5. No welfare for any new arrivals.
6. Then you start on the rest with the no welfare. You get a list, payments out including NHS insurance, common goods, schooling, everything, compared to tax paid.
You start canceling the welfare of the most expensive. Overnight, no money. Offered instead is a free flight home, and some getting started cash.
7. If they riot, then its jail and deportation with no cash.
The message will get through. LIFO for the channel lot. You must allow them to keep their phones. That way they tell all their mates.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GeoVestAdvisors The big problem is the Garbage in, Garbage out.
Another example is mortgages. They were sold orginally as 3 times salary. Why 3 times salary? It's not the actual rule. It just a rule of thumb used by the advertisers to say what multiple of earnings you could borrow.
The actual measure was not more than 50% of after tax income, and even there that was only for the better off, because of other costs like heating and eating.
Turns out in most interest rate regimes, that equates to 3 times earnings.
That's the affordability measure. If interest rates are zero, then you can go to higher multiples.
The real question relates to risks, if interst rates rise, Multiples of earnings is irrelevant at zero percent
So notice yesterday how the level of interest rates was completely ignored, and the percentage of income being use to service the mortgage, that's ingored too because it blows the narative out of the water.
Similarly, in the UK, the elephant in the room. Mass migration causes a massive increase in demand beyond the ability to build houses. So prices rocket. Ignored.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How to fix climate change?
First a green register for greens. They get a special badge to show off their green credentials
Then their name is added to the no fly list. Personally, this should happen just after they jet off long haul
Electoral Roll is cross checked against the register and gas supply. Then the gas is cut off.
Smart meters, when the wind doesn't blow etc, click the power is cut off.
Green only tariffs, no subsidies. After all they say subsidies are bad.
Electric only driving licenses. If caught in a fossil powered vehicle, that they own, its crushed. If caught in a fossil powered vehicle, that someone else's owns, its crushed, and they compensate the owner.
On the register, automatic DNR and spare parts harvested.
There you go, an easy fix, using existing systems bar the register, so its cheap. I might have gone a tad too far on the last one.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The doctrine of judicial recusal dictates that a judge may recuse himself from proceedings if he decides that it is not appropriate for him to hear a case listed to be heard by him. A judge may recuse himself when a party applies to him to do so. A judge must step down in circumstances where there appears to be bias or ‘apparent bias’.
Judicial recusal is not then a matter of discretion. The test for determining apparent bias is this: if a fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility that the judge was biased, the judge must recuse himself (see Porter v Magill [2002] 2 AC 357 at [102]). That test is to be applied having regard to all the circumstances of the case.
The doctrine is underpinned by important public policy reasons. The judiciary must ensure that it remains independent and that it is seen to be independent of any influence that might reasonably be perceived as compromising its ability to judge cases fairly and impartially.
Judges in the UK take an oath or affirmation of office, where they solemnly promise to "do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm without fear or favour, affection or ill will."
The common law tradition, developed through precedents and case law, reinforces the requirement for judges to be impartial.
If a judge has any personal interest or a connection to a case that could affect their impartiality, they are expected to recuse themselves from hearing that case.
In this case they were effectively let off after committing a terrorist offence. Given the prior behaviour of the judge its certainly the appearance of bias.
It follows that judicial office holders should, so far as is reasonable, avoid extra-judicial activities that are likely to cause them to have to refrain from sitting because of a reasonable apprehension of bias or because of a conflict of interest that would arise from the activity.
The question is not whether the judicial office holder would in fact be biased (which would, of course, require recusal). Judicial office holders must recuse themselves from any case where a fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility that they would be biased. This hypothetical observer is taken to know that judges take an oath to administer justice without fear or favour, but also to know that the taking of the oath, by itself, is not sufficient guarantee to exclude all legitimate doubt
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So the practicalities. 100K foreign criminals. How quickly can they be removed?
Lets assume its all flights. There are 6000 flights a day in the UK. 1% for the removal? That's 60 flights.
Then we have 200 seats per flight. Lets reduce that to 100, because you will guards as well. So that 6,000 a day.
18 days, and the problem is solved. So the bottle neck isn't flights.
So you need to get them to the airports, get a plane full, and send them home. What you need is a holding center. Lets say we start off with Nigerians.
Round them up, that's the more difficult part, but they turn up for their interviews, you ship them off to the holding center. Pick them up on the street - holding center.
Hotels? Ship them to the holding centers.
Paperwork? Will Nigeria provide the papers? No. Then all visas, residency permits, work permits the works, welfare, everything cancelled for all Nigerians in the UK.
No tourists visas, no access to the NHS. Nigeria's choice.
So legally what's needed? No legal aid for foreigners regarding right to stay, asylum. If the courts say you have to provide it, £50 and its capped.
A list of safe countries. No asylum from safe countries.
You can always declare an emergency and take emergency powers.
The criminal element sends a major message. Can politicised courts go against that? Threats work. For example their little tax evasion law on their pensions
That can always be revoked. A new court can be created and stuffed with members, about the Supreme Court.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How to fix climate change?
First a green register for greens. They get a special badge to show off their green credentials
Then their name is added to the no fly list. Personally, this should happen just after they jet off long haul
Electoral Roll is cross checked against the register and gas supply. Then the gas is cut off.
Smart meters, when the wind doesn't blow etc, click the power is cut off.
Green only tariffs, no subsidies. After all they say subsidies are bad.
Electric only driving licenses.
If caught in a fossil powered vehicle, that they own, its crushed.
If caught in a fossil powered vehicle, that someone else's owns, its crushed, and they compensate the owner.
There you go, an easy fix, using existing systems bar the register, so its cheap
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Is shit racist?
However, yellow stool can also be a sign of a medical condition affecting the
liver, pancreas, or gallbladder. For example, liver disease such as hepatitis or
cirrhosis can cause yellowing of the skin and eyes (jaundice) and yellow-coloured
stool due to the build-up of bilirubin in the body.
Other possible causes of yellow stool include pancreatic disorders, such as
pancreatitis, or inflammation of the small intestine, such as celiac disease or
Crohn's disease. Hence Chinese people are targeted by the white patriarchy, and shit is racist.
Red stool can be a sign of bleeding in the digestive tract. The colour of the
stool can vary depending on the location and severity of the bleeding.
If the bleeding is in the lower digestive tract, such as the colon or rectum,
the blood may mix with the stool and give it a reddish colour. The bleeding could
be due to a variety of conditions such as haemorrhoids, inflammatory bowel
disease, or colorectal cancer. But that's just a sign of the oppression
heaped on native red Indians in the USA by the white male patriarchy.
Black stools can indicate that there may be bleeding in the upper
gastrointestinal tract, such as the stomach or small intestine. The black colour
can occur due to the digestion of blood in the digestive system.
However, it's important to note that certain
medications and supplements, such as iron supplements or bismuth-containing
compounds, can also cause stools to appear black. Certain foods, such as
blueberries or liquorice, can also temporarily cause black stools. So you can
transition your shit and become black. Plus you might get some of that
reparation money.
If your stool is consistently white or light-coloured, it could indicate a
problem with your liver or bile ducts. Bile, which is produced in the liver and
stored in the gallbladder, gives your stool its brown colour. If your liver is
not producing enough bile or your bile ducts are blocked, your stool may appear
pale or white. Lets face it the white patriarchy are full of bile and shit,
and now there is medical proof they are racist.
=========
The Guardian view of the subject.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Not working? Zero contributions. Massive consumers of other people's money. There's an easy solution
1. No discrimination. No pro White EU racism for example.
2. Net contributors only.
3. You get a minimum tax code of 38,500 a year, increasing in line with average wages.
4. No welfare for economic migrants. No housing benefit, income support....
5. Remember, they came here for economic reasons. If its not economic for them they leave.
What happens?
1. Massive cuts in state spending.
2. The beneficial migrants not affected
3. Wages rise for the poor brits
4. Tax receipts from brits go up
5. Welfare for brits goes down
6. Housing problem cured.
How to implement?
1. Average wage - once a year from the ONS
2. Tax code? HMRC already know who is from overseas because of NI registration. Letters go out to employers.
3. Annual Check? Easy
4. Letters with the short fall? Easy
5. No welfare because you earn 38,500 a year.
6. Tax avoidance convictions? Easy - single justice system. All cases signed off by one judge.
7. One law change, on conviction, deported. Make it automatic. You can appeal the conviction, not the deportation.
Can be done in under a month, and then the cash starts rolling in. Taxed at source, the companies hand over the tax to the government. They won't break the law because the consequences are no company.
So the migrants have to make another economic decision.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oneoflokis Some are latex, some are fossil fuelled.
When it comes to these policies I'm in favour of experimentation. Not 1935's Germany experimentation on people without consent.
No, the greens sign up to a register, get a badge they can wear to virtue signal. Then we impose all their policies on them.
Washing out condoms and re-using them is one. It will need a new quango, OffBonk to make sure they are playing by the rules.
Another example is flying
Then their name is added to the no fly list. Personally, this should happen just after they jet off long haul
Electoral Roll is cross checked against the register and gas
supply. Then the gas is cut off.
Smart meters, when the wind doesn't blow etc, click the power is cut off.
Green only tariffs, no subsidies. After all they say subsidies are bad.
Electric only driving licenses. If caught in a fossil powered vehicle, that they own, its crushed. If caught in a fossil powered vehicle, that someone else's owns, its crushed, and they compensate the owner.
Lets experiment on their first, see how it works.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rickymort135 A liability/debt is a present obligation of the enterprise arising from past events, the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow from the enterprise of resources embodying economic benefits
For example, if the state has received money in the past and is obligated to pay it back in the future its a debt. e.g Borrowing or pensions.
Economic value covers services and goods. For example, if you worked for the state in the past and as a result the state is obligated to pay you a pension in the future, its a debt. Same for unpaid wages.
Other examples, if we take the NHS. If the NHS has damaged someone in the past, from a mistake then the expected damages are also a debt/liability
Borrowing
State pension
Civil service pension
Unpaid wages
Unpaid invoices
The EU
Expected losses on insurance contracts
Expected damages (Post office, NHS etc)
Nuclear clean up (paid up front, state pays for the work)
Expected losses on guarantees.
So in your case of Groceries. There's no payment in the past, The transaction for the delivery of groceries, against payment, has both legs in the future.
It's not a current debt.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rickymort135 No you replyed ot someon else expecting me to respond.
It's very simple. Future food purchases are paid for in the future. The payment and receipt of food are both in the future, so that isn't a debt.
If you paid last week for a delivery of a TV next month, that's a debt. The company who sold you the TV owes you the TV. One leg [the payment was in the past] The delivery in the future.
If you deposit money with a bank at 2% interest, due in a year. Then you have 1 leg in the past, one in the future. The bank owes you.
If you borrowed money in the past, to be repaid in the future, its a debt.
If you spent on a credit car two years ago and paid of the balance, last year, its not a current debt. It was a debt, but since both sides are now in the past, there is currently no debt.
Now for thewaffle. Those pensions debt cause the wealth inequallity and austerity.
People had paid the state close to 20% of their income. If they had invested that you wouldn't have been talking about wealth inequality.
Mr Average for example, retiring today, 1.15 million in a fund if their NI had been invested. Instead they get zero assets and a share of those pension debts. 800K. They are down close to £2 million.
future liabilities, or potential future liabilities
I'm not talking future liabilities or past liabilities.
Current liabilities only.
What's the difference in your world, for the balance sheet for
a) Past liabilities?
b) Current liabilities?
c) Future liabilities?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rickymort135 No. Pensions can be past, current or future.
The key is when people paid the state, and when the state's obliged to pay them.
So lets take the case of your mum. She's paid the state for her pension, and will use that money to buy her groceries.
She paid the state in the past. The state will pay her in the future. One leg in the past, one in the future, that means its a current debt. That appears on the balance sheet.
Joe Little, 14, hasn't started work yet. He's not contributed to the state for his pension. He will do in the future when he starts work, and his pension will/may be paid when he is old. The contributions in the future, the pension in the future. Not a current liability so DOESN'T get included in the debt number
Ethel, who paid in in the 1940s and has died, well the payments and the pensions are all in the past. Doesn't appear on the books.
Remember 4 books of accounts. Assets and liabilities are the balance sheet. Income and expense are separate.
Income and expenses are recorded this year only. That is contributions in, and payments out.
You DO NOT record in the income and expense books future payments in or out.
On the balance sheet you do record the current value of assets and liabilities. But you need that two leg test, and you record the present value of them.
For example, you don't assume that you have 1 Apple share and its going to be worth a trillion in the future. If you own it [one test] you record the current market value.
Do you know the difference between income and expense books, and the balance sheet?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rickymort135 .And I checked and the government follows FREM an adapted version of IFRS which spells out how to report tax income... So you're doubly incorrect
Post the the evidence. Somehting that is searchable to back up your statement.
= BTW under IFRS, no, civil servants technically aren't owed pensions because there's no contractual obligation.
For PS workers, it is contractual. The state needs to implement a law that changes the contract.
For the state pension its the law. To get out of paying in full, the state needs to change the law.
That they have to change the law to get out, is 100% evidence that its currently a debt.
Changing the law not to pay, is just the mechanism where the state defaults, again, and the peasants lose.
You're just a typical socialist. Take the money, then screw the peasants over.
Here's your problem. Reform come in. State simply to the treasury, DWP, you follow IFRS to the letter. The debts then get published. They then send a letter with the full details of the debts that have been stuffed down the back of the sofa to all taxpayers, with their share. They could even add on, if your NI had been invested, this is what you could have had. Last line, this is your total loss.
What's the swamp going to do about that?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@richardroulstone-roberts8598 I agree and that is a problem. Youngsters don't realise.
So what's the solution for Reform? It's information.
1. Full audit of the pension debts.
2. Everyone gets an annual statement of their share.
3. They could even be told, if we had invested your wealth, this is what you could have had.
ie. A statement as to what you have lost.
So you're 18 years old, and a brown envelope pops through the door. Congrations on being allowed to drink etc. Here's you 600K pension debt, your 185K borrowing debt. We hide it, but you're on the hook.
That deals with youngster's ignorance. It deals with Tories, Labour, Lib Dems, PC, SNP, ...
Who would have thought a bit of sunlight disinfects completely
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The man who spent £160,000 on chauffeur cars ,took an 85 min flight to Belfast costing £443.spent £20,000 on 4 flights to Washington ,spent £724 for taxis, and took home over £1 million in 5 years in charge of the CPS, and takes a £336,000 State pension and spent £250,000 in travel over 5 years as a public prosecutor.
The man with his own special tax bill, passed by parliament, just so he can dodge taxes.
The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013
Plus £115,000 a year for life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You need to stagger it.
Start off with no welfare for new arrivals, and minimum tax codes of 40K a year,. That's break even.
Second automatic deportation for convictions.
So when that tax isn't paid, boom, single justice system, you get sent the papers, if you don't stump up the cash, its a bulk signing and now you're a criminal.
I suspect that the left will go and say you can't do that for recent arrivals, its discrimation.So the state agrees, applies it to all. Not what the left wanted , but ...
A list of safe countries. No asylum from safe countries. Canceled with a grace period or refused for new ones, then you are shipped home.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
On the mammoth hunting.
An adventurer travels through the jungle and is suddenly confronted by an unusual sight: fallen trees and trampled vegetation as if something gigantic has forced its way through. He decides to investigate.
After walking for a few minutes, he sees a dead elephant lying on its side and a pygmy jumping up and down with excitement on top of the fallen elephant. The adventurer inquires as to what is going on.
"The elephant, sir," explains the pygmy. "The elephant has gone mad. 'Tis terrible. Elephants are wise and friendly, but when an elephant goes mad, it destroys everything in its path. It cannot be reasoned with, no sir, and it cannot be helped in any way. Unfortunately, when it happens, the elephant has to be put down."
The adventurer inquires, "But how did you kill such a gigantic animal?"
"I killed it with a club," helpfully explains the pygmy.
"It must have been a big club," observes the adventurer.
"Yes, sir, a very big club indeed," says the pygmy. "We have over 300 members!"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
One interesting feature of the councils going bust is investment.
The left demands investment. So I ask where are the accounts for these "investments". I want to see the income and expense accounts to see if they have made a profit, and similarly the balance sheet showing assets a liabilities to see the same thing. They can't provide them, because the investments aren't investments
The exceptions are councils. We know can see exactly how these government investments have worked.
The latest is Nottingham. The BBC doesn't report what has gone on. However, they started a company Robin Hood Energy. The only bit of that name that's correct is the robbing bit. The tax payers have been robbed. Auditors Grant Thornton calculated the council had invested a total of £43m into the company and risked £16.5m in guarantees.
Bristol did it first. The failed energy company, set up by Bristol City Council, lost around £46m. A report examined why extra council investment was approved despite the heavy losses.
So why did Nottingham copy the investment?
Croydon. Bust three times.
Croydon borrowed £545m during the past three years to invest in housing and commercial property. This included a £200m loan to its own housing development arm Brick By Brick, which has yet to return a dividend. The council has capital borrowings of nearly £2bn.
It invested £30m in the local Croydon Park Hotel in 2018-19. This went into administration in June. It also spent £46m on a shopping centre. The council’s strategy of “invest[ing] its way out of financial challenge” was “inherently flawed”, as councillors did not properly understand the retail and leisure markets, auditors said.
It had debts that totalled £1.3bn.
Woking. Following a failed investment strategy, propelled by borrowing hundreds of millions of pounds for local regeneration projects, Woking Borough Council issued a section 114 notice in June. The council – which invested in building a new shopping centre, residential skyscrapers and the cutlery for a 23-storey Hilton hotel in the town centre – has debts which are forecast to reach £2.6bn
Thurrock’s situation emerged after it provided £655m to companies via bonds, including the purchase of 53 solar farms.
1
-
Sexual Offences Act 2003, S1, Rape.
Rape
(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,
(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
(2)Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.
(3)Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.
(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.
The only tricky word is "He" in section 1 a
However, English law also states.
"Unless the contexts otherwise demands, words importing any gender shall be interpreted to mean any or all genders."
In this case, he/she has a problem because of part 1(a)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Veeger My current complaint. Parking on double reds to fine people for parking on double reds. I've challenged them in the past, they carried on. So its a policy that's gone wrong. In this case the officers went on the attack, accusing me of harassment. They said if I don't like it, complain. What they didn't know is that I had been doing my research. Basic police drivers MUST obey the highway code at all times. He admitted to being a basic police driver. I FOI'd the Met, do they have any divergence from the college of policing rules. No was the answer for basic drivers.
So the complaint goes in. I SAR'd for their body worn video, made it clear I wanted to see their statements and the video in case there were any follow ups. [In reality it would be them being very very rude about me]. So they want to hide that.
First major cause for concern, a second response on the FOI contradicting the first. ie. Professional standards had told the FOI if you don't change your answer, we have a problem. So I raised the complaint to perverting the course of justice, and SARed for all the communications on why the FOI was changed. They have gone completely silent on that.
They have also stated the answer is going for review before being sent out. No statements, no body worn video supplied. Just you have your video of it. I do, I want the discussion afterwards.
I also said if they proceed in the way they are, each and everyone of my FOIs and SARs where they breached the time limit and I complained was under schedule 3. They will get follow up complaints for not following the law on resolution letters. That doubles the number they will have to write. All will go to MOPAC, and all the information ones to the ICO.
Given the repeated nature, the ICO is suspect will fine. MOPAC - there's an 8 month delay - have a problem because it shows a pattern of abuse of complaints.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Updates - boy, 17, dies after shop knife attack in Smethwick and crash near city hospital
West Midlands Police said the victim was chased into a shop in Waterloo Road, Smethwick, before being stabbed
=============
Could be connected.
=============
A shop worker has described seeing a teenager being 'chased' into a store room before a man with a machete began 'stabbing and thrusting' at him. Derlano Samuels, 17, was seen running into a Smethwick shop on May 1 last dyear before a man with a 'large knife about 25cm long' followed, Wolverhampton Crown Court heard today.
Derlano was allegedly stabbed multiple times. Cam'ron Dunn, 19, denies murder.
=============
From 2 years ago. Found Guilty.
Nash Dhindsa said: "Becoming the norm around the West Mids, I said this before parents need to wake up to what your twinkles are up to on the corners with their so-called friends." June Price commented: "Vile stinking thug. Big man with a weapon [in] his hand."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
To people who owe them money, because they have evidence. For example, an invoice.
Dear Dave.
Thank you for the ten letters you sent concerning the lack of a TV license at this address, each demanding action and making threats.
Presumably, you find it inconceivable that I might be able to live my life without a television set. Please rest assured that I have clean drinking water and adequate sanitation; televisual entertainment is the only impoverished aspect of my life.
As it happens, I find it inconceivable that you could live your life without a copy of my book, My Erotic Granny Does Grangemouth. It's a literary homage to one of my favourite films, Debbie does Dallas.
However, my records show no purchases from your address. Even though all my books are available to download from the Internet (much like BBC iPlayer and Netflix), I still find it beyond belief that you would be able to live and breathe without paper copies.
You have left me no alternative but to schedule a visit from my enforcement officer. He will visit your address without any further warning and threaten you with a court order if you do not let him in immediately. Upon access, he will conduct a thorough search of your premises.
A.
There you go, why won't you pay me? I've sent you a message.
@Daverocks-zp3kh
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@BasedScotsman1984 Exactly. Now I would make a change to legal aid. Zero for nationality, for migration issues.
I'd make deporation on conviction automatic, and loss of nationality too.
Lastly you need to have a migration court, staffed by "sound people" that is superior to the supreme court and the ECHR.
Then for things like illegal entry into the UK, its the Single Justice System. Papers sent out, you have 2 weeks to respond. Then its signed off in bulk, and you are out.
A list of safe countries is also needed. That cuts out the Home Office.
I'd also start investigations into acquiring UK nationality. I bet you lots were wrong or corrupt. If that's the case, all are cancelled. You get a refund or you get to apply again, for free.
But you have to meet the no criminality, net contributor only test. If so, I'm more than happy to have you here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@@Cernunnos-2024 Well, you are going to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Here's a very simple policy that fixes most things.
1. Make a list of safe countries. You could even require the SC to accept or reject the list up front. ie. Can a single white woman go there on holiday?
2. Any person claiming asylum from a safe country is rejected and returned.
3. If the country is added to the safe list, we help people we sheltered to return home. 3 months to sort their affairs out.
4. No criminals - deported.
5. No discrimination. e.g Special rules for EU nationals who are 97% white.
6. For economic migrants, a net contributor rule. Their tax code is set at average government spend. 14K a year. I suspect you would say if they are paying in more, the more the better. Your tax bill goes down.
So that's an annual test. For that you get your residency permit extended. If you don't pay that, its cancelled. No need for thousands of civil servants to work out points and get it wrong. Just a tax code from HMRC. Easy peasy. It's then taxed at source. Of course when you are paying 14K a year in tax, you are too rich to claim welfare. So no welfare.
7. Those entering illegally - prosecuted - see the no criminals bit
8. Now some will turn up with no papers. Off to a Scottish island. Any claims put on hold until your papers arrive. If you won't say where you are from, you are stuck. If your government doesn't hand over documents, you are stuck.
It's not difficult to solve. The HMRC tax code is the one the left loathe. After all they claim migrants a benefit. The tax code makes sure they are.
But we all know what the left want. Cheap servants, cheap tarts, cheap employees and to surpress the wages of the workers to keep them poor whilst they asset strip them.
The Curley effect is strong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@helenb6399 There are ways. For example, before Musk started I was doing the same.
I asked the Palace of Westminster security if you could get in without a pass or temporary pass being recorded in your database. Answer no, do you think we are stupid?
So I asked the lords for how many sitting days each peer had used a pass or temporary pass to get n. They can claim for sitting days.
First response, here are their expenses.
No I asked for sitting days and passes.
Second response, Peers can get in via the Peer's entrance without it being recorded.
So I reply, adding in the head of security, original email, saying one of you is lying.
The Clerk of Parliaments, Michael Pownall, sends back a state secrecy certificate he had signed.
One of his roles is dishing out the expenses.
So one approach, release the full details, which dates they attended from the IT system. Which dates they claimed for from their expenses.
Then for those that claimed for any day fraudulently, you've got a choice. Resign or be prosecuted. Or both.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jamesjefferies3762 Can you pay £600,000 of debt rising at £60,000 a year?
If you and all other taxpayer's don't hand over that money, Granny gets no pension.
So austerity, he's caused it. Lack of investment, he's caused it. Pensioner poverty, low take home pay, he's cause it.
It's his policies that have created the mess.
So in this case, his wealth, that pension. It's unproductive. It generates no income, no growth. It does the opposite.
So why not tax his pension? That money can then be spent by the state. Won't be productive, but its in the economy,
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I had an interesting one working overseas in a German speaking country. I said we need a guinea pig to do some testing. Now in English, in England, that's not derogatory.
The Guinea Pig Club, established in 1941, was a social club and mutual support network for British and allied aircrew injured during World War II. Its membership was made up of patients of Archibald McIndoe in Ward III at Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, Sussex, who had undergone experimental reconstructive plastic surgery, including facial reconstruction, generally after receiving burns injuries in aircraft. The club remained active after the end of the war, and its annual reunion meetings continued until 2007.
These are people who became the basis for most treatment of burns in the 20th and 21st century. It has a positive connotation.
Guinea Pig in German, is Meerschweinchen. Sea piglet being the literal translation. Because of the pig part, its not got the positive association.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@beresfordquimby
So your first argument, practicality, is spurious.
=======
where one person agrees, and another doesn't, but the first person's consent impinges materially on the second person's quality of life, or vice versa?
=======
So what you are saying here s that person's A''s decision needs the consent of person B. Now they could say yes, they could say no. If they say no, then A doesn't get.
What you are saying is that someone is freeloading at the expense of others and its bad. I agree. The state should prevent that.
So lets take two examples. State pension and migration.
Migration, most migrants pay less tax than they cost the state in services. A simple solution, consent based, is a minimum tax code per adult migrant set above average wage, to adjust for the deficit. The no freeloader test. Of course nothing stops people from sponsoring migrants. All consent based
Next state pension. Informed consent s the biggy here. Why are the debts hidden? Why not allow people to opt out and invest their wealth? They would be much better off. Those that want capitalism, choose. Those that want socialism can choose. But neither side can be a parasite on the other.
1
-
1
-
How to fix climate change?
First a green register for greens. They get a special badge to show off their green credentials
Then their name is added to the no fly list. Personally, this should happen just after they jet off long haul
Electoral Roll is cross checked against the register and gas
supply. Then the gas is cut off.
Smart meters, when the wind doesn't blow etc, click the power is cut off.
Green only tariffs, no subsidies. After all they say subsidies are bad.
Electric only driving licenses. If caught in a fossil powered vehicle, that they own, its crushed. If caught in a fossil powered vehicle, that someone else's owns, its crushed, and they compensate the owner.
On the register, automatic DNR and spare parts harvested.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Tensquaremetreworkshop 3,000 is common goods. Defences, legal etc. That's per head.
Education of a child 8,000.
NHS, 3K per head.
For the rest, there's a website entitledto. You can put details in their to get direct costs. HB, income etc.
Then on top for the adults, there's pensions. They aren't paying in but they get years added to their entitlement.
Total it up and the costs are horrific. Paid for by others with austerity.
Now in practice to get rid of that is impossible, until the money stops. Then its even worse that the victorian set up.
Harsh as it sounds, there are people who have moved to the UK and are claiming. That needs to be ended. They will leave, and it mitigates the problem.
Second we have to move to funded pensions. That's again going to be pain for 20 years. After 20 years yongsters will be better off.
But that starts with people like Richard telling the truth about pension debt.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've a better idea. ULEZ cameras are now high res. A local junction is running at 1200 offences an hour. Cyclists and e-bikes, 98% of the time.
So video the junction. Trivial to detect cycling on pavements, jumping reds. High resolution cameras capture the faces, type of bike etc.
Then do an operation. Nick the red light jumpers. Names, addresses, and photograph their faces and their bikes.
Now that AI kicks in, does the facial matching. Humans check, and the fines go out in the post. Given the repeat nature of the crimes, it wouldn't surprise me if some ended up with 500 £100 fines. £50,000. It's a magistrate's fine, so you can't get out of it with bankruptcy.
It raises more money than ULEZ. :-)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@basiaszendrei1603 No I haven't.
In the UK, the sentencing for murder is governed by strict laws because it carries a mandatory life sentence. The "tariff" refers to the minimum term a convicted murderer must serve before they can be considered for parole.
The Tariff (Minimum Term)
The judge sets the minimum term, often referred to as the "tariff," which is the number of years the offender must serve before being eligible for parole. It considers:
Aggravating factors (e.g., premeditation, use of a weapon, particularly brutal or sadistic killing).
Mitigating factors (e.g., lack of intent, provocation, or the offender's youth).
If you go to the sentencing council you will see their starting tariff for example, 12 years for anyone under 18, and the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors on the minimum tariff.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So what's needed?
The state needs to be drastically reduced. See Argentina. That causes unemployment, unless uneconomical migrants are removed from the workplace. That means removing welfare for the ones not working, and putting in place a break even tax code. 40K a year. They can't afford to stay without subsidies. That creates vacancies for those state employees on workfare.
DEI jobs, lots of them, just go. No legal aid for migration. ...
For example, road tax. Abolish it. 2-3p on fuel covers it, and its hard to dodge, collected already by 2 people from the 7 refineries. Repeat repeat repeat.
So spending falls, and GDP per head increases. Housing crisis solved. Lots of crimes prevented.
Then the government model of extortion has to go. Parking, congestion charges, remove it all. To force that through, send everyone a full statement with their share of the state debts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SvenDettman Disagree. Strongly.
If people knew that every economic migrant paid more into the system than they took out, then there wouldn't be objections bar from a handfull.
That's not the case. The vast majority of migrants get massive subsidies from others.
That's why there's a simple solution. First is deport all foreign criminals. Second, welfare is cancelled for migrants. Next a minimum tax code of 40K [break even] is imposed. The later two are easy, can be done in a week end.
Now clearly the woke media would be camping out at airports saying how bad this is. So some PR is needed. All migrants get a statement with tax paid, and on the other side, the costs. NHS [3k a year], Schooling [8K] a year, common goods [3k a year], total welfare paid, for the time they have been here, adjusted for current value.
Now will the woke media do the interview and put out that number?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They have a problem. Everyone has been asking about Biden being Gaga. They have all been saying he's a genius. You don't get Alzheimers overnight. So they have been lying through their back teeth. If they lie about that they lie about everything.
So what other options. Parkinson's is another guess. Get the Dopamine dose wrong, take it at the wrong time, and you get similar effects. It's very difficult to control.
So the mechanism. Joe can say no. Then what? 25 Amendment
Section 1. In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.
No problems there
Section 2. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
Would Hillary get the nod? Why would anyone from the Reps play ball? They have the speaker and he's defacto number 2 with no VP
Section 3
Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.
Far more likely and a way out for Joe.
Section 4.
Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.
So turns out that its the VP and the cabinet. The VP cannot be sacked, but the Cabinet can be replaced. So with just the VP tough.
Then it goes to Congress. 2/3rds vote to get Biden out.
Why would the Republicans vote to remove him, when he's the guaranteed win. So Joes back in, and the Cabinet is out?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@blackbulldog4897 No. I'm spot on.
So the government can never run out of purchasing power. Lets do the thought experiment on that.
The government says, for a £1 payment today, we will deliver you 1 Ferarri, new, a day [or equivalent spend], for the rest of your life.
Everyone in the UK takes them up on that. Would be mad not to.
Now that promise to pay, is for real resources. ie. For purchasing power. You are saying the government can deliver.
Now those Ferarris, or equivalent goods to the value of that Ferarri, for 70 million people exceeds the economy of the UK. They have promised more than the total economic output.
I've deliberately made it extreme to show that your assertion of delivering resources, because that's what you mean by purchasing power, is limited to the size of the UK state. It's actually lower, but extreme cases show you are wrong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jlys5037 In addition to these measures, Mexico has recently adjusted its import tariff regime. On April 22, 2024, the Mexican Ministry of Economy established import tariffs ranging from 5% to 50% on specified products, including steel, aluminum, textiles, clothing, footwear, wood, plastic, furniture, chemicals, paper, and transportation items. These changes, effective April 23, 2024, aim to protect domestic industries from foreign competition.
Prime example. Mexico imposes tarrifs.
What should Trump do as a response?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's not needed.
1. Deport all criminals.
2. No discrimination.
3. Net contributors only.
Now lets look at how that's implemented. For criminals, its automatic on sentence. No legal aid for any deportation issues, so nothing in it for the legal aid scammers.
Net contributors? Easy. Zero welfare. What are they going to do if the money doesn't come in? Riot? See point 1. Leave? A lot will. You don't need to 'remigrate' people. They have come here for economic reasons, and when the economics don't work for them, they will move onto other targets.
Then you can move up the chain. Change tax codes to break even. 40K a year minimum tax code. Taxed at source, the money will flow in. They will flow out.
Now you need to implement that in stages. Tax code? Any migrant starting a new job, automatically on that tax code. The migrants who are good for the UK, not affected one iota. It's just calling the lefts bluff. Just making their claims a legal requirement. Migrants are good for the UK, the law says they have to be.
On the welfare. No new claims. Zero. Then do you start with the biggest claimants? The inwork claimants? I'd start with any on the terror watch list as a priority. Certain countries, like Romania, Albania, Somalia. Ones wiht hight rates of criminality.
But in general, when the money stops flowing, they will leave.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
GemApps So what are the debts of the state?
A liability/debt is a present obligation of the enterprise arising from past events, the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow from the enterprise of resources embodying economic benefits
For example, if the state has received money in the past and is obligated to pay it back in the future its a debt. e.g Borrowing or pensions.
Economic value covers services and goods. For example, if you worked for the state in the past and as a result the state is obligated to pay you a pension in the future, its a debt. Same for unpaid wages.
Other examples, if we take the NHS. If the NHS has damaged someone in the past, from a mistake then the expected damages are also a debt/liability
Insurance contracts, you expect that you will pay out on a percentage of the sum insured. That percentage is one of your liabilities.
So here's the list
1. Borrowing
2. Pensions
3. Nuclear clean up
4. Losses on insurance contracts
5. The EU
6. Unpaid wages
7. Unpaid invoices
8. Expected payouts - eg post office, NHS damages.
So borrowing I know because the DMO publish it each morning.
How big are the other debts?
Why are they not reported on the balance sheet?
It's not hard. Surely you can find the numbers.
For example, the borrowing at 9:00am this morning,
Total Amount Outstanding (including inflation uplift for index-linked gilts) = £2,449.38 billion nominal
Can you get the other numbers? I predict you will struggle. In that case, explain why
1
-
@maria8809ttt No I haven't. That appears in the issuance element.
The state insures banks in two ways. First is that lender of last resort. That only happens if there is a liquidity crisis. If however a bank has a credit issue, which means assets < liabilities and no chance of a reversal, the government isn't on the hook for all of the liabilities [assets from the banks side]. Then the government is only on the hook for the guaranteed amount.
1. up to £85,000 per eligible person, per bank, building society or credit union.
2. up to £170,000 for joint accounts.
Above that you are an unsecured creditor.
Now if you look at the history of bank failures the typical recovery rate, is 85%. So those numbers are reduced to 15% of their value. It's not huge, and its paid for by the banks with premiums.
If we take Lehmans, they got back more than 100%. Yep, it wasn't a credit event, it was a liquidity event and Goldman Sachs used to make lots of money and take out a rival.
But unless you know otherwise, and I'd be interested to hear which bank, assets > liabilities for all banks. Credit exposure [potential losses] has to exceed bank capital by a margin.
So where's the exposure from fractional reserve banking to the government?
So its not liable in the way you state. It's only liability if you turn up with £1 is for them to give you another £1.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RicardoPetrazzi Yep. I've suggest to my local police. An operation, monday evening, mcdonalds. No many parties, fridges empty, lots of delivery jobs.
You don't have to chase them. They have their apps so you can 'id' them. Are the bikes, mopeds, cars legal? Are they legal? Are they the 'account holder'?
Then you keep are record of how many you have siezed and got off the road, and a list of secondary offences.
The funny part. They have to cancel the job, so with 20-30 jobs going, they call come to you.
When the flow stops, move onto Nandos.....
Easy cheap and effective.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well post the numbers.
Borrowing numbers you can get from the DMO [Debt Management Office Website]
The number for this morning
Total Amount Outstanding (including inflation uplift for index-linked gilts) = £2,464.77 billion nominal
The borrowing number is easy to find.
What about the state pension and civil service pension liabilities? Unfunded, so no assets to pay for them.
Can you find the numbers? [PS 16 trillion on top of the debt, zero assets]
Now for private debt. Mortgages, credit cards are biggies. Most credit card debt will be for people will assets. So you need to offset assets against liabilites. Just as I've done for the government above.
Value of UK housing stock, 8.7 trillion. [2022]
Value of UK residential mortgages [1.6543 trillion, Dec 2023]
Can you do the net or would you like help with that? I'll help you. Positive equity just of 7 trillion.
UK Credit card debt, 2023 June, was 0.0664 trillion. An irrelevance in the scheme
So the private sector [people] have equity of 7 trillion.
The state has two debts, borrowing and pensions, that are close to 18.5 trillion
Other debts, such as the EU, Nuclear clean up, unpaid wages, unpaid invoices, losses on insurance guarantees, payouts for damages like the post office and the NHS when things go wrong, not included.
Do you now see the problem?
The state is bankrupt.
PS. It's inflation linked debt. You cannot inflate your way out of that debt by printing.
@OnlineEnglish-wl5rp
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timg1246
A liability is a present obligation of the enterprise arising from past events, the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow from the enterprise of resources embodying economic benefits
That's the definition. It's the correct one.
So because the state has received money in the past, and as a consequence has to pay out money in the future it's a debt.
That includes pensions [contract and the law] as well as borrowing. Re-read the test, and you will see that both pensions and borrowing meet the test.
Now the question is what gets booked? It's the present value of those obligations. The big part there relates to pensions. Since most pensioners get to 65, you can include those. Half [roughly] get to average life expectancy, so you don't record it assuming all get there. You record the payouts adjusted for the probability you have to make the payment. This is standard practice. You record the actuarial valuation of the pension debts.
The same applies to all the other debts left off the accounts.
Nuclear clean up. Damages [post office, NHS]. Unpaid wages, unpaid invoices, the EU, losses on insurance contracts, ....
The only one reported is the money owed to bankers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ColaSpandex Do you suggest that we should stop paying state pensions?
No. We should change the system to remove the ponzi over time.
So when I ask the left the Gary's of this world they say the state pension isn't a debt. Even the ONS, OBR and treasury all say in writing, the state pension isn't a debt BECAUSE WE WON'T PAY IT. FOI requests.
So I'm offering more.
People start investing their NI. If you run out of money, then others chip in to help. The guarantee.
Over time, that becomes a redundant guarantee.
Mr Average, his NI is 6,240.60. Average return on the FTSE all share is inflation + 3.25%. Cost of a state pension, 160K, lump sum.
How long does it take to accumulate 160K? 18 years. If you add on work place pensions, that's 13 years.
For Mr MIn wage it takes longer. 25 years. After 25 years he would have a lump sum that can buy an annuity that generates him a state pension when he retires.
If he worked for 50 years, 555K in a fund. Dividends alone comes to 18K, which is the state pension.
The state is saying we are going to cut his pension, and there's no assets to pass on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@arthurpewtey It's unpleasant. Who takes the pain and in what proportion.
1. The debts published. Everyone gets sent a statement with their share.
2. Included in that is what people could have had, if their money had been invested.
3. The sum of the two number is the loss.
4. You could project forward to include expected state pensions to be paid, and expected returns on the fund less that income.
That gives the total life time loss. All standard actuarial maths.
That's' the starter. That tells people two things. First what the problem is taht need to be solved.
For example tell me how big the state pension debts are? Assets we know, zero. If you can't tell me how can you decide on any policies?
So what happens now people have that information.
First those that caused the mess are going to be running to the hills. They should be caught, arrested, tried and jailed. They need to be asset stripped. They are clearly not part of the solution. It's a token guesture but it sends a message.
Second, given the huge differnece between what the state offers and what investing your wealth offers, it shows the least harmful way out.
What the state does is offer a guarantee, that if and only if your assets [all of them] run out, will other people help.
Then you have to invest your NI and your workplace pension. Over time that builds up.
For Mr Avearge he is better off after 12 years of working. For Mr Minwage its longer at 22-23 years. After 50 they are more than quids in.
Set it up that any unused fund goes to heir's pension funds tax free, and since the poor die younger, they benefit more over time.
But in the interim, existing pensioners are shafted. Tax payers get shafted. ie. Austerity. Taxation with out services.
But with debts the consequence is asterity. That's what debt does.
So what's the socialist plan appart from the tooth fairy?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sososoprano1 Health care is another issue.
1. Universal coverage is needed
2. Bad risks get insured
They are the basic starting points.
Next, the three legs to be split. Regulation is the sole role of the state.
Insurance and supply of health care never to be combined.
It's got a name. It's a Bismarck system. The NHS and Obamacare are Beveridge systems.
Beverigde systems are bad. Bismarck systems, such as Holland and Switzerland are not.
So why would you pay for a system that kills 20,000 a year from mistakes?
Or this little story from the week
===============
Surgeons operated on the wrong side of a patients body during one of four failed hospital procedures that should never have happened, a new report has shown.
Four so-called "never events," that should not happen within the NHS were reported at Nottingham's Queen's Medical Centre and City Hospital from April 1, 2023 to February 29, this year, according to NHS England. The health body says between April 1, 2023, and February 29, this year, there were 345 serious never events. It added 22 serious incidents did not meet the definition of a never event.
===============
Note. Just one hospital. Not even a full year.
There are 1,921 hospitals in the UK
345 times 1,921 is 662,745. Serious Never Events.
Minor Never Events don't count. Only 22? That number must indicate massive under reporting.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Easy to solve.
1. Criminals. Deported from the court or from Prison at the end of their sentences.
2. A minimum tax code of 38,500 per migrant. Taxed at source, lots of money for the state. Any of those doctors, not affected one bit. I can't see Timothy complaining
3. Tax evasion is already a crime, so for those that don't pay the tax, see point 1.
4. A list of safe countries. If you are from a safe country and claim asylum, you get prosecuted for being here illegally, see point 1.
5. When a country leaves the safe list, you get three months notice that your tax code will change. We have done our bit and given you safe haven. Now you become an economic migrant. If you want to stay, you know the rules. If not you have been given time to make arrangements.
Now for safe countries. If a blonde single white woman can go there on holiday, its safe. 'See Wandering Emma's channel on YT.
In fact its very very hard to find unsafe countries. Ukraine for example is one. For some people, Russia. Some and that's very few.
It's up to people who know that the current set up is corrupt and a mess, to put forward solutions that work.
@itsoccamsrazor
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The question then is what policy to apply.
First we need a list of safe countries. Easy. There's North Korea, Palistine, Israel and Ukraine that are dangerous.
1. So no asylum from dangerous countries. Top of the list new arrivals at Dover. Immediately on a plane home.
No papers? Off to the Falklands. You get internet/phone to contact your embassy to get replacements. No catch and release.
2. Criminals. Barred and deported. The ones that are most likely to kick off.
3. Terror watch list. Ditto. One by one, going home.
4. Asylum to be temporary.
We might need some Con Air like planes with cages.
Then for the rest. The big issue is welfare. We start pulling the welfare. To deal with the Woke, each person need to get a statement with the welfare paid, the cost of other state services, less any tax they have paid. That way when they are interviewed by the BBC, the BBC has to give out the number. When numbers in the hundreds of thousands of pounds are shown, the game is up. So start with the worst costs.
New arrivals, no welfare and a minimum 40K tax code. Break even. Now I know the woke will try and sue, but there's a trap. The Woke will say all migrants must get it because its discriminatory to say the new can't and the older arrivals can. The trap is, OK then, no migrants get. Tax code changes go in over night.
We also need a migratation court above the supreme court, stuffed with appointees for life who have right think.
No legal aid for migration cases.
It's actually quite simple bar setting up a base on the falklands to house those from dangerous countries.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I checked out one of the reports into these offences.
The term ‘discourse’ has been interpreted and applied in a broad way in this research. Discourses can be defined as clusters of ideas that provide ways of talking about issues such as child sexual abuse (Hall, 1997). This includes the language, terminology and definitions used but also how child sexual abuse comes to be understood, through the key points of change, and the different lenses through which it has been viewed, for example, through a focus on gender, social class or sexuality. It is important to look at which discourses have dominated ways of speaking about child sexual abuse over time, and who is speaking, because the language used to describe it is significant in determining how the issue is addressed. Discourses also produce meanings that can become accepted ‘truths’ and sustain particular power relations in society.
The contexts in which discourses about child sexual abuse originate are wide ranging. They include academia, politics, the media, and social movements or civil society groups such as the feminist, children’s rights and victim and survivor movements. They can be amplified by the media and through government policy. Discourses may be linked to particular institutional contexts or ‘arenas’. They circulate both within and across these and can be key to how institutions respond to child sexual abuse. Competing and contradictory discourses can co-exist within the same time periods, and the views and approaches held by some may be contested by others, which can create shifts.
Complete twaddle. When you have that [and its the intro] pushed, its just people creaming the cash ata the public's expense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pauln6803 It reviews evidence submitted by the police and makes the decision to prosecute
=========
We still have private prosecutions in the UK. Prosecutions by people other than the CPS. The Post Office for example.
However the CPS still has a role.
The right to bring private prosecutions is preserved by section 6(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act (POA) 1985. There are, however, some limitations:
the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) has power under section 6(2) POA 1985 to take over private prosecutions;
in some cases, the private prosecutor must seek the consent of the Attorney General or of the DPP before the commencement of proceedings.
In principle, there is nothing wrong in allowing a private prosecution to run its course through to verdict and, in appropriate cases, sentence. The fact that a private prosecution succeeds is not an indication that the case should have been prosecuted by the CPS. Parliament has specifically allowed for this possibility by the way section 6 is constructed: there is no requirement for the CPS to take over a private prosecution.
However, there will be instances where it is appropriate for the CPS to exercise the Director's powers under section 6(2) POA 1985, either to continue the prosecution or to discontinue or stop it.
The key point is that when asked to do so, the CPS must make a decision on whether or not to take over a private prosecution. The decision whether or not to take over a private prosecution should be made by the reviewing lawyer and endorsed/ratified by a Chief Crown Prosecutor (CCP) (or Deputy CCP (DCCP)) or relevant Head of Casework Divisions (HoD) (or their Deputy) and recorded in writing.
The CPS under Starmer failed in the Private Prosecution cases. When the CPS was the prosecutor, it failed because it went after the innocent.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Deportation of criminals certainly.
For the others, I've a suggestion.
First you cancel welfare. What do they then do? No need to deport they start to leave.
Second if you start increasing the minimum tax codes towards break even, they also start to leave.
Both of those things need no more civil servants to administer than we have now. It's the DWP and HMRC.
Why make it complicated? Why not set it up so they leave of their own accord.
On the tax code, remember, tax evasion is a crime. See the first point.
For asylum, a list of safe countries. All asylum is cancelled if you come from a safe country, even with leave to remain.
Then we start helping people to return. We've done our job.
Another point. I would suggest a full analysis of costs of migrants at the individual level, NHS, common goods, welfare, education is made, against tax paid
Then each one gets a statement with the cumulative net cost.
The reason is the BBC. You and I know they will be their at Heathrow with the sob stories. But given they have that letter, its very very dangerous for the BBC
to do the story without telling people the number on that letter. I would suggest telling the BBC board very clearly. If you do that, the license fee will be set at 1p.
Afterall a minister can do that, without creating new laws.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Given the level of offending, something has to change.
Here's an idea for London
ULEZ cameras film a junction. It's trivial AI to pick up on offences
Red light jumping, cycling on pedestrian only crossings, pavement cycling.
That gets the video, and the close up images of the cyclist. That gets stored
Then a few months later, an operation, stop those committing an offence.
£100 fine, name and address AND a photograph. All that put into the system
Then click search. The photograph is matched against photographs of previous
offences, and 500 letters sent out, with £100 fines. £50,000 dished out
What's funny, its a magistrate's fine, so you can't get out of it with
bankruptcy
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There are other features of Bismark systems. Such as excess payments. You can get cheaper insurance if you agree to pay the first say 1000 CHF of your health care. After that its fully covered. Health insurance is mandatory. You must have it.
It does lead to some odd effects. Towards the end of your insurance year, people either delay getting health care, to move it forward where they take insurance with a low excess because they know they are going to use it. Or they have the treatment now, because they are close to or over their excess.
But in general its when do your want the operation, not as it in the UK, you have to join a queue.
The other thing about the UK system, and this is just acute hospitals. They kill 20,000 a year from avoidable errors. That would be 100,000 a year for the US. You do slightly better in the US compared to the UK. The advantage if you can call it that in the US, is you can get damages. In the UK they will only pay $13,000 for killing someone.
@JLSAudioWorx
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@simonchilli2088 I am a little devious at times.
I've just had another idea. The state's pension debts are all of the books. Pensions alone, £600,000
So what if Reform sent a personalised letter, looks like its HMRC to each person on their 18th birthday. You can get the names and address from the electoral register. You send them their statement on that date. The usual threats about not paying, pointing out the Tories, Labour, Lib Dems and Greens have hidden that number.
You can do this in target seats. Cost about £4K per seat per year.
Or you get even more focused, and just send to the swing voters, and here, just a selection of them. One per group. There are organisations who can get you the names and addresses. ie. One per family, you don't need to do husband and wife, just one.
What's the establishment going to do about that?
Cat's out the bag, you can't put it back in.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mikebikekite1 It does. The reason is simple probability.
Take the NHS. If there's one avoidable death a year, and all other maternitiy wards don't suffer lots of deaths, then the probability of murder in the Letby case is such that someone killed the kids.
However, given that 20,000 avoidable deaths in just NHS accute hospitals in England is the rate, you need to adjust. Take account of East Kent, South Wales, Mid Yorks, Shrewsbury and Telford, and the death toll in those maternaty wards, and the odds are different.
It's called Baynesian Analysis.
So with cyclists, given that close to 100% of them are cycling and breaking the law regularly, with intent, you have to take that into account when on a jury. What's the odds you got the one cyclist who wasn't breaking the law?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mikebikekite1 I have. They say we haven't got the staff.
For example, I was told Lambeth had one officer on at night. Quite what the other 1999 were up to, beyond me.
The fixes are easy.
1. Schools. Picks up the motorbikes used for school runs. Seize and destroy, report to Social services. Easy
2. McDonalds. Gets deliveroo.
3. Red light jumpers. Just for the rushhour in the morning, as a cash cow.
There you go, some nice and simple solutions.
The first, for the whole borrough comes out at 1 man month, plus you are flying the flag for the police.
McDonalds, you include mopeds being used for delivery of food. Lots of secondary offences.
Red light jumpers. You don't need to get many before the word spreads around the coffee machines at work.
Difficult to get the mobile phone snatchers, but I did manage to get one nicked.
On report it, I do have script. Video the junction. Then watch it, note the time and offences in a spreadsheet.
Then the script reports each offence to the Met. No typing. No errors. Given they have 20-25K CADs logged a day, do you think I would get a visit for reporting 10% of them?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What about pyjamas, bungalow, bandana, avatar, Juggernaut, Karma, Loot, Pundit, Pukka, Thug, ....
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
On 1 June, 1995, at about 6.40 p.m. Police Inspector Mackie counted 21 people on the roadside verge of the southern side of the A344, adjacent to the perimeter fence of the Monument at Stonehenge. Some were bearing banners with the legends, "Never Again," "Stonehenge Campaign 10 years of Criminal Injustice" and "Free Stonehenge." He concluded that they constituted a "trespassory assembly" and told them so. When asked to move off, many did, but some, including the Appellants, Mr. Lloyd and Dr. Jones, were determined to remain and put their rights to the test. They were arrested for taking part in a "trespassory assembly" and convicted by the Salisbury Justices on 3 October, 1995. Their appeals to the Salisbury Crown Court, however, succeeded. The court held that neither of the Appellants, nor any member of their group, was "being destructive, violent, disorderly, threatening a breach of the peace or, on the evidence, doing anything other than reasonably using the highway."
===========
Is that the jones case?
The appellants' convictions for speeding offences would be set aside where they had not signed their notice forms under s.172 Road Traffic Act 1988 but the first appellant's case would be remitted for rehearing.Appeals by way of case stated against the decision of the Warrington justices for the conviction of Mawdesley ('M') of a speeding offence and against the decision of Manchester Crown Court upholding Dwight Yorke's ('Y') conviction for speeding. The issues were closely related and it was therefore directed that they be heard together. Both appeals related to speeding offences after which a notice of intended prosecution under s.172 Road Traffic Act 1988 was sent to each of the appellants. The notice required the name, driver number, address, date of birth and occupation of the driver to be filled in and for the notice to be signed and dated. M's and Y's notices were both returned with all of the information (except Y's driver number) but they had not been signed or dated.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@canderson1955 Sir Kid Starver
The man who spent £160,000 on chauffeur cars ,took an 85 min flight to Belfast costing £443.spent £20,000 on 4 flights to Washington ,spent £724 for taxis, and took home over £1 million in 5 years in charge of the CPS, and takes a £336,000 State pension and spent £250,000 in travel over 5 years as a public prosecutor.
The man with his own special tax bill, passed by parliament, just so he can dodge taxes.
The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013
Plus £115,000 a year for life.
1
-
CDA 1971 - A person who without lawful excuse destroys or damages any property belonging to another, intending to destroy or damage any such property, or being reckless as to whether any such property would be destroyed or damaged, shall be guilty of an offence.
This offence is triable either way – para. 29, Schedule 1 Magistrates’ Court Act 1980 (MCA 1980).The maximum penalty is 10 years imprisonment - Section 4 CDA 1971.
Meaning of Without Lawful Excuse [This is for firefighters, or for people damaging wheel clamps so doesn't apply]
However, a charge of criminal damage may be justified where:
the damage is excessive or gratuitous; or
there is difficulty in establishing the evidence required for the other offence; for example, proving an intent to steal in what is thought to be an attempted burglary.
[Gratuitous looks to me as the bit to go for]
I think I'll put in a second complaint, after making a crime report. I've one going in about the Data Controller of the MPS. Sir Mark Rowley again, who is, in both cases, Bang To Rights to use the police vernacular.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@verzeda The ones prosecuted, all from the culture of greed.
Derrick Peters was convicted and jailed for six years in August 2018.
Eyob, 26, was given £15,918.20 on pre-paid cards, £60,945 in hotel accommodation (at the Holland Park Hilton between July 2017 and June this year) and £9,968.36 for laundry and parking - a total of just over £86,831. He was jailed for three years and four months over the fraud and a further three years and four months for five drug offences.
Jenny McDonagh, 39, took £62,000 from a fund for Grenfell victims while she worked as a finance manager at Kensington and Chelsea Council.
Anh Nhu Nguyen, 53, was jailed for 21 months after getting more than £10,000 from the local council and charities by pretending his family had died in Grenfell Tower on the night of the fire.
.... it goes on and on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@christinavuyk2026 Austerity is a consequence, not a policy.
So you think that taxing the billionaires will solve it.
Well I totted up the numbers. The sunday times rich list has quite a lot of rich people on it. I excluded the people who are just here but their wealth is else where, don''t have UK nationality. Gopi Hinduja and family for example. You won't be able to tax them. I've included people who I know are British, but have wealth all overseas. The hedge fund lot.
You have 220 bn in wealth to tax. What rate are you going to tax them at? They are forced to sell if its a high rate. To whom are they going to sell to? Some other rich person who you will imediately say, you are rich, hand over the wealth? It won't work.
That's the tax side.
Now for the reason. You need the money for something. There's that 30% gross profit margin of the state. That's right. They make a profit on their services. The reason they need that 30% margin is debts. That money is just going to go on the debts.
So 16 trillion pounds of pension debts, increasing at 10%. So you need 1,600 bn a year just to stand still.
You've got 220 bn as a one off by bankrupting them, if you can find a buyer, and if they stand still and allow it. They have options now to leave the UK. Branson's left. Dyson too, that awful plumber has gone. Even Harry Kane has gone.
The core problem with your idea is that you don't understand the core underlying problem. Then along comes the people who have caused the mess, who demand your money, and they sell you a fairy story that if only you could tax the rich, or catch the leprechaun...
So why don't you know about the pension debts?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@trevorhart545 I must add that to my how to fix the climate policy.
First a green register for greens. They get a special badge to show off their green credentials
Then their name is added to the no fly list. Personally, this should happen just after they jet off long haul
Electoral Roll is cross checked against the register and gas
supply. Then the gas is cut off.
Smart meters, when the wind doesn't blow etc, click the power is cut off.
Green only tariffs, no subsidies. After all they say subsidies are bad.
Electric only driving licenses. If caught in a fossil powered vehicle, that they own, its crushed. If caught in a fossil powered vehicle, that someone else's owns, its crushed, and they compensate the owner.
There you go, an easy fix, using existing systems bar the register, so its cheap
On the register, automatic DNR and spare parts harvested.
Thanks for the extra idea! :-)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I sent the email to Simon that trigged this, so I have to say thank you for him publicising it.
The question is what can you do about it?
1. Write to Daniel Greenberg CB, the standard's commissioner making a complaint
You need to read up on the rules and use those. It's quite easy to pick out which rules have been broken.
It's also very easy to get chat GPT to write the complaint. Cut's your workload
2. Include your MP in on it.
If they get 5 letters on one subject, they take notice. If they get even more they get worried.
Ask them what they are going to do?
If they have been in Westminster for longer, the obvious question, did they vote for it? If they did they are in just as much mess, as Starmer, under the rules.
If you have the time, go and see them.
Ask them why they are cutting the pensions for the peasants whilst Starmer is looting?
Ask them if they voted for him?
3. The civil service are also in a mess. They were complicit in it which makes for complaints.
4. I've some FOI requests going in. What's' the betting there's no documents, ie. they are hiding them, or you get back those documents that have been painted black.
I've masses of those from the cabinet office.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's simple.
1. List of safe countries
2. Remove the decision of safe countries from judges
3. If you try and claim asylum from a safe country, its back on the plane.
4. Economic migrants? A minimum tax code of 38,000 a year, per migrant.
5. If a country moves from dangerous to safe you move from asylum to economic migrant. You get 3 months notice your tax code will have a minimum
6. If you don't pay the tax, you have to leave.
7. If you commit a crime, or have a criminal record, you have to leave.
No need for Rwanda. The decision can be made in minutes. Then its a holding centre, next flight out. Given the numbers, we can charter planes to deal with the problem very quickly.
Economic migrants? It's taxed at source, so that deals with most apart from the tax dodging illegal workers. That's a crime, treat it as such.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nighttrain1236 Here's my problem. Evidence was presented that the odds were rare that you get this number of deaths in one institution so it must be her.
Shrewsbury and Telford hospital NHS trust uncovered hundreds of cases. 201 babies, 9 mothers would have survived in care had been better. That excludes other effects. 1,592 women and babies either died, were left disabled, or were traumatised
Problems over the assessment of women, the monitoring of babies and the management of severe incidents were highlighted as needing immediate improvement at Gloucestershire Royal Hospital.
See also East Kent (multiple hospitals). See Morecambe Bay.
40% are not up to standard.
So you need those odds to factor into any calculation of odds that she did it.
If we take English (not Scots, Welsh etc) acute hospitals (not GPs, not dentists, not pharmacists), 20,000 killed a year from avoidable errors.
Factor that rate in. It wasn't done.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stevenpaterson5100
## Asylum
1. A list of safe countries. Might be easier to make a list of dangerous countries. Israel, Palestine, Yemen, Ukraine.
2. No asylum from safe countries.
3. When a country moves from dangerous to safe, you get a grace period and your asylum is over.
4. No claims if you passed through a safe country to get to the UK
## Criminals
1. Barred from entry
2. Deported if here, automatically at conviction or at the end of sentence.
3. If from a dangerous country, then off to a Scottish Island to a tented encampment to wait it out.
4. Destroy you papers? Off to the island until they arrive. See point, if its a safe country....
## Economic Migrants
1. No discrimination. No pro White EU racism for example.
2. Net contributors only.
3. You get a minimum tax code of 38,500 a year, increasing in line with average wages.
4. No welfare for economic migrants. No housing benefit, income support....
5. Remember, they came here for economic reasons. If its not economic for them they leave.
## Impacts
1. Massive cuts in state spending.
2. The beneficial migrants not affected
3. Wages rise for the poor brits
4. Tax receipts from brits go up
5. Welfare for brits goes down
6. Housing problem cured.
## Implementation
1. Average wage - once a year from the ONS
2. Tax code? HMRC already know who is from overseas because of NI registration. Letters go out to employers.
3. Annual Check? Easy
4. Letters with the short fall? Easy
5. Tax avoidance convictions? Easy - single justice system. All cases signed off by one judge.
6. One law change, on conviction, deported. Make it automatic. You can appeal the conviction, not the deportation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sebastianw7348 So what does that tell you when the Tories and Labour are screwing people over?
On the markets, its very easy. Go full Argentina. That makes public sector workers unemployed. So you need to make jobs for them. That's easy. We have millions of uneconomic economic migrants. They leave, the jobs are then available.
Now with the deficit turned into a surplus, you can ignore the city, you don't need to borrow. The borrowing is paid off and the city has no power. Same for the WEF.
On companies, abolish the subsidies. Zero. Zilch.
For core items, water, power, gas, rail, roads, put in place a proper regulator. Make sure everything is hypothecated.
It's not hard. Can be done in a couple of months.
Which bit would you like to discuss in detail?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Some bits coming out of the inquiry are interesting. One bit I saw stated that a transaction was taking 10 seconds, locking the system for that period of time.
A bit more digging and its clear they didn't build it as a distributed system. For example, if you have a Point of Sale system, then updating the accounts in real time is not a requirement.
What you should do is separate off the book keeping, with a queue between the POS and the Accounts. POS does its transaction, puts it on a queue. That's fast. The back end then pulls the transaction off and handles it. No need for the transactions to be synchronous. A proper fault tolerant queueing system is needed. MQ for example.
1. I bet they were using raw SQL to update the database
2. Accounting entries. Never ever delete. Reverse and rebook, with links between the transactions.
3. Integrity constraints, on the DB
4. Full audit trail, with records written to a write only log.
5. A proper role based security system and that includes the accounts for the technical users [eg. Cron jobs]
6. Integrity reports just for it integrity.
Another issue, I bet the accountants designing the system didn't understand IT. And the IT staff didn't understand accounting.
For example, how many people understand that double entry is a consequence of the accounting equation, not a fundamental principle?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tomround8271 On the French.
1. Don't pay them
2. Moving illegals across the channel - no licences. I agree.
However the real solution is simple.
1. Tax code of 38.7K a year for all economic migrants. Taxed at source - lots of money.
Turns out most will find that completely uneconomic, and move of their own accord.
2. Asylum. Make a list of safe countries. You might also need a separate supreme court just for Asylum. One judge, two assessors. Majority vote. 🙂 SC is out of the picture.
If you are from a safe country, holding center, next flight home.
If you have claimed asylum, then three months notice of that Tax Code change. We've done our job as a country giving you refuge.
Criminal record? Convicted here? Next flight home after sentence via prison to the airport, or to a holding centre from the court.
Now for those entering illegaly? Well picked up, processed, into court, convicted. If the country is unsafe, you stay in the holding center until it is safe.
For the unsafe countries, you get asylum. I've no qualms about that.
Next, you cannot pass through safe countries to claim asylum here. The UK will not accept you
Destroy your papers? Some tents on a Scottish Islands until your new papers arrive. No catch and release.
It's not difficult.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They need to dump Sunak AND change policies. They are running out of time.
So what policies can be implemented quickly?
1. A minimum tax on migrants of 38,500 a year. That's close to break even. That can be implemented in a weekend and the cash rolls in at the end of the month.
2. Tax evasion is a crime. Prosecute those who don't pay their taxes. Single justice system means all the cases can be signed off in one one hour session with a judge.
3. A list of dangerous countries. If you come from a safe country, no asylum. Automatically back on the next plane.
4. If you have asylum and the country becomes safe, you get 3 months to sort affairs, then you become an economic migrant.
5. That EU rule, no resort to public funds. Economic migrant? No welfare. Zilch. No tax credits no housing benefit, no income support. Zilch.
6. If you are a criminal, automatic deportation.
7. If you are a criminal from a dangerous country, a holding camp on the Outer Hebrides.
8. If you cross the channel and someone died, then its a joint venture, its murder.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shadowofmyfutureself Gary's one of them. For example the other day he talked about goven debt being affordable.
ie. The ratio of debt / gdp being the measure.
What debt? Oh only the debt owed to his banker mates matters. All the other debts, like PS worker's pensions, state pensions, nuclear clean up, EU, Post office and NHS damages, ... not included.
That makes the debt look 'affordable'.
Next GDP. As if the state can tax 100% and deliver zero services. Inflate the income, the denominator makes the debt look affordable.
One the rich leaving, what happens is that their wealth leaves. They don't have to.
Remember the top 1% pay 27% of income tax. How many have to leave [or their wealth] to have a serious effect on the UK government?
Same for companies. If companies decide, we're going to put our money elsewhere, you lose tax money mostly because of the jobs it generates.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ There's already been a massive tax on wealth. National insurance at the end of the day is a wealth tax. 20% of your income is taken and given to someone else. As a result you are deprived of the wealth that money would bring.
For Mr Average, if his NI had been invested and he retired at the end of last year, his fund would have been worth 1.15 milllion. He's lost all that wealth. It's a wealth tax.
Then we have the debts. He's owed a pension, as other people who have paid in. That's a debt that the state owes people. How big is that debt?
Gary won't tell you how big it is. He will just tell you how big the borrowing is. That's the only debt that matters to him. I suspect its because he's a banker and bankers want to be paid even if the peasants aren't.
He then comes along and says look the debt is affordable because the ratio of debt to GPD is 1. But if you want to fiddle affordability, what do you do?
1. Decrease the debt number. Leave off pensions, wages, invoices, insurance, damages, the EU, nuclear clean up. Makes the ratio look better.
2. Increase the income. Eg. GDP not tax receipts. Even that's an inflated number. 100% of tax going on debt's never going to work.
The simple test for Gary is for him to come back and itemise the debts.
I've given him a free starter. The borrowing this morning was £2,646.45 billion [DMO number]
What do you conclude if he can't find any of the other numbers?
What do you conclude when, if he does, that number exceeds the debt he reported on?
Hiding the debts so the peasants carry on paying in is the name of the game.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ah slave labour.
"In all social systems there must be a class to do the menial duties, to perform the drudgery of life... Such a class you must have, or you would not have that other class which leads progress, civilization, and refinement. It constitutes the very mud-sill of society and of political government... Fortunately for the South, she found a race adapted to that purpose to her hand—a race inferior to herself, but eminently qualified in temper, in vigor, in docility, in capacity to stand the climate, to answer all her purposes."
How many times have you heard that philosophy recently?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pvere3246 I live on a cycle route. You have the full set of cycling infrastructure.
So according to your theory, because the infrastructure is there, cyclist will obey the law?
On a typical day, within 10 seconds of leaving the house there will be a cyclist committing an offence. Certainly within a minute.
Mobile phones, pavements, jumping red lights, wrong side of the road. Then you get the e-motorbikes that the riders claim are cycles. Derestricted, pavements, no signals no helmets, no insurance, license plates, tax evasion, and that's before the moving offences.
1
-
1
-
@derekheeps1244 No, you can witness them as a police officer and stop them. Fine them
There are other approaches such as this
ULEZ cameras film a junction. It's trivial AI to pick up on offences
Red light jumping, cycling on pedestrian only crossings, pavement cycling.
That gets the video, and the close up images of the cyclist. That gets stored
Then a few months later, an operation, stop those committing an offence.
£100 fine, name and address AND a photograph. All that put into the system
Then click search. The photograph is matched against photographs of previous
offences, and 500 letters sent out, with £100 fines. £50,000 dished out
What's funny, its a magistrate's fine, so you can't get out of it with
bankruptcy
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If you look at migration to the UK, from the slaves, to the Irish, to Windrush, Bangladesh, EU, illegals now, its all being done for cheap labour.
How often have you heard who will pick the crops, who will clean toilets? That's the same as any plantation owner in the deep south.
That's been a disaster.
Genuine refugees, think Jews and pograms, Kinder Transport Kids, Ugandan Asians. Where's the issue? They aren't committing crimes. You don't read about them in the news. By and large they have done well.
Take another example, Bangladesh against India. Why have Indians by and large succeeded and Bangladesh failed? Well its because the Indians were educated, and pushed that on their kids. Those working in the mills didn't. Second factor is religion, and the attitude to women. One group, the women worked, the others were locked away, didn't learn English. Hence incomes were nearly halved.
So what's happened is they have imported poverty, and then are surprised that poverty increases!. They are stupid.
So what's the solution? It's easy.
A minimum tax on migrants. Set at the level of average wage. So if average wage is 38,500, that's the tax code of any adult economic migrant. That way we only get the people who pay in more than they take out [almost, there's a deficit].
So make that tax code change. An existing system is utilised. No points, no extra civil servants. Taxed at source, solves the problem.
Second for migrants, no welfare. They are earning over 38,500 a year. Saves lots of spending.
That leaves two categories. First are criminals. Deport and bar. Make it automatic. On entry, one of those US forms, have you been arrested? If so no entry you have to be interviewed first. That deals with illegal entrants, illegal workers. Lots. Offer rewards, 2K, 5K for example, for grassing illegals. Tax free
Next we have asylum. There are people who need asylum. Easy. a list of safe countries, No asylum. If a country moves from dangerous to safe, a grace period and you become a economic migrant, you tax code changes. Easy to do. One assessment. Status changes.
For those with no papers, or who won't say, or are criminals past the end of their sentence from a dangerous country, its a tent on a Scottish Island to wait it out. Separated by sex as well. No breeding.
It isn't hard to solve. It's easy. It's simple.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rent, rates, parking, tax, regulation, ... that's created a void that Amazon has filled.
Another example, in the last week I have had to motorbikes drive at me on the pavement. The first one a week ago, I was standing next to two police officers. This was after lots of cyclists had ridden at us and the police ignored it. Same today.
When the police don't act, and the criminals decide so what we won't be done, lets commit what is common assault and in the case of a neighbour, hit from behind on the pavement, put in a wheel chair, ABH.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Ludus57 For vouchers, they are worthless. Why would any business accept them?
For fiat, you have taxes and fines that create the value.
So now look at debts. You have two types of debts.
First is fixed rate debts, pay 5% plus principle. Also invoices and unpaid wages
Second is inflation linked debts. Pensions, nuclear clean up, insurance losses, damages, the EU, ...
For the first, you can print to pay. It screws your creditors because it creates inflation and they don't get back the value they lent.
For the second it doesnt' work. As fast as you inflate the debts get bigger. These debts are transfers of value and you have to tax to make the transfer. Take from one set of people. Don't provide them with services. Give the money to someone else. ie. Austerity and asset stripping. You are also limited by your ability to tax. Inflation linked debts, debts for value, work just like a household.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Heres' one from another report.
The term ‘discourse’ has been interpreted and applied in a broad way in this research. Discourses can be defined as clusters of ideas that provide ways of talking about issues such as child sexual abuse (Hall, 1997). This includes the language, terminology and definitions used but also how child sexual abuse comes to be understood, through the key points of change, and the different lenses through which it has been viewed, for example, through a focus on gender, social class or sexuality. It is important to look at which discourses have dominated ways of speaking about child sexual abuse over time, and who is speaking, because the language used to describe it is significant in determining how the issue is addressed. Discourses also produce meanings that can become accepted ‘truths’ and sustain particular power relations in society.
What the beep is that supposed to mean?
Oh look, I spot a lessons learned.
So social worker babble, or an english major into semiotics.
It's a just a cover up. Someone creaming the cash, achieving nowt bar enabling the abuse to carry on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
To stop them getting back in, here is a policy for Reform. A full audit of Social Security. Assets we know, zero. Liabilities, for pensions? Off the books. So get that number. Publish it. Send taxpayer an annual statement with their share of the debts. 180K for borrowing. 600K for pensions. It all adds up.
Ask yourself, what would you do if you were presented with that bill? Would you blame the Messenger, or would you blame Labour, Tories, Lib Dems, SNP, Civil servants ....?
If you do that in the first three months, its not Reform that gets the blame.
It also means they never ever get back in.
1
-
How do they grow wealth is the right question. They have to invest their surplus income. Into the stock markets. Long term that returns 6% in capital values and 3.25% in dividends. Over the same period inflation has averaged 6%.
So next do they have surplus income and how much do they have? The answer is yes. Around 20% of their income is surplus income. That's their NI contributions. 20% of income. If you look at the NI Fund accounts close to 100% of that goes on the state's pension debts. ie. To someone else. None goes on their services. So they are generating surplus income.
So lets have that 20% invested, in a fund, that they own, for their old age. If you throw on 7-8% for work place pensions on top that adds up.
The second part. None of that should be taxed. No dividend tax that brown used to loot funds. No stamp duty. No income tax. No VAT. It all accumulates tax free. Then you can draw down in your old age. When you die, what's left goes to your heir's funds, tax free. The poor die younger, so they get to benefit.
For Mr Average, retiring at the end of last year, just investing his NI, the fund would have been worth 1,196,925.65. The income from that fund, 38,900.08 and that's just from dividends.
The state offers no wealth, a paltry state pension and a share of its debts. the pensions debt along, including Murphy's fat cat pension means he has a 600,000 share of the debts. Borrowing on top. Debt is after all just negative wealth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The evidence is that they did. Earliest known homo sapiens skeletons, existed in South Africa. Then if you example the earliest dates by location you can track the spread north. That's for our species. You can also look at genetic mutations. More diffences in Africa, less as you get farther away. You can even pick up on breeding with other hominids, such as denosivans and neanderthals. Clear evidence there.
But if you want to widen it to other hominids, you have widespread homo erectus, including in England, such as Boxgrove. Eating large animals - e.g Put another Rhino on the barbeque Bruce.
So where did home erectus originate. more difficult, but for erectus's own ancestors, hom rudolfensis, homo habilish, you are talking only finding them in Africa.
The next step back, the australopithicines, are all African.
What's interesting is that there is a very high correlation between the nationality of the researcher, and the conclusion that their country was the source of humanity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Agreed. There as the grand design where the guy built the massive cob home.
What's interesting to me is that cob is a composite material. The addition of fibres, such as straw, hair is needed. Just like you put carbon fibre into a plastic matrix, or rebar into concreate.
It's clearly fire proof too.
In terms of the rain, the bigger issue is ground water. You need the right foundations, to prevent capillary action lifting water destroying the cob from, the base.
In terms of ability to last, we have the remains of cob buildings going back 8000 years. Jericho for example.
There's a general problem in society that we must have high tech solutions. An example in tunnel boring. Machines costing millions make the holes.
But look back at Brunel. To build a vertical shaft they put a cookie cutting ring on the ground. On the inside is a lip. Whilst they were digging out the centre of the shaft, brickies were building a wall on that lip. That increases the weight forcing the cookie cutter into the ground. Dig more out, build the wall, and the cookie cutter sinks. The wall is there and protects the workers against cave in. You can go down a long way. This for example is how Elephant and Castle Tube station was built. You could do the same now. We precast concrete wall sections. a mini digger, and a crane to lift the sections in, the spoil out. Cheap and cheerful.
Then at the bottom, the put a cookie cutter in the wall, and started digging. The name for this was the great shield. They bolted metal sections into place to create the tunnel. Then hydraulic rams attached to those sections, pushed the cookie cutter forward. Two men dug out the soil, it was carted away. Then new wall sections added, Cookie cutter advanced, more soil removed. repeat. The numbers I've seen were 20 meters a day. OK. doesn't sound like much does it? But If you want a 1 km tunnel, you start at both ends. Each side needs to do 500 meters. At 20 meters a day, that's under a month. That's nothing.
So I think a simple. Just update the method. Conveyor belt to get the spoil out, a small train. You add the rails as you go. Crane is standard to lift the spoil out. At the front a small digger running off compressed air to dig out the material. A small digger modified to lift the wall sections into place. Doesn't take many people and you still get 20 meters a day.
So why's it not done? It's because the people running the system get more money by delaying than doing the job.
Another example, cross rail. For the cost of cross rail you could have had 150 DLR extensions in London. What effect would that have had on transport in the capital? Could you get 150 in place? No, So you could have had it in Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester, and Liverpool. But they spent it on one line.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JohnSmith-ux3tt People voted for the left. The socialist welfare state took 20% of people's money.
Now that creates a debt, but those leftists wanted to spend the money, and they didn't. No investments, no capitalism.
But that creates a problem. That debt? If its on the debt, people work out that it can't be paid. it's negative wealth. People work out that wealth inequality, low take home pay, austerity, poverty is directly caused by socialism
But without that debt number, people will vote to be ripped off.
With that number, what does the swamp do? Answer, run for the hills, or private jet out of the UK
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@NaomiRosemaryJohnson So for example.
Met Police News today. Keith Edun.
Name Keith Daniel R Edun Birth Oct 1976 Croydon, Greater London
So born in the UK.
Electoral register.
Name Dr Keith Edun Birth 1975-1977 Residence 2014-2015 Croydon, Surrey, England
So probably British. [You can be foreign and vote in the UK]
Keith Edun, 47 (12. 11.1976) of Strathmore Road, Croydon appeared at Croydon Crown Court on Friday, 14 February, where he was jailed for encouraging the rape and sexual assault of a baby, distribution of indecent images of children, two counts of making indecent images of children and perverting the course of justice.
Ties up with Croydon, ties up on the age.
Got 21 years. A long sentence, particularly compared to the PDFs in Rotherham etc.
1
-
@NaomiRosemaryJohnson Here's another example.
Marius Ziugzda, 48, (15.06.76), of no fixed address, was sentenced on Thursday, 13 February and will serve a minimum of 18 years.
He was previously found guilty on Friday, 17 January of the murder of 60-year-old Brian Shields following a two-week week trial at Wood Green Crown Court.
No birth record.
Electoral Registers.
Name Marius Ziugzda Birth 1975-1977 Residence 2010 Barking, Essex, England
So that matches up, Redbridge was where the murder took place, so the area is consistent.
So looks like he came to the UK sometime before 2010, but wasn't born in the UK.
That's just two examples from the Met News website.
You can take that information in lots of ways.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1. Major confusion about money and value of money. The assumption print, and you can get goods and services for the money
A simple gedanken experiment shows why this is bonkers. We introduce a new currency. No need to tax or fine to back it up. The government prints away and pays its staff in the new currency. It needs a snazzy name. Lets call it the voucher. To help its introduction it doubles the wages of its staff. Instead of £50K a year, they get 100K of vouchers. Everyone else switches to the dollar. What happens when those employees try and spend their vouchers?
2. Full employment is a complete red herring.
3. Governments are exactly like households. Print as much as you like, the problem comes when you try and change it into goods.
Another gedanken experiment shows this. The government passes a law. A UBI is introduced. £200K a day, inflation linked, for everyone in the UK. £200K is price of a nice Ferrari. So you get your UBI payment and go down the car dealership. I'll have my Ferrari. You want it to export it to turn that money into dollars. Ah yes, you can't exchange the money for goods (or services). The reason is the state now has a debt, that UBI, where the VALUE promised exceeds the VALUE generated by the UK economy. The state has defaulted on its debt to pay that UBI.
This household argument, print to pay and never run out, is based on the assumption that money has value.
4. So you are limited by the ability of people being taxed to give up their wealth, their purchasing power.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Can I make a suggestion?
Next letter, report it has harassment on a police website. That way they can't say no, its recorded. Write the date, and the crime reference number on the letter. Add it to your collection. You can name the woman running BBC Revenue as the offender.
If they turn up, report it as harassment and this offence.
Town Police Clauses Act 1847 Section 28
Every person who wilfully and wantonly disturbs any inhabitant, by pulling or ringing any door bell, or knocking at any door,
or who wilfully and unlawfully extinguishes the light of any lamp
Again via a police website. You can of course get the employee number, name etc.
If they refuse to give it to you, report them for casing the joint. ie. Ringing the bell prior to a burglary to see if the place is empty. Police website, get the crime reference number.
I've done this and they have stopped. I wrote a follow up letter, cease and desist. I withdraw rights of access. With all the date and the crime reference numbers.
You then insist that they remove your personal details from their database.
You can do the same with Capita. That's the interesting one. I don't think the BBC can transfer their powers to a private company.
@BedsitBob
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There's a common connection. If you look back at the history of migration and classify the waves into two categories, its shows something interesting. Category one is cheap labour. Category two is asylum. Category 3, high tax, high skilled. Category 4 is military. They cover the general set up, with spouses being a 5th.
So slavery, windrush, the EU, Irish, Pakistan and Bangladesh were all for cheap labour, and that's gone wrong.
Asylum we have Ugandan Asian, Kindertransport, Jews fleeing pograms. That's not gone wrong.
High skilled? You have to be integrated. You have to have a stake in society to earn. By and large you don't commit crimes because you lose the economic advantage.
Military? Chinese in the navy, Nepalis in the army? They are highly integrated because of their long period of work in a British institution. Crimes? Nope.
Spouses? Again for natives, they will be integrated.
So the problem is with the cheap labour category. Not surprising.
The solution is two fold. Deport all criminals who have a second passport and strip their UK passports.
Second is a minimum tax set at average wage levels of 38.5K a year. Minimum. Taxed at source its very easy to implement. Economic migrants then find out its not economical to be here. They also lose welfare. So what happens?
First is they leave. Problem solved there.
Second is they commit crimes. That's again easy to fix. Deport them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So what's the solution. A register of greens. Tory MPs added, Labour MPs added, SNP, the works. Same for members of the Green party. They get a small badge to show they are in the club. Then its full zero carbon. Not net zero, zero carbon.
Electricity supply? Renewable with no subsidies, and smart meters that cut the power.
Electric only driving licenses, and massive fines if in a fossil vehicle of any sort.
Added to the no fly list, ideally just after they jet off to Bora Bora. Tickets cancelled, not allowed to buy new ones.
Gas supply cross checked against electoral roll, and that's cut off.
It's what they want, lets make sure they get what they want.
How to get off the list? Well that's difficult and would need a lot of work to implement. 10-20 years minimum
How many would get that click today and a brown out?
1
-
1
-
1
-
Points based is a bad idea
1. Civil servants get to dictate the value of X. They can't.
2. You have the points, you come, then you don't earn a lot. Now others are poorer because they are force to fund you
3. You don't have the points, because you are an entrepreneur. If you did come you would be one of those paying a lot of tax. Civil servants denied them and us that benefit
So here's a better solution
Every migrant gets a £38,000 a year tax code, minimum. If they earn more, it goes up, if they earn less, its stays there. So you must pay a tax corresponding to 38K a year. Each migrant. Include those already here.
Tax at Source via PAYE, it fixes a huge existing problem. It also fixes a future problem. It's not attractive to come.
Entrepreneurs will. They may well make the bet.
Other conditions. No criminals. Barred and deported.
What's great about it. It uses an existing system. HRMC. No need for a quango OffMIg run by more civil servants. Notice how the civil service solution is more civil servants when it was them that create the mess.
Plus the existing problem is also cured. That deliveroo rider, gets taxed at source. More tax for the government, lower spending. Housing crisis resolved.
@peterclareburt4594
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In all social systems there must be a class to do the menial duties, to perform the drudgery of life... Such a class you must have, or you would not have that other class which leads progress, civilization, and refinement. It constitutes the very mud-sill of society and of political government... Fortunately for the South, she found a race adapted to that purpose to her hand—a race inferior to herself, but eminently qualified in temper, in vigor, in docility, in capacity to stand the climate, to answer all her purposes."
That was Pre Civil war. That's from the Cotton is King speech.
I've heard that recently. For example, Kelly Osbourne, saying without Mexican's who would clean toilets.
That way of thinking is strong on the left.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1