Comments by "Sam Brockmann" (@SamBrockmann) on "Barr precedent raises questions about Mueller report release" video.

  1. No, CNN, it doesn't raise any questions. For those who, you know, actually read the Constitution.
    3
  2.  @fabiofoxmusic3971  , you may want to re-read the emoluments clause there, bud. You clearly are using exegesis interpretation of it, instead of eisegesis. President Trump has not violated that. And, no, I don't think President Trump is going to "MAGA". I just think Hillary would have been a worse choice. But, hey, whatever makes you feel good about hating the man, go for it.
    1
  3.  @fabiofoxmusic3971  , backing out without presenting any actual facts, bud? What a shame! Oh, and if I were you, I'd worry more about my own challenged worldview than someone else's. https://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/1/essays/68/emoluments-clause || https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/The-Text-and-History-of-the-Foreign-Emoluments-Clause.pdf https://mises.org/wire/4-reasons-why-socialism-fails || http://www.aei.org/publication/why-socialism-always-fails/ || https://www.hoover.org/research/why-socialism-fails
    1