Comments by "Stephen Jenkins" (@stephenjenkins7971) on "Europe Is Losing Its Factories" video.

Mostly from the US, Norway, and MENA region. Very little from India/China/Russia. Also US energy is "high priced" due to distance and lack of infrastructure to support it; which European leaders refused to create since they were getting cheap energy from Russia.
5
Gotta love how those same EU officials greenlit and supported closer ties with Russia against US crying, and then watched it blow up in their face as Russia used it against them. EU officials "serving European interests" looks hilariously like serving Russian interests.
2
@Martincic2010 Making peace with Russia by abandoning Ukraine would destroy Europe politically/morally/geopolitically all at once. Eastern Europe would never trust the EU ever again, and Russia would be validated in its blatant colonialism within the European continent. The outcome of giving Ukraine up is infinitely worse than getting Russian oil. So the answer is; they will support Ukraine for however long it takes for Russia to give up or collapse. Their choice.
2
@Khalid_Looby Amazing how Russia can beat Ukraine at any time after having lost 100k men within 2 years and having been beaten back on multiple fronts. If the US suffered such setbacks, you'd call it for what it is; the dying gasps of an empire. "1.5M army" Lmao. Yeah, as if Russia has the capacity to deploy all 1.5M men in a war where 90% of their tanks have been destroyed, or even use their air force effectively with a country with a decent anti-air capability.
1
@start3215 The sheer coping rage from the Muscovite about their failing state is weird af, not gonna lie.
1
It was not for the betterment of the world; it was for the betterment of Europe. If the EU stayed out of the conflict, it would have destroyed any trust EE nations had in it and broke it to pieces. It would have been undeniable proof that they'd sell them to Russia if it was for their benefit.
1
@mpriymak Oil imports into China/India have "skyrocketed" in relative terms. In reality they haven't even reached a fraction of oil exports to Europe prior to this war. Total Russian gas/oil exports have dropped massively. And you guys are coping to the high heavens on how that's actually a good thing.
1
@airrodgers7277 That still takes years, genius. The point is that Russia nor China can do that within a timely fashion, let alone to make up for the loss of Western money anytime soon.
1
@trade1713 It has something to do with China currying up Russia by echoing their propaganda in Europe; including denying the rights of former Warsaw Pact countries their right to self-determination. If Europeans came around denying China's right to exist, I don't think they'd take it kindly either. China is a threat, specifically because it is very aggressive and imperialist itself. And don't try to deflect by crying about someone else either.
1
It won't be a rival at all if EU tries to antagonize it by pleasing Russia -Eastern Europe would sooner abandon Western Europe than give in to Russia imperialism.
1
@Martincic2010 "Clearly fighting" as if they have a choice. There were Russians fighting the USSR with Nazi Germany; that doesn't suddenly mean that there are multiple Russian states. Ditto here; there is one Ukraine -and the war will not end until Russian forces are destroyed and fled Ukrainian land.
1
@Martincic2010 Russia suffered a Vietnam War in Ukraine within 2 years; Russia has to justify and maintain their war effort -Ukraine has every reason to fight for however long it takes. Every imperialist loses in their colonialist war because the victims have far more to lose. Russia's defeat is inevitable; all that is in question is how utterly destroyed Russia wants to be by the end. Morally/economically/geopolitically.
1