Comments by "Fernando Jackson" (@fernandojackson7207) on "" video.

This situation does not meet the definition of Occupation by the Hague, which says an occupation takes place when the hostile army replaces the function of the government of those occupied. No such happens, as both Area A, gaza( pre 7/10) , have their own government.
1
@BiharyGabor Er, no. hamas runs its police force, army, education system. They were even voted in. The Idf doesn't patrol Gaza. If it did, the repeated attacks against Israel, the building of tunnels, wouldn't have happened.
1
@BiharyGabor As agreed to by _ both sides_, and in agreement with Oslo. If Palestinians don't like it, have them take it out with their representatives in the PA, who signed the agreement.
1
@BiharyGabor Er, there is no forceful imposition when the PA has agreed to both this arrangement, to Oslo, without any duress involved. Thus, by the Geneva definition, there is no such. Israel neither makes nor enforces laws in Area A. Please provide references to the contrary. All of Judea and Samaria are still technically, formally, Israeli land by Utis Posidetis Juris, as J&S were part of the Mandate for Palestine .
1
@BiharyGabor Do tell is just what specific international laws has Israel violated. Not quoting the UN, whose Human Rights council includes Russia, China, Iran. UN advisory opinions aren't International law, nor legally binding. Same for its resolutions, notwithstanding that hizbollah ignores 1701.
1
@BiharyGabor Controlling access to Israel by gazans is what every country does. Restrictions to prevent the regular attacks by hamas against Israeli civilians, don't violate International Law. Gazans were able to travel to and work in Israel freely. Until they started walking in with self-immolation vests and regulary killed or hijacked Israeli civilians. You want to deny Israel the right to self-defense. Notice Egypt blockades gaza, and several countries forced out Palestinians. Why don't you ask Jordan, Kuwait, who forced them out, to retake their Palestinians?
1
@BiharyGabor https://youtube.com/shorts/Xq3CcALmq2o?si=u4UyuhNdp8IBNX3x
1
@BiharyGabor I'm not sure of their status, given Oslo has been repeatedly violated. As of 1967, they were part of Israel proper, by Utis Posidetis Juris. I believe at this point, they're administered in accordance to Oslo.
1
@BiharyGabor Er, no, upon transfer of Mandate land, Israel automatically acquires the boundaries of such land. Just like several other countries like Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, etc., that evolved out of the Mandate system. I told you, beyond that, I'm not clear, as Oslo was the governing scheme since 1993, after which it was violated repeatedly. Thus I'm not clear on its status at this point. Funny how those like you only question Israel's claim to its land, but have no concerns for the ownership status by other countries.
1
@BiharyGabor If you keep calling me dishonest, I will stop exchanging with you. I'm providing answers to the best of my knowledge. Do tell, just _ what_ have I misrepresented?
1
@BiharyGabor Just what is it Im not being honest about? Be honest yourself, rather than throwing about the term without any basis in fact.
1
@BiharyGabor It was you who falsely claimed Israel was occupying Area A , as the PA is the government there, where law enforcement is based on Oslo, which has been _ agreed to_ by both parties, contradicting your claim that Israel forces itself on the PA; the authorities in Area A. Spare me your moralizing.
1
@BiharyGabor The terms by which the Idf operates in Judea and Samaria, _ have been agreed to_ by both sides. As such, it is _ not_ forceful, nor has it been impossed / done under duress. When the terms have been agreed to, there is no dictatorship by the Idf. Want to see dictatorship, look at hamas, which is in its 17th year of a 4-year term, which governs without any controls, opposition party nor free press. And you endorse the sham of the UN, UNRWA, who have artificially kept this problem ongoing. UNCHR was able to place all its refugees in a few years , while in 75 years, UNRWA has increased the number from 700,000 to 5.9 million. UNRWA considers any descendants of refugees of 1948 to be refugees themselves, so that, even those that have acquired nationality in 3rd countries are still considered refugees. So, the likes of 28-year old Bella haddid , born in Washington DC, worth around $23 million, a supermodel, is a refugee, and, as such, can claim benefits from UNRWA. Spare me your lecture. I'm done with this exchange. My " lack of answer" is the result of vague, unverifiable claims and appeals to authority, as you demand sources without providing any yourself. Good day/night, etc.
1
@BiharyGabor You have _ repeatedly_ made vague, unverified/unverifiable claims yourself. Your claim of occupation is , has been countered by actual International Lawyers such as Eugene Kontorovich, who has taught at the University level and publishes a column in mainstream papers. I won't take lectures from you. I'm done here. Good day/night, etc.
1
@BiharyGabor Enjoy parroting baseless UN and otherwise nonsense. Now I understand how you reach your conclusion. By citing shills within the UN. I have _ already_ adressed the opinions you misrepresented as facts. Kontorovich's opinion stand or fall on their own, independent of your questionable claims. Not surprised of yet one more person giving a pass to hamas, to several other wars. You accomplish nothing in terms of swaying my opinion. Clearly this isn't your real goal.
1
@BiharyGabor Regards to Mrs Dunning and Kruger.
1
@jamesarthur2140 Nothing specific. No evidence on him getting paid. No surprise.
1
@mochithepooh5368 But this assumption is made, used by many in their arguments.
1
@squid_3 There were versions based on local Jewish culture. Unlike with any Palestinian culture.
1
@artificialconstruct-c8m Jews had been living there for centuries. Judea: Judaism.
1
@chuknorth Just what fairy tales are those?
1