Comments by "Fernando Jackson" (@fernandojackson7207) on "Josh Hawley Mercilessly Grills Arab American Institute Leader About 'Long Live The Antifada' Meaning" video.

@harnessriscallous7466 ICJ is a cangaroo court, where participants who display an open anti-Israel bias fail to recuse themselves. Just look into Navi Pillay and Francesca Albanese at the UN. The definition of Apartheid just doesn't apply here. Non-Jews have full rights, work in all profesions and a Muslim Arab was appointed to the Israeli Supreme Court. Tell me how non-Muslims are treated in non-Muslim countries now.
14
@Aprilforevergreen There is no occupation. Occupation means the hostile army replaces the government of the occupied. This isn't the case in neither Area A nor gaza.
14
@harnessriscallous7466 There is no such apartheid. Do tell us about _ specific_ laws in Israel that explicitly benefit Jews over non-Jews. Tell us too, how non-Muslims are treated in Muslim countries. Jordan, Kuwait, forced out Palestinians in droves. Why should Israel be held responsible for them?
12
@weispresidentnow Right, because " From the River to the Sea" isn't a call for genocide. Got it.
9
@harnessriscallous7466 A Kangaroo court, where participants , such as Navi Pillay, who have an overt anti-Israel bias , refuse to recuse themselves. The UN's Human Rights council includes Russia, Iran, cuba and Venezuela. Right.
8
@harnessriscallous7466 I went over it. The judges have an open anti-Israel bias. And yet don't recuse themselves. Not aware of the case you refer to.
8
@harnessriscallous7466 There is no siege whatsoever. Area A has its own autonomous government. And, Btw, Israelis aren't allowed into Area A. But Israel Apartheid. The rules by which Area A is governed abide by the terms of Oslo, which the PA agreed to. That isn't a siege by any stretch of the imagination.
8
@harnessriscallous7466 1)Descendants of _ alleged_ displaced have no right of return anywhere in the world. 3) Area A has its own autonomous government, which implements that law, and not Israel. 4) Er, no. You can travel outside of Israel. 6) Land allotment is decided by the PA , not Israel . The PA is autonomous , and not subordinate to Israel. 7) Now tell me how non-Muslims are treated in majority Muslim countries.
7
@harnessriscallous7466 6) Several countries offer incentives of return to those of the country's descent. Israel is intended as a haven for Jews.
6
@weispresidentnow And yet it's you who are unable to make a specific , coherent point.
6
@RpgRambo Real life says otherwise. In this context, the meaning is clear. Just like " From the River to the Sea".
6
 @jchan9761 And yet you can't point to a _ specific_ point made by him that doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
5
False. There's plenty evidence this movement, the demonstrations, are astro turf, rather than grass roots. Notice the similarity of strategies; of using encampments, and a large percent of those arrested by the police aren't even students. The signs are all nicely made, prefab, rather than improvised( which you would expect from a grassroots movement). The placards all new and fresh made , and read exactly the same as others. This is an _ organized_ movement, not a " natural" one, as the woman being interviwed is claiming.
3
@peacewarrecords You mean the readily debunked narrative of the nakba and similar nonsense?
3
@peacewarrecords You mean the likes of : " From the River to the Sea" aren't calls for genocide?
3
 @weispresidentnow You can't. Most of us can.
2
@harnessriscallous7466 The court where those involved didolay an open bias against the accused party, yet refuse to recuse themselves.
2
@AbdulSoomro-kj5lt There is no occupation. The term has a definition that doesn't apply here.
2
 @jchan9761 Do support that. I guess only the Jooz can't have a lobby. No problem with CAIR and other lobbies, right?
1
@CommonSense-ei2rk They don't what? What definition is being misused.
1
@peacewarrecords Just when/where/how did I say or imply any such thing?
1
@Aprilforevergreen Clearly the Israeli government/Idf controls the PA, which just submitted a resolution to dissolve Israel.
1
@peacewarrecords There is no aggression. It's called self-defense, after years of terror attacks by hamas against Israeli civilians. However it upsets you, Israel is defending itself. Go check your pager now.
1
@PooPie-b4c Their actions speak louder than anyone else's words.
1
@deaddudegaming That " Evil Crap" is called self-defense, as hamas spent several years attacking Israeli civilians, with thousands dying, all leading to October 7. Before that there were massacres of Jews in Hebron 1929, Munich Olympics 1972, Israeli Embassy in Argentina in 1994, Sbarro attacks, among several others.
1
@gweilospur5877 Because actions context, speak louder than words.
1
@ACruelBadger They're planning a worldwide Caliphate. ISIS, ISIL, Al-Qaeda. That will affect you.
1
@AbdulSoomro-kj5lt Yet there is no such occupation.
1
@peacewarrecords Resistance should be against hamas, who treat gazans like garbage.
1
@HopePeace-hr5qx I'm betting you're unable to quote the actual International law you refer to, nor the basis on which land was taken from them. Keep hiding behind your vague, unsubstantiated claims.
1
@_sahalahmed Er, no one shoved them there, and it's not an open air prison, as they can move about gaza, go to work, etc., without any coercion. Maybe if they had not gotten forced out of Jordan or Kuwait, they would not be in gaza. If they had not been repeatedly, cowardly, attacking and killing Israeli civilians, they could be prosperous and happy. Do tell about the _ specific_ points I dismissed. They, hamas, brought it on themselves. Good job pretending to care about gazan civilians while ignoring hamas treats them like garbage and Syria, Lebanon, treat them like 2nd class citizens. But that's ok, since Israel isn't involved. You offer no specifics. How surprising. No one more ignorant than yourself.
1
@_sahalahmed By actual International Law, specifically Utis, Posidetis Juris, all the land between the river and the sea, belongs to Israel. Let alone that, unlike with those like yourself, Netanyahu isn't talking about killing all Palestinians. Try again.
1
@HopePeace-hr5qx How ridiculous to call the country fighting in seven fronts, the agressor.
1