Comments by "Evan" (@MrEvanfriend) on "" video.

  1. 3
  2. The deaths prevented by banning guns would be offset by the deaths CAUSED by banning guns, too. Guns are used for defensive purposes many times more than they're used in crimes. A man who plans to overpower a woman, rape her, and strangle her, will think twice when she has a .380 in her purse. Some thugs trying to rob a guy walking to his car from work after dark will stop when he pulls his concealed pistol. The scumbag who tries to break into my home some night will find himself staring down the barrel of a loaded AR15. Even without a shot being fired, the sight of a gun will cause most criminals to rethink their plans. Unfortunately for us Second Amendment supporters, the number of deaths prevented by law-abiding citizens with firearms is incalcuable. The number of defensive uses of guns is estimated anywhere between 200,000 and 3 million per year, which far outpaces the number of gun murders even at the lowest estimate. We live in an imperfect world, and until we can "social engineer" crime out of existence (which would be utterly Orwellian either way, and thus undesirable), guns in the hands of good guys will stop guns in the hands of bad guys enough to make a difference. In my native New York City, guns are de facto banned. You have to pay something like a $640 fee to get a permit to even buy a gun at all, which takes about six months, and if you get it at all, it then needs to be registered (and the types of guns allowed are heavily restricted). Carrying a gun in New York, in theory, is legal with a permit. In practice, those permits are not issued (this is one of the MANY reasons I no longer live in New York). There are still hundreds of murders per year in NYC, most of which are committed with guns. A Bronx gang-banger who wants to kill a rival is undeterred by the insane gun laws. 
    3
  3. 3
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1