Comments by "Evan" (@MrEvanfriend) on "Pakistan vs India (2017)" video.

The Egyptian Army is useless, as is every other Arab army. Israel would win handily, just as they have every other time the Egyptians were dumb enough to pick fights with civilized people. The Israelis are well trained, their military is built to fight. Egypt's military is built to control their own population.
16
Right, adding "trust me I'm a right winger" to the end of your statements doesn't make them any more true. The fact that you call conservatives "low IQ retards" makes me skeptical that you are, and regardless, your own political views are irrelevant. The fact is, we on the right have guns. Lots of them. On the left, almost nobody does - and the guns they do have tend not to be the type that have any military utility. A side-by-side for skeet shooting is not the same as a modern semiautomatic rifle. Also, what makes you think that the left would "just release a biological weapon?" It's not that simple. First, it requires access to the proper pathogens. This is by no means a universal thing. Then, it requires engineering those pathogens so that they'd be appropriate for use as a weapon, developing a delivery system, and then actually delivering it. This is complicated. They don't just have canisters of airborne Ebola virus sitting around in San Francisco. The last biological attack that I'm aware of was the anthrax mailings in 2001. They killed like six people. That's hardly a winning strategy. A workable mass casualty biological attack would likely take years to produce. Furthermore, in the scenario we're talking about, a civil war based on politics with no clear front lines, even if a mass casualty biological weapon was prepared, it would be almost certain to blow back on those who prepared it as well. So no, your assertion holds no water. Try again.
10
One Punch Negga You're assuming that the South = the right, which isn't true (just look at an electoral map, the left is essentially limited to urban areas, the right is the rural areas and suburbs). You're also assuming that the left would somehow control nukes. If you'd ever served in the US Military, you'd know that it isn't exactly run by leftists. Also, it isn't exactly easy to just start launching nukes. It's specifically designed to be hard to do. Then there's the extremely asymmetric distribution of weapons. Conservatives own them, leftists don't. Even in a "battleground" state like Pennsylvania, my home state, which has a lot of people from both sides of the aisle, there would be no contest. We have guns, they don't. A bunch of faggots waving rainbow flags and throwing bricks aren't gonna be much good against normal people armed with AR15s.
7
That's because the current conflict is based entirely on Islamic savagery. The antidote to Islamic savagery is Western troops. The British didn't tolerate savagery.
4
One Punch Negga Oh, I see what you did. First, you tried equating conservatives with Nazism, a left-wing socialist movement that the modern left pretty much agrees with in most regards but pretends it doesn't, then you called conservatives "degenerates", because somehow being decent people who work for a living and want to be left alone is worse than, I don't know, demanding that I'm the opposite sex and using the coercive power of government to enforce that fiction on everyone else.
4
Dante war The US has never come to Israel's aid. Israel beats the various savages that attack it every time, and will for the forseeable future.
3
Dante war Yes, the Egyptian army buys cool toys from the US. That doesn't mean they're capable of fighting well. Their training, like the training of every other Arab army, is abysmal. Their officer corps is useless. Their job is to control their own population, not to fight other armies, and especially not civilized ones as the Israelis have. I don't care how many troops and tanks Egypt has, I'd much rather have well trained and well led troops in a smaller force than a massive rabble. Egyptians, like all paynim savages, have a massive problem with Jews. All the Egyptian Jews are in Israel or the US by now. And no, American pilots never flew sorties for Israel. There were certainty no American tanks on the ground there. Quit making excuses, Israel beat the savages because they are civilized.
3
The Saudis have cool toys, but I seriously doubt that they can use them effectively. From what I've seen in Iraq, Arabs make piss-poor soldiers - virtually untrainable. I have two friends whose fathers, while serving in east bloc militaries, were tasked to train Arabs as well, including one as a pilot (the air force is Saudi Arabia's biggest advantage). He said that Arab pilots were completely useless. F-15s are really good planes, but if the pilots flying them are barely trained knuckleheads, it doesn't really matter how good the planes are, and I suspect, based on everything I know, that Saudi F-15 pilots (and all pilots in general) are barely trained knuckleheads mostly there because they're third cousins of the al-Sauds or whatever. I don't think that Iran's military is much better. In fact, I suspect that any war between Iran and Saudi Arabia would very quickly devolve into an extended conflict between various Sunni and Shia terror groups competing to bomb each other's mosques and similar savagery. Either way, I'd love to see the Saudis and the Iranians just bleed each other. Let wolf rend wolf, as they say.
2
UnitedGreatLakes Quantity is a quality of its own. That should never be forgotten. Look at what happened to Germany on the Eastern Front in WWII, the vastly superior man-for-man German army was destroyed by barely trained Soviet hordes. Chosin Reservoir in Korea is another Example. The First Marine Division is likely the best division ever fielded by any force ever, and they were forced to retreat (a fighting retreat, but they didn't hold the ground) when faced with eight vastly inferior Chinese divisions. As far as stealth fighters go, yeah, F-22s are really really good. We have 155 of them. That's not a lot. You swarm them with enough MiG-19s, and they'll all eventually be lost to attrition.
2
Bullet-Tooth Tony In the end, which nation existed after the end of WWII, the Third Reich or the USSR? A costly victory is still a victory.
2
Enlightened and "progressive" are mutually exclusive terms. The West Coast and Northeast are generally horrible and populated by cretins. I know, I grew up in New York and have lived in California and Seattle as well. Any state north of Virginia with a coastline should be avoided at all costs.
2
Well, if by "defeat", you mean "force to a stalemate", you'd be right. China's military might (discounting nukes) is based solely on numbers. They have a whole lot of people, and thus can afford to send more of them into a fight than anyone else. The Russians don't have the manpower that China does, but they do have a whole shitload of tanks and artillery. Either way, such a war would be a bloodbath that made WWII look like a picnic, but, if you discount nukes, the US et al would eventually win.
1