Comments by "Evan" (@MrEvanfriend) on "Australia or Indonesia? Whose military would prevail? (2017)" video.

  1. Everyone hates Pakistanis.
    19
  2. issysito I'm American. Everyone in the West hates Pakistanis.
    9
  3. Lil Ladiboi From Bangkok Someone going around calling themself a Thai ladyboy shouldn't speak to the states of mind of others.
    5
  4. Australia has never been invaded by sea because the US Marines beat Japan back at Guadalcanal. Semper Fi!
    4
  5. Irtaza Azam As I said before, nobody actually likes or respects Pakistan. You're disgusting backwards savages. That various countries including China and even, at times, the US collaborate with Pakistan for geopolitical reasons does not mean that anyone actually thinks highly of you benighted wretches.
    4
  6. issysito Well, you're clearly in the minority then. Where's Zawahiri hiding?
    3
  7. issysito Britain is a pretty good country. Your gun laws suck, and you need a written constitution in the worst way, but overall Britain is one of the better countries in the world. Canada is lame, I would never move there.
    3
  8. Aussie Militant The fact was that you did send your troops to Europe and North Africa. I knew some Australian soldiers, and would never speak ill of the Australian Army, but the fact remains that you were not prepared for the Japanese, who were the type of major power that Australia was not. Whether or not Japan intended to actually invade Australia is irrelevant; both Australia and the US believed that they did. Guadalcanal would have been an excellent staging point for such an invasion, and the American attack on Guadalcanal was meant to stop an invasion of Australia, whether or not such invasion was planned. I appreciate Australia. You are the only country on earth who has fought alongside Americans in every conflict since WWI. I own an Australian "jelly bean suit" that I traded one of your soldiers for a set of my own cammies. Don't take anything I say as anti-Australian, because it certainly isn't meant that way. But the fact of the matter is, in the Pacific Theater, your contribution to the war effort was negligible compared to that of the United States. You yourself have admitted that the bulk of your army was deployed elsewhere by the time that war broke out. I'm not saying that you didn't fight. I'm just saying that in the wider Pacific war, the Americans did the overwhelming majority of the fighting. In the planned Operation Downfall, there was to be a single Australian division, plus an air wing, out of 52 total divisions.
    2
  9. ***** Where was the Royal Navy at Midway? At the Marianas? At Leyte Gulf, the biggest battle in naval history?
    2
  10. ***** Ignorant savage
    2
  11. ***** Indefensible it is, no matter how hard you've been hit by Karl Martell or Godfrey de Bouillon or Richard the Lionheart or Jan III Sobieski or whoever else. Islam is a political cult, much the same as communism was. These cults all fade. And now, the entire civilized world is starting to rise up against Islamic savagery. Your false god will fall. Your child rapist false prophet will fall. A century from now, Islam will only be practiced in Hell. DEVS VVLT
    2
  12. ***** The Chinese just hate India
    2
  13. If France is the powerhouse, the EU has a serious problem. The French military is for shit. They may have some halfway decent toys, but you just can't expect a bunch of Frenchmen to actually fight competently. Their record in Afghanistan has been a complete disgrace on every level.
    2
  14. Snowcold No, your army is bad because your combat record says it is.
    2
  15. Snowcold Let's see what's wrong with that: Korea was divided by the Soviets, collateral damage has existed in literally every war ever, the chemical weapons found in Iraq are well documented and you have to be willfully blind to still claim they were never there, and, unlike the French, we've smoked the Taliban at every encounter, unfortunately we've just had eight years of a presidential administration that was run by French-level pussies who didn't want to win.
    2
  16. ***** The British/Indians fought hard in the China/Burma/India theater. I never said they didn't. In the Pacific Theater, there were some British ships, and they contributed. But the Pacific Theater was won by the United States. It's really that simple. It was Americans who sent the Imperial Japanese Navy to the bottom, it was Americans who destroyed the Japanese Army on all those islands, it was Americans who bombed Tokyo into rubble, and it was Americans who nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Where were the British on Pelieliu? Where were the British on Tarawa? On Guadalcanal? On Saipan? On Iwo Jima? On Okinawa?
    1
  17. ***** Tell me: which Japanese carriers did the British sink? Which islands did the British storm and secure at great loss of life?
    1
  18. Oh no, I forgot, we sunk Taiho too.
    1
  19. That's at least nine carriers sunk by the US Navy. Nine carriers sunk is enough to destroy any navy's ability to wage war. Hell, the only modern navy that has nine or more carriers is the USN. We also sunk a fuckload of other ships, including Yamato and Musashi, the two biggest battleships ever made.
    1
  20. ***** No, I said that the US won in the Pacific. The China/Burma/India theater was a separate theater, and one that the US had a relatively small involvement in (my step-grandfather, who is also American, flew C-47s in that theater, so I know we were there. He once had to bail out over the Himalayas).
    1
  21. kahlzun Well, that makes you either an Islamic savage or a complete dope.
    1
  22. ***** The Koran even has a bit about how you should treat your wife who has not yet menstruated, and as such is a child. I don't remember chapter and verse offhand, but your savage death cult gives explicit instructions in your unholy savagery manual for how to treat your pre-pubescent wife. That implicitly is endorsing child rape.
    1
  23. ***** Nobody fears Pakistan. You have nuclear weapons, which may or may not work, and we let you buy our old aircraft and whatnot. We still operate in Pakistan with impunity whenever we feel like it, and don't bother alerting your government about it either. Remember how you wretches were sheltering Usama bin Ladin? That is, until a SEAL team came in and lit him and all his buddies up. On your sovereign territory. Without asking. And our Reaper drones go wherever they want over your territory and kill other savages that you grant refuge to. Ha, and you savages think you're an actual military power that anyone fears! Priceless. Don't worry, eventually India will get fed up enough to deal with you.
    1
  24. Killian Weise-Desbois I'm American and a realist. The French Army is relatively well equipped, especially after they ditch the woeful FAMAS for the HK416, but they're poorly trained, poorly led, and generally incompetent.
    1
  25. Killian Weise-Desbois I wouldn't have thought that there was a French word for "courage"
    1
  26. Snowcold Yeah, because Trump may not know what he's doing, but Secretary of Defense James Mattis certainly does.
    1
  27. Killian Weise-Desbois A Frenchman with the audacity to call anyone else a piece of shit? Amazing. Don't you have some moslems to surrender to?
    1
  28. Snowcold William the Conquerer lived almost a millenium ago, Napoleon was Corsican, and the French Resistance during WWII was more or less negligible, and is greatly exaggerated by the French. Because your army lived right up to the stereotypes, you then collaborated with the Germans, and you as a nation are ashamed of this. You rescued some Allied airmen, and did some minor sabotage. The Dutch and Norwegians had much more effective resistance movements.
    1
  29. Snowcold You're gonna talk shit about how Americans eat? Seriously? When you queers with your baggettes and your snails and frog legs and your 84 course meals and wine for breakfast? Give me a break. I think your ridiculous mustache needs more wax.
    1
  30. Snowcold Yeah, your ridiculous Eurotrash stereotypes aside, Americans aren't all as stupid as you arrogant frogs like to think. Fun fact: Napoleon wasn't a Frenchman by any means, he was an Italian - speaking Corsican who changed his name to "Napoleon Bonaparte" from Napoleone di Buonaparte while at the military academy so he could fit in.
    1
  31. Snowcold Americans tend to eat single course meals, and we only need a single fork to do so. I don't particularly care how the French spell things, your spelling is idiotic with your superfluous silent Xs at the end of every other word and managing to somehow get "ver-sye" out of Versailles. That's four extra letters on the end that serve no apparent purpose whatsoever. I don't drink soda. Just water and beer. I put ice in my water, which you Europeans haven't seemed to figure out yet. I've been all around the world, and the only country I've been to where the food was as good as in America was Japan.
    1
  32. Snowcold Hey, you know where to find two million French jokes? Paris
    1
  33. Snowcold In case you didn't understand the nuances of that joke (which would be understandable as jokes in foreign languages tend to be rather hard to understand), what I was saying is that Frenchmen are ridiculous not to be taken seriously. A nation of cartoon characters.
    1
  34. Snowcold Yeah, unfortunately, having grown up in New York, an "international city" that attracts its share of foreign tourists, I've dealt with my share of Frenchmen. Also, both my sister and my ex-wife have been to France for various reasons, and neither had anything good to say about it.
    1
  35. Snowcold And your language is highly obnoxious too. You can't speak French without sounding like a douche. If I wanted to hear that shit, I'd go to the Francophone part of Belgium, where at least they have good beer.
    1
  36. Snowcold Yeah, I pointed out that you had medieval castles. Those are cool. I actually want to see Chateaux Gaillard, but I don't consider it worth going to France to do so. And there are plenty of castles in good countries like Britain and Germany as well. I'm guessing that joke has something to do with showers, but it doesn't translate. French is the most obnoxious sounding language I'm aware of, including Arabic. And there's more to a country than UNESCO world heritage sites. The US has very few of them, because we're a very new country. That you have less than twice as many as us when you have about 2,000 years more history than we do is pretty pathetic though. What we do have are outdoor activities though. While you queers are sitting around in a cafe or a wine bar, we have the chance to go camping or hiking, or go to the range and shoot guns, or go fishing, or whatever. All of those beat sitting at a cafe and smugly discussing how us Anglos are so uncultured.
    1
  37. Snowcold I've heard of the Alps, but who cares about the French part? Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Italy all have better Alps. And there's no woodland to speak of in France, or really anywhere in Europe for that matter.
    1
  38. Ryan Hall No, most of us don't. And what "bravery" exactly are you talking about?
    1
  39. Ryan Hall Unprepared? The French had a bigger and arguably more modern army when the Germans invaded. The Germans, who were outnumbered and had smaller tanks with less armor and smaller guns, mopped the floor with them. French armor was surrendering to fuckin motorcycle scouts. And let's not forget the Maginot Line - "this will stop the Germans dead in their tracks unless they do the exact same thing they did last time and come in through the Low Countries". Then, after their disgraceful performance in the face of invasion, the French willingly collaborated with their occupiers. Vichy French troops fought WITH the Germans in North Africa. The French Resistance was minor and ineffective compared to resistance movements basically everywhere else Hitler occupied. Then let's talk about since WWII. Algeria, Indochina, the French have suffered humiliating military catastrophes against ragtag militias all over the globe. Their best troops are the foreign legion, who, by the way, AREN'T FRENCHMEN, and even they are little more than a group of competing ethnic prison gangs with some rudimentary infantry training. Read what Rommel, or presumably any other German (probably any Englishman too) has to say about the French military. It's been a joke ever since Napoleon destroyed the Grand Armee by foolishly invading Russia. Think about it, these faggots lost a war to fuckin Mexico.
    1
  40. Ryan Hall You mean the "Free French" army that did a lot of massacreing prisoners of war and next to no actual fighting? Yeah, real instrumental. The French resistance barely existed, and, apart from helping downed Allied airmen get to Spain or Switzerland, did virtually nothing of value. The Dutch, Norwegians, Danes, Poles, Soviets, Yugoslavs, and Greeks were all far more active and far more effective. The Norwegians destroyed a heavy water plant, and set Hitler's nuclear ambitions back to the point where they were never realized. They also sank shipping. Every country had its collaborators. No country but France sent troops to the German war effort. Had America been invaded, it is likely that the American resistance would have surpassed any and all others, simply because of the proliferation of firearms among Americans, which is essentially unique in the world. An Axis government controlling part of the country with Hitler's blessing is unthinkable. There's a reason the French have such a bad reputation among English and German speaking peoples. They've earned that reputation. When the supposed best army on earth capitulates to a weaker force in like six weeks after barely putting up a fight, their honor is beshitted, and it would take outstanding service in another major powers war to get it back. Seeing as how the French Army has failed at everything they've attempted since, this is highly unlikely.
    1