Comments by "Brandon" (@gravoc857) on "NBC News"
channel.
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
@hwoods9773 It has to do with my original comment about people not trusting and feeling angst against the courts. It’s not about protesting the courts, per say. It’s about a more inherent part of the human condition.
This woman saw something very impactful. Something she feels went wrong because of the officers. This is her perspective. The court is asking questions that challenge her perspective, and in better words, her reality. Done so in a tone and manner to paint innocence on the officer.
While yes I understand this is the duty of law to equal representation & a honest attempt at pleading the defendants case. It’s a very hard pill to swallow for those doubtful of the legitimacy of the legal institution, or in the witnesses case the reality to what she knows she saw.
You may call it stupidity, I call it challenge of perspective. I’m asking you to understand the perspective of the doubtful in the same way you would ask to understand the perspective of the advocate of the justice system. I’m not asking you to change your position.
I’m merely attempting to point out that both the legal system & humanity are complex. That its difficult to develop and maintain a system that can unequivocally ask/demand of its participants & receive participation. That the human instinct and human condition are much deeper. That these things cannot be reduced down to “just do it or she’s stupid”.
That to develop a more fair and just system is to understand both perspectives.
I understand your perspective. I spent the majority of my life as a patriot who held the institutions of the United States in high regards. I used to once fill your shoes. My perspective (my reality) has challenged that belief. Because I’ve now filled both shoes, I have a better appreciation for both stances, since I’ve experienced them personally. I now know that both are wrong, and that our system can be done better. Our system as currently stands is a system designed by humans, but does not incorporate the human condition. It is our societies best current attempt at ascending and holding ourselves to a higher and more just standard. It worked for a while, but it’s not working as intended now. We can do better. I see the flaws in the establishment and the flaws in human testimony while watching this trial. I don’t blame corruption. I blame the issues of scalability to both the human condition & the human constructed centers of establishment & control.
It’s why I’m very excited for the possibility of AI-ran government. It’s apparent that our complexity is surpassing the capability of humans. We humans are very smart. But individually we lack the required perspectives and knowledge to be sufficient at managing society. It’s a strange problem to have. Being so successful as a species that we outpace our physical evolution. This overburdening of knowledge we now face tends to make people resort to reductionist conclusions, in order to feel we sufficiently understand the overwhelming complexity we find ourselves in today. It’s how a brain whose design surpasses its capability copes with that. It’s how we hold sanity in a world we do not understand. It’s the limitation that leads to the flawed human condition. It’s what makes us, us. We’re special but we’re really bad at managing things. We could use some help.
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1