General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Black_Triton
Anders Puck Nielsen
comments
Comments by "Black_Triton" (@black_triton9264) on "Ukraine is losing the media war to Israel" video.
@ABCBCNM have watched some of these vids? They are often baseless assumptions. "Putin's regime is collapsing", "UA is winning", "UA can break thru the Surovikin line", "the RU winter offensive failed" (there wasn't one - just the Bakhmut operation)... it's hopium because even analytical assumptions should have some "indicators" to base them on. In this video, Anders says the mud has stopped armoured vehicle movement. The daily telegram vids on drones destroying both UA and RU tanks say otherwise. You are better off watching History Legends or Military Summary Channel. Although they are amateurs get it more right, more often than this "expert". I'm convinced more and more that Anders' channel is just a NATO info op 🤣
3
@ABCBCNM I suppose, as a serving NATO officer, at a military academy in Denmark, Anders is better off drinking the kool-aid. Even if it's wrong, his career will be fine. Imagine if he was unbiased and said Russian Forces did something well... career over. The groupthink in some J2 shops extremely disappointing.
3
@ABCBCNM The New Atlas is also a great analysis channel.
3
You're An expert... whose analysis is mostly wrong 😂
2
@Rtg5637 how can that be? Zelentsky was Time Man of the year. A new Churchill. And Zaluzhnyy the ne Eisenhower or Patton. Were we lied to?😢
2
Anders has been mostly wrong...
1
@Pierluigi_Di_Lorenzo if RU has the 2nd best army in Ukr, why is it causing 10x more casualties on UA and beating NATO? Why are western leaders (US) starting to talk about negotiations? Because they're winning? 🤔 Pull yer head outta your posterior 🤣
1
No. The "danger" does not advance west. It's the other way around. See "nato expansion" for more info. Ukraine is just a proxy. Not an objective for nato.
1
@cheztaylor8 😂 funny, isn't it. A cake and eat it too, paradigm
1
@xSandamx before you comment on global strategy, learn to spell "massive" 😂
1
@bluemarlin8138 sounds racist
1
@Whangareitaiji3138 but it's somehow ok for the US to take a chunk or Syria and wreck countries all over the planet....
1
@sivsuikki9428 No. Its not. It's just the best proxy to wage war against Russia. Like NATO tried in Georgia. Once project ukraine fails, who do you think they'll put into the breech next? Finland? Poland? The Baltic states?
1
How can Russia be an incompetent and toothless tiger yet threaten Western Europe at the time? 🤔
1
And what are you a "professor" of? CNN?
1