General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Black_Triton
Anders Puck Nielsen
comments
Comments by "Black_Triton" (@black_triton9264) on "Ukraine's river crossing can change the war" video.
All of Anders news is encouraging! And most of it turns out wrong ð
10
1. How is the river crossing going (2 weeks since the video) 2. Presuming that there are 2 UA battalions on that side of the river, what is the minimum daily supply in tons and how many rubber boat trips does that take to ferry over?
6
@shueyk2320 I know. But Herr Puck, the "analyst", is oblivious and wrong. It's like he's a NATO propagandist. ðĪĢ
3
Is one of the agreements you mentioned include the Minsk agreement?
2
@Sparticus-fh3os how about a 20 year failure against Afghan guys in flip-flops and manjamas?
2
Such wisdom! You, Sir, are the next Zhukov!
1
Are you really paying any attention to the turn in the headlines? From Ghost of Kiev to perhaps its better to negotiate since we're outta ammo now?
1
@user-je3sk8cj6g who said "72hr operation"? ... it was MSM war pundit General Kelley abs he's been wrong about everything ðĪĄ
1
@flyingisaac2186 and yet the US fleet will be successful in the Taiwan Straights... ðĪ
1
@martstam2016 Marx was German.. Funny how Germany exported communism to cause chaos in Russia in WW1 and 25 yrs later communism rubbed Germanys face in ð ðĐ.... Karma...or, should I say, "schadenfreude"
1
You mean you want the Russians to suffer under idiotic EU leadership?
1
â@yohanannatanson4199 you're right. It wasn't ukraine that threatened them; it was NATO expansion into ukraine ð
1
â @sillysad3198 correct
1
â @DIREWOLFx75 You can try to present facts to the smooth-brained, but the facts slide right off. All you can do for these propoganda addicts is hand them a hopium pipe and a safe injection space.
1
â @Wwhite1980 Yo! Hpoium addict.... check out "mediazona project" for Russian casualty estimates. It's from a NATO info op, not the Kremlin. Glory to the Ghost of Kiev & Heroes of Snake Island! ðĪĄ
1
You are stuck in a very old (and erroneous) "thinking". They pioneered armored and combined arms doctrine in the 1930s. The Soviet army in 1941 was far different from the one in '43+... because they were "rigid"? Even western pundit commentaries are acknowledging the the RU now is far different from the start of the war because they "adapt quickly". But keep on being stuck in your cold war propoganda mode. Because the height of military analysis is to constantly underestimate your adversary ð
1
Hopium
1
@guydreamr "blalanced", "unbiased" means calling out the good and bad plays on each side. That never happens on this channel. Why? Because Anders is an officer at a Danish mil academy. He's a serving NATO officer. He'll be on the carpet for disloyalty if he says RU did something well. He kept saying the UA c/offensive was making gains when it was already dead in the water. Look at what he said about Bakhmut being "strategically important " while in UA hands then magically it wasn't very important once it changed hands. All those "game changers" that amounted to nothing. Putin has cancer/14th heart attack/med issues.. ok, I'll bite. Source? Zero. Putin under political stress/tenuous hold on power... as evidencedby what? RU has sustained hundreds of thousands of deaths... BBC (UK MoD?) Funded "mediazona project" says different (check it out for yourself). When RU started using upgraded RM37 and shot down 25 UA aircraft in last two weeks of October... crickets. Here is some BS "analysis" from this vid: RU has to pull back to high ground away from river and build defences there OR fight at the current bridgehead line. Why can't they do both? Is that what RU did in order to build the Surovikin Line? Pull back and not maintain the line of contact? ðĪĄ Anders is a navy guy (i think the equivalent of an army major). I'll presume he knows what he's talking about in the maritime environment (im givinghim a freebie because i haven't heard any). But he's out to lunch on army operations. I conclude that he is either trying to make a popular name for western audience echo chamber to sell books/YouTube revenue OR the channel is a NATO info op. So why do I watch Anders? Because I listen to points of view across the whole spectrum and then make my own assessment of who is winning. It's not who Anders says it is...
1
@alfisti93 James Baker stated that the United States was striving for a united Germany that would remain "firmly tied to NATO," promising at the same time "iron guarantees that NATO jurisdiction or forces would not move eastward." (FEB 1990)
1
@alfisti93 are you trying to say there are no nato bases east of Germany?
1
@alfisti93 agreements ratified by US-USSR continued after USSR. Like INF. They didn't just disappear, right?
1
@alfisti93 yes, I do think that. When someone says no eastward expansion, I tend to believe the mean "no eastward expansion". I don't this RU would care if nato expanded to, say, Senegal ðĪŠ
1
@alfisti93 no, no... I was mentioning the Afghan adventure I was involved with in nato. With all those weapons, tech, etc, etc... we lost a 20 yr effort. Perhaps if I was there more than the 8 yrs I did, we could have won! ðĪ
1
@alfisti93 yes... me and nato. I'd say 60% of the coalition were tourists. Notably the Germans and Italians. The Japanese contingent didn't even have weapons ð
1
@alfisti93 perhaps you should join a UA legion. You might enjoy it. Overall, my experience was personally very fulfilling and profitable. Viel Gluck! (Still remember a bit of German from when I was stationed there... near the inner german border)
1
â @rainbowodysseybyjonlion glad you asked. Google the NATO funded "mediazona project Russian casualties"
1
@grandroyal66 when has NATO actually faced even a semi-credible air defence system? Short Answer: Never Long Answer: Neverrrrrrrrr
1