Comments by "rejvaik" (@rejvaik00) on "The Legal Reasoning Why Roe v Wade Was Overturned. Explained By a Lawyer." video.

  1. To answer your question you posted at the end of the video: With everything you have shown us Nate, and your very well thought-out and concise explanation and I absolutely commend you on that I do believe that the Dobbs court was correct, and I do not say this as a pro lifer victory lap I do believe that abortion can exist as means to be utilized in today's modern world But it is as you said not a right, meaning it can be determined by individual states governments what rules and regulations, if any, they want to set And those laws and regulations will be influenced by the citizens who live in those same States
    36
  2.  @NateTheLawyer  this is the best video on this issue!
    13
  3. Agreed!
    10
  4. Thanks for being a voice of both nuance and reason I only wish those idiots that attacked the Arizona capitol would listen to more people like you
    9
  5. Yeah I loved seeing emotionally driven pundits claim RBG to be some kind of Messiah like figure to women and I point out to them RBG was not anything like that she was just going to do her JOB!!! And if that meant writing an opinion she had on the issue you didn't like well then so be it
    8
  6. Agreed this is the best summation video on not only this abortion issue but also a great introductory video for enumerated and unenumerated rights that we the layman can understand and easily digest
    5
  7. Yeah I made a similar comment when trying to answer the question Nate proposes at the end of this video
    1
  8.  @Peacekeepers2  my point never mentioned RvW and it still stands, emotionally driven individuals who dislike policies should NOT utilize violence to express disapproval over policy
    1
  9. from what I can tell with Nate's explanation it doesn't look like it can no because that's the reason why RvW got overturned in the first place it didn't use any aspects of the Constitution to say there's an unenumerated right to the abortion it used a Unenumerated right to claim that hey this is now a new Unenumerated right found within the Constitution When that's backwards you use the Constitution to find new unenumerated rights you don't use previously discovered unenumerated rights to find new Unenumerated rights
    1