Comments by "rejvaik" (@rejvaik00) on "PolyMatter" channel.

Unfortunately it is China as seen by international community. China was deviously cunning to have never given "de jure" recognition status. The struggle against Sinocization in Tibet goes back centuries. Basically Tibet is the Poland of Asia, disappearing from the map in 1720, reappearing in 1912 and again disappearing in 1951 In 1720 the Imperial Qing government launched an expedition into Tibet under the pretext of defending it from a common enemy. Tibet was soon annexed afterwards. But Tibet didn't accept Qing rule resulting in a revolt in Lahsa in 1750 which the Qing brutally put down. Tibet struggled with Qing rule off and on until the fall of the Qing. Tibet was able to recover it's national sovereignty with the assistance of the world's strongest military at the time, the British Empire. Who utilized it's geo strategic position as a buffer state. Despite the security guarntee from the British Empire Tibet never became a colony. Likewise it also never achieved de jure status of international recognition instead being able to achieve the de facto status. This would severely limit the Tibetan struggle in the future. After WW2 the UK couldn't continue with its security commitment to Tibet and recalled its troops. Tibet was left without any international recognition but the Chinese were still occupied with their civil war however the Tibetan government knew it was only a matter of time as both the Communists and the KMT claimed Tibet as part of China. Tibet attempted to reach out to both the United Nations and the Chinese government to gain it's legal status as a sovereign territory but the UN was focused on the European rebuilding effort and the establishment of Israel it couldn't focus on the Tibetan cause who in 1946 wasn't a UN member. Tibet then approached the government of China in 1946 but the Chinese civil war had outlasted WW2 was still ongoing so no response was received to grant Tibet it's full legal status. With the victory over the KMT in 1949 Mao and the communist forces moved west to "reclaim" Tibet and 1951 Tibet was returned to its second period of Chinese rule. Tibet has since tried to wither the erosion of Tibetan customs and traditions as best it can.
1
@suh6282 well I wish you could bring that mentality towards the American continent.
1
When your entire nation's population is smaller than the population of New York city you can be more efficient much easier
1
@Whalllllllllllly no buddy, a smaller population size that is also densely packed means it is much easier to gather data to craft good policy So yes, geography and population size is very fundamental to government policy decisions
1
I wonder how many people will fall for this
1
You basically summed up drug trafficking as well in this video.
1
Rip Rhodesia
1
This is true but the CCP is very subtle instead vthey have the ability to reflect themselves on the Chinese students who study abroad. They do this by leaching off of the success of these students. By claiming that any success the students achieve is a success for the CCP and only the CCP. This is what adds to the perception of mistrust for these foreign students. Its something that they cannot escape because the CCP has placed propagandists everywhere in the world. And any CCP official can just point out a single Chinese student and use that student to help promote the public image of the CCP
1
When education becomes a fucking business....
1
@schijtnaam https://youtu.be/uhXFgKEkwbU
1
Gotta read the dictators handbook first CGP Grey recomended it now this guy
1
The struggle against Sinocization in Tibet goes back centuries. Basically Tibet is the Poland of Asia, disappearing from the map in 1720, reappearing in 1912 and again disappearing in 1951 In 1720 the Imperial Qing government launched an expedition into Tibet under the pretext of defending it from a common enemy. Tibet was soon annexed afterwards. But Tibet didn't accept Qing rule resulting in a revolt in Lahsa in 1750 which the Qing brutally put down. Tibet struggled with Qing rule off and on until the fall of the Qing. Tibet was able to recover it's national sovereignty with the assistance of the world's strongest military at the time, the British Empire. Who utilized it's geo strategic position as a buffer state. Despite the security guarntee from the British Empire Tibet never became a colony. Likewise it also never achieved de jure status of international recognition instead being able to achieve the de facto status. This would severely limit the Tibetan struggle in the future. After WW2 the UK couldn't continue with its security commitment to Tibet and recalled its troops. Tibet was left without any international recognition but the Chinese were still occupied with their civil war however the Tibetan government knew it was only a matter of time as both the Communists and the KMT claimed Tibet as part of China. Tibet attempted to reach out to both the United Nations and the Chinese government to gain it's legal status as a sovereign territory but the UN was focused on the European rebuilding effort and the establishment of Israel it couldn't focus on the Tibetan cause who in 1946 wasn't a UN member. Tibet then approached the government of China in 1946 but the Chinese civil war had outlasted WW2 was still ongoing so no response was received to grant Tibet it's full legal status. With the victory over the KMT in 1949 Mao and the communist forces moved west to "reclaim" Tibet and 1951 Tibet was returned to its second period of Chinese rule. Tibet has since tried to wither the erosion of Tibetan customs and traditions as best it can.
1
@funky_cartel097 If I had to say I enjoy Picasso's early works when he was in school of fine arts in A Coruña and the Real Academia de Bellas Artes de San Fernando which was the equivalent of MIT for Art in Spain. I mean there is no doubt he was a prodigy, He completed his entrance exam to the first school in 1 week at age 13🤯 and I will admit the only reason he stopped doing those style of paintings was he had already mastered those techniques at such an early age and frankly he was bored with them it wasn't a challenge for him that's why he started to start to circumnavigate them or even break them entirely it's just he started getting into more on the experimental side of art , which is fine you can do that but it's just not going to please everyone everyone's aesthetics are different And I also will admit when Picasso got into his Rose period and we started to see a return of his use of the traditional styles and elements I do enjoy those as well But on the whole it's not like me to appreciate his stranger looking paintings
1
@funky_cartel097 Thanks, well I had to make sure I knew a little bit about Picasso when I made my original comment because I did I had to study him And again he's a quality artist just 99% of the time he's just not what I'm looking for and not what I enjoy in art Hope I didn't sound too much like a jerk
1
@unassumingaccount395 yes but the US acknowledges it exists and provides laws to combat it the Chinese mainland government does not have any laws in place to guarantee rights and prevent discrimination for anyone who is not Chinese
1
@unassumingaccount395 i literally just said that 🤣 re read my earlier comment
1