Youtube comments of rejvaik (@rejvaik00).
-
7700
-
1800
-
1000
-
821
-
771
-
769
-
646
-
621
-
619
-
602
-
573
-
474
-
391
-
360
-
355
-
350
-
341
-
334
-
309
-
283
-
270
-
263
-
258
-
254
-
251
-
234
-
229
-
220
-
210
-
200
-
200
-
195
-
185
-
185
-
181
-
179
-
179
-
169
-
166
-
163
-
155
-
151
-
147
-
147
-
135
-
131
-
124
-
123
-
120
-
117
-
113
-
107
-
103
-
102
-
101
-
101
-
94
-
90
-
89
-
88
-
88
-
87
-
86
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
84
-
82
-
82
-
82
-
82
-
81
-
80
-
80
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
75
-
74
-
74
-
74
-
73
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
69
-
@favkisnexerade what Elon should do is stop selling a solution to the problem back to the public, you and I can't shop our way out of this.
And you need to learn not to fall for virtue signaling, meaningless tokenist acts of environmentalism. For example, like how the chinese government literally planted the world's largest artificial forest of over 300,000 trees.....sounds good right? Only it's a single species of tree, which means it's genetically susceptible to disease, that also quickly drains ground water in an already desert environment, and causing the entire situation to WORSEN
You have to treat musk and everything he says and everything he does in the same objectifiable manner as the criticism that is being levied towards the world's technically "largest artificial forest"
What he (Musk) needs to do, again I stress this, is open his own power generation plants (he can open whichever one he likes, wind, coal, nuclear, solar, natural gas, geothermal, etc.) run the darn things and then from his experience with energy generation, begin to and offer up suggestions for improvement in power grid efficiency, and usage.
He also needs to realise that you can't reduce the amount of energy a nation uses and expect the high quality of life to continue unabated, if the US wants to stay at the forefront of the world it needs to consume energy no matter it's source, renewable or non and musk could be a louder voice in that situation, if he so chooses
Musk should focus his efforts, if he really was concerned, on nuclear power research AND proper containment of spent material. There's already a site designated as the main storage site in Nevada by the federal government since the 1980s! it just needs to be built
Musk could easily win that contract! Hell since it needs to be underground he could even go all crazy with his obsession with tunnels and even design the car from the ground up to transport the spent material to the final site!
Because a small piece of nuclear material the size of a baby's fist out supplies a coal plant's entire year of burning That's simple economics right there!
Trees also years to grow and even when grown it takes even more months to make a difference in carbon removal in the air
But that's again also not the best, because there's pollutants in the air which trees can't recycle, such as Freon
I stress that renewables aren't truly renewable if they require a significant cost in time before becoming effective, which is why I don't like any renewables save for geothermal.
But sadly geography wasn't applied equally to this planet so not everyone gets the option of being on a geological active site so while I may like it it's a moot point
68
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
64
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
56
-
55
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
I have to admit that I did enjoy Trevor Noah as both a comedian and a news broadcaster for a Time it was brief but I'm going to be frank and admit it
but what's interesting is Trevor Noah is the exact reason why I had the Awakening moment commonly known to as the red pill
Story Time
very long typed post if you don't want to read
Now my Awakening begins with just watching a normal episode of The daily show with Trevor Noah
And in this episode they were doing a story on an inventor you might not have heard of but you've definitely heard of her products, Disposable diapers, and their inventor Marion Donovan
I was intrigued I had written a college research paper on Marion Donovan and I knew a bit about her story so I was curious to see what Trevor Noah would do with it so I started to watch the rest of the episode...
And brother let me tell you I was appalled my mouth hung open with just the incorrect factual statements the ensuing use of modern lenses of societal norms and standards as well as insisting the case of problems applied to her merely because of her era
lastly, and most horrid in my opinion, how none of the talk the story gave was about celebrating her and the accolades she has received
They made Marion Donovan out to be as if she was the poorest wretched creature to ever exist on this Earth
they kept emphasizing how she was a woman competing in a man's world and how she lost all her rights to her inventions and she was eclipsed by what is a male dominated industry of inventon
And she ultimately invented the disposable diaper to free her self and women from the idea of being left at home cleaning cloth filled diapers covered in poo
and the whole time I'm listening to this I'm like "what in the world are you talking about?"
Yes Marion Donovan was from the 1950s yes she was a very rare sight in that era of being a female inventor.
And is it possible she suffered from discrimination for that? Sure maybe, but don't you go around fabricating of ideas about her suffering from it just because she's a 1950s woman
Provide concrete examples a of that! This story was likely the very first time anyone was hearing of this talented lady and already your poisoning the perception of her with your own politics
And the facts just kept getting more wrong, she didn't create the disposable diaper to push some feminist agenda she did it because she wanted to save time
And that was her style actually, she focused a lot of her inventions to that of time savers for mundane things around the house
and she continued to invent throughout the entirety of her life, a major fact they left out of her story
Marion Donovan also didn't get her patents or ideas stolen, she sold them to an industrialist a man you may know today as Pampers and when she sold them she sold them for a million dollars making her a self-made millionaire in the 1950s no less
You should be celebrating that fact!!!!! Trevor!
Again no mention of her recognition and success, she has received accolades she was inducted into the inventors Hall of Fame in 2014
Now some people might try to stretch that oh well she was only inducted so late nearly 70 years later as a result of female acceptance and Feminist ideals
And to that I had to counter, well it's hard to compare great inventors such as Nikola Tesla getting into the hall of fame easier than to someone gifted in the creativity of invention, but inventing things as mundane as the disposable diaper
That's not going to get you into the Hall of Fame as fast as someone who literally invents one of the foundations of electrical industry, the Alternating Current, that we all use on a modern basis
all those horrible presumptions, assumptions and then downright lies towards Marion Donovan were the alarm Bell, the light switch that went off in my head that said
"you know what? I'm being manipulated right now"
they're taking something that I already am familiar with about and they are twisting it to get me to view it through only one singular lens and I just couldn't believe it
And ever since that time I have viewed every one but especially Trevor Noah with suspension and apprehension
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
@mykeh3155 well then you are lost, because I don't understand why you cannot see how the industrial and manufacturing segment of any industry untilizes more energy and has the potential to create more pollutants than you, me, or any other consumer will use in our entire lives
Again this is where you need to focus your regulation efforts
Let's look at an example: Anti-freeze every car needs it, yet Anti-freeze is a very dangerous chemical if humans come into contact with it via skin, fumes, ingestion, or is leaked into the ground, yet manufacturers make billions of gallons of the chemical every single day
In addition the manufacturing process is very demanding on an electrical grid and also produces wasteful byproducts, these byproducts then need to be disposed of
Then the chemical needs to be bottled stacked on pallets and hauled away in diesel engine trucks to a climate controlled storage facility, meaning that the A/C is on permanently another massive amount of electrical energy used
Untill a retailer places an order for a number of pallets of the chemical, then it's again hauled away by the same diesel engine to the retailer who puts it on the shelf and then it sits waiting for a consumer to buy it
All the while that energy was used BEFORE the consumer even had the iota of "looks I need antifreeze"
And that's just one example, I haven't even told you about the manufacturing process of Herbicides for crying out loud XD
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
@eonjustingeneral7073 sure. I wish this account of black American racism against indigenous African communities was more widely known.
Here are a few
sources to get you started:
Slaves to Racism: An Unbroken Chain from America to Liberia
Johnston, Harry Hamilton; Stapf, Otto (1906). Liberia, Volume I. Hutchinson & Co. ISBN 1-143-31505-7.
"Global Impacts of White Racism: Americo-Liberians" by Feagan, Joe R.
"Christian Community and the Development of an Americo-Liberian Identity, 1824–1878" by Wegmann, Andrew N.
Jesse N. Mongrue M. Ed (2011). Liberia-America's Footprint in Africa: Making the Cultural, Social, and Political Connections. iUniverse. ISBN 978-1462021642
I also recommend that you find books on the Liberian Pepper Coast, the American Colonization Society, the True Whig Party, the indigenous Kru and Grebo people
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
The main reason why I support non proliferation of nukes isn't because I fear any war in which they're used its because I fear an nuclear mishap and accidental detonation
The 1961 Goldsboro incident in North Carolina is proof of this:
In 2013 Lt. Jack ReVelle, an EOD officer on the scene, recalled the moment: "Until my death I will never forget hearing my sergeant say, 'Lieutenant, we found the arm/safe switch.' And I said, 'Great.' He said, 'Not great. It's on arm.'"
Parker F. Jones, a supervisor at Sandia, concluded in a reassessment of the accident in 1969 that "one simple, dynamo-technology, low voltage switch stood between the United States and a major catastrophe" He further suggested that it would be "credible" to imagine that in the process of such an accident, an electrical short could cause the Arm/Safe Switch to switch into the "Arm" mode, which, had it happened during the Goldsboro accident, could have resulted in a multi-megaton detonation
Secretary of Defense Robert S. Macnamara in a Top Secret January 1963 meeting with representatives from the Departments of Defense and State, as well as the White House, used the Goldsboro accident to argue against the delegation of authority to use nuclear weapons to SACEUR, citing the possibility of accidental nuclear war. According to declassified meeting notes, McNamara "went on to describe crashes of US aircraft, one in North Carolina and one in Texas, where, by the slightest margin of chance, literally the failure of two wires to cross, a nuclear explosion was averted"
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Jake Tran: "You can't be a king anymore"
Spain, Brunei, Morroco, UK, Vatican City, Swaziland (eSwatania) , Sweden, Denmark, Thailand, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan: "Allow us to introduce ourselves"
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I agree but sadly the governments of: The Chinese, The Russians, The Eritreans, The Turks, The Brits, The Americans, The Koreans (North and South), the Australians, The Pakistanis, the Indians, and the Saudis don't
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Oh ffs, the US doesn't need Oil from other countries. It has 36 Billion barrels in proven reserves. It also the capacity to increase its domestic production tenfold. For example the US currently has an oil field in Alaska (Prudhoe Oil field) that is bigger than entire British Isles.
The US also has untapped offshore resources in California, Oregon, Washington, New York, Maine, Florida and Guam. The reason why it doesn't exploit these is because the residents of these states/ territories don't want the harmful effects of the environmental impact.
So to maintain this strong American concern for America's environment, the US looks to trade to secure it's oil needs and it has an abundance of options of oil nations to trade with. Mexico, Norway, Canada, Brunei, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait just to name a few.
I'm telling you this to end that bullshit and actually put some truth to your "memes"
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@sumerianfarmer5363 You DO know these are just estimates right? As collected from the international community. They can never be fully accurate
But I'll tell you where my sources for the estimates are from:
Hiro, Dilip (1991). The Longest War: The Iran–Iraq Military Conflict. New York: Routledge. p. 205, p. 251
Rajaee, Farhang (1997). Iranian Perspectives on the Iran–Iraq War. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida. p.2
Clodfelter, Micheal (1992). Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991
Jacob Bercovitch and Richard Jackson (1997). International Conflict : A Chronological Encyclopedia of Conflicts and Their Management 1945–1995, p. 195
Koch, Christian; Long, David E. (1997). Gulf Security in the Twenty-First Century. Abu Dhabi: Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research. p. 29
Potter, Lawrence G.; Sick, Gary (2006). Iran, Iraq and the Legacies of War. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 8.
Mikaberidze, Alexander (2011). Conflict and Conquest in the Islamic World: A Historical Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. p. 418
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@guppy719 no the US doesn't need a country spanning high-speed rail network because unlike China the US doesn't have over a dozen cities in a straight-ish line each with over 8 million people
China's population density is massive by comparison some cities like Shanghai and Beijing have a whopping 20+ million population!!
US Pop density by comparison is low on a nation wide scale we have 1 single city with 8.8 million, New York City which is the largest concentration of population in the entire US
Second is Los Angeles, with a population of 3.8 million which a difference of 5 million is a significant reduction!
After that comes Chicago with 2.7 million
Then houston with 2.3mil, Phoenix with 1.6 mil, Philadelphia with 1.6mil as well
Look at that, top 6 largest cities in the US and they scattered all over the country! How in the heck you think you can create a rail line linking California, Arizona, Texas, Illinois, Pennsylvania and New York and expect passengers to ride on it? And the business operating it to turn a profit as well? It can't be done
Speaking of price China had to pay a hefty price for such a system 900 billion in debt to get this project through no local, state level or federal level government wants to fork over anything even close to that for something unnecessary
Any improvements to public transportation are going to have to start with proper city planning and city expansion, and possibly founding brand new cities closer to existing ones
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@dianeconti7602 he is misinformed but partially correct. Currently (as of September 2019) the US state department has rated the entire nation of Turkey as a level 2 (increased caution) travel advisory.
Specific Areas within Turkey are listed as a level 3 (Reconsider Travel) these include: Batman, Bingol, Bitlis, Diyarbakir, Gaziantep, Hakkari, Hatay, Kilis, Mardin, Sanliurfa, Siirt, Sirnak, Tunceli, and Van
And Level 4 (Do not travel) exists as well for the Turkish borders of Iraq and Syria.
Source: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/turkey-travel-advisory.html
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Here is some context for landlocked nations with navies:
"The Declaration recognising the Right to a Flag of States having no Sea-coast (French: Déclaration portant reconnaissance du droit au pavillon des Etats dépourvus de littoral) is a 1921 multilateral treatywhich legally recognised that a land-locked statecould be a maritime flag state; that is, that a land-locked state could register ships and sail them on the sea under its own flag.
As of 2013, the Declaration has been ratified by over 50 states, and international law recognises the right of any state to sail ships on the sea under its own flag. Today, land-locked states which have merchant vessel fleets include Austria, Azerbaijan, Bolivia, Ethiopia, Hungary, Laos, Luxembourg, Mongolia, Moldova, Paraguay, Slovakia and Switzerland, though of these, only Ethiopia, Laos, and Mongolia have no river/sea port from which the high sea can be reached."
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
Invasion of The Kurill Islands
The Invasion of the Kuril Islands (Russian: Курильская десантная операция "Kuril Islands Landing Operation") was the World War II Soviet military operation to capture the Kuril Islands from Japan in 1945. The invasion was part of the Manchurian Strategic Offensive Operation, and was decided on when plans to land on Hokkaido were abandoned. The successful military operations of the Red Army at Mudanjiang and during the Invasion of South Sakhalin created the necessary prerequisites for invasion of the Kuril Islands.
Battle
The operation took place between August 18 and September 1. The attack was made by the 87th Rifle Corps (Guards Lieutenant General A. S. Ksenofontov) of the 16th Army (Lieutenant General L. G. Cheremisov) from the 2nd Far Eastern Front, and elements of the Kamchatka Defense Area (Major General A. R. Gnechko commanding). Ships and transportation were drawn from the Petropavlovsk military base (Captain D. G. Ponomarev). The 128th Airborne Division also provided support.
The islands were occupied by the Japanese 91st Infantry Division (Shiashkotan, Paramushir, Shumshu, and Onekotan), 42nd Division (Shimushiro), 41st Independent Regiment (Matua Island), 129th Independent Brigade (Urup Island), and 89th Infantry Division (Iturup and Kunashiri). The Japanese commander was Lieutenant General Tsutsumi Fusaki.
Initial reconnaissance was undertaken on 18 August by a detachment of the 113th Separate Rifle Brigade (Captain-Lieutenant G. I. Brunshtein), carried by two mine trawlers (ТЩ-589 and ТЩ-590) to Rubetzu Bay on Iturup island. The landings on Iturup were continued by the 355th Rifle Division, which also landed on the smaller island of Urup.
On August 23, the 20,000-strong Japanese garrisons on the islands were ordered to surrender as part of the general surrender of Japan. However, some of the garrison forces ignored this order and continued to resist Soviet occupation.[2]
From 22 to 28 August, troops of the Kamchatka Defense Area occupied the Kuril Islands from Urup north.
On 1 September, elements of the 87th Rifle Corps were landed by torpedo boats, mine trawlers and transports (departing from Otomari) on Kunashir and Shikotan in the southern Kuril Islands. This was an assault landing against Japanese resistance. On 4 September, 87th Rifle Corps occupied five smaller islands (Sibotzu, Taraku-Shima, Uri-Shima, Akiuri, and Suiseto).[2]
After September 4, Soviet forces occupied the rest of the Kuril Islands without further resistance.
The islands remained part of Russia after the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_the_Kuril_Islands
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@PeachDragon_ First and foremost security.
The Italian peninsula and surrounding islands has a previous history of allying with the US to help secure it's maritime trade even before italy was united into a single country
The Barbary wars for example of 1801 had the Kingdom of Sicily ally itself to the US from a shared interest by both countries in putting an end to the disruption of trade on the Mediterranean Sea caused by the corsairs
And that historical tradition of security alliance is still visible even today;
The Italian government has cooperated with the United States in the formulation of defense, security, and peacekeeping policies. Under longstanding bilateral agreements flowing from NATO membership, Italy hosts important U.S. military forces at Vicenza and Livorno (army); Aviano (air force); and Sigonella, Gaeta, and Naples—home port for the U.S. Navy Sixth Fleet. The United States has about 11,500 military personnel stationed in Italy. Italy hosts the NATO Defense College in Rome.
Italy is a leading partner in counterterrorism efforts, being a founding member of both the EU, NATO, the United States and Italy cooperate in the United Nations, in various regional organizations, and bilaterally for peace, prosperity, and security.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Remember that when a now considered beloved classic and part of cinema history of a movie was debuted in 1964 it was trashed by the critics of the era and it took 45 years for it to gain recognition
That movie was called A Fistful of Dollars More, starring Clint Eastwood
I think you guys are being a little too demanding because you are used to nothing but professional pieces
This is his very first attempt at Cinema he has ZERO experience at managing a budget, renting the equipment writing the script, casting actors, scouting for film locations, getting costumes, make-up, set pieces, and then editing the whole thing
You HAVE TO START SOMEWHERE with whatever chosen art form you choose to do, and this is an a heartfelt attempt of course it's going to be bad in comparison to the great other movies out there that have already stood the test of time
The difference is that he will improve upon the failures he will be making, and you can bet he will accept the criticism and push past it to become a better creative
Not wallow in it and say woe is me, and blame everyone else but himself
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"I don't need your civil war"
"It feeds the rich while it buries the poor"
"Your power hungry sellin' soldiers"
"In a human grocery store"
"Ain't that fresh"
"I don't need your civil war"
"No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no"
"Whaz so civil bout war any way?" - Guns N Roses 1991
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"I don't need your civil war"
"It feeds the rich while it buries the poor"
"Your power hungry sellin' soldiers"
"In a human grocery store"
"Ain't that fresh"
"I don't need your civil war"
"No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no"
"Whaz so civil bout war any way?" - Guns N Roses 1991
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Warning Slightly Long Post!!!!!! - still recommend you read regardless though
For Ana, I will admit takes a lot of stones for someone like her admit they were in the wrong on this large of a scale and I can give a little respect for that..... Not a lot, but a little
It's very much reminds me of the woman who made the documentary about the men's rights movement, called The Red Pill
(She also made a TED talk which I HIGHLY recommended that you see it. Its actually one of the few good ones)
She was the epitome of the spiteful raging feminist and she openly admitted that, but she forever changed her views as she researched her subject matter more intensely to make sure her documentary on men's rights was up to her own high standards
And in her Ted talk she said something that I'll personally never forget:
"When you begin to humanize with your enemy, you will in turn be dehumanized by your community"
And that's exactly what happened to her;
Overnight her friends and acquaintances she had known for 20+ years, who had cheered her on in her job as a journalist and documentary director, dropped her faster than you wouldn't believe
Called her every nasty name in the book, boycotted her, slandered her you name it
And to her it was mind blowing because she never got this vile treatment from her supposed "enemy" that her extreme feminist individuals drilled into her were her enemies
They all came from former "allies" she had built up a lifetime of capitulating to, and while she admits in her own words: "no longer calls herself a feminist" the experience helped her grow as a person
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"I don't need your civil war"
"It feeds the rich while it buries the poor"
"Your power hungry sellin' soldiers"
"In a human grocery store"
"Ain't that fresh"
"I don't need your civil war"
"No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no"
"Whaz so civil bout war any way?" - Guns N Roses 1991
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here is some context for landlocked nations with navies:
"The Declaration recognising the Right to a Flag of States having no Sea-coast (French: Déclaration portant reconnaissance du droit au pavillon des Etats dépourvus de littoral) is a 1921 multilateral treatywhich legally recognised that a land-locked statecould be a maritime flag state; that is, that a land-locked state could register ships and sail them on the sea under its own flag.
As of 2013, the Declaration has been ratified by over 50 states, and international law recognises the right of any state to sail ships on the sea under its own flag. Today, land-locked states which have merchant vessel fleets include Austria, Azerbaijan, Bolivia, Ethiopia, Hungary, Laos, Luxembourg, Mongolia, Moldova, Paraguay, Slovakia and Switzerland, though of these, only Ethiopia, Laos, and Mongolia have no river/sea port from which the high sea can be reached."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You forgot the Russian Invasion of the Japanese territory of the Kurill Islands!!!!!
Here is to help you remember
Invasion of The Kurill Islands
The Invasion of the Kuril Islands (Russian: Курильская десантная операция "Kuril Islands Landing Operation") was the World War II Soviet military operation to capture the Kuril Islands from Japan in 1945. The invasion was part of the Manchurian Strategic Offensive Operation, and was decided on when plans to land on Hokkaido were abandoned. The successful military operations of the Red Army at Mudanjiang and during the Invasion of South Sakhalin created the necessary prerequisites for invasion of the Kuril Islands.
Battle
The operation took place between August 18 and September 1. The attack was made by the 87th Rifle Corps (Guards Lieutenant General A. S. Ksenofontov) of the 16th Army (Lieutenant General L. G. Cheremisov) from the 2nd Far Eastern Front, and elements of the Kamchatka Defense Area (Major General A. R. Gnechko commanding). Ships and transportation were drawn from the Petropavlovsk military base (Captain D. G. Ponomarev). The 128th Airborne Division also provided support.
The islands were occupied by the Japanese 91st Infantry Division (Shiashkotan, Paramushir, Shumshu, and Onekotan), 42nd Division (Shimushiro), 41st Independent Regiment (Matua Island), 129th Independent Brigade (Urup Island), and 89th Infantry Division (Iturup and Kunashiri). The Japanese commander was Lieutenant General Tsutsumi Fusaki.
Initial reconnaissance was undertaken on 18 August by a detachment of the 113th Separate Rifle Brigade (Captain-Lieutenant G. I. Brunshtein), carried by two mine trawlers (ТЩ-589 and ТЩ-590) to Rubetzu Bay on Iturup island. The landings on Iturup were continued by the 355th Rifle Division, which also landed on the smaller island of Urup.
On August 23, the 20,000-strong Japanese garrisons on the islands were ordered to surrender as part of the general surrender of Japan. However, some of the garrison forces ignored this order and continued to resist Soviet occupation.[2]
From 22 to 28 August, troops of the Kamchatka Defense Area occupied the Kuril Islands from Urup north.
On 1 September, elements of the 87th Rifle Corps were landed by torpedo boats, mine trawlers and transports (departing from Otomari) on Kunashir and Shikotan in the southern Kuril Islands. This was an assault landing against Japanese resistance. On 4 September, 87th Rifle Corps occupied five smaller islands (Sibotzu, Taraku-Shima, Uri-Shima, Akiuri, and Suiseto).[2]
After September 4, Soviet forces occupied the rest of the Kuril Islands without further resistance.
The islands remained part of Russia after the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_the_Kuril_Islands
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@waluigi3807 buddy those minorities are claimed to be "Chinese" They are the part of the 56 recognized minority groups, and they STILL get persecution at the hands of the mainland Chinese government
The Tibetans, Manchu, Hui, Uyghur, Bei have all faced discrimination and judgement from the Han majority and many still do, particularly the Uyghurs
I'm talking about actual non Chinese, AND non Asian blood immigrating and trying to join society. Because again I tell you that in Taiwan, if you can speak the language and show competence you can gain access to whatever standing and whatever position and title you want
In mainland China, not at all, if you don't have Chinese blood and actually look Chinese you will be flatly refused and told to your face,
"You are not my race, so I deny you this"
It's disgusting
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@uncleadi The Western alliance, with it's american leadership, wasn't all that Western. It contained defensive pacts with more than 60 countries...from S. Korea, to Pakistan, to Saudi Arabia, Israel and Argentina with NATO at it's core.
This was a bundle of nations that weren't ideologically aligned, and some of them even hated: (Pakistan/Israel) or went to war with each other: ( Turkey/Greece, Argentina/UK) despite being supposedly on the same side but they all were united in one commonality, they all opposed Soviet Communism
Which resulted in weird entangled networks of military assistance;
Where the Americans sent Israeli weapons, to Pakistani officials, to arm Saudi fanatics, in a war against the Soviets in Afghanistan
However when Soviet Union collapsed the alliance lost the one thing which kept it together, the enemy
This resulted in an American sphere of influence with no unified purpose
The American presence, once seen as a protector, increasingly began to be seen as an American occupation abroad. And as an entanglement in foreign conflicts at home
These entanglements compounded by:
1) conflicts within that sphere of influence
2) the lack of commonality by ideology or purpose
3) And the eventual attack against the main guarantor of that alliance from within supposed allies
Became increasingly unpopular
EXAMPLE:
The US has had close military ties with Pakistan since the 1950s, as Pakistan's rival India allied with the Soviets
but as the cold war ground itself to an end that relationship became strenuous.
Pakistan aided terror groups, such as the Taliban, even as they were fighting the Americans
Secretly built a nuclear weapons program with the help of one of America's biggest rivals (China)
Harboured and provided safety to enemies of the United States (Bin Laden)
And used military assistance to train terror groups to undermine a neighboring democratic society
All of it, while it remained a dictatorial, Islamist, Theocracy
Now the network of allied nations the US had built to coordinate against a common enemy, had unfortunately turned into a network of entanglements of conflicting interests, ideologies, and ambitions
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"I don't need your civil war"
"It feeds the rich while it buries the poor"
"Your power hungry sellin' soldiers"
"In a human grocery store"
"Ain't that fresh"
"I don't need your civil war"
"No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no"
"Whaz so civil bout war any way?" - Guns N Roses 1991
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here is some context for landlocked navies:
"The Declaration recognising the Right to a Flag of States having no Sea-coast (French: Déclaration portant reconnaissance du droit au pavillon des Etats dépourvus de littoral) is a 1921 multilateral treatywhich legally recognised that a land-locked statecould be a maritime flag state; that is, that a land-locked state could register ships and sail them on the sea under its own flag.
As of 2013, the Declaration has been ratified by over 50 states, and international law recognises the right of any state to sail ships on the sea under its own flag. Today, land-locked states which have merchant vessel fleets include Austria, Azerbaijan, Bolivia, Ethiopia, Hungary, Laos, Luxembourg, Mongolia, Moldova, Paraguay, Slovakia and Switzerland, though of these, only Ethiopia, Laos, and Mongolia have no river/sea port from which the high sea can be reached."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
DW is well enough
I like to get mine from a blend of sources:
DW, WION, Gravitas, RTÉ News, NTD news, TLDR News, America Uncovered, France 24, Sky News Australia, VICE, Channel 4 news, China Uncensored, just to name a few
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MrCmon113 nope it's been published many times across many studies regarding addiction and substance abuse here are my sources:
Kidorf M, Disney ER, King VL, Neufeld K, Beilenson PL, Brooner RK. Prevalence of psychiatric and substance use disorders in opioid abusers in a community syringe exchange program. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2004;74(2):115–122
Brooner RK, King VL, Kidorf M, Schmidt CW, Jr, Bigelow GE. Psychiatric and substance use comorbidity among treatment-seeking opioid abusers. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1997;54(1):71–80
Rodriguez-Llera MC, Domingo-Salvany A, Brugal MT, Silva TC, Sanchez-Niubo A, Torrens M Itinere Investigators . Psychiatric comorbidity in young heroin users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2006;84(1):48–55.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@emilychb6621 The Armstrong limit or Armstrong's line is a measure of altitude above which atmospheric pressure is sufficiently low that water boils at the normal temperature of the human body. Exposure to pressure below this limit results in a rapid loss of consciousness, followed by a series of changes to cardiovascular and neurological functions, and eventually death, unless pressure is restored within 60–90 seconds.[1] On Earth, the limit is around 18–19 km (11–12 mi; 59,000–62,000 ft) above sea level,[1][2] above which atmospheric air pressure drops below 0.0618 atm (6.3 kPa, 47 mmHg, or about 1 psi).
The term is named after United States Air ForceGeneral Harry George Armstrong, who was the first to recognize this phenomenon.[3]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"I don't need your civil war"
"It feeds the rich while it buries the poor"
"Your power hungry sellin' soldiers"
"In a human grocery store"
"Ain't that fresh"
"I don't need your civil war"
"No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no"
"Whaz so civil bout war any way?" - Guns N Roses 1991
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here is some context for landlocked navies:
The Declaration recognising the Right to a Flag of States having no Sea-coast (French: Déclaration portant reconnaissance du droit au pavillon des Etats dépourvus de littoral) is a 1921 multilateral treatywhich legally recognised that a land-locked statecould be a maritime flag state; that is, that a land-locked state could register ships and sail them on the sea under its own flag.
As of 2013, the Declaration has been ratified by over 50 states, and international law recognises the right of any state to sail ships on the sea under its own flag. Today, land-locked states which have merchant vessel fleets include Austria, Azerbaijan, Bolivia, Ethiopia, Hungary, Laos, Luxembourg, Mongolia, Moldova, Paraguay, Slovakia and Switzerland, though of these, only Ethiopia, Laos, and Mongolia have no river/sea port from which the high sea can be reached.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Babylon Bee: "Guess who's back?"
Andrew Tate: "Back again"
Jordan Peterson: "Trump is back"
Elon Musk: "Tell a friend"
Trump:
"Now every one report to your safe space, to your safe space, to your safe space
Now everyone report to your safe space, alright stop, its MAGA time"
"Come're little kiddies on my lap guess who back and in a new plat-
Formal making of a complaint for elections fraud and not moderate
(Augh augh augh)
"No worries, space Daddy's gotta make some brand-new noise"
"What else could I possibly do to these Twitter soy boys?"
"Cept I fall down some stairs and be quite annoyed"
"Now that's not a stab at Biden, that's just a metaphor I'm not hidin' not my taxes or a laptop but you can believe they'll be crying their @$s off"
"Now I'm gonna make you cringe!, make you winge! Yeah girl rant and rage! Oops I mean he, he, he, he, know your pronouns safe with me"
"Alright now loose it (Augh augh augh)"
"Just loose it (Augh augh augh)"
"Go crazy (Augh augh augh)"
"TDS, Poor babies. Maybe"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here is some context for landlocked navies:
"The Declaration recognising the Right to a Flag of States having no Sea-coast (French: Déclaration portant reconnaissance du droit au pavillon des Etats dépourvus de littoral) is a 1921 multilateral treatywhich legally recognised that a land-locked statecould be a maritime flag state; that is, that a land-locked state could register ships and sail them on the sea under its own flag.
As of 2013, the Declaration has been ratified by over 50 states, and international law recognises the right of any state to sail ships on the sea under its own flag. Today, land-locked states which have merchant vessel fleets include Austria, Azerbaijan, Bolivia, Ethiopia, Hungary, Laos, Luxembourg, Mongolia, Moldova, Paraguay, Slovakia and Switzerland, though of these, only Ethiopia, Laos, and Mongolia have no river/sea port from which the high sea can be reached."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@smegmadiver22 yes the US DOES have an official language it is the language that all government operations municipal, state, and federal must be carried out in and it is English
Those 3 levels can then choose to translate their operations if they want but they do not have to
You can't be a soldier, a postal worker, a senator, a president, a congressman, or any other type of government employee at municipal, state, or federal level if you do not have fluency in English
If you don't then you must obtain it, or the position will be denied to you,
living in Puerto Rico I learned that the national guardsmen had to conduct all their drills/military operations/medical screenings/ recruitment processes in English even though Spanish is their mother tongue and the majority of the island uses Spanish
Because the national guardsmen had to communicate with their counterparts in the US mainland on a daily basis
1
-
@smegmadiver22 yes there IS an official language at the federal level 😂 all government publications; including but not limited to; memos, operating instructions, military work manuals, inventory forms, engineering blueprints, even classified documents, at the federal level are drafted and must be drafted IN ENGLISH
Every single email from joint chiefs of staff, the secretary of state, the secretary of energy, secretary of the interior, even civilian-hire GS employees that send information to multiple departments even ones outside of the DoD must have command of fluency in, and must draft all their publications in English
In addition every single Military service member are federal employees THEY MUST SPEAK IN ENGLISH at all times when they are tasked with their respective day to day duty assignments OR at all times in a deployed environment
The one exception are cryptographic linguist students, who are subjected to 8 months of schooling in Monterey bay California.
They are HIGHLY encouraged to utilize their assigned language in as many instances as possible to gain a fluency of their language as fast as possible to pass the 8 month course
Only when they are off duty or on leave can they speak another language
Your site information is incorrect
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm a soldier,
I haven't slept in 5 years
and I have eye bags under my eyes.
I haven't seen for myself
but so I was told.
I am a soldier
and I don't have a head,
they took it off with their boots.
Yo-yo-yo, the commander shouts,
commander's mouth is torn open
because of the grenade...
White wool,
red wool does not heal the soldier.
I'm a soldier,
an immature boy of war.
I'm a soldier,
mom, tend to my wounds.
I'm a soldier,
a soldier of a godforsaken country.
I'm a hero,
tell me of which novel?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Over 250,000 losses, thats a quarter of a million losses during the korean war by the PLA and the CCP let that sink in a bit.
Edit
Apparently the CCP does not like to look bad when it comes to its military strength so there is a disagreement between official CCP records of losses and contemporary 1958 western records of the PLA losses. Officially the CCP says 390,000 that is including all KIA, MIA/POW, WIA and lived, WIA and died, and any that died from sickness disease, and starvation. Now contempary records from that era place the number at 400,000 thats just KIA, an additional figure of 486,000 were said to be wounded. If true and thease statistics were treated like the CCP's accounting all the above criterion as "casualties" then the PLA sufferd a whopping 846,000 losses in the span of 3 years. Now Idk if thats true, idk who is more correct but both sides agree that well over 3 million PLA personnel were deployed to cross the yalu river by the CCP. The stalmate that exists today on the korean mainland was paved for by PLA soliders who employed a tactic of overwhelming sheer numbers to achieve their goal, and boy they achieved it alright. Thank you for reading this all to the end.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@braxtonjones6163 also China has ruled over Vietnam 4 different times in history, over a total of 1000 years of being dominated by the Chinese:
111BC - 40AD W. Han, Xin, and E. Han dynasties
43 - 544 by the E. Han, E. Wu, W. Jin, E. Jin, Liu Song, S. Qi and the Liang dynasties
602 - 905 by the Sui, Tang, Wu Zhou, and S. Han dynasties
1407-1427 by the Ming Dynasty
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1