Comments by "Joe Kelsoe II" (@nsahandler) on "EXPLORE WITH US" channel.

  1. No no They took it seriously. But what are they supposed to do? In the USA you can only have your gun rights removed if a court order deems you mentally unfit. That is the sad case here
    264
  2. I hate kid's fake crying.
    233
  3. ​@Beatyofeet32 The "cost" of something is a very subjective metric designed to get the libertarians in an uproar. The truth of the matter is that all the equipment is already owned by the State and already budgeted for. The police, the labs, and the equipment are all on payroll. Trying to say "it cost this much in manpower and resources" is dumb when it's already a flat-rate. Think about it: the police make the same salary whether they are assigned to traffic duty or a murder investigation. The equipment was already bought, whether it was used or not. The lab technicians run the tests regardless and are on salary as well. The only metric that matters any differently is "overtime" pay for anyone that has to work late on a case. I just need to shove the two-bits into it. I loathe when people try to dictate state salaries to doing things we pay taxes for in dubious terms such as "costs" - especially when it would have been the same rate.
    131
  4. "No one's home is perfect" That cop had to think about that response for soooooooo loooooooong and she barely got those sentences out when she was asked about the condition of the place by the abusive mother. Professionalism is key EDIT: I just finished the documentary. I am physically sick from these acts and I didn't even see the details, only had them described.
    94
  5. As someone who lost his sister this past year, I cried. She reminded me a lot of my own sister - from enjoying Pokémon to the "buh-bye!" I can't comprehend anyone who would want to murder a little sister.
    77
  6.  @fate8718  he bought guns with the job he had obtained legally and the police had to release his weapons to him because the only thing that can keep a person from their firearms in the USA are criminal firearms charges that prevent ownership (felonies or domestic abuse convictions), pending criminal charges involving firearms themselves, restraining orders with firearms stipulated on them, and a court order ruling of mental instability. If you notice - 100% of these require a judge to sign an order to remove the guns. He called them, said he was better, and when they checked the only reasons he was allowed to keep his own firearms away from him they found none so they returned them. I'm not defending the mom, but what happened here was entirely inevitable. Like the Parkland shooter, he would have gotten a job long enough to buy a firearm and gone on the rampage in the same fashion. No hitches.
    75
  7. ​ @namelessxdread  I mean expecting the worst doesn't mean it gets easier. The people who can't compartmentalize it will eventually quit or self-delete.
    68
  8. ​@captainkarnage9874 911 dispatcher and lifeguard/rescue diver background. Once you've seen someone's eyes bulging from their skull, or tied down someone thrashing like a madman as they succumb to the Bends, you've seen it all. Seen it all. Heard it all.
    54
  9. Because there are guns everywhere. It's easier to find a gun than it is to find another parking spot and they are trafficked out from the USA worldwide.
    50
  10. ​ @cornhusk  Wow what a trashy opinion.
    47
  11. "Working in the office makes you more productive" Lol I used my whole paid lunch break to watch this on the clock.
    41
  12. ​ @DroneStrike1776  Nope. That's what you get when you defund public programs: The lowest of the low with little to lose and no qualms - as long as they get that monthly check - will gravitate towards those barely-paying programs.
    39
  13. Contact the innocence project
    35
  14. "He doth protest too much"
    29
  15. BRUH LOOOOL
    26
  16.  @cocklexp51  >slippery slope You act as if checks and balances can't be implimented
    19
  17. @Thisismetman  all court documents are available to the public unless suppressed by a judge or law Which is a good thing. We WANT people able to check the validity of law & Order in their society.
    13
  18. The description that people give again and again of "shallow breathing and gurgling" is actually called "death rattle" because the brain has finally stopped being able to perform it's baseline function of breathing and circulation.
    12
  19. ​ @Shamino1  You've SEEN how humans talk, right? You're describing redundant syntaxes. It's just how people end up when a script is written by one person and edited by another. Look through all my comments and you'll notice that I'll break up long sentences - much like this one - with dashes to ensure the reader knows that I'm not a crackhead. I just need to reiterate and match the statement with something said earlier or later. Kids do this a lot and people do it a lot less as an adult. You know, like, how Jennifer like LIKES Jim? Not like LIKES but like REALLY LIKES Jim
    11
  20. ​ @Crowfist nope and distinctly not A channel tried it. I DM'd him personally on social media, and they struck it down. He's extremely pro voice-actor and is leading the charge against the low-effort cop content ai generating bot channels getting demonitized
    10
  21. "Listen to an Schizophrenic's Psychotic Ramblings" doesn't hit as hard
    9
  22.  @kayakdog121  Two person verification.
    9
  23. This Chad is even positively responsive on social media, and is actively advocating for yt to get those content-ripping bot channels demonitized (its not even a human making the edits but a bot making the edits and using different lengths of clips on different channels) One channel had the audacity to try to make an AI voice with his voice and that sh't is what got me to reach out to him. Shut that sh't down quick
    9
  24. ​ @Steve.._.  He has to. It's his job.
    8
  25.  @kayakdog121  They were the crime team. They need two person integrity on initial evidence discovery. Two person integrity is how everything works so nobody can argue once person planted anything. This is the highest form of integrity. They use it for top secret documents and files as well. If you have a felony murder then their district may dictate two people need to physically witness the state of the body. Just like almost every district requires a police officer to physically witness a misdemeanor for them to cite a misdemeanor, and a mere video of it without context.
    7
  26. ​ @Osamabintardin  No he is just the narrator. There is a writing team for these projects and why they aren't getting demonitized like the other low-effort bot channels are
    7
  27. @ogcatlady  yep but that is a bad thing. If it is worth sentencing someone to death over then it is worth being reviewed by the public.
    6
  28. ​@Casey Kelso as a fellow Kelsoe, you should have been able to grasp the definition by context clues alone
    6
  29. ​ @LoveYouLove1986  They took it down It was his voice as an AI I literally alerted him to our and the channel was gone
    6
  30. ​@JayQuan007 It's not. He's a voice actor and extremely pro-voice-actor I'm not giving you guys his public page social but there is enough info to get it. Guy is a Giga Chad for responsiveness to fans and people reporting stolen content
    6
  31. Imagine spending weeks researching a murder of one of your friends but not a single second of effort in your alibi. Like. This is 2006. You didn't even bother going to the school library to double up on the movie synopsis or checking the theater number? Or even swinging by the ticket booth to see who was selling the tickets from the parking lot?
    6
  32. ​ @christinaoh7022  You can see the evidence for any public trial (in photograph form) and other statements in the case file. It would only be withheld by incompetence or judgement of the court at the time.
    5
  33. She is clearly on medication already. She is in Prozac Zombie mode
    5
  34. ​ @VeilStar  She knows it because the detective told her.
    4
  35.  @jonsmith8924  you guys are insane. It's nothing to do with woke and everything to do with marketing companies putting phrases that YouTube has to put into their bots to filter for Monetization
    4
  36. >cameras in every kid's room That's dystopian and weird yo. Like. Really really really effen weird.
    4
  37. I mean. If you know you're done for you might as well ask for all you can. You seen "The Wire" before? Bird knows he's done for so ge basically starts trading a bunch of murder wraps for BK Whoppers. Even ones he didn't do. "Sheeeet another one of those burgers I'll cop to the Wilson kid too."
    4
  38. ​ @PallasAndDove  It really isn't dude
    4
  39.  @Jacktrack7  look at that ratio
    4
  40. ​ @alexg4462  Since it requires 12 people to agree to convict someone, and he removed the only party who was not down - JUST to get a verdict that they want - is up there with "Murder" in my books. Dude straight-up didn't like the fact that a juror had reasonable doubt and tried to rig the game in their favor.
    3
  41. BTW this is what paranoid schizophrenia looks like. Most people with schizophrenia and paranoid schizophrenia will not do things to others such as violence - but it will make them act irrational and they WILL BEHAVE extreme. Sometimes they can tell when it's voices, but most of the time they are just reacting to a random train of thoughts that enter their mind. I feel sorry for the woman who suffered and their families, but I do not blame the crazy girl. The fault is entirely with the fact that mental Healthcare is ignored and mostly inaccessible in our country.
    3
  42. ​@martenkrueger8647 Prozac isn't the issue. It's just that it needs to be handled carefully and done with cooperation with a medical provider to proactively adjust the dosage. It's not a miracle drug. And they don't prescribe it to people who are well in the first place, which is where your bias comes in. Sincerely, Someone Not Mentally Well Without It
    3
  43. ​@Casey Kelso as a fellow Kelsoe, you should have been able to grasp the definition by context clues alone
    3
  44. It was the only thing in the headlines for a long time lol republicans kept thumping on the Trans part because all the previous school shooters were all far-right. This was the only feather in their cap
    3
  45. @sheilaboston7051  she wasn't my sister either mate. It's called empathy. Humans have it while monsters don't
    3
  46. "Let's just say we went to a movie." "What was the plot of the movie?" "DAMMIT THEY FOILED OUR PERFECT PLAN" This was 2006. They could have literally gone to the library at school and checked the dang synopsis of the film and theater info. These guys didn't actually plan anything. Not really. They fantasized about doing something, copied a generic film plot, then filmed themselves talking about it as if they were documenting some criminal mastermind nonsense. Petty Thieves and Graffiti Artists have more planning than these guys.
    3
  47. >4-5 times a week He's clearly exaggerating. 4-5 times a week is ~30 bucks a week. Minimum. He's not flipping anything he steals out of cars at a pawn shop either lol And it doesn't sound like he had a lot of friends that would play outside or come over and play, so he's not pooling to smoke that much, either.
    3
  48. ​ @bakenbeans420  Out of all the murder cases I have watched in these formats - not just this channel - this is one of two times where the person genuinely acted not-guilty. He wasn't confused when he was told that she was alive, just relieved. He's flailing and screaming during a mental breakdown when he finds out otherwise. It's ... extremely odd ... how timed his reactions are perfectly with an actually-innocent person. He did this interview while clearly heavily intoxicated and STILL he didn't slip-up on the emotions? You could probably light his breath on fire rn.
    3
  49. That mother is on medication herself.
    3
  50. ​ @MrManic52001  I mean it's a matter of a jury of your peers in the community where the crime was committed. The entire concept is that the community someone is accused of committing the crime in must accept or deny the guilt of the person based upon the evidence presented before them. If the community agrees that the evidence they have seen is strong enough, then they can vote guilty. If there is any reasonable doubt in their minds, then they are instructed to vote Not Guilty.
    2