Comments by "Joe Kelsoe II" (@nsahandler) on "Boyfriend Films Moments Before Police Discover Horrific Scene" video.

Contact the innocence project
35
@Thisismetman all court documents are available to the public unless suppressed by a judge or law Which is a good thing. We WANT people able to check the validity of law & Order in their society.
13
@ogcatlady yep but that is a bad thing. If it is worth sentencing someone to death over then it is worth being reviewed by the public.
6
@christinaoh7022 You can see the evidence for any public trial (in photograph form) and other statements in the case file. It would only be withheld by incompetence or judgement of the court at the time.
5
@alexg4462 Since it requires 12 people to agree to convict someone, and he removed the only party who was not down - JUST to get a verdict that they want - is up there with "Murder" in my books. Dude straight-up didn't like the fact that a juror had reasonable doubt and tried to rig the game in their favor.
3
@bakenbeans420 Out of all the murder cases I have watched in these formats - not just this channel - this is one of two times where the person genuinely acted not-guilty. He wasn't confused when he was told that she was alive, just relieved. He's flailing and screaming during a mental breakdown when he finds out otherwise. It's ... extremely odd ... how timed his reactions are perfectly with an actually-innocent person. He did this interview while clearly heavily intoxicated and STILL he didn't slip-up on the emotions? You could probably light his breath on fire rn.
3
@MrManic52001 I mean it's a matter of a jury of your peers in the community where the crime was committed. The entire concept is that the community someone is accused of committing the crime in must accept or deny the guilt of the person based upon the evidence presented before them. If the community agrees that the evidence they have seen is strong enough, then they can vote guilty. If there is any reasonable doubt in their minds, then they are instructed to vote Not Guilty.
2
 @Uzi16_29 I'm not trying to justify anything. I think that everyone has the right to a fair trial without some judge throwing out jurors that had reasonable doubt.
2
 @AmonAnon-vw3hr Nah. We were mad that he was restrained far-past the point of no return without medical care. Nice of you trying to drag George Floyd into this unrelated case lolol.
2
 @michellepoggers8022 Until they are dismissed and replaced with a juror that votes the way the judge desires, that is!
1
 @Ericsaidful Even if the evidence were stronger, and he MIGHT have done it, he still doesn't deserve being convicted if there is any reasonable doubt in their minds.
1
@gratefulkyle1 "Bro I just don't see how someone can kill themselves while high as balls on a mix of Barbiturates and Amphetamines." I saw someone high on meth chew through their own pinky finger once. Then he runs from the ambulance I called for him because the cops showed up first to a medical call and sketched him out. I've seen girls literally screaming while waking around across the span of several hours, and she is always greeted by the police and not by medical staff for a clear psychotic break and drug OD symptoms. There are few constants in this world, but here is one that applies: "Never deal with someone who is high on meth or withdrawing from opiates." Both of those things make people do the craziest bs you could ever possibly think-of because they are in their most agitated state.
1
 @WoundedWarrior2012 Yeeeeeah I'm 50/50 on this one.
1