Comments by "Joe Kelsoe II" (@nsahandler) on "Dr Insanity" channel.

  1. The Sheriff's office failed this poor man. If anyone else had a person assault them with a machete - with witnesses and evidence - that would have been arrested immediately. This brazen assault was so disheartening that a homeless man ACTUALLY CALLED THE LAW (which almost never happens) and they give the perp a mere warning. Homeless people are still people. They deserved more due-diligence from the law.
    3200
  2. @ckoritko  Dawg I'm literally a provider aid at a homeless shelter and overcame homelessness personally. The issue is that yeah sure homeless people fight and argue and all that all the time ... and you see the homeless persons in the video actually account for that. And the guy who assaulted them and gave a warning to HAS A HOME and THEY WENT TO THE ADDRESS to give him a finger-wag for actively assaulting others with a machete. He wasn't merely brandishing it or wearing it or pointing it he actually took the thing and carved through a tent blindly while looking for a specific person. It was SO concerning that other homeless actually bothered to call the gd Sheriff's Office. You know how wild stuff has to be for a homeless person to involve the law and bring them into their relatively-well-hidden and organized (best I've seen ngl) encampment?
    132
  3. That female officer's face when she confirmed that Elkins was bonded out to the same address had insane Sherlock Holmes energy. Her expression went from "we gotta catch the perpetrator" to "we got her" is instant and poetic.
    106
  4. They can't question a minor without their mother's permission. That would be a quick technicality to get the case thrown out.
    73
  5. ​@gabeminajj I'm innocent and just tell officers that I don't consent to searches as a principle. What's nuts is that a few times they literally WERE just fishing, because they said "okay! have a nice one" and let me go about my business.
    57
  6. ​ @moonman2022  Unless someone else is armed and in waiting... But that's all aside the point. He definitely frisked the guys before he followed them and made sure to radio in his position along with directions for backup to find him.
    50
  7. ​ @gabeminajj  Because they can find and charge you for things you didn't know about or outright plant evidence on you. They can get a warrant
    45
  8. It seems like everyone is in each other's business. They all loathe each other but if one of them got killed they would be talking about them like they were a character in a Greek tragedy
    45
  9. Dr. Insanity: You need to not use the highlight transition. It gives away the ending in the text portion. Any mystery was dead the second I read "Police say the surveillance camera saw Ford set the fire."
    42
  10. @syrup8783  They absolutely can arrest someone for assault with a deadly weapon. They wagged a finger at him and he came back later in the day to actually murder the person. If someone came to your house and swung a machete around looking for you the cops would have them tazed and confused
    36
  11. ​ @Eddieking  Imagine being so disconnected from reality that your don't know what nervous eating is
    32
  12. So Spoiler Alert: Murderers aren't smart
    28
  13. That Federal Agent is a master of the long and awkward silence in a practiced and trained way.
    28
  14. They are actually concerned. It's just that they were recovering from carbon monoxide poisoning. They were so compromised that the two adults were fighting off the final, paralytic stage of monoxide poisoning. That kind of injury literally kills brain cells.
    23
  15. ​ @stevienguyen2047  He's nervous about being implicated
    21
  16.  @gabeminajj  Your example is incorrect. It's like someone telling you to buckle your seat belt, but you deciding not to because a majority of accidents are survivable and you trust your driver. Yeah your car driver might be really good and in an accident you might not roll over and throw you out of the car. Just like the officer might be good and might not arrest you for a two-week-old beer can from a camping trip (open container) or plant evidence on you. Submitting to a search is allowing them to use anything and everything in your vehicle against you. The same goes for talking to the police without an attorney. You might admit to a crime and not even realize that you are and - even if it isn't the reason they are talking to you - they can take you in. In fact there's an entire questioning strategy based around telling someone that they need the person's help and that they aren't worried about the "smaller crime." But idiots will STILL talk to the police willingly and without an attorney.
    21
  17. @virginiabalch6274  Yeah but that was not this situation. And I was homeless and now work with the homeless. If it's wild enough for a homeless person to alert the law to their own encampment, it's not your standard Feud over pisspots and sleeping spots.
    18
  18.  @syrup8783  Dawg you don't get a choice if someone is arrested for a violent assault in public. In fact they definitely did want to have something done because the Deputies actually went to the house, investigated, and made contact. At the very least they could have charged him with Disorderly Conduct
    17
  19. @ckoritko  A group of them end their testimony is as reputable as any other. There is no reason to discount it until evidence shows otherwise. He cut through and destroyed a tent with a machete and the other guys all called the cops.
    16
  20. It sounded like it was that chick's first day I'm not joking lol she even said the county 911 line. I work 911 dispatch. Probably her third call
    14
  21. ​ @arl_wins  I don't think she was bluffing my dude. She ran over random people and then looked the officer in the eye and said "no you don't get it you need to charge me with Murder" The fact of the matter is that you CAN'T COMMIT YOURSELF in the US. You have to pay for that. She probably DID try to commit herself but was given the Catch-22 (this is actually where the phrase came from): "If you were insane, you wouldn't be telling us you were insane. If you are telling us that you are insane because you recognize your insanity, then you are not insane enough to receive treatment." If she didn't tell him "no I ACTUALLY was trying to kill those people I need you to write all this down," she was trying to ensure that she would actually be committed like she needed to be. It's absolutely nuts that people can only get free mental Healthcare in the USA after committing a crime.
    14
  22. #2 "I took criminology" Aight so what's the indication of a highly-accusatory, highly-agitated, and highly-confrontational subject on the scene of an incident?
    12
  23. That is just the general comfort/safe room that they have.
    10
  24. Alcohol is who you really are when you don't have inhibitions. He hated that guy.
    10
  25. @saagar2002  The perpetrator came into the camp earlier that day with a machete cutting through tents and looking for the victim. It was enough of a fight for other people at the camp to alert the police. When they followed up the first time they just gave him a warning. What you are seeing now is him coming back that same night and slaying the man he was looking for earlier.
    9
  26.  @MrEpicness1234  Right? I cracked
    7
  27. I don't think it was "thanks for calling 911" I think it was Something-County 911 and the recording was garbled. Like Franklin County 811 or Tamkin County 911
    7
  28. They recorded it from much closer. He couldn't use the whole video because YouTube demonitizes everything automatically these days. He's clearly kinda drunk and (we know, but the kids don't) looking for a phone, looking under kid's legs with a snorkel (which is creepy). He doesn't explain himself. Then he tries to say they stole a phone, and they are (acting like) "nice excuse you were just trying to look at her butt underwater pedo" The fact of the matter is that the person who is armed has the obligation to deescelate the situation. You don't get to confront people with aggression and kill them for being confrontational. That's not how this world works and isn't a world we want to live in
    7
  29. @ZooZoo293  Yeah they have asked to search my car multiple times for unrelated stops and one time they came up to my door to ask about a separate incident. It's always the boondocks nowhere Sheriff's that ask to search your car
    7
  30. They live in another state
    6
  31. That's his job. He's the one writing up the investigation report.
    6
  32. @paigeanguish6216  They generally can't until a certain age and even then it has to be about criminal activity towards the child itself. Many many states have rules against questioning children without consent - especially if the parent is in their presence to revoke that consent (which she could do immediately).
    5
  33. They can't question a child without the parents permission. That's an easy way to get charges tossed
    5
  34. And the cars and the house and all the rest of the stuff "grandma" said that she was signing over to her
    5
  35. ​ @LetitRideGregRyan  It was recently changed. YouTube now decides where the ads go and how much you see of them. That's because adblock software was able to look at the stream and could bypass it by running the advert in the background and preemptively 'skip' the ad. It's not just this channel. This is YT wide.
    4
  36. @williamoneal2858  The 6 years I served was great training for the homelessness when it was all over.
    4
  37. For real tho
    4
  38. Nah. He seems genuinely disappointed at the start and helpful at the end.
    4
  39. >no body, no crime They can convict a person without a body if there is an overwhelming amount of evidence that someone isn't alive, that one party is trying to cover the fact up, and that the party has something to gain for it. Back in the day? Yeah you're right. Grandma could have been in another state and nobody knew - But there is evidence she didn't leave, and a witness saying that she was there when she wasn't, and when she wasn't there she said she was somewhere that she wasn't. AND she was medically dependent on regular doctors visits. Motive. Means. Opportunity.
    4
  40. I can't imagine why she wanted to see other people and keep you away from the kids! 🙄
    3
  41. You ever been around a rotting corpse? It'll make you hurl.
    3
  42. Condolences brother
    3
  43. ​ @PlatinumHustle  I'm in Prospect bruh people are crazy af
    3
  44. ​ @JP-ml1xe  More like "the person with the weapon has the obligation to deescelate the situation." He went straight to punching and stabbing people.
    3
  45. ​ @obiwanjakobe9814  They should have definitely had an officer on camera detail since they know a near-exact timeframe that it happened
    3
  46. ​ @scumbaggo  They are allowed to follow cars until there is a traffic infraction. They just can't do it day after day after day on a single subject Police officers have all the ability to drive their car down whatever street or road any other civilian does. It's just that they cannot continuously do it without a warrant (aka "continuous monitoring" aka "stake out").
    3
  47. ​ @makeitallgaming8396  It's not entrapment. Please stop saying big words to don't know the meaning of. Entrapment would be making someone criminally liable via coercion. An example would be if an officer took a stolen watch out of evidence, put it on FB Marketplace, sold it to you, then arrested you for receipt of stolen goods. Or targeted someone with no likelihood to commit a crime but in financial straights and offered them, say, a million dollars to give them a USB drive. The key is coercion. The only way you would ever be "entrapped" in a vehicle crime would be if the officer tried to run you off the road then pulled you over for swerving in your lane or passing yellow.
    3
  48. ​ @docbohemian1328  To be fair, a lot of people just don't go about getting officers charged in the correct district. Aka they shouldn't be going to a municipal, County, or even State Court. If a police officer ACTUALLY COMMITS A CRIME against you. Like full-fledged, no-doubt-about-it crime, you need to go to Federal Court and file the charges. No state (that I am aware of) has the charge of "under the color of law." It's 100% federal and makes any crime the officer (or any public official, actually) committed while identifying themselves or baring title into an automatic felony. People complain about cops getting slaps on the wrist but they don't know that they are complaining to the wrong people
    3
  49. @SmokeEater509  I'm in the State wit the highest number of homeless persons
    2
  50. That was a lie.
    2