Comments by "Joe Kelsoe II" (@nsahandler) on "Teen Realizes He Accidentally Recorded A Mass Stabbing" video.

It sounded like it was that chick's first day I'm not joking lol she even said the county 911 line. I work 911 dispatch. Probably her third call
14
I don't think it was "thanks for calling 911" I think it was Something-County 911 and the recording was garbled. Like Franklin County 811 or Tamkin County 911
7
They recorded it from much closer. He couldn't use the whole video because YouTube demonitizes everything automatically these days. He's clearly kinda drunk and (we know, but the kids don't) looking for a phone, looking under kid's legs with a snorkel (which is creepy). He doesn't explain himself. Then he tries to say they stole a phone, and they are (acting like) "nice excuse you were just trying to look at her butt underwater pedo" The fact of the matter is that the person who is armed has the obligation to deescelate the situation. You don't get to confront people with aggression and kill them for being confrontational. That's not how this world works and isn't a world we want to live in
7
 @JP-ml1xe More like "the person with the weapon has the obligation to deescelate the situation." He went straight to punching and stabbing people.
3
@MotoSly "It was sold defense!" The person who is armed has the obligation to deescelate the situation. You don't get to start fights while armed then kill people who confront you. That's not how this works
2
 @Swiddlyumptious Libertarian detected lol
2
@Dalroc they didn't. Look at the case file and the video. You'll see that the defense claimed that the other side had a knife and that a knife was found ... but it was some old rusted cutlery - like a cooking knife. Not something you carry in your bathing suit, and was there for weeks. None of them had a knife in that video or they would have brandished it proper.
2
@petergmred2005 "Kids baited him" Even if what you are saying is true (it isn't) The 'adult' is still responsible for falling into childish antics
2
I'm a current paralegal and you're full of it lol. Paralegals are just paper-pushers and contract drafters. You have the literal verbatim understanding of the law as-written and not the actual law as-applied in context via case law. They had the ability to elect 1st degree murder because he started the confrontation while knowingly armed then lied to cover up his actions. In every state - even "stand your ground" States - you don't get to confront someone then kill them for responding to the confrontation. The person who is armed has the obligation to deescelate the situation. If they had been the ones to initiate the confrontation, then you would be correct. But they weren't. If you watch the full video it's clear that he doesn't explain himself and is looking around at them under the water, then they ask him wtf he is doing, and he accuses them of stealing a phone. Since it's weird that he is looking underwater and also accusing them of stealing a phone, they call him out for it. Then he punches the chick that comes down to break up the fight. Then they push him. Then he comes up from the water and starts stabbing.
1
Not only that. I've fought people and nobody ended up maimed or killed over it. And I had a knife at the time: I just didn't use it, because it didn't come to that. You don't get to confront someone then pull out a weapon when it's not going your way. That's not how this world works.
1
@Mayhamsdead I haven't been duped in the slightest. You don't get to confront people then kill them when they meet you with confrontation. That's not a world you or I want to live in. The person with the weapon has the responsibility to deescelate the situation. You bare the weapon and issue commands. This is responsible concealed carry 101.
1
Ayedidyae you don't get to START the confrontation then kill people for responding just because you are armed and they aren't. That's an unhinged and brain dead take. This guy STARTED the confrontation while armed. Then elevated it to deadly force.
1
@Ayedidyae >regardless of who started what Nope. Not in the least. When one person goes to confront others armed they don't get to kill them for meeting their confrontation. That would mean if you got out of your car to confront someone for hitting your car, they could start a fight with your and then shoot you dead if they start losing. Your line of thinking gives the power of judge, jury, and executioner to every armed, hot-headed loser in the US.
1