Comments by "Joe Kelsoe II" (@nsahandler) on "" video.

Even if they took it Federal ... good luck trying to find 12 jurors in the federal district - let alone the whole country - who hasn't been hurt by for-profit insurance
78
@Idolikethis he's saying that this guy is getting his life dissected meanwhile murders of people who aren't richy rich folk are disregarded in favor of riveting things like the Santa Parade or road closures
73
@cranjusmcbasketball2052 No They are usually targeted. It's just not called an "assassination" when it's poor people shooting each other over a beef
16
Of course not. He shot royalty. You can't shoot royalty
7
@jackl5576 No. A person who brags about increased rate of automatic claim denials to 33% is the Healthcare equivalent of a Captain Planet villain.
3
Now is a great time to cover Jury Nullification, Legal Eagle!
2
@JustAGun_ In the United States every citizen has a right to a speedy trial by a jury of 12 of their peers in the district the crime was committed. The only thing that changes that is if the accused asks for an expedited trial with a partial jury (6 jurors instead of 12), or a bench trial (the judge decides after hearing all arguments). A bench trial is good if your lawyers have solid legal nuance and case law that jurors might not understand, of if a jury would have been biased against the accused (judges care more about precedent. Jurors are more swayed by circumstance and personal opinion). A speedy 6 person trial is good if you believe the odds are highly in your favor or you want the case to start before the prosecution can gather dirt. A direct 12 person trial can also be speedy - but not as speedy as a 6 juror trial or a bench trial (by simple logistics of juror selection. 0 v 6 v 12) and contains the best odds for juror nullification.
2
@jewii3824 Jury nullification
1