Comments by "D. San" (@DSan-kl2yc) on "DW News" channel.

  1. ​@@Dobacat US was not the aggressor. North Vietnam invaded.
    5
  2. Countries/the west has sided with India as well. You act like lines were drawn when they weren't. More often than not, Other countries have tried to resolve it, taken India's side, or helped them.
    5
  3. So you don't know. So why bring up what you don't know
    5
  4. ​​ @RogerMellie-yk3gw  Dude... Your account is 2 months old..that's public knowledge. His is 8. Edit 8 years.
    5
  5. ​ @nashbridges-cu6dy  they choose by choosing leaders. They choose by exercising their rights. They want to be in NATO to be protected from someone attacking them.
    5
  6. ​ @kyunhwoarang  Tibet was annexed dontchaknow
    5
  7. ​ @rouz0  ha stop you're arrogance. It was a lease. And it was based on Russia maintain good relations. Which it broke when it invaded.
    5
  8. That doesn't make sense. They'd have to attack where they can. It wouldn't prove anything.
    5
  9. For people who think so badly of Hamas, they're counting on them to save the hostages doing this
    5
  10. You don't know what they feel because this wasn't put to a vote. People protested against this at first. Now they're probably scared.
    5
  11. @kızgın tosbağa No one in any western country started this war. I'm confused here, who escalated this into a war if not Russia.
    5
  12. ​ @tinaforbes1059  there's no such country. Ukraine is a weaker, smaller country, that has at times completely trounced the bigger, richer country attacking it. Seems that's only revealed how some US training and a bit of tech go a long way.
    5
  13. ​ @TerraThink  somehow that explains Russia immediately intervening with Georgia right. It wasn't the west. Russia made some bad choices with leaders.
    5
  14. This isn't pan Africanism
    5
  15. ​ @jeffreyaizprua3261  they should have spent time trying to convince Mexico of that until they succeeded instead of going insane. People and countries with unstable tempers come off as uncivilized.
    5
  16. Doesnt it? Its not integrating them yet.
    5
  17. They really are giving the US good publicity.
    5
  18. ​ @OworBenard  is Russia's? That's rhetorical btw.
    4
  19. ​ @mng8680  the east is moving towards the west. Nato isn't a threat to russia. And there's already rules to keep nukes away from Russia. Russia refused neutrality deals too. But most of all, Russia is pushing its neighbors towards NATO. If Russia had done nothing, and left Georgia, moldova, and Ukraine alone, they might have stopped bothering trying to get into NATO.
    4
  20.  @Cryptospirosis  Russia is definitely the aggressor. NATO hasn't allowed Ukraine to join which is why Russia feels it can invade. Russia has invaded Ukraine multiple times, Ukraine has an understandable interest in its own safety.
    4
  21. Maybe you misundstand It's the people in the legion that are foreigners
    4
  22. ​ @caravanstuff2827  Israelies are safe. The same can't be said for Palestinians.
    4
  23. I'd almost believe you if all your comments weren't crazy pro Russian even outside of this.
    4
  24. ​ @stevendefehr4393  how nefarious you try to make it sound. But that doesn't change that Russia attacked Ukraine.
    4
  25. ​ @ambessaseway5594  with a junta in power they risk losing their democracy. That's people having even less power. With no promise or guarantee of being any wealthier.
    4
  26. The benefits are like trying to be nationalistic and popular. That kinda dumb thing
    4
  27. ​ @ademirrodriguez4209  ironic and hypocritical, coming from someone supporting Russia, who's the aggressor
    4
  28. Ridiculous hatred. That's probably your shackle right there.
    4
  29. They haven't changed their line at all.
    4
  30. ​ @govindbisen388  It's funny how it's always Russia. Even the issue with the president running out, was Russia interfering in Ukraine's politics
    4
  31. @Юрий & Ко When will you stop stealing land and attacking neighbors.
    4
  32. ​ @MegaFarah78 he is not
    4
  33. ​ @Deltasquadformingup  So it's a stalemate. But the situation can change. Russia's economy is an X factor. Whether they can strike at Russia might change. Whether allies will get involved is too.
    4
  34. Give some proof of how it wouldn't benefit them, and how would this benefit them? So far it's been ruinous.
    4
  35. From Russia
    4
  36. ​ @MrThartofwar  Russia invaded before any NATO weapons. Again and again.
    4
  37. ​ @majchowdhury6646  the bases don't really matter if the country is friendly. I don't get why you get hung up on it.
    4
  38. A vocal minority doesn't mean majority support. Like a certain US president that lost an election despite his rallies.
    4
  39. ​ @DarrelX-im2hb  the other guy is right. But a declaration of Independence is not the constitution. They declared their independence, and referenced that they will be implementing some of the things previously mentioned. That's not a legal thing. There's no laws broken because it's not a law. It's not a treaty. It was them saying their intention. That's why it's called a declaration. The country can do whatever it wants because countries can. Russia didn't make an agreement with that declaration. It recognized the already formed state of Ukraine.
    4
  40. ​ @streetgamers9790  US didn't have to do anything. Yugoslavia was disintegrating on its own.
    4
  41. ​ @simonpedge  That's right. We do know. If they were nuclear. The US negotiated and then removed their own missles away from Russia.
    4
  42. ​ @simonpedge  we're talking about Putin who invaded Ukraine. You guys can't handle that fact and keep talking about the USA.
    4
  43.  @zelenskyy-the-blackmailerh5920  bridges are bridges. But it hasn't been confirmed it's an attack.
    4
  44. ​ @Tylersel  Russians. Happy to help you figure that out
    4
  45. ​ @notwoke9001  All 3 of your points are lies. That anyone can look up. maybe you're lying about being Australian too, because you can't seem to say the truth.
    4
  46. It only needs to be a small group of people
    4
  47. ​ @sayitasitis100  No, state owned or funded isn't the same as state controlled. Plus it's an English channel and people like me aren't from the German state.
    4
  48.  @RuskiVanka  people didn't vote for Russia. Russia invaded first. You can't do it in that order.
    4
  49.  @himiehonor1196  out of all countries, none negotiate in worst faith than Russia. Pretty sure Ukraine being neutral was on table at first and Russia ignored it. Because that's not really it's interest. Russian interests are a weird mix of ego and arrogance for old times. And wanting resources and a sea that belongs to another country.
    4
  50. You're talking about the US. Guess china goes there to talk about the US
    4