Comments by "D. San" (@DSan-kl2yc) on "How to guarantee long-term security for Ukraine after the war? | DW News" video.

  1. That wasn't true even when Russia invaded in 2014.
    1
  2. ​ @piratesofthebarentssea  there's no bases. Russia wouldn't invade if there were. Russia also had NATO in its country.
    1
  3. Russian coping or Russia lying? It was theirs. They were part of the USSR and inherited it. It was not Russia's. Nothing you said implies any of that. Whether they had to switch controls or the expense would have been a lot. They did give it up instead of taking control of it for safety because they were given a guarantee.
    1
  4. @GlobalCitizen_y2k  Wrong. The agreements prove that they didn't which is why they needed them to gain things back. Each independent country inherited what was in its territory as is standard. The Nukes were Ukraine's. That's not up for debate. It was reality. This revisionism is nonsensical.
    1
  5.  @GlobalCitizen_y2k  yes wrong. And misunderstanding something. None of that says Russian owns Ukraine's nukes. Because it didn't. Logically why they had to go through new agreements on them and negotiate for them. Ukraine was a successor state to the USSR. Which stopped existing.
    1
  6. @GlobalCitizen_y2k  because that's not how it works. There's multiple successor states for different things. When a state splits up, the successor states often still have the treaties unless they're former colonies. You're issue is you think you know it all but don't understand how states gain things and you didn't bother to learn it. I looked into and don't see how it relates to your incorrect point. While Russia gained some USSR things, it didn't get to keep those former territoriesthat became successor states themselves, and independent, sovereign states. You need to learn about partial succesorship
    1
  7. @GlobalCitizen_y2k  It's by virtue of it existing. It's just what happens with dissolution. Because of the dissolution of the Ukranian SSR, and the Soviet Union.
    1
  8. The premise being pushed isn't something that the other person believes so it wasn't good framing.
    1
  9. Yes there was. Thats what the various budapest memorandums were.
    1