Comments by "D. San" (@DSan-kl2yc) on "Why Putin spends hundreds of millions on knocking out Kyiv’s grid for eight hours | DW News" video.

@patrickdayton2080 No they don't. How do you even come to that conclusion. Ukraine has the right to do whatever. Russia has nothing to do with anything. And should respect it. Russia should have been friendly to other countries and NATO would have been a great ally for Russia if it had.
2
@lawrencekling8598 It wasn't suppose to be a chemical weapon. It was essentially weed killer. But it has horrible effects on soldiers of both sides.
2
@udayfluer3744 NATO is an alliance. And specifically, an organization that follows certain rules better than Russia. With better aims than Russia. With less selfish goals. And more restraint.
2
Matias D.C you admit it at least.
1
Matias D.C and like other countries in WW2, it would drag other countries into it.
1
@patrickdayton2080 that's right... They don't have the right to invade Ukraine. I'm surprised you don't seem to understand that. I'm shocked you act like you have the right to invade a sovereign country that has not posed any threat to you ever.
1
@patrickdayton2080 she didn't... Russia invaded.
1
@АртемАртем-л4э they did way less. Russia has done more damaged and killed more people in the basin than 8 years of war of fighting it's proxies, and soldiers there.
1
@udayfluer3744 there's huge differences. NATO isn't a country itself and has no goal to expand ECT. Look at NATO operations and they are much more controlled. They really are more defensive. Humanitarian and peace keeping, usually with UN approval. That means it isn't as selfish as a single country. More oriented towards defense. NATO has broken this but generally, NATO is much better, and much more restrained than Russia or any single powerful military. Only time they broke this was to make sure someone that already did a genocide, didn't do another. Now this can be criticized twice over. But it isn't the same than an expansionist war, or an interest war.
1