Comments by "D. San" (@DSan-kl2yc) on "Cable News Stuns With Accurate Reporting On The Israeli-Palestinian Crisis" video.

@Bootyfarrell BS. And that wouldn't make it right. Nothing in any religion is about pushing people out of their homes. especially now. This is a state, sanctioning and pushing for these actions. These are the policies of a state. And that state should be criticized. I legit don't care what reasoning a state uses to justify it.
5
@Bootyfarrell you've been told that this isn't a freedom of speech issue. Him losing support due to what he says isn't a freedom of speech issue. He also did that while ignoring the much greater death toll and destruction that Israel committed, and all their actions before hand. He had no reason to step in on it.
4
@Bootyfarrell the only way to tie this to religion would be to say that Israel is a theocracy. How a state tries to justify this doesn't matter.
3
@Bootyfarrell not in particular. A conservative faction, or a terrorist group is not a theocracy. That has no say in how the state of Israel has acted with it's previous actions. And like I said, I don't care how a state justified it's bad actions. Trying to obfuscate a bad yang take by talking about religion is ridiculous, and beside the point. How many Muslims don't care, or are peaceful. How many Jews are against this. You're ignoring that these are peoples and cultures, with different views on foreign backing ect. Religion might be part of a cultural difference. And two different groups of people might have different religions. But there is nothing inherent. You are practically saying that all Muslims are violent. But applying it to all religions. To defend yang? I'm not sure how that even does that.
3
@Bootyfarrell this isn't demonization, or cancelling. He is running for political office. He's being criticized. You can still like him, vote for him ect. But saying politicians or candidates can't be criticized is ridiculous. Saying people have to like him is ridiculous (and yes that's essentially what you're saying). No one is trying to deplatform him or anything. I get you're trying to defend him. But you don't have to. Or you can defend what's good about him. In fact I have to state again that your defense of him makes no sense. You agree with the criticism on principle. How do you accomplish this by saying Israel or Palestine are equally bad. That doesn't take away what Israel is doing by throwing people out of their homes or other policies(or that the retaliations weren't proportional, or necessary).
2
@Bootyfarrell you said "[...] Religion are a threat to humanity and humankind". You made it universal. And maybe you misspoke. Now just saying that one of their differences is about religion wouldn't be wrong. But you're talking about a faction (which is sometimes categorized as a terrorist) vs an actual state actor. Attacking civilians when it has no need to. Which is unrelated to some of their other actions. And you can look up where they get them from themselves. It lines up with how terrorist do things.
1