Comments by "D. San" (@DSan-kl2yc) on "Andrew Yang Dodges Question About Corporate Influence On 'Forward Party'" video.

@wilsonchang2294 yea because you really have to reach and pinch pennies for it to add to anything. Like how you're doing now. Taking 3 decades when Biden got 6 million in one campaign is ridiculous. And do you know how they count that? If some lobbyist happens to donate, or someone who works at an oil thing gives Bernie 24$, then suddenly they're saying he takes oil money.
10
To be fair Yang has been consistent in the fact he was always a centrist business person with some libertarian beliefs. Tulsi has been a betrayal. Like she had some aspects but she had some stuff to counter weigh it and be a better person for it. Now she's leaning right.
9
@wilsonchang2294 you can support yang all you want. Butyou have to be honest that you don't support the idea of corporations getting involved in politics. Be honest with yourself. None of us have to support yang. Or support the idea of corporations being so involved in politics.
7
@loulfw2513 pacs aren't super PACs. And probably from unions like nurses and teachers ect. If it's anything like the attempt to smear Bernie similarly.
7
@pragmaticpolitics1413 I don't get why not go fully public elections with it by banning corporate money. Remember that half of that 100 would go to republicans anyway. It might do nothing if it's all equalized. Or it might do something enough to then ban corporate money from elections. So I do think it's good. I think it'd be good to go further with it.
4
Biden used to say the same. Thats what it reminded me of. This old interview of Biden saying that.
3
Democracy dollars aren't enough. Corporate money in politics needs be illegal on top of it
1