Comments by "D. San" (@DSan-kl2yc) on "CNBC" channel.

You've made up stuff in your head. And they have every right to demand a solution to their representatives.
6
That was literally one neighborhood. One. And with trader Joe specifically as oppose to any big store that could absorb it but cater to lower income. A right winger showed what should be done. A city run store. There was this right wing town(mayor or something) that turned an old grocery store and ran it non profit.
3
You mean you fell for a lie
2
Business interests are so strong in the U.S. and they've managed to brainwash the republicans to be all for business. At the exclusion of everything. Somehow caring for people for right wingers has become an issue of race. An issue of religion. Everything bad in the world will happen, and also theyre told that the people that want to make life better want to destroy the country.
2
Tell them to come back to Philadelphia.
2
@catspaw3815 aside from two of the reasons op stated being made up, how is it not poverty? In fact other stores exist fine. Part of the issue is wages, lack of support for housing, lack of support for education, medical care ect. None of business people even stated any of those reasons for closures. It's simple..when you deprive people of something for a long time, they essentially don't know how to use it. Part of it is better public transportation. Classes, either for adults or kids. Or running it nonprofit.
2
Societal problems aren't individual problems. people in this video aren't blaming anyone. They're discussing the causes. I literally don't know anyone that has opened a supermarket. Or anyone that has had to. And you also saw one woman in this video take an initiative. While another reports on it. While another set up a different one.
2
@goodboy7721 what about Canada? And the rest of the Americas. All settlers and explorers ect. As bad as they are, the other american countries want to establish some system or have some system. They're just too dysfunctional or poor right now to be any good.
1
@Artem-te1xn or that medical costs plus student debt is too high. It's also closer 54,000(rounding up...)
1
The difference between Democrats and Republicans isn't about anything Democrats want to do. It's republicans idea that they should be cold psychopaths and harshness is how to deal with it. It's why they emphasize "illegality". It's a way to write it off and what they want is punishment. Some of it is code for racism. They just found a new way to hide it under a layer of legitimacy. They always look for stuff like that. Some definitely just want less non "white" people. There's layers of self justification and self deception. That's one of them. It's intermixed with their ideas of minorities, and of course elections. To the point of "economic" migrants. Just because other country's do it, doesn't mean we should. Round them all out if you want. But we can develop talent too. A lot of small businesses and entrepreneurs come from the way we do it now. I'm not criticizing other countries. But that's not part of the issue with our backlog of immigration. Or overflow at the border. And it's why you can tell it's coded. That dude wants no immigration but is willing to tolerate money.
1
They wonder why unemployment is down while talking about using AI to double shops with reducing their workforce.
1
First time I've ever heard of Gloria Jeans
1
@TrackedHiker literally only you've said that. That's your own idea that you think is crazy. I keep saying a right wing government set up their own store for a town to get necessities and groceries. Or incentivize small businesses in the area. Or large businesses. But elected representatives are there for exactly that. That's who you ask for a city problem. Whatever the solution. And those people, the higher ups, are never in any danger. So that safety thing is BS. They'd hire people in the area anyway. Only risk is financial, which is another area where the representatives can do something. And if you think crime is the issue, that's another area where representatives can do something.
1
@TrackedHiker I told you a rightwing government in a small town already did this. We can't control what people do like that. You have a fantasy you can tongue-wag the problem. You'd need to do a whole campaign. And that's an area where the government really can't get involved and no one would want it (it would take a generation to even see any change). The only cultural problem is that people might not be used to fresh food right away. Which would go away. Most poor people are not criminals. why did that rightwing town not have any stores? Because it also wasn't profitable. we can also remove the profit motive entirely.
1
It hasn't happened. Not even now.
1
Honestly all you need to do is teach people like some basic safeguards And I think those safeguards are taught at least where I am
1
What a propaganda campaign.
1
@anyanyanyanyanyany3551 the entire thing is from a big business perspective. That's a huge bias. Makes them sound like a mouth pieces, and apologist. Saying that they should have talked to Musk is ridiculous. He's the guy that would be okay with a coup to have cheaper supplies.
1
They like the system they think is public or psuedo public and I don't see the benefit of "competition" here.
1
@catspaw3815 you can go down any poor neighborhood and find stores. The fact you're asking that is nuts, nutso. They even mention corner stores. Some of which do have a small grocery selection.
1
@ordinary_average_guy nope because obviously they pull out. Meaning they are there for profit and create food deserts. That's why it should be non-profit but a public good for awhile. That way people have access, and their tastes buds can change, or become accustomed to healthier food ect. Then some stores can come in knowing what they know. Small supermarkets I saw in New York are also a good model. They had very compact supermarkets.
1
@Anonymous-ld7je Communism has nothing to do with personal belongings or ownership. It only talks about owning the means of production. Commercial, money generating things, by groups of people that either work in it, or it's for that land/area ect. Which has nothing to do with what most people, liberals, or even socialist talk about when they talk about any policies here.
1