Comments by "Evan Norman" (@Newbmann) on "What if WW1 Never Happened(feat. Vologda Mapping)?" video.

Stability in this era is like a house of cards just like our own. It can all hit the fan withen a year or 2 If you think 2020 is bad for the disease just look at what happened in the saHELL this year.
94
Rhodesia would still exist in this world which would be Rhodesians never die would be true.
25
This one didnt though It ended with germany puppeting Austria-Hungary and probably with groups like Danubian-Swabians or Translyvanian-Saxons surviving. So always somthing positive for germany assuming there not partioned which he has done a FEW TIMES.
14
@lordbotato7175 what are you talking about RHODESIA WOULDNT DIE therefore best timeline.
9
@Khajiidaro the only reason theres so many ideologies or rather that said ideologies is able to pick up ground in the first palce is theres a power vaccum after the decline of religion in the west.
8
@Stefano Raul Febles Verastegui lol as if that ever stopped people from being allys with the British the Japanese were in WW1 the British or stuff like this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Moroccan_alliance Yeah uh racism rarely actually effects geopolitics. American racism for example didn't prevent us from being supporting Somalians in the Ogden war.
5
Im guessing Overall a stronger byzantine core probably slightly more land in north africa keeping land in italy for slightly longer. islam being much smaller I could easily see persia and later parts of india and indonesia becoming islamic so not gone. Byzantine empire being alot less slavic without the plauge letting the bulgarians,serbs,dalmatians migrate in. Does not mean more greek just replace slavs with Illyrians and Thracians and a very diffrent kinda of Macedonian. Stronger Southern Europe while weaker Northern Europe without the med being split in half. Russia would do alot more trade in the black sea. Im just gona stop it right here.
4
@Perrirodan1 obsolete seems really optimistic If there obsolete how come the 1st and 2nd congo wars happened. Or hell right now theres about 10 powder kegs around the world.
4
What if Austria could leverage the Danubian Swabians and Translyvanian-Saxons against the romanians and hungarians?
3
Oh god how did we get to the point of rickrolling. Then again there is no standard to online etiquette so ANYONE WHO MAKES A RICKROLL JOKE IS eh I cant honestly say somthing really bad.
3
The revolutions of 1848 did succeded on a minor level. IE scared the rulling classes enough to reform.
2
@xanthman7528 No It did do that Before lossing it withen a year COUGH COUGH BREST LITOSK.
2
@ihavenomouthandimusttype9729 I mean it depends on where you draw the line between central and eastern europe Austria and Bohemia yeah most people would agree its central europe. Hungary EH If hungary is even split in half over the danube than it would be MOSTLY central europe since then you also have to include half of slovakia and all of croatia and bosnia. So yeah there is a argument to be made it was majority central europe and not eastern but still Its not one many people make
2
A much smaller WW1 as in no italy no america etc.
2
The union of soviet sovereign republics is a another way to defacto keep the USSR alive. I say defacto since the ussr itself would have been "gone" but in reality would have just gone through a massive reorganization.
2
Your assuming the internet would exist the computer was invented to crack german codes in WW2 without WW2 theres no need to crack german codes thus no computer. So the part about computers is null and void at least in my flawed mind.
2
I he made up a situation more so like russia and china being allyed today they both hate eachother but hate the american world order even more. Or in this case they hate the european world order even more. It was not a aliance ment to last but one rather ment to break the world order they were in.
1
@henryp9671 barley functioning No it was closer to modern day saudia arabia barley holding onto social cohesion. About 3 steps away from that but still.
1
@henryp9671 Like I said it was only 3 steps away from barley functioning But also it did have alot of potential I could easily see it ending up like modern day Iran under the Tzar or I could see it ending up like a mix between modern america and modern china.
1
@henryp9671 yeah I mean even then I doubt without the soviets they would lose Ruthenia so Im pretty sure they would have that going for them today.
1
@pewpew4950 . . . That was long after the middle ages and the PLC crushing the austrians and Bohemians is much closer to WW1 than the middle ages. Not that thats a reason why germany couldnt have been able to swallow eastern europe.
1
@antimatterg somthing probably on the scale of the 7 years war.
1
@Khajiidaro It wasnt big back then outside of russia which allready saw some issues due to decline of traditional orthodox being replaced by catholic and protestant I mean stuff Ideologies like prussian constitutionalism was big.
1
@eljanrimsa5843 It was for centuries beforehand and I mean in someways colonialism and racism are still stable today just look at modern china https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/coronavirus-china-mcdonalds-black-people-home-evictions-a9465776.html%3famp or modern day France and how they still practice "colonialism" in north and west africa today. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.africanexponent.com/amp/post/8126-how-france-remains-a-west-and-central-african-colonial-master The ottoman empire on the other hand why would it be less stable than the British and French empires that ended it with closer cultural affinity and not memory of prior to conquest. I would expect it to be more stable than the british and french argue They would be less equipped to deal with instability not that it would be less stable.
1
@eljanrimsa5843 okay and the british and french after managed to hold onto the land the ottomans held onto with much less cultural affinity. 19Th century-colonialism okay should have specified what kind of colonialism you were talking about earlier. Instead of just saying colonialism it easily could have reformed into "neocolonialism" but yeah 19th century kind I see where your coming from. And racism debunked yeah alot of stuff got debunked and its still popular monotheistic religions,marxist theory working as marx invesioned,ETC alot of stuff is still popular even after being debunked. Its still popular today in east asian countrys like China or Malaysia in fact the only reason singapore even exsists was the racist malaysian gouvernment didnt want a majority chinese city in the country so they kicked them out. Not to mention modern china and how they do stuff like this. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/coronavirus-china-mcdonalds-black-people-home-evictions-a9465776.html%3famp
1
@danielw.8356 oh not to mention all of the artificial boarders that only exist because america doesn't want a power Vacume in. If america pulls out eventually the populations will "sort it out themselves". Not to mention how unstable supply chains are and how few countries have navy's to support them. The stability of the American lead world order is artificial held in place by america.
1
@danielw.8356 America didn't fuck up not doing operation downfall america fucked up by making everyone in the world dependent on them protecting ocean trade. For example protecting chinas trade resulted in China becoming China And also protecting trade has resulted in so many country's populations being able to grow way past there own abilities to sustain themselves. For example Nigeria has a population of 201 million If america doesn't protect there trade they can only support a population of around 120 million as a high end estimate. And this example holds true for so many places. America has got itself in so many places it really shouldn't be in and if it pulls out it would be a disaster for the country's itself. In other worlds america set up a global house of cards it has to hold to keep it up.
1
@danielw.8356 okay imperial powers What empires are there today? That's my very point theres going to be alot of places that colaspe and then neo empires are probably going to rise up If collapse of nations leaving a power vacume for empires then there would be stability Beforehand mass instability.
1