Comments by "KGS" (@kgs2280) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder" channel.

  1. 905
  2. 79
  3. 64
  4. 57
  5. 54
  6. 53
  7. 52
  8. 51
  9. 50
  10. 49
  11. 47
  12. 47
  13. 44
  14. 41
  15. 34
  16. 28
  17. 21
  18. 20
  19. 20
  20. 17
  21. 17
  22. 16
  23. 15
  24. 15
  25. 14
  26. 14
  27. 13
  28. 12
  29. 12
  30. 11
  31. 11
  32. 11
  33. 11
  34. 10
  35. 9
  36. 9
  37. 9
  38. 9
  39. 9
  40. 9
  41. 8
  42. 7
  43. 7
  44. 7
  45. 7
  46. 7
  47. 7
  48. 7
  49. 7
  50. 6
  51. 6
  52. 6
  53. 6
  54. 6
  55. 6
  56. 5
  57. 5
  58. 5
  59. 5
  60. 5
  61. 5
  62. 5
  63. 5
  64. 4
  65. 4
  66. 4
  67. 4
  68. @MW66VB, I couldn’t agree more. Psychedelics certainly opened and enlarged my mind (and I had a few “religious/spiritual” experiences, as in, I understood that I am God, but so are we all, and that all the energy of the Universe, especially creative energy, and love, along with us, and whatever other beings there might be out there, including all the animals and plants of any planets that might have those things, are what God is, and we’re all connected. That sort of thing…you know, the “simple” stuff, LOL) and certainly made me more open than I even was naturally. That and traveling, as you say. SO helpful! My father was an Air Force Pilot, so he was always off to some other country while I was a little girl, and when he was able to come home for some time, he always brought me a doll dressed in the cultural clothes from whatever country he had been in on that trip. He would also tell me stories about the people and the country, and even show me maps (and I became a huge lover of maps) and pictures of various places in that country (and I became a photographer for a while). My parents and my two older brothers lived for three years in Germany before I was born (I was born just a few months after they came back to the States. It still had a large effect on me as we had children’s and adult’s books for teaching German, and I learned a number of words, and my dad even used some at the dinner table, like “I love my schpargle” (asparagus), so I still call it that. Then, after I left university, I became a “hippie” (thank God!) and hitchhiked around the U.S and Eastern Canada. The next year I got a car and drove it from Orlando, Fl, up to Maryland to pick up my girlfriend then we drove all the way the way across the country to San Francisco, of course, then to San Diego for a few weeks, then to the Mexico City airport to pick up my boyfriend who worked, so he couldn’t take off three months for the stateside part of the trip, then drove all the way to the Yucatán Peninsula because I just HAD to see Chichén Itzá, and we found a number of other great archaeological sites, esp. Teotihuacán near Mexico City, which is one of my favorite places on earth. I definitely want to have some of my ashes sprinkled on the pyramids when I’m gone from this life (I think I lived a former life there). We spent about two weeks in Mexico, and met many people there (I was the translator for our group because I had taken three years of Spanish in High School, so that was fun). I’m in love with Mexico, and have been back there many times. Well, I didn’t intend this to be a dissertation, but I’ll chalk it up to being practice for when I write a book about that period of my life. I learned so much there, and the cultural differences are so hugely different, it’s also mind-expanding. And, as @diphenhydramine6072 said above, (and I also agree very much with him) that education also plays a big role in being open-minded, which often leads to more left-leaning thinking. As for psychedelic “trips” I can definitively say that I wouldn’t ever want to experience what the right-wingers experienced if it cemented the right-wing philosophy in their minds. I would consider that to be a very “bad trip” for me!😅 Again, sorry for for the probably overly long comment, but that was such a special period in my life, and I love sharing it, plus it fits in with the context of the video. Thanks for your patience.
    4
  69. I also see similarities between this case and Alito’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Of course they’re not similar in that they both aren’t dealing with medication, but I see them first pre-deciding what they wanted to see happen to the laws (to shut them down) and they both brought weird laws from way back in history to use to hold up for comparison (Judge Kacsmaryk’s was discussed here) and Justice Alito brought up some judge from, I believe, from the 😅16th or the 17th centuries, in England, written by a legal-minded man who, ironically also sentenced young women to go through the “proving your innocence period” before condemning these women to die by fire on a stake. One of the most popular “proving your innocence techniques” was to toss the young women (er: witch) in a lake or wherever (most young women were never taught to swim in those days because it was concidered “unseemly for a lady”. The formula they used was that if the young women drowned, they were found innocent of the charges. If they managed not to drown, they were guilty, and so would be killed by being burned at the stake. I scratch my head thinking about why a 21st Century American Justice would choose to use the opinions of an Englishman from the 15th Century who burned women on stakes as witches. Also, similar to Kacksmaryk’s going back in time to decide that he didn’t think mifepristone was approved correctly, Alito decided that Roe v. Wade was “unconstitutional” at the time it was passed, though he didn’t clearly explain how other than to say it should go to the states, which again, I don’t remember him clearly stating WHY it should be returned to the states. And this was a ruling that contributed to the health and happiness of women, and was found to be reasonable for women for almost 40 years! That’s basically two generations of women having the help they needed. But Alito wanted it to go to the states, I’m sure, because that would end up doing exactly what it did, with so many states jumping on it, and lowering the abortion rates in the country which is just what his religious beliefs demanded. Kacksmaryk’s presumably, having to make some adjustments to his decision, but it will also serve his religious beliefs. And Alito doesn’t have to backpedal one tiny bit. Our laws are NOT supposed to be determined on the plaintiff’s or the judge’s religious beliefs, PERIOD!
    4
  70. 4
  71. 4
  72. 4
  73. 4
  74. 4
  75. 4
  76. 4
  77. 4
  78. 4
  79. 4
  80. 3
  81. 3
  82. 3
  83. 3
  84. 3
  85. 3
  86. 3
  87. 3
  88. 3
  89. 3
  90. 3
  91. 3
  92. 3
  93. 3
  94. 3
  95. 3
  96. 3
  97. 3
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107.  @Pintheshadows  Thank you for your very kind, and very honest, answer. I think we might be in the same age range, as I am also having some “memory issues”, especially when it comes to names of specific philosophies and such. (As the saying goes: “nouns are the first to go”). Yes, I think I very much lean toward a pantheistic view, and am very much influenced by quantum theory. I read a wonderful book about quantum theory a number of years ago, and it cemented much of my thinking. Of course, with quantum theory, nearly EVERYTHING can fit together and make sense, which can be a positive or a negative (lol). If I remember the name of the book soon, I’ll add it to this comment (see? Memory issues!) But it’s something about quantum theory and spiritualism, or psychic-type happenings, which I’ve also experienced a fair amount, and was probably the main reason I came to my belief system because they made me realize there’s something much “more” going on than we’ve been told by religions). I guess I could also agree with the philosophy of monism, because, as the spiritualists say, “we are all one”. And quantum theory gave me to understand that that “one” is energy. My personal theory of “god” is the sum total, and probably the original source of that energy. Many spiritualalists say that source or origin is love, which I’m not sure I totally agree with, but I think it is intelligent and creative. And when I learned about light being composed of many, many particles, or protons, that was how I came to think of us as individuals, as particles of the light which is the force, or substance of energy…yes, we’re still individuals to a degree, but, all together, we are part and parcel of the light. Yeah, it’s pretty much metaphysical thinking, but quantum theory explains it to a great degree. I hope this makes sense. I also simply can’t think of “God” as some old man with a beard, sitting on a cloud, surrounded by angels playing harps, and watching - and judging - every single thing we do, is such a ridiculous, and small, way of seeing “The Creator”, or “The Divine”. How small that “God” seems to me, not to mention, how self-involved that thinking is, as well as an insult when considering the entirety of the Universe and all life and all energy. Thanks again for your comment. It got me thinking, and figuring out how to put into words my way of thinking. The book I was referring to is The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot.
    2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. 2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. 2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. I loved this! It reminds of how the media presents Mexico to Americans here. “Oh my God, don’t the killings there scare you?”, “You shouldn’t go to Mexico; it’s far to dangerous. You could get shot!” “They’ll kidnap you because your American and try to get a bunch of money for a ransom”. Sure, some things do happen to Americans, but much less frequently than the drug dealer’s shooting war/infighting. Mostly they just shoot someone who tried to shortchange them or ripped them off. Usually nothing to see. I’ve been to Mexico a number of times in all different parts of Mexico, and it’s absolutely beautiful, and the people are generally very nice, open and kind and generous. I’ve even been invited into the home of a poor family I had just met, and they fed me very well. I have no fear walking around the streets of a city, but I do keep my eyes moving around 👀 to check out my surroundings, and don’t go alone into any sketchy neighborhood, esp. at night. You just have to be smart. I’ve never had a bit of trouble and I’ve never been afraid. The Mexican people are mostly really wonderful and curious about Americans and our way of life. In fact, I love Mexico so much I hope to move there one of these days, especially if trump actually manages to win the next Presidential election (God forbid!). I’m certain I’d be much more relaxed and happier there than here. Looking forward to it! And I even have Mexican friends down there. They’re a lovely family I lived with one summer when I was studying immersion Spanish in Cuernavaca, and I would love to see them again.
    1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. Mitt Romney was also one of the first Senators to fight against the Equal Rights Amendment in Congress after Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it, which is the threshold for which an amendment is supposed to automatically be entered into the Constitution. What happened first, immediately after Virginia ratified it, Donald Trump called Bill Barr and told him to call the Chief Archivist, whose job is to enter an amendment into the Constitution as soon as it’s ratified by the 38th state, and tell him NOT to add it to the Constitution. So it got sent back Congress to fight over the deadline, which is something that hasn’t been put into other amendments, nor was that written in the text of the law, so it should not carry legal power. And there was Romney and others saying no, don’t put it in the Constitution. Though he wasn’t in the room, even Joe Biden was able to call in his opinion that the ERA shouldn’t be put into the Constitution, the same man who on his campaign trail said, “ I’ll do everything in my power to get the ERA put into the Constitution and made law”. The ratification by Virginia was in January of 2020, and, IF it had been put in, as it should have been, Roe v. Wade could NOT have been overturned. Of course they knew that was the plan all along, and that was why all these steps were taken to prevent it from happening. And Romney was one of the leading Senators shooting it down. The deadline was put into the amendment as an excuse to not have it work, as they had a pretty good idea that the women wouldn’t get enough states to ratify it within a certain period of time, especially because Phyllis Schlafly was going around the country spreading lies about the ERA which did a whole lot of damage and convinced a number of states not to ratify it. Interesting note: the Constitution explicitly states (I’m not sure where right now - Article 5?) that once the amendment is ratified by the 38th state, it is NOT to go back to Congress, because Congresses job is DONE with it. It is supposed to go directly to the Archivist who is directed to enter it into the Constitution, and the Archivist is then supposed to send a notice to Congress that it has been done. Period. End of story. But, no! Congress and the President (both trump and Biden apparently) - for some reason - (money maybe?, shooting down Roe v. Wade maybe?) DO NOT want women to have Equal Rights. I have been taught that when I have a question about why something in our politics is being done, or not being done, to “Follow The Money” and determine “Who Stands to Profit”. That has anaswered a whole lot of questions for me, and I’m guessing that, besides of the knock-down of Roe v. Wade, there are a whole lot of companies and corporations who give hefty envelopes of money to their favorite congressmen to do their bidding, who don’t want to pay all the extra money it would cost them to pay their women employees the same pay they give their men employees. We must fight this and get this done so that not only will women have equal rights, as they do in every other developed country in the world, women can’t have any more rights taken away like Roe v. Wade was taken away. I know this was long, but I hope SOMEONE read it and it made them think on it.
    1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1