Comments by "KGS" (@kgs2280) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder"
channel.
-
905
-
79
-
64
-
57
-
54
-
53
-
52
-
51
-
50
-
49
-
I think this is also a symptom of the American exceptionalism individual “toughness”, or strength theory where we are taught to NEVER show weakness or inability at any time. It’s the old “work till you drop”, in the face of all odds philosophy. It’s especially strong in the post-WWII and Boomer generation, and it’s just plain damaging to everyone. People have a right and a responsibility to admit to an inability or a need for recuperation, which was why John Fetterman was lauded for admitting that he was having problems with depression, and took the necessary time off for getting himself better so that he could do his job properly and efficiently. It benefits NO ONE to force yourself, or anyone else, to work when you’re just not up to the task. People need to understand that it’s OK to take time off for mental, as much as physical health self-care, just as it’s OK to retire in dignity when you recognize you have reached a point of diminishing capacity, and even just to give yourself time to enjoy retirement to spend your remaining time on Earth with loved ones and just doing things you enjoy doing while you still can. There’s NO shame in doing that; that’s your reward for working all your life. It’s especially a problem when you’re in a position that affects many people in the country, and I hope society starts losing the “I’m so tough” philosophy and developes a more humanistic one.
47
-
47
-
44
-
41
-
34
-
28
-
21
-
Sadly, they pretty much ARE above the law, because they are the final arbiters of the law (hence the name SUPREME Court). Unlike ALL other judicial offices as well as legislative offices, the Supreme Court Justices have NO ethics rules they have to abide by. It’s just “assumed” they will make laws justly and ethically. However, since these recent events have taken place (like lying or misrepresenting themselves during confirmation hearings and overturning Roe v. Wade, etc.), they are coming under much more public scrutiny and anger, that some legal minds are talking about creating ethics rules they will have to abide by now. But it’s been such a “tradition” historically to not have those rules, so it will be interesting to see where this goes, if anywhere. Personally, I’m not holding my breath.
20
-
20
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
@Descalabro Absolutely right, except it depends on which people you’re talking about. If it’s for the very wealthy and corporations (which are “people” according to the Supreme Court, unbelievably) and for the manufacturers that make weapons of war, bombs, fighter jets, and oil-drilling rigs (for wars in Middle Eastern countries that have oil, then, I imagine the soldiers would be told they’re fighting for their country’s “people”). But it’s never, ever for the working-class taxpayers that wars are fought, except, as you say, it’s when their own country is under attack.
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@cycologist7069 Well, that’s a tough one to answer because he ended up betraying me in a really horrible way, so I didn’t have any good feelings about him after that anyway. However, at the time he told me about flying in Cambodia I was very young, non-political and blinded by love, so I didn’t understand, or think about any implications about what he did at the time. But I also understand that our boys in the military have to obey commands, no question asked, so I’d be less like to hold it against him personally. So, my comment was more about the lies our government told us than the men who, sadly, had to carry out the orders.
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
I highly recommend the book The People’s History of the United States by Howard Zinn. On one hand, it was shocking how much we have never been taught in school or told about. On the other hand, you realize that so much of what goes on in our government and society today has almost all happened before. We’ve always had a government and society of vile, greedy and murderous villains. Of course, we’ve always had good people, too, who tried to make things better, but that’s always been the struggle. I was a bit surprised to learn how Andrew Jackson never signed a treaty with the Native Americans that he wasn’t happy to break, on one occasion, the very next day. He was absolutely heartless and murderous, and had no concern for the Native Americans. It’s also interesting how the actions of the South, during and after the Civil War, still echoes in our Congress today.
9
-
@InternetMameluq Where did you get that idea? Unfortunately, there quite a few women, especially younger women, who have learned to parrot expressions like “I’m not really a feminist because…”, or, “I don’t need feminism because…”, or, “I think feminism has gone too far because…”, when the real problem is that they don’t have any idea of what feminism really means. So many young people, including both men and women, seem to have gotten the idea that feminism means that women want to be “better” or “above” men, I’m guessing for “payback”. When, in reality, feminism just means that women want to be treated as equal citizens, in the laws, at work and in every area of life. As one of my favorite expressions goes: “Feminism: The radical notion that women are people”, and a favorite organization’s name is Equal Means Equal. That’s it. Period.
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@Jacob B I absolutely agree with the addition of the religious fundamentalism aspect, at least for the last forty or fifty or so years. It wasn’t really as strong a thing before that. I grew up in Florida, (and, yes, I’m old!) and religion didn’t factor nearly as strongly as the “Old South” mentality at that time. I remember in high school, they played Dixie at our in-school basketball games, and everyone sang along (except me, since I was born much further north. I used to sing Yankee Doodle well under my breath as my personal rebellion, LOL). And I remember some students even put confederate flags in their windows in the college dorms. That mentality, especially the racism (even though I’m white) was one of the big reasons I got the hell out. I never looked back, and I certainly never missed it.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@MW66VB, I couldn’t agree more. Psychedelics certainly opened and enlarged my mind (and I had a few “religious/spiritual” experiences, as in, I understood that I am God, but so are we all, and that all the energy of the Universe, especially creative energy, and love, along with us, and whatever other beings there might be out there, including all the animals and plants of any planets that might have those things, are what God is, and we’re all connected. That sort of thing…you know, the “simple” stuff, LOL) and certainly made me more open than I even was naturally. That and traveling, as you say. SO helpful! My father was an Air Force Pilot, so he was always off to some other country while I was a little girl, and when he was able to come home for some time, he always brought me a doll dressed in the cultural clothes from whatever country he had been in on that trip. He would also tell me stories about the people and the country, and even show me maps (and I became a huge lover of maps) and pictures of various places in that country (and I became a photographer for a while). My parents and my two older brothers lived for three years in Germany before I was born (I was born just a few months after they came back to the States. It still had a large effect on me as we had children’s and adult’s books for teaching German, and I learned a number of words, and my dad even used some at the dinner table, like “I love my schpargle” (asparagus), so I still call it that. Then, after I left university, I became a “hippie” (thank God!) and hitchhiked around the U.S and Eastern Canada. The next year I got a car and drove it from Orlando, Fl, up to Maryland to pick up my girlfriend then we drove all the way the way across the country to San Francisco, of course, then to San Diego for a few weeks, then to the Mexico City airport to pick up my boyfriend who worked, so he couldn’t take off three months for the stateside part of the trip, then drove all the way to the Yucatán Peninsula because I just HAD to see Chichén Itzá, and we found a number of other great archaeological sites, esp. Teotihuacán near Mexico City, which is one of my favorite places on earth. I definitely want to have some of my ashes sprinkled on the pyramids when I’m gone from this life (I think I lived a former life there). We spent about two weeks in Mexico, and met many people there (I was the translator for our group because I had taken three years of Spanish in High School, so that was fun). I’m in love with Mexico, and have been back there many times. Well, I didn’t intend this to be a dissertation, but I’ll chalk it up to being practice for when I write a book about that period of my life. I learned so much there, and the cultural differences are so hugely different, it’s also mind-expanding. And, as @diphenhydramine6072 said above, (and I also agree very much with him) that education also plays a big role in being open-minded, which often leads to more left-leaning thinking. As for psychedelic “trips” I can definitively say that I wouldn’t ever want to experience what the right-wingers experienced if it cemented the right-wing philosophy in their minds. I would consider that to be a very “bad trip” for me!😅 Again, sorry for for the probably overly long comment, but that was such a special period in my life, and I love sharing it, plus it fits in with the context of the video. Thanks for your patience.
4
-
I also see similarities between this case and Alito’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Of course they’re not similar in that they both aren’t dealing with medication, but I see them first pre-deciding what they wanted to see happen to the laws (to shut them down) and they both brought weird laws from way back in history to use to hold up for comparison (Judge Kacsmaryk’s was discussed here) and Justice Alito brought up some judge from, I believe, from the 😅16th or the 17th centuries, in England, written by a legal-minded man who, ironically also sentenced young women to go through the “proving your innocence period” before condemning these women to die by fire on a stake. One of the most popular “proving your innocence techniques” was to toss the young women (er: witch) in a lake or wherever (most young women were never taught to swim in those days because it was concidered “unseemly for a lady”. The formula they used was that if the young women drowned, they were found innocent of the charges. If they managed not to drown, they were guilty, and so would be killed by being burned at the stake. I scratch my head thinking about why a 21st Century American Justice would choose to use the opinions of an Englishman from the 15th Century who burned women on stakes as witches. Also, similar to Kacksmaryk’s going back in time to decide that he didn’t think mifepristone was approved correctly, Alito decided that Roe v. Wade was “unconstitutional” at the time it was passed, though he didn’t clearly explain how other than to say it should go to the states, which again, I don’t remember him clearly stating WHY it should be returned to the states. And this was a ruling that contributed to the health and happiness of women, and was found to be reasonable for women for almost 40 years! That’s basically two generations of women having the help they needed. But Alito wanted it to go to the states, I’m sure, because that would end up doing exactly what it did, with so many states jumping on it, and lowering the abortion rates in the country which is just what his religious beliefs demanded. Kacksmaryk’s presumably, having to make some adjustments to his decision, but it will also serve his religious beliefs. And Alito doesn’t have to backpedal one tiny bit. Our laws are NOT supposed to be determined on the plaintiff’s or the judge’s religious beliefs, PERIOD!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It’s interesting to me that these “anti-child mutilation” people never bring up the actual Female Genital Mutilation (without any anesthesia) that happens, not only in Egypt and other African nations, but also right here in the United States, where the parents (from certain sects of Islam) will drive their young daughters, usually as young as eight years old, from one state to another where there is no law against it. This practice is not only not wanted by the child, most are not even told in advance what is going to happen. What they do to those girls is so horrific and so damaging that they often have trouble afterward urinating, having periods, having sex and might even die in childbirth. And it’s all, in theory, to make her appear “clean” and virginal to a prospective husband. That is real and extreme mutilation, and it’s happening right here in the U.S., legally in some states, yet nobody is raising a hue and cry over that. Perhaps it’s because these girls aren’t white or Christian.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I’m (F) from an older generation, and, when I was a teenager, my father would have immediately run out of the house to go fishing for a couple of days if either I or my mother suggested he have The Talk with me about sex (on ANY level) or what we called “the birds and the bees”, or what I should do if a guy got pushy with me; and, if asked to take my father’s place, my older brother would have completely rejected that commission. No way in he*l would that conversation happen. Back then, we “unsophisticated girls” just had to figure it out for herself. She might get some good ideas from her classmates and friends, but they were pretty unsophisticated as well. I know the current younger generations of women are quite a bit more sophisticated, and they also have instagram and TicTok and such to help them with more modern ideas for safety, but rapes will continue no matter how sophisticated the ladies get UNTIL MEN LEARN THAT ITS WRONG, IT IS A CRIME OF VIOLENCE, AND THEY UST NOT DO IT - AFTER they learn that women are not also their property for the evening, and after they come to understand that women are PEOPLE, with feelings and concerns regarding what happens to them in their future, and with the same rights as men (though still not in the U.S. Constitution) - and THAT needs to be fixed ASAP!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Pintheshadows Thank you for your very kind, and very honest, answer. I think we might be in the same age range, as I am also having some “memory issues”, especially when it comes to names of specific philosophies and such. (As the saying goes: “nouns are the first to go”). Yes, I think I very much lean toward a pantheistic view, and am very much influenced by quantum theory. I read a wonderful book about quantum theory a number of years ago, and it cemented much of my thinking. Of course, with quantum theory, nearly EVERYTHING can fit together and make sense, which can be a positive or a negative (lol). If I remember the name of the book soon, I’ll add it to this comment (see? Memory issues!) But it’s something about quantum theory and spiritualism, or psychic-type happenings, which I’ve also experienced a fair amount, and was probably the main reason I came to my belief system because they made me realize there’s something much “more” going on than we’ve been told by religions). I guess I could also agree with the philosophy of monism, because, as the spiritualists say, “we are all one”. And quantum theory gave me to understand that that “one” is energy. My personal theory of “god” is the sum total, and probably the original source of that energy. Many spiritualalists say that source or origin is love, which I’m not sure I totally agree with, but I think it is intelligent and creative. And when I learned about light being composed of many, many particles, or protons, that was how I came to think of us as individuals, as particles of the light which is the force, or substance of energy…yes, we’re still individuals to a degree, but, all together, we are part and parcel of the light. Yeah, it’s pretty much metaphysical thinking, but quantum theory explains it to a great degree. I hope this makes sense. I also simply can’t think of “God” as some old man with a beard, sitting on a cloud, surrounded by angels playing harps, and watching - and judging - every single thing we do, is such a ridiculous, and small, way of seeing “The Creator”, or “The Divine”. How small that “God” seems to me, not to mention, how self-involved that thinking is, as well as an insult when considering the entirety of the Universe and all life and all energy.
Thanks again for your comment. It got me thinking, and figuring out how to put into words my way of thinking.
The book I was referring to is The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I remember in my senior year of high school in the late 1960s, which was made up, primarily, of wealthy, white kids (wheareas I was very middle class), we were required to take a class entitled “Americanism vs. Communism”. This was during the height of the Vietnam War, when we were beginning to see the boys who graduated just before us go off to war and, frequently not come home, or come home missing limbs or mentally damaged. Somehow, even then, even though I was not at all socially sophisticated in any way, I could see that it was entirely propaganda. And, of course, this was in Florida.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
A female who has FGM is usually 7 or more years old, and she remembers all the pain. Plus, FGM causes loss of all pleasure (which is part of the reason it’s done (which is pretty messed up), and as a method to control the woman and keep her from “straying”, plus it can cause problems with menstration, including infection, and it can cause great pain, physical damage and even death in childbirth. So, while I’m still undecided on how I feel about circumcision, I don’t think there’s any doubt whatsoever that FGM is far, far more dangerous and causes problems that male circumcision does not cause. Not to mention the fact that FGM is done SOLEY for the pleasure of her future husband, circumcision is generally done for hygienic reasons and has nothing to do with the pleasure of another person, or the other person’s control over the male.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I loved this! It reminds of how the media presents Mexico to Americans here. “Oh my God, don’t the killings there scare you?”, “You shouldn’t go to Mexico; it’s far to dangerous. You could get shot!” “They’ll kidnap you because your American and try to get a bunch of money for a ransom”. Sure, some things do happen to Americans, but much less frequently than the drug dealer’s shooting war/infighting. Mostly they just shoot someone who tried to shortchange them or ripped them off. Usually nothing to see. I’ve been to Mexico a number of times in all different parts of Mexico, and it’s absolutely beautiful, and the people are generally very nice, open and kind and generous. I’ve even been invited into the home of a poor family I had just met, and they fed me very well. I have no fear walking around the streets of a city, but I do keep my eyes moving around 👀 to check out my surroundings, and don’t go alone into any sketchy neighborhood, esp. at night. You just have to be smart. I’ve never had a bit of trouble and I’ve never been afraid. The Mexican people are mostly really wonderful and curious about Americans and our way of life. In fact, I love Mexico so much I hope to move there one of these days, especially if trump actually manages to win the next Presidential election (God forbid!). I’m certain I’d be much more relaxed and happier there than here. Looking forward to it! And I even have Mexican friends down there. They’re a lovely family I lived with one summer when I was studying immersion Spanish in Cuernavaca, and I would love to see them again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If “the well-being of the ‘child’ is what the pro-life movement has always been about”, then why are doctors not allowed to remove an already dead fetus in order to save the woman’s life or health or future ability to have more children? Do they think that maybe with a little more time it will instantly spring back to life? And a dead fetus, at any stage of gestation, does not feel pain…it’s dead! Make it make sense.
Also, they mentioned that other country’s abortion laws have limitations. Well, so did Roe v. Wade, pretty reasonable (but not entirely) limitations on what could take place at each trimester. I highly recommend that everybody Google “text of Roe v. Wade” and read it. It’s very easy to read, not heavily filled with legalese, and very easy to understand. And it stood the country, and women of the country, in good stead for 50 years. It was slightly a little too conservative than some wanted, but we got by pretty darn well with it for 50 years.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@52flyingbicycles What a concept! Well, Utah, I believe it was, did a study where they allowed homeless people to live in unrented apartments (I don’t remember for how long), gave them social services like rehab/drug treatment, helped them fill out government papers and helped them find jobs. The result? It actually cost the state LESS money to do that than leave them on the streets, clean up the streets after them, lose tourist dollars, etc., etc., etc. Interesting concept, yes? I guess states would much rather lose money while bitching about the problem than actually doing something about it. Then again, there are groups building tiny houses for homeless people, but I haven’t heard much about how that’s turning out, except that in Las Vegas the city went in and bulldozed them. Go figure.
Yup, there are LOTS of things that could be done to help people, but some politicians prefer to tell people to “pull themselves up by their bootstraps”. But, of course, most of those politicians got where they are by having rich daddies, so they wouldn’t have any idea of what a bootstrap really is, and that they can break with overuse. Funny, you said “this game is easy”, but it really COULD be.
1
-
Nancy Pelosi may play the “woman card” when it suits her, but don’t forget that she promoted Henry Cuellar over Jessica Cisneros in Texas a year or so ago because she said that she wouldn’t support a challenger over an incumbent. Funny how it didn’t matter about Cisneros being a woman then. Also, Cisneros is a progressive, something Nancy hates, as well as pro-choice, whereas Cuellar is a neoliberal, “old-school” Democrat and Anti-Abortion. Gee, what happened to your “woman card” on that one, Nancy, especially with Roe v. Wade under fire at the time? I’d love to see Katie Porter get Feinstein’s seat, but Nancy would probably never allow it because Porter is progressive.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If Richard Nixon had been really held to account, and punished, and certainly not pardoned by Ford, we might not have had these following Presidents thinking they could get away with what they did, especially trump. And that’s exactly why trump must be severely punished for what he did, and NEVER be allowed to run for office again, because if he doesn’t and behest becomes President again, he may very well be our LAST President, because he will immediately install himself as President-for-life, as in a dictator. And he could very well make a law that Don Jr. would become President after 45 dies, then maybe Eric and/or Ivanka would have that position after that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You folks NAILED it! It’s all about the Patriarchy’s control, especially over women. We need to do much more investigation into, and speaking out about, Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society which hand-picks these justices for confirmation. It is essentially a far-right Catholic organization, with, I’ve heard, connections to Opus Dei, and it is also an enormous donation collecting organization to, essentially bribe the conservative justices to pass certain laws, like overturning Roe v. Wade (hence the incredibly generous “gifting” of lavish vacations like the ones the Thomases get from certain mega-wealthy donors, along with especially upscale dinner parties). In fact, they (The Federalist Society) has a team of legal scholars on board who actually write those laws, hand them to the justices, and say, “here, pass these”. We often talk about Separation of Church and State, and this system completely obliterates that concept. I also read an article about Amy Coney Barrett and her membership in some far-right religious group (I can’t remember if it’s Catholic or not) where the women of the church at her “level” are called “Handmaids”.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wow, for a political party that says they’re wanting to “protect children” they sure aren’t looking at the #1 reason children are dying in this country today, but, oh boy, let’s ban Tik Tock and drag shows and books that say anything about marginalized groups or “wokeness”, or, or, or absolutely ANYTHING other than guns, which are THE #1 killer of children. But, hey, they’re “Pro-life” and don’t want babies and “children” murdered…in the womb, but in schools? Thoughts and prayers.
1
-
And some in Israel’s government have said their goal is to eliminate every last Palestinian. So, that door swings both ways. But the Palestinians were, literally, in that whole area first. In fact, it was known by the entire world as Palestine. But in 1948, because of the Holocaust in Germany, Israel wanted their own country, and, with the agreement of the U.S. government, they simply declared the largest portion of Palestine as Israel. The Palestinians were not amused, so, ever since then it has been a tit for tat back and forth war, with Israel turning Palestine into what people here are referring to an open-air detention center, which is accurate. Israel has also, ever since, constantly pushed their borders into Palestinian territory, often killing the people there. And the U.S. has decided to support Israel completely and without question.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I’ve heard that when 75% of the population dies, that is considered a mass extinction. Buckle up, kiddos.
Also, “we” didn’t screw up, the richest corporate CEOs and and stock holders and all their buddies in the fossil fuel industry, the big agricultural companies and others, used their wealth to make sure they will always live lives of luxury, and to make sure their children are rich as well, and, because they’re undeniably totally sociopathic, they don’t give a single f**k about anyone else in the world (including possible furture grandchildren or great-grandchildren) and whether or not any of us live or die horrible deaths. Funny thing, though, the last laugh will be on them, because, no matter where on earth you build your fantasy “paradise with your own private militia, it won’t last very long when all the air, soil and water is poisoned (I’m thinking, in part, of the George Bush family who, I’ve heard, have bought quite a large plot of land in Paraguay or Uruguay for when things go bad). Everything is interconnected, air currents (which also carry particulates that poison the soil as well as the air we breathe) and water currents always move as the earth turns. And I really doubt that they’ve already found and built mansions on another, pure earth-like “garden of paradise”.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Mitt Romney was also one of the first Senators to fight against the Equal Rights Amendment in Congress after Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it, which is the threshold for which an amendment is supposed to automatically be entered into the Constitution. What happened first, immediately after Virginia ratified it, Donald Trump called Bill Barr and told him to call the Chief Archivist, whose job is to enter an amendment into the Constitution as soon as it’s ratified by the 38th state, and tell him NOT to add it to the Constitution. So it got sent back Congress to fight over the deadline, which is something that hasn’t been put into other amendments, nor was that written in the text of the law, so it should not carry legal power. And there was Romney and others saying no, don’t put it in the Constitution. Though he wasn’t in the room, even Joe Biden was able to call in his opinion that the ERA shouldn’t be put into the Constitution, the same man who on his campaign trail said, “ I’ll do everything in my power to get the ERA put into the Constitution and made law”. The ratification by Virginia was in January of 2020, and, IF it had been put in, as it should have been, Roe v. Wade could NOT have been overturned. Of course they knew that was the plan all along, and that was why all these steps were taken to prevent it from happening. And Romney was one of the leading Senators shooting it down. The deadline was put into the amendment as an excuse to not have it work, as they had a pretty good idea that the women wouldn’t get enough states to ratify it within a certain period of time, especially because Phyllis Schlafly was going around the country spreading lies about the ERA which did a whole lot of damage and convinced a number of states not to ratify it. Interesting note: the Constitution explicitly states (I’m not sure where right now - Article 5?) that once the amendment is ratified by the 38th state, it is NOT to go back to Congress, because Congresses job is DONE with it. It is supposed to go directly to the Archivist who is directed to enter it into the Constitution, and the Archivist is then supposed to send a notice to Congress that it has been done. Period. End of story. But, no! Congress and the President (both trump and Biden apparently) - for some reason - (money maybe?, shooting down Roe v. Wade maybe?) DO NOT want women to have Equal Rights. I have been taught that when I have a question about why something in our politics is being done, or not being done, to “Follow The Money” and determine “Who Stands to Profit”. That has anaswered a whole lot of questions for me, and I’m guessing that, besides of the knock-down of Roe v. Wade, there are a whole lot of companies and corporations who give hefty envelopes of money to their favorite congressmen to do their bidding, who don’t want to pay all the extra money it would cost them to pay their women employees the same pay they give their men employees. We must fight this and get this done so that not only will women have equal rights, as they do in every other developed country in the world, women can’t have any more rights taken away like Roe v. Wade was taken away. I know this was long, but I hope SOMEONE read it and it made them think on it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There are also other areas of politics besides reproductive health and anything “sexual” in the laws that they want to change and control. They’re real big on altering future elections as well. They’re planning to challenge every state election results that don’t go for their group and/or trump. They will be doing what they did in Arizona last time, ramped up, in every state that doesn’t go the way they want, plus they’re planning on throwing out votes that don’t go their way, and just appointing their own legislators, and that’s at every level of the ballot, from President of the U.S. to heads of local school boards. It’s a very comprehensive, and well-thought out (in an evil way) plan. And I think January 6, 2020 was just a trial run. If trump loses, we will undoubtedly be seeing even larger, armed insurrections, and not just at the Capitol, but in many locations around the country.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Aww, but hey, it’s only “locker room talk”, right? He wants to seem like a “regular guy” to get their vote. He, and all guys like him, are WEAK! And because, if he did stand up for his wife, instead of respecting him for it, they would laugh at him and call him p***y-whipped. I grew up around guys like this, and I’m sick of that troglodyte, knuckle-dragging thinking. I will call them out for it every chance I get.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Wyrmwood66 Yes, and WHILE trump was in office, which Biden wasn’t when his son Hunter was acting up. Oh, and one of the doofuses in Congress even just admitted that the Hunter Biden “investigation” was to be able to watch if trump’s poll numbers went up because of it, showing it’s entirely political, but criticize the Dems if they say the “Russia, Russia, Russia “ investigation was just politics to make trump look bad. Well, it was political in that Putin was playing financial and political footsie with trump, and they were happily making deals and offering deals to each other, but not allowing our intelligence services to have any recordings or printed memos. Secret deals with America’s greatest foes should not be kept secret, especially from our intelligence agencies. Sure, that’s political in that we’re trying to keep the U.S. as a Democracy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1