Comments by "KGS" (@kgs2280) on "Thom Hartmann Program"
channel.
-
393
-
171
-
158
-
Hospitals, when delivering a miscarriage, throw them in the incinerator because they ARE biological waste, so are they going to be required to set them up for a funeral that the mother has to pay for? And, what will the state’s requirement be for a funeral for, say a 16- week fetus, which is what this woman’s was? Or a two-week (which she would probably not even be aware of)? Can they bury it in a cardboard box in their back yard, or at a local park or wooded area? Or are they going to require the mother to provide a coffin, which is expensive, as “punishment for the woman? That was the problem here: nobody tells women what to do with the dead fetus when she miscarriages. How can you be punishing a woman for breaking a law that, hitherto, wasn’t a law at all? Insanity now rules this country.
129
-
122
-
86
-
69
-
65
-
62
-
59
-
57
-
57
-
55
-
53
-
50
-
46
-
46
-
44
-
40
-
38
-
38
-
36
-
34
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
Ladies, don’t EVER tell a professor or boss or anyone who must give you permission for time off for any healthcare what that healthcare is. If they ask (which they shouldn’t in the first place) tell them that it’s private, and between you and your doctor, and don’t give in to any pressure from them. (If they continue to pressure you, tell them you’ll have to confer with your lawyer or the administration whether or not they’re allowed to ask you that - NOT whether or not you have to answer). They have no right to even ask you, and much less to punish you in any way for taking the time off, whether that’s by firing you or dropping you from a class. When I was young and “dumb” (and, frankly, I don’t know what the law was at that time and in that state), I made that mistake when I asked my boss for one day off. It was for a tubal ligation for which I already had an appointment. He told me he would fire me if I took the day off for that. Fortunately, I was working for a concession company inside another company run by women and we all got along well together. I went to the head of that company and told her what was going on, and would she be interested in hiring me at that company. I said bye to my previous boss on Thursday, had my surgery on Friday, and was at work on Monday morning at the bigger company, and at the same location. My old boss saw me there and asked what I was doing there and I smiled and said “I work here now. See? I told you I only needed one day off”. I was very lucky I was able to get that job, but the moral of the story is just don’t tell anyone what kind of healthcare you need.its none of their business.
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
@mariarooney6262 That is absolutely untrue, and based soley on YOUR religious beliefs (because some other religions do not have such beliefs. For example, in Judaism, they believe that the already living woman’s life takes precedent in the case of a problem pregnancy. So, why does YOUR personal religious belief take precedent over other religious beliefs? Plus, medical doctors have not come to a consensus as to when human life actually “begins”. So, how is it you know more than the entire medical community? Besides, in Genesis, the first book of YOUR Bible, says that Adam was not “alive” until he took his first breath. So don’t cherry-pick YOUR religious text to make laws regarding the rest of OUR citizens. Also, if you think murder is wrong (which, of course, it, actual murder, is) do you think the death penalty is appropriate for a woman who has an abortion? Is murdering someone for theoretically murdering someone else an appropriate thing to do? How is that not murder? Do you support that?
16
-
15
-
15
-
Thom, that was excellent, and chilling. I think you’re very correct on that account, and think you ought to expand that thinking into a full-length book, á la 1984 or The Handmaid’s Tale. If you did that, I know it would be a best-seller (I’m sure that at least all your fans would buy it), and it would be a very stark warning to many still thinking “everything will work out”, if it gets published in time. People really need to wake up and realize the truth of what’s already in front of our eyes. I have been saying for the last couple of years that if trump gets elected again, he will immediately set himself up as President-For- Life, as in, a dictator, and we’ll never have free and fair elections again. Now, he and the GOP are actually telegraphing their plans for this country, and you nailed a lot of what they’re now saying they would do. Please write that book! (I’d do it myself, but I’m no writer). People need to have it laid out for them. Who knows, maybe I’ll see you in prison in the future anyway, as I’ve been very vocal about my feelings about trump and his shills. Yeah, I know, I’m a woman, and we’ll probably be be in separate prisons, but I also imagine they’ll be bussing women to men’s prisons to see to the men’s physical “needs” to keep the men from rioting too often. Then again, I’m also an “old” woman (within just a couple of years from your age), and as such, they’ll probably be “eliminating” older women because, by their lights, we simply are of no more use to society as we can no longer reproduce.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
I’m so glad you covered how the Democrats and the Republicans “switched places”, and you used the term “Dixiecrats”. It is all very true, and I don’t think enough people realize it. The Vietnam War was the first time I got at all political as I was a hippie at the time, so, of course, I was anti-war, especially anti-stupid wars in which we shouldn’t have gotten involved in the first place, and Vietnam was one of those situations. I learned that there’s almost no war, in any country in the world that the U.S. won’t happily jump into as war is extremely lucrative, and it also increases our appearance of power. And there’s almost no war in any country in the world that the U.S. wouldn’t happily create, for the same reasons, though they’ll make up some humanitarian-sounding reason even when there’s absolutely nothing humanitarian about it. I also have the Kent State shooting by the National Guard etched into my consciousness as I was in college in Florida at the same time those students were getting gunned down in Ohio. (That was also Nixon, well before Reagan). Then, as I am a woman, I got very involved in the feminist movement, and it’s still my primary socio-political interest. This past few years has really brought that topic, along with their motivations for sublimating women even more egregiously than they have in the last fifty years. They really want to go back to living in the past when it comes to controlling and punishing, and even damaging and/or killing women and girls. You know, real “pro-life” stuff (*sarcasm). I’m definitely a Democratic Socialist, á la Bernie Sanders, and possibly going a bit to the left of that ideal as well. The things that the “other side” is doing now are so regressive and harmful, especially with its adoption of far-right Christianity that it’s actually frightening, and we must stay very aware of everything they’re up to and crush it with our votes and our voices. We need to get into the streets of every city in the country by multiples of thousands every day that we are able to. This political takeover HAS to be stopped or we will definitely descend into fascism, which can happen very quickly, and that’s something I NEVER want to see in this magnificent country. I hope I didn’t rant too long, but you got me fired up! Thank you for all your great informative programs.
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
Thanks, Thom, for another exciting and uplifting interview. Dr. Greyson is a treasure. He’s scientifically trained, and he was originally skeptical, but has had his mind opened to different possibilities by collecting thousands of stories, and after sharing stories with other trained doctors, and seeing that many of the patients’ stories matched in certain regards, it’s hard not to become a believer, at least on some level. I have also read a number of books on the subject, and find them to be some of the most incredible stories. I find this subject, and field of study to be absolutely fascinating, and I find myself hoping to have an NDE, or for that to be my experience whenever I die. I love that many of the stories are not religious experiences per se, but more spiritual in a non-religious manner, which I would prefer, as I find the ones where people say they spoke to Jesus to be outside my comfort zone, particularly because they often mimic the patient’s personal religious beliefs. I tend to think, as one person once stated in another book I read that perhaps the image of Jesus or another religious figure appearing could just be the “being’s” way of presenting themselves as a way to make the patient more comfortable. Who knows? Perhaps we’ll all find out someday.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
And this is exactly why we need the Equal Rights Amendment in the Constitution. And it’s also exactly why Republicans in Congress (right now the particular group is headed by Mitt Romney and Ron Johnson, and another Senator from Ohio, I think, but I can’t remember his name) are constantly fighting against putting the ERA into the Constitution every time it comes up for a vote in Congress, especially after Virginia became the 38th state to ratify the ERA in 2020.
Also remember how Republicans started whining about a study coming out a few years ago about how the U.S. population was starting to decline because it would negatively impact the amount of workers corporations would have in the future. (And which is also undoubtedly why some Red states like Arkansas have voted to overturn their child labor laws!).
Remember, too, that Justice Alito, in his decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, cited for reference some judge in England who lived in the 1500s or 1600s who also sentenced witches to be burned at the stake! Maybe it’s just me (sarcasm), but I somehow don’t think we should be basing our American 21st Century laws on the laws of a 14th or 15th Century “legal scholar” from England, besides the fact that the United States was created and broke away from England and wrote a new Constitution to get away from those old religious-based laws.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@normaowens7569 Agreed. I did the same thing, and reading it a second time after you become an adult, especially now, is a much harder gut punch than the first time, especially when government policies affect us personally. Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is another good one. Also, The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood. Even if you’ve watched the series, reading the book is a different perspective. Plus, Atwood has said a couple of times, publicly, that everything in the book that was done to the women in the book has actually happened in some society at some time. I’ve always said that we read, or saw, The Handmaid’s Tale as a warning, but the Republicans read or saw it as a blueprint, and they all the men fantasize about being Commanders.
I also saw a great comment recently that was perfect: “1984 and The Handmaid’s Tale had a baby and named it Project 2025”.
8
-
Thank you, Thom! Yes, we have to act, NOW. I’m tired of, and sad for, these people saying that we’ll have elections soon, and we can vote a lot of Republicans out of office, when I don’t think we have that long. We cannot wait. By the time our next elections are held, the coup will likely be complete. We have maye a couple of weeks, if that. If that. This is a rapidly rolling steamroller going downhill, and if we don’t take action to stop it RIGHT NOW, we, and our democracy, are going to be crushed before we can think twice.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@kaybee46 Yes, but in all fairness, hindsight is 20/20, and very few people could have seen it as a dumb thing to do even 20 or 30 years ago (fortunately, I did 60 years ago, for myself, anyway). Plus, there has always been so much pressure on women to have babies, even now, though, thankfully, that’s starting to change now.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Yeah, we don’t even have the Equal Rights Amendment in the Constitution yet, but then it was ONLY first put before Congress ONE HUNDRED years ago! And presented to every single Congressional session (season) since then. Which means that the ONLY right women have per the Constitution is the right to vote. Yup, that’s it. And the ERA is really basic and simple as it says “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.” That’s it. Not so hard, is it? But, apparently, it’s a bridge too far for many Congressmen, and, unfortunately, some congresswomen as well. Some states have an Equal Rights Amendment in their state constitutions, but not nearly all of them, and they’re all a mishmash of rights, and different from each other.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
I think a lot of restaurants are adding more sugar to their meals, probably to get people “hooked”. My favorite food when eating out is Thai, and I found that, apparently some restaurant supply person has been going around to Thai restaurants telling them that they should add sugar to their meals because “Americans love sugar”. I figured out that every time I eat at a new Thai restaurant I have to ask them if they add sugar. And they usually add it to sauces and things that are made ahead, so you can’t just ask them to leave it out. It’s crazy because the beauty of Thai food is their incredible way of combining various flavors so that you can still taste all the separate flavors, and adding sugar pretty much ruins it that. I think even American restaurants are doing the same as well, because almost every time I eat in a restaurant, by the time I get home, I’m in such a deep mental fog that I have to go lie down for a couple of hours just to feel like I’m connected to the earth plane again. It is not at all pleasant. I’m going to start checking my blood sugar as soon as I get home now as I am diabetic, although I always take both kinds of pills (Metformin and Glipizide) before I eat. I think the “Sugar Council”, or whatever organization is behind restaurant foods is probably literally profiting off our impaired health (like they always have). If I start finding that my sugar levels are going way up after every restaurant meal, I’m going to just have to start learning how to make Thai food at home, although I’ve tried it before and it’s very labor intensive, and I enjoy going out. I really wish our food companies would quit dicking around with our food.
7
-
@Mike2244eSam Thanks for that. It is sickening indeed. I came pretty close to having a trauma response because, although I’m white, I grew up in Florida in the 60s and 70s, and heard all those sentiments throughout the years and watched many of those events of the 60s on TV. I had a few prior childhood years in Kansas, and because my dad was military (Air Force), racism was a taboo subject, and my classmates were white, black, Japanese, German, and a few others, so it was quite peaceful and pleasant, at least for a kid. Moving to Florida at age 9, I was in shock when I saw the “Whites Only” and “Coloreds Only” signs in some locations, especially bus stations. I could not even begin to understand the concept, and had to hear a number of comments like those in the video through the years, and it still makes my stomach knot up, and it hurts my heart. But then, in 1972 I became a “hippie”, and got some similar comments thrown MY way. Of course, I generally did not have to literally fear for my life at those times like the Black people there constantly did, although I was literally run out of a tiny north Florida town “at the end of a shotgun” once, although I didn’t really think the gun would be fired. I left quickly, though, just to not take that chance! I was so glad to leave Florida, and the south, when I was finally able to do so.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
It’s not just a tragedy, it’s a huge embarrassment and humiliation for our country. This is why Americans HAVE to open their eyes and STOP idealizing “celebrities” as if, just because they look good (to them) in movies or on TV, they’d be terrific as governors or Presidents. This is how we got Ronald Reagan (who really got our country to pick up speed going downhill), Arnold Schwarzenegger (who almost completely ruined California’s economy as Governor) and trump (who almost killed our democracy, along with all the other things he did). I may really enjoy someone’s acting ability, but that doesn’t qualify them to be a Governor or President. Granted, most politicians are actors to some extent, but the converse is not true, and we need politicians who understand how our government works, what the Constitution says and what it means, and what has happened in history, not to mention have some serious care for the American people who pay their salaries.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
If you’re thinking of the right to vote for women, yes it is. It is the 19th Amendment, and it was put in the Constitution in 1920. But if you’re thinking of the Equal Rights Amendment, no, it has never been put into the Constitution, even though it was first written and put forward to Congress for a vote in 1923 (yes, 101 years ago), and it has been put forward to Congress at the beginning of EVERY legislative session since then, but they keep voting it down. It’s funny (not funny at all, actually), but it was voted down again in 2022, just a few months before Roe was overturned. And if the Equal Rights Amendment had been put into the Constitution, Roe v. Wade could NOT have been shot down. And this is why we ALL have to fight for the ERA.
Also, SCOTUS is showing us now that they’re willing to change things in the Constitution just by saying “But they really meant this, not that, when they wrote a law.” Just like Alito said about killing Roe v. Wade, that it wasn’t “rooted in the Nation’s” history and tradition”, (although I have to disagree with that, as American women have always found ways to end pregnancies, just as women all over the world have since the beginning of recorded history. There’s even mention of it in the Bible), and that it should be a state’s decision, not Federal. So, they can change anything.
6
-
@hlnbee I was born shortly afterward, and grew up under Eisenhower, and the difference between that period of time, with that type of government and today’s, is incredibly different and enlightening. We were at our peak then, and, hopefully, we’re at our bottom now (unless, somehow, trump gets back in office) and we might be able to start climbing back into the light. But it’s going to take all of us, and it’s going to be a rocky path, and a whole lot of work.
6
-
I’m so glad you brought this up, Thom. I’m also very careful to not buy into conspiracy theories, but this looked extremely suspicious to me. Besides what you said (especially the part about no hospital doctor’s report), I would also add that I saw a photo of what looked to be a white Turkish-style washcloth (very coarse) with blood on it that someone supposedly put on his ear, but it didn’t look like real blood to me. I’ve seen a fair amount of blood in my time, and it wasn’t the right color, too blue, like lipstick, even “streaky”, like someone rubbed lipstick on it. (Sorry I can’t remember the source, so I can’t say it’s reliable). Also, he had Bibi Netanyahu and his wife over to Mar-a-Lago just about three days(!) after the shooting, and he no longer had his “bandage” (pantyliner) on it, showing off his ear to Bibi, and it was completely “healed”. He said to Bibi, “I’m a fast healer”, and I thought, right, three days after what Ronnie Jackson described as a “gouge” across the top of his ear. It was literally unbelievable. The truly tragic part of it is that one man died, and two other people were critically injured in the event (funny, but we haven’t ever gotten an update on their condition that I’m aware of). And why would his security team allow him to stand up and pump his fist a few times while it was an active shooter event?? I just can’t believe it wasn’t staged, and for sympathy votes.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@dominicfucinari1942 I’m not familiar with Randall Terry (who is he?), but Mitt Romney and a congressman from, I believe, Ohio formed a two-man “smashing campaign” against adding the ERA because of a 10-year deadline, which had been added regarding the state’s ratifications, but it was not part of the main text of the amendment, just an add-on to pull out and use against it later if they could, just like in a case like this. And, as I stated, it’s clearly written in the Constitution that once the 38th state has ratified, Congress has NOTHING to do with it anymore, and the Amendment is supposed to go directly into the Constitution, end of story. Before that, trump called Bill Barr to tell him he didn’t want it put in (of course!), and it seems Bill Barr called Mitt Romney, and he and the other Congressman killed it. If I remember correctly, Joe Biden was also there, and I think it was also to help kill it. After that, a women’s group (Equal Means Equal) took it to the Supreme Court, and, of course they also shot it down, on the basis that the group didn’t have “standing”, which I don’t understand. I know how standing works because I looked it up, and it’s when someone brings a suit that really isn’t in the personal interest of the person or persons bringing the suit. But I’ve never had anybody explain to me how a group of women which exists solely to try to get the ERA put into the Constitution are not personally affected by getting it in there! As individual women they will be personally affected by that action, and as a group for that purpose they will be personally affected. Can you explain that to me? But this just shows how much they do not want women to have equal rights. Period.
5
-
5
-
The Constitution already is readable. Yes, the language is from a previous century, but I think it’s very understandable. The problem is that the “legal minds” want to twist its meaning to mean something totally different to suit their purposes, sometimes into something that you or I would not understand it to mean. As in the Colorado case arguing that they would not allow Trump in the ballot because he engaged in insurrection. To most of us, when reading Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, it would be perfectly understandable and support Colorado’s case, but, of course, the Supreme Court had to twist it around to mean something else in order to allow Trump on the ballot there. And that’s exactly why the Supreme Court has lost favor, or trust, with so many people. I highly recommend that everyone read the Constitution. It’s not some massive tome in a totally archaic language. It’s small enough that you can get a pocket-sized (very legible) copy (from Amazon) for just a few bucks. And anyone who has made it through middle school “should” be able to read and understand the basics of it. (I put “should” in quotation marks because so many middle and high school kids these days have not even learned how to read at better than a fourth-grade level. It’s pitiful.)
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
She was truly a despicable character. So much of the time she just made her arguments up on the spot and out of thin air. She said, “But we’ll have to send our daughters to war”, but we see how many women are now voluntarily joining the military, where before they weren’t allowed to, or were only allowed secretarial jobs or nursing (and I’m not criticizing those professions, just that a lot of women wanted to be up there on the front lines, and now they are, and women in the military are being raped at unprecedented levels by everyone from their fellow soldiers up to their captains. Not to mention the fact that the guys in Congress still propose drafting women, even though we still don’t have the draft in effect). She also said, “But we’ll have to use the same public restrooms as men”. Well, we now have non-gender public restrooms everywhere, but it doesn’t mean we use them at the same time as men. But, because of her, we still don’t have equality. Her arguments were entirely specious. We pretty much had the ERA in line to pass in 1973, but she ruined it all.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I have a question for Ms. Farrell regarding the ERA: why do so many people say putting it into the Constitution is now in the hands of Congress? Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it in 2020. I know the deadline has passed, but many people, including Laurence Tribe, a Constitutional scholar and professor, say that since the deadline was not in the text of the Amendment it does not carry any weight. When Virginia ratified it, Donald Trump told Bill Barr to direct the Chief Archivist NOT to put it into the Constitution, which tells me that he (Trump) was aware that that was the final step. Also, the Constitution clearly states that once 38 states have ratified an Amendment, it should go directly into the Constitution, period, that Congress has done its job by passing it, and doesn’t have to do anything else with it, nor does the President. So, what is all the dithering about? I know the Chief Archivist under Trump, David Ferriero, either has just retired or is about to, so we should have a new Archivist now or in a few days, but shouldn’t President Biden, or someone in charge of that action (Merrick Garland?), just call the Archivist and tell them to just put it in? If we had the ERA, these new/old laws (like abortion and all the others on the chopping block) undoubtedly could not take effect. I would love to hear an answer to that.
5
-
5
-
5
-
Which of the six thousand or so Gods throughout history wins here? Ra or Ishtar of the ancient Egyptians? Thor of the Vikings belief system? That blue God of the Hindus? (Sorry, I can’t think of his name at the moment). The cows that some of the Indians worship as gods? Quetzalcoatl, the Aztec God! Or Kulkulkan, the My
Ayan Ghief God, or maybe one of the Nature Gods like Tlaloc, the Mayan rain God (and Chac, the Aztec rain God). What about Cthulhu? Of course I know you mean YOUR God, but why does YOUR God win and none of the others? Keep in mind that a whole host of prayers will go toward getting abortion rights reinstated, because the MAJORITY of Americans want it. And religion has been deemed to NOT be inserted into the political process from the earliest times of our country. That’s what Separation of Church and State means. God knows he’s not invited to this show of your Christian belief (qit is just that, a show, a performance), so why would you immorally force him into a discussion where he’s not invited when he’s not needed for these decisions being made by human beings for human beings. It’s simply not in his purview. He’s already said that human life begins when the baby takes its first breath. So he doesn’t have any problems with abortion before that moment. Read your Bible. He starts in Genesis saying this And he continues on in following chapters, so I don’t think he’s going to suddenly change his mind at this point.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
Thank you, Thom. An excellent video. BTW, these people saying that whenever a country has a growing Middle Class, they always end up having a revolt, like in the French Revolution. The thing is, it wasn’t the Middle Class that revolted, because France didn’t have a Middle Class, it was the poor people who revolted…and that’s the problem with what I call “end-stage Capitalism”, or the far right-wing rich guys today. They want everything ruled by the wealthy, and for everyone else to be working class poor and uneducated people. Seems to me that’s much more likely to cause a revolution than the Middle Class. I’m old enough to remember the Middle Class of the 1960s, and people then were pretty proud to be Middle Class, because it was a big step up from being poor in the earlier years. People had something to work for, something they could actually achieve, and they were much happier people overall. I’m not saying it was perfect, and some people, obviously, got left out, but it was a better life than what we’re headed for. Plus, in the 50s and 60s, education was held up, nationwide, as the best and most important thing to get because that would help you achieve a solid Middle Class life, or better. And we had some of the highest quality education in our country that was available anywhere in the world. We had hope for a better future, and the opposite is the problem today. We’ve lost most of our hope because the wealthy are taking all of that progress away from us, and continually talking about taking away even more. That sounds like a recipe for revolution to me.
BTW, it was a woman, Frances Perkins, who created many of FDR’s New Deal policies. He appointed her as Secretary of Labor as she was a worker’s rights advocate. “She was heavily involved with many issues associated with the social safety net including, the creation of Social Security, unemployment insurance in the United States, the federal minimum wage, and federal laws regulating child labor.” (Wiki)
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Yes, even in something as “recent” as YouTube, I’ve seen a steady decline in the quality of comments, both in comprehension of the subject and literacy skills, not to mention, as you say, empathy. I’m quite a bit older than you, and I can remember when education was one of our most valued social benefits, and something to aspire to. Now I see people actually defending not getting an education, not because of economic status but because they don’t really see any benefit of it to their lives. Now it’s a badge of honor to use against “liberals” (I wanted to say “libruls”, but just couldn’t do it) and “elites”. When I was in junior high (middle school) all I wanted in order to start my life was a driver’s license and a college education.
4
-
4
-
4
-
Well, that’s the problem in a nutshell. As Thom Hartmann said, wealthy women have always been able to (and always will be able to) obtain an abortion, even if it’s legal. However, the majority of women who need abortions are lower income and can’t afford to take the time off work (some states require the woman to have two visits to the clinic several days apart), and many can’t afford the travel. Depending on the state in which she resides, it can take a woman ten to twelve hours to drive or take a bus to the closest state that allows it, and few can afford the plane fare. Plus, because of the two or three-visit delay, the often will have to pay for a hotel room and meals. For some, they can’t leave their jobs or children that long, or will also have to obtain childcare for the duration. It all adds up to a costly situation a majority of women simply can’t afford.
4
-
4
-
4
-
As Abigail Adams wrote to her husband John when he was helping draft our Constitution said, “Don’t forget the ladies” (although he just laughed, unfortunately for our country’s future). This has also been very hard for women as well. This whole thing with E. Jean Carroll has also left women more vulnerable for more hatred, condemnation and bodily threats by trump’s adoring supporters. I’m certainly not casting aspersions at E. Jean Carroll, as she’s a hero for taking him to court to expose what a monster he really is when it comes to women. And it was quite remarkable that she actually won on the sexual assault verdict. But it has also had the sad effect of riling up the anti-woman sentiment of the MAGA Republicans, except for the Stockholm Syndrome-possessed women on “their” men’s side (They’re what Mona Eltahawy, a feminist author, calls “the foot soldiers of the Patriarchy, which is a very appropriate title IMO). The way the audience laughed at his comments/rants at his Town Hall the other day really underscored their low opinion of women in general. And I don’t think it was any coincidence that every Republican in Congress except two (Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins) two weeks ago, once again, voted down putting the Equal Rights Amendment into the Constitution. In fact, this time, many of the Republicans voted this time with a physical thumbs down gesture (like Kirsten Synema did with the vote to raise the minimum wage). I have certainly seen more anti-woman, misogynistic rhetoric in the comments sections of YouTube videos since the E. Jean Carroll court finding.
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ErichSemmelweisEffectFromm Thank you! I knew I recognized the name. I actually think about Dr. Semmelweis as a classic example of simple, but powerfully beneficial discoveries, but had not remembered the effect part of it, though I do know I’ve heard about that response by other doctors. Originally, I had thought it was your last name, so I asked my German friend what it means, and semmel means a roll, like a dinner roll, and, of course, weiss means white. And of course, I somehow got stuck on the name and didn’t even see the word “Effect” afterward, so I’m thrilled to learn something new today. That’s one of my goals in life: to learn - at least - one new thing every day, which I usually, if not always, do. And, at the time of the good doctor, the doctors were often going straight from the autopsy room to the maternity ward and birthing babies. They were trying to figure out why so many newborns, and women, were getting so sick so quickly and dying. Of course, they never would have consulted a midwife who probably would have had an idea of what was going on because they had been practicing midwifery for centuries, but when men decided to create and attend medical schools, they did so with the express notion that they would be sure that midwives would no longer be able to continue their craft (by law, I believe) because, as everyone knew/knows that women are not nearly as intelligent as men (yes, I’m still laughing), and that only men would be allowed to become doctors. And, of course, they wanted all that sweet sweet money the midwives were receiving for their services, which often consisted of a nice hen for their dinner. But the doctors only wanted cash, unsurprisingly. So, just making a leap here, is your name Erich Fromm? (There is a Dr. of Psychology named Erich (or Eric Fromm), is there not? At least one of the great thinkers, and authors, yes?
Great convo, thank you very much.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@DjangoMarine-Esq That’s interesting, because women sometimes talk trash about guys when we’re alone with other women, but, somehow, we figured out long, long ago how to “code switch” (and, yes, I do understand that phrase, especially when speaking in other languages) when we’re around guys. Perhaps it’s because we’re very aware of the very real threat of actual physical violence that can, and has, come from men if we say anything (anything at all!) that might, even unintentionally, be considered critical of them, particularly when it’s in regards to their looks, body or sexuality (or their hair, their clothing, their voice, the way they walk…). I don’t quite understand how this can be a new concept for men to learn. After all, would you talk that way around your mother, or your sister, your daughter or your aunt? I certainly hope not! You said “how you should act when in a professional business environment”. What part of a ‘PROFESSIONAL’ business environment do they not understand? So, then why is it so hard for some men to figure it out in the workplace? I’d venture to guess that a number of women have been in the average workplace since before most working men today have been alive. Apparently many men just feel the need to defend the indefensible. To borrow a phrase from toxic masculinity, they need to “grow up”.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@admiralfrancis8424 That’s an excellent question, and something I’ve been wondering about forever. I only guessing, but I’m thinking it’s the fear that women will not give them all the sex they want, anytime they want it. Or, it’s, more likely a fear that women might become as powerful, or more so, than men and knock them out of their positions of power over others. Or perhaps that, when and if women do get that power they will treat men like they have been treated by men for, well, the last 10,000 or so years (7,000 at least). A lot of people speculate that men hate women because women can have babies, therefore, “create life”, and men can’t (which is a fear of being “lesser than”). I’m not buying that because, as the old feminist saying (which I think is true) goes, “if men could have babies, there’d be an abortion clinic on every corner, like Starbucks”. I can say, with near certainty, that the vast majority of men would not enjoy that experience. Then there’s the fact that people often say that women are “naturally” more nurturing and caring, but I think that’s only because they do have babies and that’s what has been expected of them by society. Can you imagine that if men could have babies that they’d all be naturally nurturing and caring? I simply can’t imagine that happening, at least for a few hundred years until it’s been totally assimilated by them. Plus, a lot of men still think it’s great that their wives have the babies, but they themselves don’t want to be involved with the actual caring for a baby’s physical needs, especially when it comes to changing diapers. (trump was one of the men who voiced that opinion publicly…but then, that’s trump). Yes, there are men who do take on those tasks, and do so happily (as happily as one can when changing nasty diapers), but many will pitch in in the beginning, but then his “availability” for the task will somehow fade into nothingness, like dust in the wind.
If you have any ideas on why men might be afraid of women, please share, as I’d also like to know, and especially from a man’s perspective, ‘cause that’s all I’ve got.
3
-
This is insanity. I simply don’t, and can’t, understand why a number of people want to take various societies back to the standards of earlier times, times that were not very good for the majority of the population, but were, of course, beneficial to only people like themselves. Why do these people feel so very threatened by the advancement of “other” people and society as a whole? It’s not a threat, it’s progress. I was raised to believe that progress is a good thing for society, that it improves the lives of everyone in a society. The leaders of Afghanistan, Iran and other countries want to relive the goat-herding, poverty-ridden societies of the 1st Century, and the U.S. Supreme Court conservatives want to take us back to our pre-Civil War status. Samuel Alito even stated in his decision to overturn Roe v. Wade that he was basing some of his decision on a top legal mind (LOL) from the 1700s, who, by the way, also approved the hanging and burning of witches! WTAF?! I will not at all be surprised to hear that they (first from the evangelical churches then the Republicans in Congress, then the Leonard Leo-approved Supreme Court conservative Justices) are going to start approving witch hunts and killings again. For crying out loud, they can’t even, still, in the 21st Century, to this day, give women Equal Rights in the U.S. Constitution, so wouldn’t that make it that much easier to institute witch hunting?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@What_do_I_Think That and “celebrity”. Americans have a special kind of fascination for celebrity where they think if someone gets famous, especially in acting, they must be smart enough to be a great politician. That’s how we got Reagan, first as governor of California then as President, and Arnold Schwarzenegger as governor of California, and both were NOT good at what they did in politics, and they were easily led by big money groups (especially Reagan), but because they were celebrities, so many people thought they were great, even while they were wrecking things, again, especially Reagan, and now we’ve got trump for the same reason. I simply don’t understand the thought process that because you like someone’s acting, they’d be a great politician. It just does not compute. And, of course, at least currently, that only extends to male actors or popular TV shows hosts, as most people would probably say that Meryl Streep is the greatest female actor of our generation, but I don’t think anyone would translate that into meaning she’d be a great President. The only celebrity I can think of who would be a good President would be Stephen Colbert because he definitely has the brains for it, but, of course, he probably wouldn’t want to do it. We have to, somehow, get people to see past the glitz and glamour of celebrity status, because that sh*t is going to destroy us.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Excellent interview. I so very much look forward to seeing trump locked up, either in a federal penitentiary (personally, I’d like to see him in Guantanamo, but that’s for foreign terrorists. He’s not foreign, but I think he could, plausibly be considered a terrorist because of these documents as well as his past behaviors/relationships with the likes of Putin, Kim Jong Ill, Erdogan, MBS, (have I got the initials right for the head of Saudi Arabia?), and several others, including Sergei Kysliak and Lavrov who he had in the White House and only the Russians were allowed to take photos, American photographers were noy allowed, echoing his first private meeting with Putin in Moscow, where no American translator was allowed, only a Russian one. (I’m not sure, but I thought that he had an American woman translator at first, but he got spooked about having something translated into English, so he sent her out of the room and ATE the notes she had made. Do I have that right?). One can make wild speculations about things possibly said during both those meetings. I would also be happy to have him locked up in a high-security psychiatric institution (for the criminally insane, possibly), and no possible release except to a maximum security prison with NO white collar perks. I keep thinking about how our country used to deal much more thoroughly with people deemed traitors, and I would say it’s highly likely he belongs in that category. I know they used firing squads and hangings, like they did with the Rosenbergs. (Did I get their name correc?) I don’t want to get in trouble with the FBI for voicing a threat like the trumpers do, when it’s really just an opinion, but for a President to sell out his own country seems to me to fit the definition of treason, so, I would be very happy to see him AND ALL the Congresspersons who were voting not to certify the election results on January 6 (also treason in my opinion) receive the same treatment right in front of the Capitol Building. That is only my personal opinion, and I’m not planning or intending to carry it out myself, and I’m not encouraging anyone to do it, only that I would like to see the DOJ consider the viability of that option to be done legally. While I know doing that would drive wild paroxysms of hatred and anger from the Right, I think it would set a real precedent showing that the U.S. does not, and never will tolerate treason in this country, especially when done by a clique of our top leaders.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Well, WE damned well better GET concerned about them right NOW, because if we don’t, we are (and it’s not speculation, we ARE) going to lose our democracy either next month or in two years. So we’d better STAND UP and SPEAK OUT, and, most importantly, VOTE. Apparently no one in our government is going to do anything to help us or fix the situation (in fact, there are those in government who are working - hard - against us), so, it’s on us, now, to set things right.
3
-
3
-
I think we’re already pretty deeply embedded into the oligarchy part, and are on the razor’s edge with the ability, very soon, to slide into the full-on fascist side. It’s going to take some extraordinary heroic actions (although there aren’t too many heroes in Washington, but, hopefully, there are enough), and it needs to be done very quickly, or we’ll be totally screwed (if I can say that here). Voting alone will help, but we need serious action by the democrats, hopefully with the association of some of the more rational and clear-sighted in the GOP. They will need to work in concert to put forth great ideas, and work very quickly to implement those actions. They will have to run roughshod over Mitch McConnell (as he has always done to Democrats, and with glee in his eyes) as well as the other delusional, conspiracy-addled trump suck-ups. It will need to be a pitched battle with a scorched earth policy. ASAP. I can’t see anything less working, and we’ve been doing much less for far too long.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Thom, I think you’ll find a big clue in the comments here. You might notice that the vast majority of the comments are critical of your speaker. I’ve found that almost all videos, at least on YouTube, that have any mention of male supremacy, feminism, abortion, birth rates and gender issues all get a whole lot of anti-women comments. I think the MRAs, incels, etc. all have some kind of search program on their computers that are triggered by those and similar keywords so they can jump into the comment sections to insult and offer “advice” (control) to women. It’s an interesting trend I’ve been seeing. I recently even had a guy on another video practically beg me to go look up MRA, MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) and “Red Pill” sites, I’m guessing so that maybe I’ll understand and sympathize with their “terrible plight”. I took a pass on that one as I’ve already seen some of those sites, and they’re pretty rabid. Oh, if only we women would understand that men are, by nature (!) “supposed” to be dominant in society, and women are here to support them and have their babies, maybe we wouldn’t be so mean to them, and would be happy to jump into their beds and pass along their oh, so special DNA!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Axel Daxel, I agree completely, but I don’t understand why it is hard to talk about I’m not saying that it isn’t, I’m just saying I don’t understand WHY it is. I’ve been studying feminism and women’s issues for years, and, of course, I read articles every day about race relations and problems, and see how our histories as so incredibly similar. Yes, it’s disheartening to hear how some of the early feminists were racist, and unfortunately, I hear that Black women still face the same problem, yet the movement began with white women being anti-slavery and seeing, as I do, that our histories are so similar, I think it’s something that MUST be talked about and overcome. I personally don’t know how a woman can call herself a feminist yet not include Black women in that struggle. Black women and Indigenous women, and Hispanic women, if anything, have had more difficulties in that struggle than White women (and that’s speaking as a White woman). We in the feminist movement all say that we’re happy to have male allies, so how can we turn away another woman simply because of the color of her skin, or for any other reason? As the old saying goes, “We’re all in this together”, yet, apparently, that isn’t so as a fact, so we have to make it that way. Any movement or struggle, especially for social justice, will always be stronger with greater numbers working together. I would love to see a large group of feminists get together with a large group of African-Americans (even small groups for a start) and discuss the similarities in our histories and discuss how we can work together to solve these problems. I know it will be difficult, and I realize that any coalition-forming group will have its own challenges, but, as an American, I’ve been taught that challenges make us stronger and better because we have to figure out ways to overcome them.
BTW, I did notice this video, along with your comment, are from a year ago, so I can only hope you see my comment.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This is so scary. Pretty soon we’ll be like Bolivia, where abortion is completely illegal, and women who have miscarriages or stillbirths are often prosecuted for having or giving themselves an abortion when they did not, and get sent to jail for many, many years. One woman there was just recently released from prison after 15 years.
A woman’s right to abortion, for any reason, in this country must be fully protected by law. That’s just one more reason Roe vs. Wade must not be overturned, and must be fully ensconced in the Constitution. The Equal Rights Amendment must also be fully ensconced in the Constitution as well. Joe Biden, on the campaign trail, promised to do everything in his power to see that it happened, and has still done NOTHING. Actually, that isn’t entirely accurate; he’s actually fighting it in court through Merrick Garland, for god knows what reason. As the ERA has now been ratified by the requisite 38 states (when Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it in January of 2020), all he would have to do is to call the Chief Archivist, David Ferreiro, and tell him to put it in there (as Donald Trump had called him and told him NOT to after Virginia ratified it), or just do an Executive Order, as a number of “new” Presidents do when coming into office to clean up or clean out some of the ridiculousness from the previous Administration, but he is not doing that. Why not? I suspect money is involved (from donors) as it always is. If Biden had done that, Texas would never have gotten away with SB-8 (and a number of other states are jumping on that bandwagon), and they would not ever be able to overturn Roe once women were considered “people” and full citizens, with all rights thereof, per the Constitution. I’ve already written to him once about it (which had no effect whatsoever, of course), so I’m preparing a very “special” 2nd letter, with copies sent to the editors of WaPo, NYT, The Atlantic, and other media outlets like MSNBC and CNN, as well as to a number of women in Congress, most particularly Carolyn Maloney who is working in the effort to get it ratified. A copy will also go to Kamala Harris, of course, as well as AOC and other congressional women who want it to happen. Perhaps I’ll send one to you as well, if you’re interested. I’d be thrilled to hear it read on your YouTube channel here,
Of course there’s great irony that the states want to give the “unborn” (as they call that constantly changing clump of cells that might not ever turn into a living breathing child) fetus full Constitutional rights from the “moment of conception” while the women having those babies have none. Here’s another thought I just had in my musings: if those children have full Constitutional rights from conception, and 50% of them will be female, will they concede that would mean when there are more of them of that 50% than women from before that law, essentially all women will have Equal Rights in the Constitution? Or, will they try to remove all those Constitutional rights once they reach 18 years, or perhaps even at birth, since they’ve proven they don’t want to do anything for the babies after they’re born.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yet we keep hearing “We have every right to call for recounts”, so why weren’t they doing that? Also, please watch a video by Election Truth Alliance (detailed on the Mark Thompson show)about how they are studying the statistical results of the election machines (see the videos about Clark County for starters). So far they have examined the machines from the counties that contain Las Vegas and Reno, which show clear evidence of Russian-style rigging (in statistical terms, it’s known as “the Russian Tail” because of how the charts line up). Now, mind you, I don’t understand much about statistics, but the guy speaking made it very clear and understandable. They are, apparently, a pretty new group, so they still need funding and time to get to all the other swing states. I’m guessing the results are going to also be irrefutable. Something needs to be done about this. Nobody’s talking about this. Our election was clearly stolen, and this current administration needs to end…now!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@carsengrave2999 Thanks for your comment. I’m sorry I didn’t see earlier that I had a comment here. That sometimes happens.
I really like the quote you put here. It’s more confirmation, I believe, to my previous thought.
I also wanted to recommend another book on the subject that, to me, completely blows a lot of the things naysayers say against NDEs right out of the water. It’s name is Proof of Heaven and it was written by Dr. Eben Alexander, a neurosurgeon (yes, it really is brain surgery!)He, himself, had an infection in his brain and provably died from it, had an NDE, and was brought back. For me, his best case was that he knows, because he’s so experienced in the science, that he was literally brain-dead because of the damage the infection did to his brain. So many people say that NDEs aren’t real because there “must be some kind of brain activity left intact for people with the NDE to understand they’re having one, and to remember what happened in their “mind” while they were experiencing the NDE, which, to them, proves there was still mental activity and the patient was therefore not really dead. According to Dr. Alexander, his brain was essentially turned to mush through which NO mental stimulus could send any kind of stimulus of recognition of anything. I don’t know if I’m describing it very coherently, but that’s the gist. The other outstanding point he made is that while he was on “the Other Side” he met a relative, a young girl he had never heard of, and I’m not sure if she was his sister who was stillborn before he was born, or one who had died very young before he was born, so he was never told about about her. When he got back and questioned his family about who she could be, and he thoroughly described her, I believe his mother broke down in tears because he had described her previous baby girl perfectly. Again, I’m not 100% I’ve got the familial facts correct (it’s been a few years since I read it, but it’s close, if not correct. Why would you be met by a family member who had passed before you were born, never knew about, and even knew her name, which had never been mentioned in the family? For me, it was the most compelling description of something that had to be the truth.
I, myself, have never had an NDE as I have never died during my life, but I, once strangely had a spontaneous “good old-fashioned” vision of myself living in the U.S. (as I do now), but in a different city in the Victorian Era, and I was crying because I had a baby who had just died in infancy. It was very quick, and disappeared almost immediately. I have no idea what that was, but it shook me to my core. Even though I didn’t have an NDE, I feel like I was given a vision of a previous life I had lived, and they might be related in some way. There are so many things we don’t know about our lives yet, but I believe we’re sometimes given glimpses of those things.
Oh, and I was not on drugs or alcohol or anything else that could have altered my perceptions in that way.
Well, I didn’t mean to turn this into a dissertation, but I mainly wanted to recommend that book to you. It was pretty darn wonderful. I hope you’ll check it out.
Nice chatting with you.
2
-
@carsengrave2999 Thanks for your reply. Yes, I had heard about verídical verifications. It’s fascinating.
As for my “vision”, yes, it was extremely real to me. What was so strange about it was that I was living in Orlando, Florida at the time (I was about 19 years old), and I had gone with my parents to the newly-opened Disney World (yes, it was a long, long time ago). Everything was wonderful and we were very happy to be there. The theme park, in case you haven’t been there, is set up so that when you first go in, you get on a monorail that takes you to the main area of the attractions. The first one you come to is Main Street, which is a a perfectly created (American) Victorian street, and Disney does not miss ANY details in creating these atmospheres, it’s like you’re going from one world to the next, and you’re completely surrounded by and inundated by the atmosphere of the place and time depicted, which is why I think that was the particular “past life” scenario I found myself in. As soon as we walked through the gates into Main Street, I was hit with a overwhelming blast of sadness and grief, and I saw myself in that situation described in my previous comment. I was standing in the living room of my home and I was grieving my lost baby. And it was over almost instantly. I had started crying uncontrollably and had to run behind a column or wall where nobody could see me, and collect myself quickly to be able to return to my parents. After all, I was at Disney World, “The Happiest Place on Earth”, so why the heck would I be standing there crying? I succeeded in collecting myself and continued on having a great time, but that experience haunted me for a long time. And there haven’t been too many people I’ve shared it with, as you might imagine.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@bruceneu8588 Incorrect: In 2020 Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it, but the menfolks (thanks, Mitt Romney /*sarcasm) in Congress voted it down because of a stupid deadline that doesn’t go into other amendments, nor is it in the text of the ERA itself. Besides, the Constitution clearly states that once an amendment is ratified by 38 states it is no longer in the hands of Congress, so they shouldn’t have even had the right to vote against it. I don’t know if it would or would not restore abortion rights after the fact, but they could not have overturned abortion rights if the ERA had been put into the Constitution after Virginia ratified it. Also, it’s interesting that there is a 2-year delay after ratification (at least in the ERA, but not in other amendments), so it should have at least been made law by 2022 at the latest, but, isn’t it funny that abortion rights were overturned just a few months after that 2-year mark, as if they (SCOTUS) were still deciding on it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
And what is being done about it? <<Crickets>>. I suppose in another six or eight years, someone will start speaking up about how trump stole this most recent election, too, and, again, there will probably be crickets from Washington. And by then trump will undoubtedly be totally non compos mentis (no longer of sound mind -at all), and unable to stand trial or already dead and buried. Yes, Garland is to blame for the 2020-2021 unanswered criminality, but I don’t really have hope that anything will be done now either because these spineless politicians, lawyers and judges just don’t have the stomach to actually go after someone who has reached the pinnacle of our government offices, no matter how much he does to destroy the country. I’m just sick of the deference, even in the face of irrefutable evidence of misconduct and criminality. Have they forgotten that the Constitution was written because the Founding Fathers did NOT want a king, yet so many of our “modern” politicians treat him as if he were one.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
How ironic it was when you said that about Mitt Romney dissing public healthcare that he was the one leading the charge in 2020 against putting the Equal Rights Amendment into the Constitution after Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it, on the grounds of the ridiculous deadline having passed. Although we, the public, didn’t know it yet, Congress must have heard that SCOTUS was about to overturn Roe v. Wade, which they did just a few months later. I came to the realization that the Conservatives didn’t want to put the ERA into the Constitution because they could not then have overturned Roe if they had done so, and they were hellbent on killing abortion access (along with women).
Thom, I have an idea: we have heard that maternal and infant mortality rates have gone up since the Dobbs decision, which means that women HAVE died because they couldn’t access life-saving abortions, yet we have never heard the names of ANY woman who has died that way, although we have read stories about living women who went public about being denied one (like Kate Cox and others). In Ireland, the woman you mentioned was named Savita Halappanaver, and the point is that we know her name, and her photo is out there. We don’t know the names of any American women who have died. Even though Ireland is an almost exclusively Catholic country, millions of people marched and demonstrated in the streets, carrying posters with her name and photos of her face on them. The demonstrations were large enough and long enough that Ireland finally caved and made abortions legal there. It was huge! If we could get the names and photos of American women who have died because they were denied abortion care, perhaps we could do the same here. Would you know how we could go about getting those names and photos? I think it is only by showing a number of real American women who have literally died here, we could change things. I’m going to ask Jessica Valenti , too. I’m one of her subscribers, and she’s also great!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Thanks, Thom, for mentioning that the abortion bans also fit into their “replacement theory”. I find it ironic that in striving to get more White babies, they’re also going to be getting more Black and Brown babies because they can’t come right out and say only White women are restricted from abortions (yet). I imagine they’re thinking that nobody (White) will adopt Black or Brown babies. Maybe they’re counting on the fact that more Black and Brown women receive less healthcare in general, and also have higher maternal death rates than White women. Horrible to think someone would be happy about that, but, I I’ve seen that sort of thing before. But, of course, they’re more than happy to shame, condemn and punish ALL women (except, of course, wealthy White women) for having sex, and, well, for being females.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ossra100 But that is part of the history of our country. A judge sentenced the Rosenbergs to, I believe, the electric chair, or hanging, for treason. Treason has always been understood to be the highest level of non-homicide crime in the country. But, if it came to it, I would be satisfied with life in a federal penitentiary with no chance of parole. Unfortunately, I don’t believe our country would ever give the maximum penalty, even life in prison, for a former President. The problem with that, and the seriousness of his crimes, is that the next evil dictator wannabe, who just might be a little smarter and a little smoother, not to mention quieter, more circumspect than trump will know that he could get away with what trump did, as well as much worse. We, as a country, might not be able to so easily extricate ourselves from that, then our democracy really would be over. Something has to be done to act as a very powerful deterrent to future politicians.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
And they wonder why our lifespans are getting shorter? Between this and the insecticides and herbicides in our agricultural practices, toxic chemicals from various plants being offloaded into our rivers, trains derailing and poisoning the air and water, and fracking that poisons the groundwater, along with a whole host of other environment-poisoning practices, we’re pretty well screwed. But, hey, the wealthy CEOs are getting rich, rich, rich NOW, so who cares if they’re killing all of humanity and wildlife, right?
2
-
2
-
@catshepherd3102 Exactly. I’m a few years older (Boomer here), and growing up after WWII, we heard about it all the time. Plus, many of our fathers fought in that war. I remember everyone saying, “ what we’re the Germans thinking, letting Hitler and the Nazis take over their country like that?” I know that the political landscape was different when Hitler came to power, but I think many of us now seeing trump come into power and the growing spread of misinformation, and especially conspiracy theories, as well as the seemingly complete takeover of the minds of the MAGA faction, I think we’re very much seeing what was going on in the minds of the German people at that time. Times were tough, especially financially, and they wanted someone strong to lead the country out of that. It’s a shame that the power of discernment isn’t very strong in a lot of people when they’re feeling desperate, and thank heavens there are, hopefully, enough people who have that power of discernment. If not, we’ll have a repeat of history.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I’ve got Kaiser, and I really loved it at first because deductibles were low, even on prescriptions, (it was from my husband’s work, and I found that the plan rates were very expensive. But they they were very good at fixing my broken toe. Anything beyond that they were not so good, and they are TERRIBLE at diagnosing. They fumble around trying to find what is wrong with you, but when it doesn’t work, they try something else, and if that doesn’t work they just throw up their hands and walk away. Or if you have pain that they can’t figure out, and especially if you’re a woman, they tell you’re probably just depressed and they write you a referral for psychiatry. I once had cancer and the doctor gave me what he called a “very aggressive” chemotherapy treatment. Yeah, it was that! It made me diabetic for life - DURING the first treatment! I was supposed to have sixteen treatments (!!!), but by the third treatment I knew I would be dead from the chemo long before the 16th treatment, so I quit after three. Just told him I didn’t want to die like that, and he was so mad at ME! I asked him what my chances were if I continued the full treatment and told me I had a 60/40 chance of still being alive after 5 years with the full treatment, and get this, he said I had a 50/50 chance of same without treatment. (And I had already had surgery to remove the tumor). I’m no mathematician, but it didn’t seem worth continuing treatment that might kill me for a measly 10% gain. I never went back, and here I am, fine after fifteen years. I started getting degenerative disk disease in my back, which I think the chemo also contributed to, so I ended up having three back surgeries, none of which did me a bit of good, just left me in constant pain. I don’t want to sound histrionic, but I feel they’ve ruined me. So, I’m not very amused with Kaiser anymore, and will only go there fore something relative minor like stitches or a broken foot. It’s so frustrating!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@robertl.fallin7062 Yes, I do understand that. Sadly. And not just the Republicans, but mainly the corporations who have bought them. The corporations get the idea and, nowadays, write the laws to permit those takeovers, and the Republicans in Congress put the laws into effect. I’ve also been reading The People’s History of the United States by Howard Zunn (highly, highly recommended), and I also learned that the U.S. never signed a treaty that it wasn’t willing to break, in one instance the very next day. Similarly attitude to the Central and South American takeovers. We have a truly ugly history in many ways, but, somehow most of us think (because that’s what we have been taught and propagandized to always believe) that we still have the best system, which is debatable, but I believe we still have to set an example, particularly in this instance, and that Democracy is fragile and requires constant attention. Ironic, but it’s Peru and Germany that have set that example this week.
1
-
1
-
1
-
On one hand I understand the nostalgia of “wishing we could go back to the 50s”, and while I agree that life seemed sweeter back then (esp. as a child), in many ways it was not. Certainly not for black people and women, but also for the many people who died or were crippled from polio, and died from the measles and other diseases we can now control or eradicate. When we think about going back to a, seemingly, idyllic time in our past, we have to remember how we viewed it as a much younger person and acknowledge all the bad things that were really happening in those times. I, personally, loved the ‘60s and ‘70s (or, at least the very early ‘70s), but I wouldn’t want to go back and re-experience the assassinations (JFK, RFK and MLK), the Vietnam War and the race riots, and many other things that were happening back then. Good times were not had by all.
1
-
1
-
It’s time for The Satanic Temple to head to Oklahoma schools to raise a stink about this. BTW, they do not believe in Satan, and they do not worship Satan. They’ve received church status from the government, so that they can go around to places like this and legally demand that if they can allow Christian teachings, they must, by law, also allow “Satanic” teachings as well. That is their shtick, and it has been very effective in shutting down these Christian-based teachings. They are in Florida right now about the Trans and LBGTQ+ issues. Surprisingly, they are on the right (not the political right, but the right side of the law), and they have been doing very well. I applaud them. They will probably go down in histhistory as the tool that broke Christofascism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As a Boomer who came along right after WWII, with a military father, and growing up hearing about Hitler and the Nazis, trump’s plans scare the beejebus out of me. How on earth did we come to this? Also, growing up in the South, I am very aware that racism has been continuing to fester under the surface, but I never thought it would come out to the surface, and so in-your-face again, and that it would cause or co-mingle with all these other ills of society, and cause this burning desire by a frighteningly large segment of our society for rule by authoritarianism. Seriously, I blame the farthest-right wing of the evangelicals, because, as the saying goes, “there’s no hate like Christian love”. One really has to feel like the ultimate victim to be able to want to control and avenge themselves on anyone and everyone who doesn’t agree with their singular beliefs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GenerationX1984 I would guess you are correct. I thought rape was a felony, yet almost no one (if anyone) has gone to jail for it. Wait, I take that back. There was the very high profile case of Brock Turner (a college student) who raped an unconscious female college student behind some dumpsters but was caught by a couple of guys riding by on their bicycle. But, of course, the judge felt sorry for ol’ Brock because he was a rich white boy, an athlete, and had such a “bright future” so he only gave him six months, which he later reduced to three. Of course, Brock returned to college none the worse so far as I can tell, but the young woman was, sadly, never able to because of her shame and the ridicule and scorn (and, probably, threats)heaped on her. The only good thing to come out of the whole situation was that the judge was forced to resign because of the public’s ridicule and condemnation. That was a horrific and tragic story, and, to my knowledge, the only one that made news because the guy went to jail. Oh, and I think the rapist of the 10-year old girl who got pregnant who Thom talks about in this story also got sent up, but, it is a very few and far-between result in our “fair and balanced” country.
1
-
1
-
@randyellis9460 He was a TERRIBLE president. Have you ever heard of Reaganomics, or “trickle down economics”? Did you get “trickled on” by the wealthy? And, since you’re a guy (I’m guessing from your name), I’m not even going to go into the ways his programs were specifically terrible for women, because, being a guy, you undoubtedly wouldn’t have noticed (and I not saying it’s because men are stupid, or bad, at all, but men really don’t tend to notice things that affect other people, especially women). I’m betting you are aware of Project 2025, right? Do you know that the Heritage Foundation also had a Mandate for Leadership (the lead title for Project 2025) in 1981 (I just learned that a couple of days ago myself), and it included things like overturning Roe v. Wade and outlawing contraception, but, fortunately, Reagan didn’t get that far, but he did start some of the lowering of standards and benefits to women, and caused the loss of government jobs for women in Washington D.C., including the percentage of women in both houses of Congress in the following election for Congressional seats. And he also brought in the cuts to education, which is why he have the expression “the dumbing down of America” now. He/they did that. They intentionally lowered the standards of education because they know that the “poorly educated”, (as trump called them, to their faces, and they effing cheered), are much easier to manipulate. Trump is both the outgrowth of those policies as well as a racist reaction to us having had a Black President.
1
-
@randyellis9460 He was a terrible president! He also gutted education. That’s where the phrase “the dumbing down of America” came from. He did that. And he also implemented ‘Reganomics” that wrecked the middle class with his “trickle down theory”, that if you give more tax cuts to big corporations, saying they would use their extra money to uplift their workers, which would improve the economy. How did that work out? Of course, in their greed, they just bought more yachts and jets and stock buybacks, and put the rest in offshore accounts. Just as Trump’s tax cuts did, because they were only for the wealthy and corporations. And it’s because they both were pushed by The Heritage Foundation, the ones who recently created Project 2025 (A Mandate for Leadership). Funny thing, they also had a Mandate for Leadership in 1981, which had some of the same ideas, the only difference being that Project 2025 goes even further, and trump is all for it even though he won’t openly admit it. But the Republicans in Congress are almost all are on board.
1
-
1
-
1
-
This mirrors what I’ve been telling people: whenever I see a comment to vote Harris/Walz, I always add, “and vote Democratic in every single race in your state, city, county and city race, as well as school boards, justices, even dog catcher, whatever is on your ballot, all the way down, VOTE”. Because the Republicans want to take over every single office in the entire country in order to have complete control by Project 2025 people, and we have to stop it now in this year’s elections.
1
-
We’ve been trying for over 100 years to get the Equal Rights Amendment put into the Constitution, but they shoot it down EVERY YEAR. Every time they do that, it needs to be widely publicized, but even that doesn’t happen. We almost never hear about it. The Supreme Court, in 2020, shot it down, so that just makes it harder. Of course, they did that because I think they already knew that Roe v. Wade was going to be on the docket soon, and they wanted to kill that. Roe v. Wade could never have been killed if we had the Equal Rights Amendment in the Constitution. BTW, the text of the Equal Rights Amendment says “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.” Short, sweet and succinct, right? Yet it was first written AND put before Congress for a vote in 1923 (yes, 1923!), and it has been put before Congress for a vote every single term (year) since then. That should give you an idea of where we stand.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mattgeiger8247 Our “natural” gas prices in Southern California (home heating and stove/oven) just DOUBLED, almost without warning. Last summer, air conditioning prices DOUBLED between the hours of noon and 6 pm, and this year I fully expect that will extend to all day. A lot of the elderly will be dying due to either the cold or the heat. I know that SoCal doesn’t have nearly the extremes (at least in the winter) of say, Minnesota, but it’s still pretty chilly (I know, we’ll get by), and in the summer, it’s regularly getting to be over 100° in the daytime, lasting for a number of weeks. Plus, I expect the states hardest hit by winter cold will adopt the same policies soon enough. Hey, as long as a few fat cats get even richer, who gives a damn about old “useless” people dying, right? Or, even working people having to spend that kind of money out of an already beleaguered paycheck.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@23buzzchopper He did say that back in the 90s, or around that time, but now that he’s a politician and his party’s platform has changed so drastically, if he doesn’t say it publicly we can’t assume he still stands on that, because doing so would mean he’s not standing with the party, and he’s not going to take the chance of alienating his party, or, especially, his donors. He once said he was pro-choice, but now he takes great pride in letting his base know that it was because of him that Roe v. Wade was overturned. He publicly said, “I did that”. So, no, don’t trust what you “think” he means, or “know” what he means, he has to come out and say it, and take action on that, but that isn’t going to happen. And contraceptives are next on the chopping block.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AuntieMamies There’s a LOT of SA, other violence and killings in it. It’s pretty brutal, so I could see why some schools ban it for children. However, for us adult women, I HIGHLY recommend it because there are a lot of male politicians in this country who seem to want to make a lot of the situations in the book national policy. They very much want to control women, and force women to have babies. Also, although it’s technically fiction, the author, Margaret Atwood, has stated (in interviews) that every single one of the things that were done to women in the book has actually happened to women in various places and times throughout history. It’s very eye-opening, terrifying, and serves as a warning to us women. I often say that while we see it as a warning, the Republicans (mostly men, of course) see it as a blueprint. Watch it or read it and you’ll see what I mean.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brett_rose The problem is with what they decide IS pornography. For example, they want to pass a law saying contraceptives are pornographic, therefore contraceptives won’t be able to be shipped or mailed to women anywhere. And, if they ban abortion nationwide, and some states still have it, they’ll call any medical instruments used for that purpose to be pornographic, so hospitals in blue states that still have abortion won’t be able to get those medical instruments shipped from the manufacturers. Theyll also ban the shipment of other medical instruments that are used for other, regular gynecological exams, like speculums, because they might also be used during abortions. They’ll shut down a lot of publishers because they think books for school age kids that even mention a kid having two fathers or two mothers is considered pornographic. There are so many other things that they will decide are pornographic that really aren’t related to what we normally consider “porn”. Think back to the Victorian Era or even the Puritan Era, and that’s what they’re going for. It won’t just be for books, movies or videos of people performing s*xual acts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidlafleche1142 So, does your explicitly Christian monarchy have any room for Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, or any other religions, or even atheists? Will they even be allowed? If so, will they even be accepted, or treated differently? Not to mention that the U.S. Constitution explicitly calls for a separation of church and state in the First Amendment, where it says there will be no laws establishing a religion, nor any laws prohibiting a religion. And why use only YOUR religion? Besides, in your quote from the Bible, the Kingdom is already established in Jerusalem, so why wouldn’t you just move there and leave our country out of it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Thank you for bringing this up! You are so right. Even as I watch our rights getting chipped away, I check out the turnout to various women’s marches and I see a handful of women in each of various cities around the country, or maybe a hundred or two hundred in Washington, D.C. I think one of the problems is that they’re not highly advertised in a city, and they’re usually mentioned in the news at about 11:30 at night the night before, if they’re even mentioned at all. The only reason I find out about the annual Women’s March in January in my city is because I signed up to be on the list of people to notify, and about 98% of the emails I get from that organization are requests for donations. And the only reason I found out about the recent women’s “strike” was because I remembered to look it up. There is just not nearly enough talk about them (could it be because most news networks are owned by men??). We need to organize loudly like they did for the big national Women’s March right after trump was elected, and we need to get thousands and thousands of women in every city to come out, and millions in the very large cities, maybe, every month (and, now maybe daily, as you say) to begin to wake people up. I’m so thrilled to see that you want to get your daughters involved. It would be so great to see them together with so many women who are in this Sisterhood together, and to be able to show them that we can change this country, for them as well as ourselves, because we absolutely have to!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ErichSemmelweisEffectFromm I know exactly what you mean. I have had many of my comments deleted for the last couple of months, sometimes for seemingly unobtrusive reasons. Apparently, they often don’t like words da*n and he*l, while it seems they don’t have a problem with other people using them. I do tend to “sprinkle” my conversations with these words on occasion, but I’m now trying to “be good” like my mother tried to make me (a serious failure on her part). I’ve already been bumped from the comment section a couple of times, and I guess I’m just going to have to control myself in this “oh, so polite space” (sarcasm).
I looked up Erich Fromm books on Amazon, and I’m going to have to get a couple. I’m sure I’ve read at least one. Good choices.
And, it’s ironic that we see the Semmelweiss Effect/Reflex in everyday politics these days. And, yes, I can see how that in itself could easily relate to that Ger*an political party and it’s followers. It’s mind-boggling in the 21st Century, but many people can’t seem to free themselves from the past. But then, there are many human tendencies that I simply can’t understand.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Skedawg88 That’s because the Heritage Foundation (the people who wrote Project 2025) also wrote a similar project for Reagan in 1981, and Reagan adopted about 80% of it. (This information was learned right here on a Thom Hartmann video not too long ago). It was less radical then, because those were different times, but now they’re feeling emboldened to go all the way with their plans. They also wanted, under Reagan, to make big cuts to the Department of Education, which Reagan did, and which started what we now call “the dumbing down of America”, because they have always known that the less educated people are, the more easily the can be manipulated, and that has worked perfectly for them as trump has been elected twice (although it’s starting to come out how this election was rigged), and why trump said, “I love the poorly educated”. And now they want to eliminate the Department of Education entirely.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It’s definitely not right. And in their effort to shame or punish unmarried women who have sex, they are also badly hurting married women who want to have a baby but it turns out to be an ectopic pregnancy (deadly) or the fetus dies in the womb and won’t leave until at nine months or so, so the woman can contract sepsis, a body-wide infection that can also kill her. Because the medical term for removing these extremely dangerous conditions is also abortion, the state will not allow it, even when the woman’s life is in grave danger, and even when it may leave her unable to ever become pregnant again. I’m so sick of anti-abortion people saying “she should just keep her legs together”. It’s not only insulting to young women who don’t get pregnant without someone else (male) involved (which is why I also hate the old saying “she got herself pregnant”. Umm, no she didn’t do that by herself), it’s also very dangerous for married women, and women WILL die, it’s just a matter of time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hmmm, Ukraine has Lithium….like for batteries for Teslas? Oh, the irony! And the fact that the mines are in the Donetsk/Donbas region that Putin says is “Russian”, therefore, his. And Putin is advancing his soldiers closer and closer to the mines everyday, as the Ukrainian military is continually pushing them back. And no matter how much trump and Putin are, supposedly, “friends”, Putin would go in and dig up as much as possible before trump could lay his hands on an ounce of it. I amuse myself thinking how trump would react to Putin stealing it all before he could get any. He’d find out real fast what Putin thinks of their “friendship”. Guys like Putin don’t have “friends”. Not real ones, only people he can manipulate and use. Hmmm, kind of like trump, huh? Both are narcissists and megalomaniacs, so that stands to reason. The chutzpah of Trump to demand fully HALF of Ukraine’s minerals!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What’s next, Thom? I have a feeling they (esp. the religious fanatics) will be bringing back Witch Hunts, Trials and Burnings (or at least some form of execution). Remember that a lot of Witch Trials in the 16th and 17th Centuries involved women who were midwives and herbalists who could give a woman a remedy for pregnancy. Even Benjamin Franklin wrote a guide for remedies, including a couple of herbs that could “restore menses”, which means, of course, abortion. I just read a wonderful book on the history of the Witch Trials called Caliban and the Witch by Silvia Federici, and I highly recommend it. The way we seem to be going back in time socially, I don’t think I would be too surprised to see that happen. Did you know that the Witch Trials lasted nearly 200 years (!),and they hanged and burned (along with tortured and killed in other ways) around 200,000 women? I know if I were a woman of reproductive age, married or not, and I lived in a Red state, I would definitely move to a Blue state (in fact, I did, in my 20s, even though this insanity was years in the future at that time, and Roe v. Wade was still law).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@normaowens7569 Well, a lot of women need what is medically termed “abortion” when it is not to get rid of an unwanted pregnancy, like removing remaining fetal tissue after a miscarriage when the fetus has already died, and has already been mostly expelled, and women are literally dying because of it. Also, the removal of an ectopic pregnancy (a fetus growing in a different part of the body than the uterus *the womb), usually in the fallopian tube, which connects the uterus to the ovary. That will always kill the mother if not removed, and the fetus as well, but it is still called “abortion”, and therefore illegal. We need to get the medical industry to change the terminology of those procedures that are not to end unwanted pregnancies but to save the woman’s life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Minimum 5-year sentence sounds wonderful, but does ANYBODY here really think trump will ever see the inside of a prison, or even jail? These DAs or lawyers have already told trump, several days ago, that if he doesn’t quit threatening or saying nasty things about, or doxxing the judges, lawyers or jurors, he’ll be arrested and held until the trial, yet he’s still out there doing just those things. Everyone is enraged about it, but he’s still out in the sun. I know it’s unprecedented to jail a former President, but, if they don’t, it just proves there’s a two-tier justice system and the law is toothless, at least for “important” people. Which will only give him or the next guy to do even worse in the future.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pidgenki It’s killing PEOPLE. And there will be more dying, especially with all his cuts to USAID, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, etc.m not to mention how some of those “criminals” in El Salvador will probably get unalived in their prison, as well as Gaza, etc., etc., etc. Just like with COVID, people start dying every time he gets into office, so, this time absolutely has to be the last, for him, and for us.
1
-
@michah7214 What is? Are you talking about the Equal Rights Amendment? It is not, and never has been entered into the Constitution. It was first written and presented to Congress in 1923, yes, 101 years ago, and it has been brought again before Congress EVERY year since then, but it has always been shot down by Congress. Also, the ONLY right women have in the Constitution is the right to vote, but, apparently, they think they can remove it because there was one other Amendment in the Constitution that got removed, and that was the Prohibition Act, so that gives them their “precedent” requirement.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I absolutely agree with you. We’re never “gone”, we cannot cease to exist at our base conscious, or energy level, only our physical bodies “die”. I recommend a book called The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot. I never understood anything about physics before reading that, but I was always interested in “things we can’t see or touch” (as in the spiritual realm) because I’ve, throughout my lifetime, had a number of “unexplainable” experiences, but he (Michael Talbot) explains how it all makes sense when you understand even a little bit about quantum physics. It was first published in 1991, so it’s a few decades old, but I found it fascinating, and it explained a lot about those “unexplainable” things. And I agree our loved ones do come to visit us (and so do our pets), and, if we’re paying attention at all, we somehow “feel” them. I know we can communicate with them. I’m sorry for your loss of his physical presence, but he’s still there and checking in on you (in a good way, of course).
1
-
1
-
1
-
On top of this, I just watched a video last night about how trump was laundering untold millions of dollars for Russian oligarchs through his properties all through the 90s, and likely beyond. He has always been such a lousy businessman that the only way he could dig himself out of his financial losses has been money laundering and huge donations by foreign entities and, of course, his blinded-by-love (and extreme ignorance) base of fans. He has always been essentially a mob boss, completely without scruples or concern for anyone other than himself. To save our country, we must make absolutely sure that he, and any of his supporters, especially those in Congress, can never, ever hold office again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Isn’t it interesting how both times trump “got elected” (I still think he cheated, at least in 2024, and now evidence is coming out) many people started dying. In his first term, it was because he ignored Covid for too long, and now he is ramping it up with cutting the vaccines as well as allowing many people to starve because of cutting Medicare and Medicaid, and, if he cuts Social Security, many, many more, esp, elderly, people will end up dying from starvation in the streets. I’ve heard that his father always told him, that to succeed you had to be a “killer”, and I think trump took it to heart, literally, not just metaphorically. I think he derives a feeling of power knowing that people actually die (even children!) because of his actions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
My greatest fear. That will be the end of our democracy, and we will have “President trump” for the rest of his unnatural life, just like Putin and Erdogan did. (May it be very, very short, please). I cringe when I think who he’ll appoint as his successors, Don, Jr.? Gaachk! Ivanka? Pleeeze no! Iwill leave this country I have loved so. Hubby has no desire to move anywhere, but if that happens, I will go by myself if I have to. I would prefer to move to New Zealand, but they have very strict immigration rules now, plus I’m elderly and disabled, so my only chance would be to apply as a refugee or ask for asylum. Otherwise, it would be off to Mexico, which I absolutely adore anyway. Maybe I could get a job as an intern archaeologist assistant on some of their incredible archaeological sites, like Teotihuacán. And the immersion in the language and culture would help my language skills greatly. That would give me great joy, whereas staying here under a fascistic regime would probably make me start thinking about offing myself. I would have to go somewhere else, almost anywhere else.
1
-
1
-
@wuffy68 And it’s not just the number of people who didn’t vote: it’s starting to come to light how trump, with the help of Elon, actually cheated and rigged the election. I recommend a video (in YouTube) by Marc Thompson where he has a guest, Nathan Taylor from Election Truth Alliance on. This is a new group who are studying the tabulators of the election machines, and they’re showing some incredible numbers in statistics, with really understandable graphs and charts (and, believe me, I know very little about statistics, but even I could understand it easily). Also, a documentary (free on YouTube) called Vigilantes, Inc. by Greg Palast, showing how millions of voters were disenfranchised just before the election without their knowledge, until they went to vote. Both show tha Kamala actually won, or would have win without the rigging.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Very good analogy! The battered wives also often say, “But I LOVE him”, (and that’s exactly what one battered wife said to me when she confided in me), like that makes it worth all the damage he inflicts on them, and that’s exactly what the MAGAts are saying, because they somehow think that he loves them, too. And they will continue to “love” him even when he starts destroying their own lives. My only hope is that enough of them will have finally had enough one of these days,and turn on him. It only takes a relatively small percentage of them to turn on him before he will come crashing down. But, of course, he will have done so much damage to all of us, including our country and our democracy before that happens.
1
-
@lifeofdan9938 The system is NOT “broken”. In fact, it is well-known in the government as the single most effective, efficient and well-run governmental organization. All those negative things you’ve heard are lies by the Republican Party to make you think it’s in trouble and only they can fix it, when they really just want to steal all the money that we working (and formerly working) people paid into all our lives. Sure, it takes a little out of each paycheck (and your employer also has to match that payment for each and every employee), so it is an insurance program for your old age. I’m a 75-year old disabled senior, and it is now my only income, but you wanna take that away from me and leave me destitute? How will I pay for my medications? How will I pay for my food? Since I paid into it for over 30+ years of working, I should just starve? The plan has been working very well for many years, and since what I get is MY money, I am absolutely entitled to it, because it was a promise made to me by my government. You can take it away from me over my cold dead body, but not before that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sccxvelo Yup, Reagan really got it going downhill fast. Nixon got a start on it with his “Southern Strategy” to give “deals” to the Southern Baptists and the evangelicals in exchange for their vote (which is exact what trump did for the evangelicals: he promised them he would do whatever he could to overturn Roe in exchange for their vote, and that’s how he won), but Reagan had the Koch brothers and the Heritage Foundation whispering in his ear, advising him on policy. Yes, that’s the same Heritage Foundation that wrote Project 2025. They had a Mandate for Leadership (which is the name for Project 2025) playbook, and they had a version for 1981, which Reagan was happy to adopt. That’s when he began serious cuts to Education, which became what we colloquially call “the dumbing down of America”. They wanted to do that because they knew that people with lower education levels are more easily manipulated. It was spectacularly successful, and that’s how we got trump and MAGA. And now Heritage wants to completely do away with the Department of Education. They are, of course, mostly Christian Nationalists. And The Federalist Society is a separate, Catholic, Uber-conservative, and equally scary group which I consider the “judicial version” of The Heritage Foundation, as they are the group (headed by Leonard Leo) that picks a list of the most conservative judges in the country to hand to whichever conservative President is in office when there is an opening on the Supreme Court, which is where trump got the names of the three he picked. Both organizations have had a well-oiled machine in place for quite a few years, and I find their machinations terrifying. And that is why we absolutely cannot allow trump to get back in the White House.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@acknickulus Having grown up in the South in the 60s and 70s, I understand your point only too well. However, at the same time, that was a period of great change and improvement, including Civil Rights, the attempt at Equal Rights for women (which still has not passed), and others. And people stopped hanging other people from trees. Unfortunately, there are many people who want to go back to the social practices of and before the Civil War, which is incomprehensible to me, I’ll take the 60s and 70s over that and our current situation any day (except for the issue you raised, of course). We were at, in some areas, on the trajectory for improvement, and now much of our society and government seems to have put us in reverse, and is putting their foot on the pedal, and I feel we are completely doomed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
After the opioid crisis made lots of news, the FDA made a judgement in around 2016 to make it more difficult to get pain meds so that, hopefully, people wouldn’t accidentally die from an overdose in their prescribed pain medication, which their patients weren’t doing anyway. It also didn’t occur to them that when people are in that much pain and can’t get their medicines, they’re much more likely to go to the “wrong” side of the street to buy anything that will relieve their pain, from any ol’ guy on the street. It has hurt millions of people in pain, and what they don’t understand is that prescribed pain pills are not the sameme thing as Fentanyl, which is much easier to overdose on because a doctor wasn’t there to tell the person how to use it safely. However, in about 2020, the FDA finally realized their mistake and issued a new statement, a correction, saying that it’s OK to give their patients their pain medication as prescribed as long as their doctor monitors their condition. Unfortunately, it seems the doctors did not read the report, and are not aware of the new recommendations, so they’re still freaking out over how dangerous opioids are. I enjoy taking a copy of the newer report (I just print it out after I Google it) to my doctors and explaining the update. They are usually pretty surprised when they find out that their “ordinary” patient actually knows about it, has the wherewithal to look it up and print it, and, finally, to be able to explain it to the doctor. I have gotten a couple of my medications reinstated that way, and I’ve got one more to go, at my next appointment next week.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We didn’t “allow” it the second time. He had “special electronic help” from Elon. Remember his quote right after the election was called? “Elon really knows those vote counting machines. And Elon “journeyed” to Pennsylvania, and now I’m your President.” He always thinks he’s so clever when he tells on himself. And, he has literally said, “It was rigged,” and “We rigged it”, more than once. Why would he say that if it weren’t true, and he was proud of it, and knew nobody would think he actually meant it, so he’d get away with it, which he has…so far. (But information is coming out. Be prepared!) He was actually telling the truth right there. It will all come out soon. Yeah, Kamala would have won by close to 4 million, (or even more) votes. Think about that! I know he’s been there a few months, but I hope we can still convince Kamala Harris and Tim Walz to take their rightful places in the White House! They will deserve a literal Triumphant March (Verdict style) to the White House. I will even fly to D.C. for that!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Merriwether-w8k A whole lot of us remember that. I remember the actual day they allowed women to get a credit card in her name, even if she were single. I was in my early to mid-twenties, and the day I read the news, I went straight to a bank to get a credit card, simply because I could, and also to develop a credit rating. I’m also old enough to remember the day when “The Pill” was legalized, even for unmarried wome, because, even though I was not sexually active at that time, it rocked my world. Before that, we knew that our (women’s) lifepath was pretty strictly as you will get married and you will have children (and bake apple pies), because there was really no other choice. On that day, for the first time in my life I realized that I now had a CHOICE of whether I wanted the "biologically dictated” life, or if I wanted to go to college and develop a career. And tben when Roe v. Wade was passed, I also realized that even if the Pill failed (as we were constantly reminded that it could) I would still be able to continue on the school and career path. it was a major life shift for women. and the Women's Rights Movement was born, and (tied with the Vietnam War), the Hippie Movement was also born). Those were heady, and exciting times!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Thank you! I feel her passion, and I absolutely agree.
Also, why isn’t the fact that the Equal Rights Amendment has not been put into the Constitution in the news EVERY DAY? It was fully ratified by the 38th state in January of 2020, and yet Senators in Congress are still fighting against it. Why??? If it had been put into the Constitution, Roe v. Wade could NOT have been overturned. But we NEVER hear about that on the news. Why not? Do they think the ladies are too dumb to understand it, or are they afraid the women WILL understand it and do something about it?
Ladies, if you think women have equal rights in this country, sorry to tell you, but we do not. Not if it’s not in the Constitution.
Also, ladies, please don’t forget that women are 51% of the U.S. population, which means that we are the MAJORITY, not a minority. We need to act on that and use that power.
I’ve been posting this information almost every day in various locations, and, for whatever reason, nobody ever says anything about it. So, Thom, maybe I’ll have to give you a call and do what Sonia did, but about the ERA.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Thom, please do a show on a woman named Savita Halappanaver in Ireland who died because she was refused healthcare to remove her dead fetus because the medical term for removing a dead fetus is still “abortion”, and Ireland is a Catholic country. Someone released her name and photo (her husband, I think), and immediately thousands of people in Ireland started marching in the streets carrying posters with her photo and name on them. Ireland very quickly made abortion legal in the country. Also, please mention there there have been news reports that maternal mortality rates have been going up in red states since Roe was overturned, which means that more women literally are dying because of that ruling. We desperately need to get some names and photos of women who have died because of these medieval practices so that we, too, can put them on posters and get out in the streets. I know hospitals would never release that information, and I think media is afraid of putting them in the news, but if these women’s husbands and families would release them, we could take it from there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That happens with, probably, the majority of the members of Congress, and it’s because of the bribery (especially by lobbyists) Thom talks about here, and because of insider trading where they get advance notice of when to buy certain stocks, which is not “supposed to” happen, but, of course, it does. There have been a number of complaints in recent years about Nancy Pelosi and her husband, and Dianne Feinstein doing the same, but, of course, many others, including the Republicans do the same. In fact, I would venture to guess that many of them decided to run for Congress just because of the money they can make there, rather than what they can actually do for the American people.
1
-
1
-
Unfortunately, he’s already been impeached a couple of times, and what good did that do us? And that was because all the Republicans let him off the hook, and, right now, we have more Republicans in Congress than when trump was in office the first time. So it’s up to US now. We have to get in the streets by the thousands and thousands everyday and in every city in the country (and there will be a protest happening in YOUR nearest, biggest city on Monday, the 17th (yes, THIS coming Monday, which is President’s Day [or what some are calling “Not My President’s Day]) in front of either your Capitol, or City Hall, or possibly the Courthouse (you’ll have to look it up). Don’t forget to take your signs. We also need to call our Senators and Representatives every day and remind them that they work for US, not trump, because WE are the ones who vote. The Capitol Switchboard number is 202-224-3121, and there’s a very cool app called 5 Calls that tell you who your Senator or Representatives are (if you don’t know), and they have a list of issues to talk about, and they even provide a script to read if you’re not comfortable or don’t know what to say. You won’t be talking directly to your Senator or Reps, but to their office, and your Senators and Reps will be getting the message. If enough of us do this every day, they will see these messages mounting up, and, if they want to get re-elected (and that is definitely what they want), they will realize they have to start acting - for us.its time to activate NOW if we want to take our country back from the traitors and foreign entities/enemies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I spent my years growing up thinking I was middle class, and I WAS, and all my family was (Boomer here), but at almost the exact time that I got old enough to work (in the 70s), I was suddenly firmly in the working- to poor class. I always had to work two jobs just to have an apartment and pay my bills (including my student loan, of course, even though I had to leave college after only two years because the government aid program changed), and then along came Reagan, and things only got worse. Now I’m on Social Security, and if trump cuts it, like he says he will, I’ll be royally screwed. Well, at least the early to mid 70s were fun (as a hippie).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bernie had the right idea, but they (the neoliberals) had to stop him cold when he proved to be immensely popular with the younger generation. They couldn’t allow him to seriously challenge the good thing they had going. Funny, too, is how they used sexism against him by claiming that all the attacks against Hillary were sexism and misogyny. No, Hillary was/is a neoliberal, so she had the whole system behind her, and the claims of sexism worked in her favor. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a die-hard feminist, but Hillary’s neoliberalism was the wrong direction, which turned off a lot of voters, but it allowed 45 to be slipped in by the right-wingers as well as his own overbearing ego.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@noheroespublishing1907 As I did with another commenter, I have to recommend the book, The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot. It was first published in 1991, so it’s a few decades old, but he made a good argument that quantum physics can explain esoteric, or “spiritual” phenomena. I don’t know what has changed in quantum physics since then, or if it has discredited that view (because people do love to discredit anything spiritual, or “unseeable”, not that we’ve ever seen a quantum particle (unless that has changed), but we can see its results, just like we can’t actually see wind or electricity, but we can definitely observe their effects, and often control them for our benefit. Just a thought.
1
-
Not at all. I think it was Albert Camus who said “Hell is other people”, and to some extent that’s true. It’s our energetic field interacting with other people’s energetic fields, controlled to a large extent, while in a physical body, by our thoughts, emotions, opinions, and other subconscious thought processes, that cause each other discomfort and distress. When our physical bodies die, that “eternal” aspect of us goes somewhere else, and possibly have positive interactions with that of other’s. I’m looking forward to finding out someday soon-ish.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Right on, Norma! I don’t get out much, but I’m continually making comments on YouTube about Project 2025, women’s rights and the Equal Rights Amendment. Strangely, most of my comments about the ERA, especially when connected to SCOTUS overturning Dobbs (reproductive rights), get deleted. I think someone doesn’t like that I make a clear connection between the two, but there is one. Like Norma, I’ve started to hear more people talking about Project 2025, so I hope it’s at least partly because I keep talking it up so much. Unfortunately, because of my other comments about the ERA getting deleted, I’m not hearing anything back about that, but I wish somebody would start making videos about it (Thom, are you listening??).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Unfortunately, the Patriarchy isn’t relegated to “the bad ol’ days”. Just like racism, it has gotten only more open and rampant since, especially, trump coming to the forefront of the news in the last seven or eight years (just think about Roe v. Wade being overturned and all the anti-abortion laws put into place, primarily being passed by rich, white men, as well as, possibly, anti-contraception laws coming up). I’m just very glad that it’s being newly exposed and explained, and that people are ‘getting it”. Maybe, just maybe, this Barbie movie will make a real difference, and that it can be sustained. Who’da thunk, eh? (From another woman very, very close in age to you).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chriswolff3893 Don’t discount boomer’s notice so quickly. We grew up in a country that was at it’s peak, shortly after WWII, and were frequently seeing news about the war and Hitler and his fascism. Then we witnessed the gradual decline of that peak from the mid-70s onward. Then it took a serious nosedive after Reagan, and through the Tea Party, and now the “Age of Trump”. I realized the minute he announced his first run that he was a dictator wannabe. The signs were all there. Granted, many didn’t see it, and I suppose it was partly because I grew up in a military family, saw many of my classmates get sent to Vietnam, so many of whom never returned, and I was also a hippie, as many of us were. Lots of us have had exposure to information about what was “really” going on. Sadly, many didn’t, but you can’t throw all Boomers into one box of people who were unaware, plus, the majority of trumpers are the following generation and younger. So, don’t try to pin this on Boomers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They’re doing it, they say, for religious reasons; the old “thou shall not kill” thing in the Bible, but, in actuality, it is primarily to punish and control young unmarried women who get pregnant, but, of course it also causes great danger, not only to the young unmarried women, but also to married women (but they really hate all women, so it serves their purpose). Plus, they’re worried about the population rate in America going down, and they’re scared to death they won’t have enough (poor) cheap labor in the future, so forcing women to have babies will help fill that gap. And that’s not mentioning that they’re racist and xenophobic, and they’re pushing a lie called “The Great Replacement Theory” wherein they’re also afraid that, since brown and black people generally have more babies than white people , and they’re so afraid there will be a higher population of brown and black people than white people in the country in the future, which is why they’re ALSO so opposed to people crossing the Southern border, because a majority of them are brow-skinned. Oh, and there was also a “secret” program implemented by Ronald Reagan back in the 80s we call “The Dumbing Down of America” wherein they lowered the educational standards in the country (it was pretty darned exceptional before that) because they (and when I say “they” I’m generally referring to Republicans as well as the wealthy donors to politicians who suck up to them by passing the laws they want), because they knew that poorly educated people fall for their lies if they push them enough, which means they can convince them to vote them into office; and also poor people can be swayed by promises to improve the economy, yet the economy has been on an almost 40 year decline. Doesn’t it all make sense now? I know, it’s convoluted.
We had pretty good abortion guidelines to follow laid out in our Roe v. Wade law which was put into law FIFTY years ago, but the radical Christians (evangelicals) on the Supreme Court had to go and throw it out last year. And we also have the First Amendment which basically calls for Separation of Church and State (as well as a couple of other things), but these radical Christians in the Supreme Court are simply ignoring that.
So, there’s all the brutal, ugly truth.
1