Comments by "KGS" (@kgs2280) on "Thom Hartmann Program" channel.

  1. 393
  2. 171
  3. 158
  4. 129
  5. 122
  6. 86
  7. 69
  8. 65
  9. 62
  10. 59
  11. 57
  12. 57
  13. 55
  14. 53
  15. 50
  16. 46
  17. 46
  18. 44
  19. 40
  20. 38
  21. 38
  22. 36
  23. 34
  24. 32
  25. 31
  26. 31
  27. 31
  28. 31
  29. 30
  30. 30
  31. 29
  32. 29
  33. 28
  34. 28
  35. 28
  36. 27
  37. 27
  38. 25
  39. 25
  40. 25
  41. 25
  42. 24
  43. 24
  44. 24
  45. 24
  46. 24
  47. 22
  48. 22
  49. 21
  50. 21
  51. 21
  52. 21
  53. 21
  54. 21
  55. 21
  56. 21
  57. 20
  58. 20
  59. 19
  60. 19
  61. 19
  62. Ladies, don’t EVER tell a professor or boss or anyone who must give you permission for time off for any healthcare what that healthcare is. If they ask (which they shouldn’t in the first place) tell them that it’s private, and between you and your doctor, and don’t give in to any pressure from them. (If they continue to pressure you, tell them you’ll have to confer with your lawyer or the administration whether or not they’re allowed to ask you that - NOT whether or not you have to answer). They have no right to even ask you, and much less to punish you in any way for taking the time off, whether that’s by firing you or dropping you from a class. When I was young and “dumb” (and, frankly, I don’t know what the law was at that time and in that state), I made that mistake when I asked my boss for one day off. It was for a tubal ligation for which I already had an appointment. He told me he would fire me if I took the day off for that. Fortunately, I was working for a concession company inside another company run by women and we all got along well together. I went to the head of that company and told her what was going on, and would she be interested in hiring me at that company. I said bye to my previous boss on Thursday, had my surgery on Friday, and was at work on Monday morning at the bigger company, and at the same location. My old boss saw me there and asked what I was doing there and I smiled and said “I work here now. See? I told you I only needed one day off”. I was very lucky I was able to get that job, but the moral of the story is just don’t tell anyone what kind of healthcare you need.its none of their business.
    19
  63. 19
  64. 18
  65. 18
  66. 18
  67. 18
  68. 18
  69. 18
  70. 17
  71. 17
  72. 17
  73. 17
  74. 17
  75. 16
  76. 16
  77. 16
  78. 16
  79. 16
  80. 16
  81. 15
  82. 15
  83. Thom, that was excellent, and chilling. I think you’re very correct on that account, and think you ought to expand that thinking into a full-length book, á la 1984 or The Handmaid’s Tale. If you did that, I know it would be a best-seller (I’m sure that at least all your fans would buy it), and it would be a very stark warning to many still thinking “everything will work out”, if it gets published in time. People really need to wake up and realize the truth of what’s already in front of our eyes. I have been saying for the last couple of years that if trump gets elected again, he will immediately set himself up as President-For- Life, as in, a dictator, and we’ll never have free and fair elections again. Now, he and the GOP are actually telegraphing their plans for this country, and you nailed a lot of what they’re now saying they would do. Please write that book! (I’d do it myself, but I’m no writer). People need to have it laid out for them. Who knows, maybe I’ll see you in prison in the future anyway, as I’ve been very vocal about my feelings about trump and his shills. Yeah, I know, I’m a woman, and we’ll probably be be in separate prisons, but I also imagine they’ll be bussing women to men’s prisons to see to the men’s physical “needs” to keep the men from rioting too often. Then again, I’m also an “old” woman (within just a couple of years from your age), and as such, they’ll probably be “eliminating” older women because, by their lights, we simply are of no more use to society as we can no longer reproduce.
    15
  84. 15
  85. 15
  86. 15
  87. 15
  88. 15
  89. 15
  90. 14
  91. 14
  92. 14
  93. 14
  94. 14
  95. 14
  96. 14
  97. 14
  98. 14
  99. 13
  100. 13
  101. 13
  102. 13
  103. 13
  104. 13
  105. 13
  106. 13
  107. 13
  108. I’m so glad you covered how the Democrats and the Republicans “switched places”, and you used the term “Dixiecrats”. It is all very true, and I don’t think enough people realize it. The Vietnam War was the first time I got at all political as I was a hippie at the time, so, of course, I was anti-war, especially anti-stupid wars in which we shouldn’t have gotten involved in the first place, and Vietnam was one of those situations. I learned that there’s almost no war, in any country in the world that the U.S. won’t happily jump into as war is extremely lucrative, and it also increases our appearance of power. And there’s almost no war in any country in the world that the U.S. wouldn’t happily create, for the same reasons, though they’ll make up some humanitarian-sounding reason even when there’s absolutely nothing humanitarian about it. I also have the Kent State shooting by the National Guard etched into my consciousness as I was in college in Florida at the same time those students were getting gunned down in Ohio. (That was also Nixon, well before Reagan). Then, as I am a woman, I got very involved in the feminist movement, and it’s still my primary socio-political interest. This past few years has really brought that topic, along with their motivations for sublimating women even more egregiously than they have in the last fifty years. They really want to go back to living in the past when it comes to controlling and punishing, and even damaging and/or killing women and girls. You know, real “pro-life” stuff (*sarcasm). I’m definitely a Democratic Socialist, á la Bernie Sanders, and possibly going a bit to the left of that ideal as well. The things that the “other side” is doing now are so regressive and harmful, especially with its adoption of far-right Christianity that it’s actually frightening, and we must stay very aware of everything they’re up to and crush it with our votes and our voices. We need to get into the streets of every city in the country by multiples of thousands every day that we are able to. This political takeover HAS to be stopped or we will definitely descend into fascism, which can happen very quickly, and that’s something I NEVER want to see in this magnificent country. I hope I didn’t rant too long, but you got me fired up! Thank you for all your great informative programs.
    13
  109. 13
  110. 12
  111. 12
  112. 12
  113. 12
  114. 12
  115. 12
  116. 12
  117. 12
  118. 12
  119. 12
  120. 12
  121. 12
  122. 11
  123. 11
  124. 11
  125. 11
  126. 11
  127. 11
  128. 11
  129. 11
  130. 11
  131. 11
  132. 11
  133. 11
  134. 11
  135. 11
  136. 11
  137. 10
  138. 10
  139. 10
  140. 10
  141. 10
  142. 10
  143. 10
  144. 10
  145. 9
  146. 9
  147. 9
  148. 9
  149. 9
  150. 9
  151. 9
  152. 9
  153. 9
  154. 9
  155. 9
  156. 9
  157. 9
  158. 9
  159. 9
  160. 8
  161. 8
  162. 8
  163. 8
  164. 8
  165. 8
  166. 8
  167. 8
  168. 8
  169. 8
  170. 8
  171. 8
  172. 8
  173. 8
  174. 8
  175. 8
  176. 8
  177. 8
  178. 8
  179. 7
  180. 7
  181. 7
  182. 7
  183. 7
  184. 7
  185. 7
  186. 7
  187. 7
  188. 7
  189. 7
  190. 7
  191. 7
  192. 7
  193. 7
  194. 7
  195. 7
  196. 7
  197. 7
  198. 7
  199. 7
  200. 7
  201. 7
  202. I think a lot of restaurants are adding more sugar to their meals, probably to get people “hooked”. My favorite food when eating out is Thai, and I found that, apparently some restaurant supply person has been going around to Thai restaurants telling them that they should add sugar to their meals because “Americans love sugar”. I figured out that every time I eat at a new Thai restaurant I have to ask them if they add sugar. And they usually add it to sauces and things that are made ahead, so you can’t just ask them to leave it out. It’s crazy because the beauty of Thai food is their incredible way of combining various flavors so that you can still taste all the separate flavors, and adding sugar pretty much ruins it that. I think even American restaurants are doing the same as well, because almost every time I eat in a restaurant, by the time I get home, I’m in such a deep mental fog that I have to go lie down for a couple of hours just to feel like I’m connected to the earth plane again. It is not at all pleasant. I’m going to start checking my blood sugar as soon as I get home now as I am diabetic, although I always take both kinds of pills (Metformin and Glipizide) before I eat. I think the “Sugar Council”, or whatever organization is behind restaurant foods is probably literally profiting off our impaired health (like they always have). If I start finding that my sugar levels are going way up after every restaurant meal, I’m going to just have to start learning how to make Thai food at home, although I’ve tried it before and it’s very labor intensive, and I enjoy going out. I really wish our food companies would quit dicking around with our food.
    7
  203. 7
  204. 7
  205. 7
  206. 7
  207. 7
  208. 7
  209. 7
  210. 7
  211. 7
  212. 6
  213. Umm, did Scott Perry actually say, “We’re replacing national/‘NATIVE’ born Americans to permanently transform the political landscape of this nation”?? If he said “NATIVE” born Americans”; ummm, didn’t White Europeans already do that starting in the 1500 and 1600s? Do these people ever really hear what they themselves are saying? And how are we going to go about that…asking immigrants if they’re Republican or Democrat when they get to the border, then only allowing the Democrats in? How many immigrants really know enough about our political system to make that choice? They’re so busy escaping the horrible conditions in their own countries that, somehow, I seriously doubt they have studied our political systems. All they know is that they can be “free” in the U.S., or at least away from their own wars and poverty and hunger and lack of a decent future for themselves and their own children. And it’s going to take a whole lot of immigrants to “replace” the 300+ million “natural” born Americans already here. How about some very simple math: even if we let in 1 million a year it would take 300 years (+ however many “natural born American” babies are born to “natural born Americans” each year for 300 years to replace us. And THIS is why they don’t want (white) women to have abortions. But these politicians know that fear and racism work well on their base, and why Republicans (through Koch policies) have lowered the educational standards for Americans since Reagan, just so they would be susceptible to far-right scare tactics like this.
    6
  214. 6
  215. 6
  216. 6
  217. 6
  218. 6
  219. 6
  220. 6
  221. 6
  222. 6
  223. 6
  224. 6
  225. 6
  226. 6
  227. 6
  228. 6
  229. 6
  230. 6
  231. 6
  232. 6
  233. 6
  234. 6
  235. 6
  236. 6
  237. 6
  238. 6
  239. 6
  240. 6
  241. 6
  242. 6
  243. 6
  244. 5
  245. 5
  246. 5
  247. 5
  248. 5
  249. 5
  250.  @dominicfucinari1942  I’m not familiar with Randall Terry (who is he?), but Mitt Romney and a congressman from, I believe, Ohio formed a two-man “smashing campaign” against adding the ERA because of a 10-year deadline, which had been added regarding the state’s ratifications, but it was not part of the main text of the amendment, just an add-on to pull out and use against it later if they could, just like in a case like this. And, as I stated, it’s clearly written in the Constitution that once the 38th state has ratified, Congress has NOTHING to do with it anymore, and the Amendment is supposed to go directly into the Constitution, end of story. Before that, trump called Bill Barr to tell him he didn’t want it put in (of course!), and it seems Bill Barr called Mitt Romney, and he and the other Congressman killed it. If I remember correctly, Joe Biden was also there, and I think it was also to help kill it. After that, a women’s group (Equal Means Equal) took it to the Supreme Court, and, of course they also shot it down, on the basis that the group didn’t have “standing”, which I don’t understand. I know how standing works because I looked it up, and it’s when someone brings a suit that really isn’t in the personal interest of the person or persons bringing the suit. But I’ve never had anybody explain to me how a group of women which exists solely to try to get the ERA put into the Constitution are not personally affected by getting it in there! As individual women they will be personally affected by that action, and as a group for that purpose they will be personally affected. Can you explain that to me? But this just shows how much they do not want women to have equal rights. Period.
    5
  251. 5
  252. 5
  253. 5
  254. 5
  255. 5
  256. 5
  257. 5
  258. 5
  259. 5
  260. 5
  261. 5
  262. 5
  263. 5
  264. 5
  265. 5
  266. 5
  267. 5
  268. 5
  269. 5
  270. 5
  271. 5
  272. 5
  273. 5
  274. 5
  275. 5
  276. 5
  277. 5
  278. 5
  279. 5
  280. 5
  281. 5
  282. 5
  283. 5
  284. 5
  285. 5
  286. 5
  287. 5
  288. 5
  289. 5
  290. 5
  291. 5
  292. 5
  293. 5
  294. 5
  295. 5
  296. 5
  297. 5
  298. 5
  299. 5
  300. 5
  301. 4
  302. 4
  303. Thank you, Thom. An excellent video. BTW, these people saying that whenever a country has a growing Middle Class, they always end up having a revolt, like in the French Revolution. The thing is, it wasn’t the Middle Class that revolted, because France didn’t have a Middle Class, it was the poor people who revolted…and that’s the problem with what I call “end-stage Capitalism”, or the far right-wing rich guys today. They want everything ruled by the wealthy, and for everyone else to be working class poor and uneducated people. Seems to me that’s much more likely to cause a revolution than the Middle Class. I’m old enough to remember the Middle Class of the 1960s, and people then were pretty proud to be Middle Class, because it was a big step up from being poor in the earlier years. People had something to work for, something they could actually achieve, and they were much happier people overall. I’m not saying it was perfect, and some people, obviously, got left out, but it was a better life than what we’re headed for. Plus, in the 50s and 60s, education was held up, nationwide, as the best and most important thing to get because that would help you achieve a solid Middle Class life, or better. And we had some of the highest quality education in our country that was available anywhere in the world. We had hope for a better future, and the opposite is the problem today. We’ve lost most of our hope because the wealthy are taking all of that progress away from us, and continually talking about taking away even more. That sounds like a recipe for revolution to me. BTW, it was a woman, Frances Perkins, who created many of FDR’s New Deal policies. He appointed her as Secretary of Labor as she was a worker’s rights advocate. “She was heavily involved with many issues associated with the social safety net including, the creation of Social Security, unemployment insurance in the United States, the federal minimum wage, and federal laws regulating child labor.” (Wiki)
    4
  304. 4
  305. 4
  306. 4
  307. 4
  308. 4
  309. 4
  310. 4
  311. 4
  312. 4
  313. 4
  314. 4
  315. 4
  316. 4
  317. 4
  318. 4
  319. 4
  320. 4
  321. 4
  322. 4
  323. 4
  324. 4
  325. 4
  326. 4
  327. 4
  328. 4
  329. 4
  330. 4
  331. 4
  332. 4
  333. 4
  334. 4
  335. 4
  336. 4
  337. 4
  338. 4
  339. 4
  340. 4
  341. 4
  342. 4
  343. 4
  344. 4
  345. 4
  346. 4
  347. 4
  348. 4
  349. 4
  350. 4
  351. 4
  352. 4
  353. 4
  354. As Abigail Adams wrote to her husband John when he was helping draft our Constitution said, “Don’t forget the ladies” (although he just laughed, unfortunately for our country’s future). This has also been very hard for women as well. This whole thing with E. Jean Carroll has also left women more vulnerable for more hatred, condemnation and bodily threats by trump’s adoring supporters. I’m certainly not casting aspersions at E. Jean Carroll, as she’s a hero for taking him to court to expose what a monster he really is when it comes to women. And it was quite remarkable that she actually won on the sexual assault verdict. But it has also had the sad effect of riling up the anti-woman sentiment of the MAGA Republicans, except for the Stockholm Syndrome-possessed women on “their” men’s side (They’re what Mona Eltahawy, a feminist author, calls “the foot soldiers of the Patriarchy, which is a very appropriate title IMO). The way the audience laughed at his comments/rants at his Town Hall the other day really underscored their low opinion of women in general. And I don’t think it was any coincidence that every Republican in Congress except two (Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins) two weeks ago, once again, voted down putting the Equal Rights Amendment into the Constitution. In fact, this time, many of the Republicans voted this time with a physical thumbs down gesture (like Kirsten Synema did with the vote to raise the minimum wage). I have certainly seen more anti-woman, misogynistic rhetoric in the comments sections of YouTube videos since the E. Jean Carroll court finding.
    4
  355. 4
  356. 3
  357. 3
  358. 3
  359. 3
  360. 3
  361. 3
  362. 3
  363. 3
  364. 3
  365. 3
  366. 3
  367. 3
  368. 3
  369. 3
  370. 3
  371. 3
  372. 3
  373. 3
  374. 3
  375. 3
  376. 3
  377.  @ErichSemmelweisEffectFromm  Thank you! I knew I recognized the name. I actually think about Dr. Semmelweis as a classic example of simple, but powerfully beneficial discoveries, but had not remembered the effect part of it, though I do know I’ve heard about that response by other doctors. Originally, I had thought it was your last name, so I asked my German friend what it means, and semmel means a roll, like a dinner roll, and, of course, weiss means white. And of course, I somehow got stuck on the name and didn’t even see the word “Effect” afterward, so I’m thrilled to learn something new today. That’s one of my goals in life: to learn - at least - one new thing every day, which I usually, if not always, do. And, at the time of the good doctor, the doctors were often going straight from the autopsy room to the maternity ward and birthing babies. They were trying to figure out why so many newborns, and women, were getting so sick so quickly and dying. Of course, they never would have consulted a midwife who probably would have had an idea of what was going on because they had been practicing midwifery for centuries, but when men decided to create and attend medical schools, they did so with the express notion that they would be sure that midwives would no longer be able to continue their craft (by law, I believe) because, as everyone knew/knows that women are not nearly as intelligent as men (yes, I’m still laughing), and that only men would be allowed to become doctors. And, of course, they wanted all that sweet sweet money the midwives were receiving for their services, which often consisted of a nice hen for their dinner. But the doctors only wanted cash, unsurprisingly. So, just making a leap here, is your name Erich Fromm? (There is a Dr. of Psychology named Erich (or Eric Fromm), is there not? At least one of the great thinkers, and authors, yes? Great convo, thank you very much.
    3
  378. 3
  379. 3
  380. 3
  381. 3
  382. 3
  383. 3
  384. 3
  385. 3
  386. 3
  387. 3
  388. 3
  389. 3
  390. 3
  391. 3
  392. 3
  393.  @admiralfrancis8424  That’s an excellent question, and something I’ve been wondering about forever. I only guessing, but I’m thinking it’s the fear that women will not give them all the sex they want, anytime they want it. Or, it’s, more likely a fear that women might become as powerful, or more so, than men and knock them out of their positions of power over others. Or perhaps that, when and if women do get that power they will treat men like they have been treated by men for, well, the last 10,000 or so years (7,000 at least). A lot of people speculate that men hate women because women can have babies, therefore, “create life”, and men can’t (which is a fear of being “lesser than”). I’m not buying that because, as the old feminist saying (which I think is true) goes, “if men could have babies, there’d be an abortion clinic on every corner, like Starbucks”. I can say, with near certainty, that the vast majority of men would not enjoy that experience. Then there’s the fact that people often say that women are “naturally” more nurturing and caring, but I think that’s only because they do have babies and that’s what has been expected of them by society. Can you imagine that if men could have babies that they’d all be naturally nurturing and caring? I simply can’t imagine that happening, at least for a few hundred years until it’s been totally assimilated by them. Plus, a lot of men still think it’s great that their wives have the babies, but they themselves don’t want to be involved with the actual caring for a baby’s physical needs, especially when it comes to changing diapers. (trump was one of the men who voiced that opinion publicly…but then, that’s trump). Yes, there are men who do take on those tasks, and do so happily (as happily as one can when changing nasty diapers), but many will pitch in in the beginning, but then his “availability” for the task will somehow fade into nothingness, like dust in the wind. If you have any ideas on why men might be afraid of women, please share, as I’d also like to know, and especially from a man’s perspective, ‘cause that’s all I’ve got.
    3
  394. 3
  395. 3
  396. 3
  397. 3
  398. 3
  399. 3
  400. 3
  401. 3
  402. 3
  403. 3
  404. 3
  405. 3
  406. 3
  407. 3
  408. 3
  409. 3
  410. 3
  411. 3
  412. 3
  413. 3
  414. 3
  415. 3
  416. 3
  417. 3
  418. 3
  419. 3
  420. 3
  421. 3
  422. 3
  423. 3
  424. 3
  425. 3
  426. 3
  427. 3
  428. 3
  429. 3
  430. Excellent interview. I so very much look forward to seeing trump locked up, either in a federal penitentiary (personally, I’d like to see him in Guantanamo, but that’s for foreign terrorists. He’s not foreign, but I think he could, plausibly be considered a terrorist because of these documents as well as his past behaviors/relationships with the likes of Putin, Kim Jong Ill, Erdogan, MBS, (have I got the initials right for the head of Saudi Arabia?), and several others, including Sergei Kysliak and Lavrov who he had in the White House and only the Russians were allowed to take photos, American photographers were noy allowed, echoing his first private meeting with Putin in Moscow, where no American translator was allowed, only a Russian one. (I’m not sure, but I thought that he had an American woman translator at first, but he got spooked about having something translated into English, so he sent her out of the room and ATE the notes she had made. Do I have that right?). One can make wild speculations about things possibly said during both those meetings. I would also be happy to have him locked up in a high-security psychiatric institution (for the criminally insane, possibly), and no possible release except to a maximum security prison with NO white collar perks. I keep thinking about how our country used to deal much more thoroughly with people deemed traitors, and I would say it’s highly likely he belongs in that category. I know they used firing squads and hangings, like they did with the Rosenbergs. (Did I get their name correc?) I don’t want to get in trouble with the FBI for voicing a threat like the trumpers do, when it’s really just an opinion, but for a President to sell out his own country seems to me to fit the definition of treason, so, I would be very happy to see him AND ALL the Congresspersons who were voting not to certify the election results on January 6 (also treason in my opinion) receive the same treatment right in front of the Capitol Building. That is only my personal opinion, and I’m not planning or intending to carry it out myself, and I’m not encouraging anyone to do it, only that I would like to see the DOJ consider the viability of that option to be done legally. While I know doing that would drive wild paroxysms of hatred and anger from the Right, I think it would set a real precedent showing that the U.S. does not, and never will tolerate treason in this country, especially when done by a clique of our top leaders.
    3
  431. 3
  432. 3
  433. 3
  434. 3
  435. 3
  436. 3
  437. 3
  438. 3
  439. 3
  440. 3
  441. 3
  442. 3
  443. 3
  444. 3
  445. 3
  446. 3
  447. 3
  448. 3
  449. 3
  450. 3
  451. 2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 2
  462. 2
  463. 2
  464. 2
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. 2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483. 2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502. 2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 2
  507. 2
  508. 2
  509. 2
  510. 2
  511. 2
  512. Axel Daxel, I agree completely, but I don’t understand why it is hard to talk about I’m not saying that it isn’t, I’m just saying I don’t understand WHY it is. I’ve been studying feminism and women’s issues for years, and, of course, I read articles every day about race relations and problems, and see how our histories as so incredibly similar. Yes, it’s disheartening to hear how some of the early feminists were racist, and unfortunately, I hear that Black women still face the same problem, yet the movement began with white women being anti-slavery and seeing, as I do, that our histories are so similar, I think it’s something that MUST be talked about and overcome. I personally don’t know how a woman can call herself a feminist yet not include Black women in that struggle. Black women and Indigenous women, and Hispanic women, if anything, have had more difficulties in that struggle than White women (and that’s speaking as a White woman). We in the feminist movement all say that we’re happy to have male allies, so how can we turn away another woman simply because of the color of her skin, or for any other reason? As the old saying goes, “We’re all in this together”, yet, apparently, that isn’t so as a fact, so we have to make it that way. Any movement or struggle, especially for social justice, will always be stronger with greater numbers working together. I would love to see a large group of feminists get together with a large group of African-Americans (even small groups for a start) and discuss the similarities in our histories and discuss how we can work together to solve these problems. I know it will be difficult, and I realize that any coalition-forming group will have its own challenges, but, as an American, I’ve been taught that challenges make us stronger and better because we have to figure out ways to overcome them. BTW, I did notice this video, along with your comment, are from a year ago, so I can only hope you see my comment.
    2
  513. 2
  514. 2
  515. 2
  516. 2
  517. 2
  518. 2
  519. 2
  520. 2
  521. 2
  522. 2
  523. 2
  524. 2
  525. 2
  526. 2
  527. 2
  528. 2
  529. 2
  530. 2
  531. 2
  532. 2
  533. 2
  534. 2
  535. 2
  536. 2
  537. 2
  538. 2
  539. 2
  540. 2
  541. 2
  542. 2
  543. 2
  544. 2
  545. 2
  546. 2
  547. 2
  548. 2
  549. 2
  550. 2
  551. 2
  552. 2
  553. 2
  554. This is so scary. Pretty soon we’ll be like Bolivia, where abortion is completely illegal, and women who have miscarriages or stillbirths are often prosecuted for having or giving themselves an abortion when they did not, and get sent to jail for many, many years. One woman there was just recently released from prison after 15 years. A woman’s right to abortion, for any reason, in this country must be fully protected by law. That’s just one more reason Roe vs. Wade must not be overturned, and must be fully ensconced in the Constitution. The Equal Rights Amendment must also be fully ensconced in the Constitution as well. Joe Biden, on the campaign trail, promised to do everything in his power to see that it happened, and has still done NOTHING. Actually, that isn’t entirely accurate; he’s actually fighting it in court through Merrick Garland, for god knows what reason. As the ERA has now been ratified by the requisite 38 states (when Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it in January of 2020), all he would have to do is to call the Chief Archivist, David Ferreiro, and tell him to put it in there (as Donald Trump had called him and told him NOT to after Virginia ratified it), or just do an Executive Order, as a number of “new” Presidents do when coming into office to clean up or clean out some of the ridiculousness from the previous Administration, but he is not doing that. Why not? I suspect money is involved (from donors) as it always is. If Biden had done that, Texas would never have gotten away with SB-8 (and a number of other states are jumping on that bandwagon), and they would not ever be able to overturn Roe once women were considered “people” and full citizens, with all rights thereof, per the Constitution. I’ve already written to him once about it (which had no effect whatsoever, of course), so I’m preparing a very “special” 2nd letter, with copies sent to the editors of WaPo, NYT, The Atlantic, and other media outlets like MSNBC and CNN, as well as to a number of women in Congress, most particularly Carolyn Maloney who is working in the effort to get it ratified. A copy will also go to Kamala Harris, of course, as well as AOC and other congressional women who want it to happen. Perhaps I’ll send one to you as well, if you’re interested. I’d be thrilled to hear it read on your YouTube channel here, Of course there’s great irony that the states want to give the “unborn” (as they call that constantly changing clump of cells that might not ever turn into a living breathing child) fetus full Constitutional rights from the “moment of conception” while the women having those babies have none. Here’s another thought I just had in my musings: if those children have full Constitutional rights from conception, and 50% of them will be female, will they concede that would mean when there are more of them of that 50% than women from before that law, essentially all women will have Equal Rights in the Constitution? Or, will they try to remove all those Constitutional rights once they reach 18 years, or perhaps even at birth, since they’ve proven they don’t want to do anything for the babies after they’re born.
    2
  555. 2
  556. 2
  557. 2
  558. 2
  559. 2
  560. 2
  561. 2
  562. 2
  563. 2
  564. 2
  565. 2
  566. 2
  567. 2
  568. 2
  569. 2
  570.  @carsengrave2999  Thanks for your comment. I’m sorry I didn’t see earlier that I had a comment here. That sometimes happens. I really like the quote you put here. It’s more confirmation, I believe, to my previous thought. I also wanted to recommend another book on the subject that, to me, completely blows a lot of the things naysayers say against NDEs right out of the water. It’s name is Proof of Heaven and it was written by Dr. Eben Alexander, a neurosurgeon (yes, it really is brain surgery!)He, himself, had an infection in his brain and provably died from it, had an NDE, and was brought back. For me, his best case was that he knows, because he’s so experienced in the science, that he was literally brain-dead because of the damage the infection did to his brain. So many people say that NDEs aren’t real because there “must be some kind of brain activity left intact for people with the NDE to understand they’re having one, and to remember what happened in their “mind” while they were experiencing the NDE, which, to them, proves there was still mental activity and the patient was therefore not really dead. According to Dr. Alexander, his brain was essentially turned to mush through which NO mental stimulus could send any kind of stimulus of recognition of anything. I don’t know if I’m describing it very coherently, but that’s the gist. The other outstanding point he made is that while he was on “the Other Side” he met a relative, a young girl he had never heard of, and I’m not sure if she was his sister who was stillborn before he was born, or one who had died very young before he was born, so he was never told about about her. When he got back and questioned his family about who she could be, and he thoroughly described her, I believe his mother broke down in tears because he had described her previous baby girl perfectly. Again, I’m not 100% I’ve got the familial facts correct (it’s been a few years since I read it, but it’s close, if not correct. Why would you be met by a family member who had passed before you were born, never knew about, and even knew her name, which had never been mentioned in the family? For me, it was the most compelling description of something that had to be the truth. I, myself, have never had an NDE as I have never died during my life, but I, once strangely had a spontaneous “good old-fashioned” vision of myself living in the U.S. (as I do now), but in a different city in the Victorian Era, and I was crying because I had a baby who had just died in infancy. It was very quick, and disappeared almost immediately. I have no idea what that was, but it shook me to my core. Even though I didn’t have an NDE, I feel like I was given a vision of a previous life I had lived, and they might be related in some way. There are so many things we don’t know about our lives yet, but I believe we’re sometimes given glimpses of those things. Oh, and I was not on drugs or alcohol or anything else that could have altered my perceptions in that way. Well, I didn’t mean to turn this into a dissertation, but I mainly wanted to recommend that book to you. It was pretty darn wonderful. I hope you’ll check it out. Nice chatting with you.
    2
  571.  @carsengrave2999  Thanks for your reply. Yes, I had heard about verídical verifications. It’s fascinating. As for my “vision”, yes, it was extremely real to me. What was so strange about it was that I was living in Orlando, Florida at the time (I was about 19 years old), and I had gone with my parents to the newly-opened Disney World (yes, it was a long, long time ago). Everything was wonderful and we were very happy to be there. The theme park, in case you haven’t been there, is set up so that when you first go in, you get on a monorail that takes you to the main area of the attractions. The first one you come to is Main Street, which is a a perfectly created (American) Victorian street, and Disney does not miss ANY details in creating these atmospheres, it’s like you’re going from one world to the next, and you’re completely surrounded by and inundated by the atmosphere of the place and time depicted, which is why I think that was the particular “past life” scenario I found myself in. As soon as we walked through the gates into Main Street, I was hit with a overwhelming blast of sadness and grief, and I saw myself in that situation described in my previous comment. I was standing in the living room of my home and I was grieving my lost baby. And it was over almost instantly. I had started crying uncontrollably and had to run behind a column or wall where nobody could see me, and collect myself quickly to be able to return to my parents. After all, I was at Disney World, “The Happiest Place on Earth”, so why the heck would I be standing there crying? I succeeded in collecting myself and continued on having a great time, but that experience haunted me for a long time. And there haven’t been too many people I’ve shared it with, as you might imagine.
    2
  572. 2
  573. 2
  574. 2
  575. 2
  576. 2
  577. 2
  578. 2
  579. 2
  580. 2
  581. 2
  582. 2
  583. 2
  584. 2
  585. 2
  586. 2
  587. 2
  588. 2
  589. 2
  590. 2
  591. 2
  592. 2
  593. 2
  594. How ironic it was when you said that about Mitt Romney dissing public healthcare that he was the one leading the charge in 2020 against putting the Equal Rights Amendment into the Constitution after Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it, on the grounds of the ridiculous deadline having passed. Although we, the public, didn’t know it yet, Congress must have heard that SCOTUS was about to overturn Roe v. Wade, which they did just a few months later. I came to the realization that the Conservatives didn’t want to put the ERA into the Constitution because they could not then have overturned Roe if they had done so, and they were hellbent on killing abortion access (along with women). Thom, I have an idea: we have heard that maternal and infant mortality rates have gone up since the Dobbs decision, which means that women HAVE died because they couldn’t access life-saving abortions, yet we have never heard the names of ANY woman who has died that way, although we have read stories about living women who went public about being denied one (like Kate Cox and others). In Ireland, the woman you mentioned was named Savita Halappanaver, and the point is that we know her name, and her photo is out there. We don’t know the names of any American women who have died. Even though Ireland is an almost exclusively Catholic country, millions of people marched and demonstrated in the streets, carrying posters with her name and photos of her face on them. The demonstrations were large enough and long enough that Ireland finally caved and made abortions legal there. It was huge! If we could get the names and photos of American women who have died because they were denied abortion care, perhaps we could do the same here. Would you know how we could go about getting those names and photos? I think it is only by showing a number of real American women who have literally died here, we could change things. I’m going to ask Jessica Valenti , too. I’m one of her subscribers, and she’s also great!
    2
  595. 2
  596. 2
  597. 2
  598. 2
  599. 2
  600. 2
  601. 2
  602. 2
  603. 2
  604. 2
  605. 2
  606. 2
  607. 2
  608. 2
  609. 2
  610. 2
  611. 2
  612. 2
  613. 2
  614. 2
  615. 2
  616. 2
  617. 2
  618. 2
  619. 2
  620. 2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. I’ve got Kaiser, and I really loved it at first because deductibles were low, even on prescriptions, (it was from my husband’s work, and I found that the plan rates were very expensive. But they they were very good at fixing my broken toe. Anything beyond that they were not so good, and they are TERRIBLE at diagnosing. They fumble around trying to find what is wrong with you, but when it doesn’t work, they try something else, and if that doesn’t work they just throw up their hands and walk away. Or if you have pain that they can’t figure out, and especially if you’re a woman, they tell you’re probably just depressed and they write you a referral for psychiatry. I once had cancer and the doctor gave me what he called a “very aggressive” chemotherapy treatment. Yeah, it was that! It made me diabetic for life - DURING the first treatment! I was supposed to have sixteen treatments (!!!), but by the third treatment I knew I would be dead from the chemo long before the 16th treatment, so I quit after three. Just told him I didn’t want to die like that, and he was so mad at ME! I asked him what my chances were if I continued the full treatment and told me I had a 60/40 chance of still being alive after 5 years with the full treatment, and get this, he said I had a 50/50 chance of same without treatment. (And I had already had surgery to remove the tumor). I’m no mathematician, but it didn’t seem worth continuing treatment that might kill me for a measly 10% gain. I never went back, and here I am, fine after fifteen years. I started getting degenerative disk disease in my back, which I think the chemo also contributed to, so I ended up having three back surgeries, none of which did me a bit of good, just left me in constant pain. I don’t want to sound histrionic, but I feel they’ve ruined me. So, I’m not very amused with Kaiser anymore, and will only go there fore something relative minor like stitches or a broken foot. It’s so frustrating!
    2
  642. 2
  643. 2
  644. 2
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681.  @randyellis9460  He was a TERRIBLE president. Have you ever heard of Reaganomics, or “trickle down economics”? Did you get “trickled on” by the wealthy? And, since you’re a guy (I’m guessing from your name), I’m not even going to go into the ways his programs were specifically terrible for women, because, being a guy, you undoubtedly wouldn’t have noticed (and I not saying it’s because men are stupid, or bad, at all, but men really don’t tend to notice things that affect other people, especially women). I’m betting you are aware of Project 2025, right? Do you know that the Heritage Foundation also had a Mandate for Leadership (the lead title for Project 2025) in 1981 (I just learned that a couple of days ago myself), and it included things like overturning Roe v. Wade and outlawing contraception, but, fortunately, Reagan didn’t get that far, but he did start some of the lowering of standards and benefits to women, and caused the loss of government jobs for women in Washington D.C., including the percentage of women in both houses of Congress in the following election for Congressional seats. And he also brought in the cuts to education, which is why he have the expression “the dumbing down of America” now. He/they did that. They intentionally lowered the standards of education because they know that the “poorly educated”, (as trump called them, to their faces, and they effing cheered), are much easier to manipulate. Trump is both the outgrowth of those policies as well as a racist reaction to us having had a Black President.
    1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. Thank you for bringing this up! You are so right. Even as I watch our rights getting chipped away, I check out the turnout to various women’s marches and I see a handful of women in each of various cities around the country, or maybe a hundred or two hundred in Washington, D.C. I think one of the problems is that they’re not highly advertised in a city, and they’re usually mentioned in the news at about 11:30 at night the night before, if they’re even mentioned at all. The only reason I find out about the annual Women’s March in January in my city is because I signed up to be on the list of people to notify, and about 98% of the emails I get from that organization are requests for donations. And the only reason I found out about the recent women’s “strike” was because I remembered to look it up. There is just not nearly enough talk about them (could it be because most news networks are owned by men??). We need to organize loudly like they did for the big national Women’s March right after trump was elected, and we need to get thousands and thousands of women in every city to come out, and millions in the very large cities, maybe, every month (and, now maybe daily, as you say) to begin to wake people up. I’m so thrilled to see that you want to get your daughters involved. It would be so great to see them together with so many women who are in this Sisterhood together, and to be able to show them that we can change this country, for them as well as ourselves, because we absolutely have to!
    1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921.  @sccxvelo  Yup, Reagan really got it going downhill fast. Nixon got a start on it with his “Southern Strategy” to give “deals” to the Southern Baptists and the evangelicals in exchange for their vote (which is exact what trump did for the evangelicals: he promised them he would do whatever he could to overturn Roe in exchange for their vote, and that’s how he won), but Reagan had the Koch brothers and the Heritage Foundation whispering in his ear, advising him on policy. Yes, that’s the same Heritage Foundation that wrote Project 2025. They had a Mandate for Leadership (which is the name for Project 2025) playbook, and they had a version for 1981, which Reagan was happy to adopt. That’s when he began serious cuts to Education, which became what we colloquially call “the dumbing down of America”. They wanted to do that because they knew that people with lower education levels are more easily manipulated. It was spectacularly successful, and that’s how we got trump and MAGA. And now Heritage wants to completely do away with the Department of Education. They are, of course, mostly Christian Nationalists. And The Federalist Society is a separate, Catholic, Uber-conservative, and equally scary group which I consider the “judicial version” of The Heritage Foundation, as they are the group (headed by Leonard Leo) that picks a list of the most conservative judges in the country to hand to whichever conservative President is in office when there is an opening on the Supreme Court, which is where trump got the names of the three he picked. Both organizations have had a well-oiled machine in place for quite a few years, and I find their machinations terrifying. And that is why we absolutely cannot allow trump to get back in the White House.
    1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. After the opioid crisis made lots of news, the FDA made a judgement in around 2016 to make it more difficult to get pain meds so that, hopefully, people wouldn’t accidentally die from an overdose in their prescribed pain medication, which their patients weren’t doing anyway. It also didn’t occur to them that when people are in that much pain and can’t get their medicines, they’re much more likely to go to the “wrong” side of the street to buy anything that will relieve their pain, from any ol’ guy on the street. It has hurt millions of people in pain, and what they don’t understand is that prescribed pain pills are not the sameme thing as Fentanyl, which is much easier to overdose on because a doctor wasn’t there to tell the person how to use it safely. However, in about 2020, the FDA finally realized their mistake and issued a new statement, a correction, saying that it’s OK to give their patients their pain medication as prescribed as long as their doctor monitors their condition. Unfortunately, it seems the doctors did not read the report, and are not aware of the new recommendations, so they’re still freaking out over how dangerous opioids are. I enjoy taking a copy of the newer report (I just print it out after I Google it) to my doctors and explaining the update. They are usually pretty surprised when they find out that their “ordinary” patient actually knows about it, has the wherewithal to look it up and print it, and, finally, to be able to explain it to the doctor. I have gotten a couple of my medications reinstated that way, and I’ve got one more to go, at my next appointment next week.
    1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. Unfortunately, he’s already been impeached a couple of times, and what good did that do us? And that was because all the Republicans let him off the hook, and, right now, we have more Republicans in Congress than when trump was in office the first time. So it’s up to US now. We have to get in the streets by the thousands and thousands everyday and in every city in the country (and there will be a protest happening in YOUR nearest, biggest city on Monday, the 17th (yes, THIS coming Monday, which is President’s Day [or what some are calling “Not My President’s Day]) in front of either your Capitol, or City Hall, or possibly the Courthouse (you’ll have to look it up). Don’t forget to take your signs. We also need to call our Senators and Representatives every day and remind them that they work for US, not trump, because WE are the ones who vote. The Capitol Switchboard number is 202-224-3121, and there’s a very cool app called 5 Calls that tell you who your Senator or Representatives are (if you don’t know), and they have a list of issues to talk about, and they even provide a script to read if you’re not comfortable or don’t know what to say. You won’t be talking directly to your Senator or Reps, but to their office, and your Senators and Reps will be getting the message. If enough of us do this every day, they will see these messages mounting up, and, if they want to get re-elected (and that is definitely what they want), they will realize they have to start acting - for us.its time to activate NOW if we want to take our country back from the traitors and foreign entities/enemies.
    1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. They’re doing it, they say, for religious reasons; the old “thou shall not kill” thing in the Bible, but, in actuality, it is primarily to punish and control young unmarried women who get pregnant, but, of course it also causes great danger, not only to the young unmarried women, but also to married women (but they really hate all women, so it serves their purpose). Plus, they’re worried about the population rate in America going down, and they’re scared to death they won’t have enough (poor) cheap labor in the future, so forcing women to have babies will help fill that gap. And that’s not mentioning that they’re racist and xenophobic, and they’re pushing a lie called “The Great Replacement Theory” wherein they’re also afraid that, since brown and black people generally have more babies than white people , and they’re so afraid there will be a higher population of brown and black people than white people in the country in the future, which is why they’re ALSO so opposed to people crossing the Southern border, because a majority of them are brow-skinned. Oh, and there was also a “secret” program implemented by Ronald Reagan back in the 80s we call “The Dumbing Down of America” wherein they lowered the educational standards in the country (it was pretty darned exceptional before that) because they (and when I say “they” I’m generally referring to Republicans as well as the wealthy donors to politicians who suck up to them by passing the laws they want), because they knew that poorly educated people fall for their lies if they push them enough, which means they can convince them to vote them into office; and also poor people can be swayed by promises to improve the economy, yet the economy has been on an almost 40 year decline. Doesn’t it all make sense now? I know, it’s convoluted. We had pretty good abortion guidelines to follow laid out in our Roe v. Wade law which was put into law FIFTY years ago, but the radical Christians (evangelicals) on the Supreme Court had to go and throw it out last year. And we also have the First Amendment which basically calls for Separation of Church and State (as well as a couple of other things), but these radical Christians in the Supreme Court are simply ignoring that. So, there’s all the brutal, ugly truth.
    1